Codebook for the 1988-1996 panel study of Democratic and Republican Caucus Attenders in Iowa, Michigan, and Virginia. Dataset includes nomination and November waves in 1988, November waves in 1992 and 1994, and nomination and November waves in 1996. PIs: Ronald B. Rapoport and Walter J. Stone co-PI: Alan I. Abramowitz (1988) **********1988 Pre-election Wave********** LIVED8A Q1, years lived in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 90 4.9 5.2 5.2 5-10 years 2 80 4.4 4.6 9.8 10-20 years 3 176 9.6 10.1 19.9 20+ years 4 1395 75.9 80.1 100.0 . 98 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1741 Missing cases 98 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIVE8A Q2, years active in party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 696 37.8 41.2 41.2 5-10 years 2 259 14.1 15.3 56.5 10-20 years 3 302 16.4 17.9 74.3 20+ years 4 434 23.6 25.7 100.0 e . 148 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1691 Missing cases 148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART888A Q3, 1988 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1450 78.8 78.8 78.8 NO 2 389 21.2 21.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 PART848A Q3, 1984 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 829 45.1 45.1 45.1 NO 2 1010 54.9 54.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART808A Q3, 1980 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 690 37.5 37.5 37.5 NO 2 1149 62.5 62.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART768A Q3, 1976 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 500 27.2 27.2 27.2 NO 2 1339 72.8 72.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 PART728A Q3, 1972 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 374 20.3 20.3 20.3 NO 2 1465 79.7 79.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART688A Q3, 1968 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 304 16.5 16.5 16.5 NO 2 1535 83.5 83.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART648A Q3, 1964 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 246 13.4 13.4 13.4 NO 2 1593 86.6 86.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 PART608A Q3, 1960 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 197 10.7 10.7 10.7 NO 2 1642 89.3 89.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMB8A Q4, member position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1292 70.3 70.3 70.3 CHECKED 1 547 29.7 29.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIR8A Q4, chair position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1724 93.7 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 115 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LOCAL8A Q4, local position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1713 93.1 93.1 93.1 CHECKED 1 126 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STNAT8A Q4, state/nat'l position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPT8A Q4, appointed position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1756 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 83 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 PAIDST8A Q4, paid position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1792 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 47 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DELST8A Q4, state delegate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1446 78.6 78.6 78.6 CHECKED 1 393 21.4 21.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTE848A Q5, Pres. vote in 1984 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1 868 47.2 50.1 50.1 MONDALE 2 793 43.1 45.7 95.8 DID NOT VOTE 3 73 4.0 4.2 100.0 . 105 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1734 Missing cases 105 NOM84D8A Q6, Cand. pref for party nom 84, Dems Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MONDALE 1 472 25.7 59.1 59.1 HART 2 247 13.4 31.0 90.1 JACKSON 3 79 4.3 9.9 100.0 . 905 49.2 Missing OTHER 4 136 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 798 Missing cases 1041 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOM84R8A Q6, Cand. pref for party nom 84, Reps Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1 771 41.9 100.0 100.0 . 937 51.0 Missing OTHER 2 131 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 771 Missing cases 1068 PTYID8A Q7, Describe party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 443 24.1 25.4 25.4 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 219 11.9 12.6 38.0 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 232 12.6 13.3 51.3 INDEPENDENT 4 67 3.6 3.8 55.1 INDEPENDENT REP 5 130 7.1 7.5 62.6 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 190 10.3 10.9 73.5 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 463 25.2 26.5 100.0 . 95 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1744 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS8A Q8, Characterize party involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORKS EVERY YEAR 1 609 33.1 39.3 39.3 ONLY IF GOOD CAND 2 941 51.2 60.7 100.0 . 289 15.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1550 Missing cases 289 LIBCON8A Q9, Describe political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 50 2.7 3.0 3.0 LIBERAL 2 300 16.3 18.0 21.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 220 12.0 13.2 34.2 M-O-R 4 269 14.6 16.1 50.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 287 15.6 17.2 67.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 451 24.5 27.1 94.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 90 4.9 5.4 100.0 . 109 5.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 63 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1667 Missing cases 172 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMPRES8A Q10, Pres campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 249 13.5 15.2 15.2 FAIRLY 2 640 34.8 39.2 54.4 NOT ACTIVE 3 745 40.5 45.6 100.0 . 205 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1634 Missing cases 205 CMSEN8A Q10, Sen. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 149 8.1 9.6 9.6 FAIRLY 2 512 27.8 33.1 42.7 NOT ACTIVE 3 887 48.2 57.3 100.0 . 291 15.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1548 Missing cases 291 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSE8A Q10, Hse. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 186 10.1 12.0 12.0 FAIRLY 2 503 27.4 32.4 44.3 NOT ACTIVE 3 865 47.0 55.7 100.0 . 285 15.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1554 Missing cases 285 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMGOV8A Q10, Gov. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 186 10.1 11.9 11.9 FAIRLY 2 498 27.1 31.9 43.8 NOT ACTIVE 3 879 47.8 56.2 100.0 . 276 15.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1563 Missing cases 276 CMLOC8A Q10, Local campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 320 17.4 19.9 19.9 FAIRLY 2 591 32.1 36.8 56.7 NOT ACTIVE 3 695 37.8 43.3 100.0 . 233 12.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1606 Missing cases 233 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTENT8A Q11, Attn. to newspapers for 1988 Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 508 27.6 29.1 29.1 QUITE A BIT 2 560 30.5 32.1 61.2 SOME 3 480 26.1 27.5 88.8 VERY LITTLE 4 156 8.5 8.9 97.7 NONE 5 40 2.2 2.3 100.0 . 95 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1744 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HELPPP8A Q12, part in local nom, help party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 576 31.3 36.8 36.8 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 559 30.4 35.7 72.5 NOT VERY IMPT 3 235 12.8 15.0 87.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 195 10.6 12.5 100.0 . 274 14.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1565 Missing cases 274 GROUP8A Q12, part in local nom, rep groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 212 11.5 14.6 14.6 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 363 19.7 25.0 39.6 NOT VERY IMPT 3 289 15.7 19.9 59.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 587 31.9 40.5 100.0 . 388 21.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1451 Missing cases 388 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND8A Q12, part, in local nom, sppt cand. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 978 53.2 61.4 61.4 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 473 25.7 29.7 91.0 NOT VERY IMPT 3 85 4.6 5.3 96.4 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 58 3.2 3.6 100.0 . 245 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1594 Missing cases 245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISS8A Q12, party in local nom, rep. issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1046 56.9 65.5 65.5 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 444 24.1 27.8 93.2 NOT VERY IMPT 3 71 3.9 4.4 97.7 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 37 2.0 2.3 100.0 . 241 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1598 Missing cases 241 MIREAS8A Q13, best reason to part in nom process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PARTY 1 267 14.5 16.0 16.0 GROUP 2 32 1.7 1.9 17.9 CANDIDATE 3 609 33.1 36.6 54.5 ISSUE 4 758 41.2 45.5 100.0 . 173 9.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1666 Missing cases 173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOV8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,winner Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 535 29.1 34.1 34.1 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 494 26.9 31.5 65.7 NOT VERY IMPT 3 262 14.2 16.7 82.4 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 276 15.0 17.6 100.0 . 272 14.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1567 Missing cases 272 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHIL8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,pol. phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1118 60.8 69.0 69.0 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 442 24.0 27.3 96.2 NOT VERY IMPT 3 39 2.1 2.4 98.6 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 22 1.2 1.4 100.0 . 218 11.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1621 Missing cases 218 ISTOME8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 933 50.7 58.2 58.2 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 536 29.1 33.4 91.6 NOT VERY IMPT 3 106 5.8 6.6 98.3 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 28 1.5 1.7 100.0 . 236 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1603 Missing cases 236 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOM8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,win nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 475 25.8 30.5 30.5 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 558 30.3 35.8 66.3 NOT VERY IMPT 3 291 15.8 18.7 84.9 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 235 12.8 15.1 100.0 . 280 15.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1559 Missing cases 280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MISUP8A Q15, best reason to sppt cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOV GE 1 283 15.4 16.4 16.4 POL PHIL 2 799 43.4 46.3 62.7 ISSUES 3 528 28.7 30.6 93.2 WIN NOM 4 117 6.4 6.8 100.0 . 112 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1727 Missing cases 112 ABORT8A Q16, opinion, abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 513 27.9 32.1 32.1 FAVOR 2 190 10.3 11.9 44.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 67 3.6 4.2 48.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 70 3.8 4.4 52.6 OPPOSE 6 272 14.8 17.0 69.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 485 26.4 30.4 100.0 . 121 6.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 121 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1597 Missing cases 242 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSP8A Q16, opinion, defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 242 13.2 15.4 15.4 FAVOR 2 269 14.6 17.1 32.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 184 10.0 11.7 44.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 187 10.2 11.9 56.1 OPPOSE 6 319 17.3 20.3 76.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 370 20.1 23.6 100.0 . 129 7.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 139 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1571 Missing cases 268 AFFACT8A Q16, opinion, affirm. action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 185 10.1 12.7 12.7 FAVOR 2 326 17.7 22.3 35.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 331 18.0 22.7 57.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 220 12.0 15.1 72.7 OPPOSE 6 216 11.7 14.8 87.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 182 9.9 12.5 100.0 . 131 7.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 248 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1460 Missing cases 379 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BALBUD8A Q16, opinion, bal bud Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 568 30.9 37.4 37.4 FAVOR 2 418 22.7 27.5 65.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 228 12.4 15.0 80.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 75 4.1 4.9 84.9 OPPOSE 6 111 6.0 7.3 92.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 118 6.4 7.8 100.0 . 129 7.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 192 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1518 Missing cases 321 POLLUT8A Q16, opinion, regs on poll Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 609 33.1 38.4 38.4 FAVOR 2 512 27.8 32.2 70.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 290 15.8 18.3 88.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 69 3.8 4.3 93.2 OPPOSE 6 78 4.2 4.9 98.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 30 1.6 1.9 100.0 . 132 7.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 119 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1588 Missing cases 251 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRA8A Q16, opinion, Contra sppt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 230 12.5 16.6 16.6 FAVOR 2 214 11.6 15.4 32.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 165 9.0 11.9 43.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 69 3.8 5.0 48.8 OPPOSE 6 240 13.1 17.3 66.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 471 25.6 33.9 100.0 . 152 8.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 298 16.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1389 Missing cases 450 FARMER8A Q16, opinion, Farm aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 213 11.6 14.7 14.7 FAVOR 2 325 17.7 22.4 37.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 306 16.6 21.1 58.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 213 11.6 14.7 72.9 OPPOSE 6 239 13.0 16.5 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 153 8.3 10.6 100.0 . 142 7.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 248 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1449 Missing cases 390 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TARIFF8A Q16, opinion, tariffs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 326 17.7 22.1 22.1 FAVOR 2 344 18.7 23.4 45.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 239 13.0 16.2 61.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 171 9.3 11.6 73.3 OPPOSE 6 234 12.7 15.9 89.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 159 8.6 10.8 100.0 . 135 7.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 231 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1473 Missing cases 366 SDI8A Q16, opinion, SDI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 198 10.8 13.8 13.8 FAVOR 2 201 10.9 14.0 27.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 234 12.7 16.3 44.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 119 6.5 8.3 52.2 OPPOSE 6 244 13.3 16.9 69.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 444 24.1 30.8 100.0 . 143 7.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 256 13.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1440 Missing cases 399 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRAYER8A Q16, opinion, prayer in school Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 477 25.9 30.9 30.9 FAVOR 2 310 16.9 20.1 51.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 173 9.4 11.2 62.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 74 4.0 4.8 67.0 OPPOSE 6 176 9.6 11.4 78.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 334 18.2 21.6 100.0 . 121 6.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 174 9.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1544 Missing cases 295 MIISS8A Q17, most impt. issue. this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORT 1 318 17.3 18.7 18.7 DEFENSE 2 223 12.1 13.1 31.7 AFFACT 3 95 5.2 5.6 37.3 BALBUDG 4 421 22.9 24.7 62.0 POLLUT 5 185 10.1 10.9 72.9 CONTRAS 6 94 5.1 5.5 78.4 FARMERS 7 75 4.1 4.4 82.8 TARIFFS 8 140 7.6 8.2 91.0 SDI 9 72 3.9 4.2 95.2 PRAYER 10 81 4.4 4.8 100.0 . 135 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1704 Missing cases 135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCBB8A Q18, pol philosophy of Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 69 3.8 7.4 7.4 LIBERAL 2 344 18.7 36.7 44.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 225 12.2 24.0 68.0 M-O-R 4 178 9.7 19.0 87.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 63 3.4 6.7 93.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 49 2.7 5.2 98.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 10 .5 1.1 100.0 . 309 16.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 592 32.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 938 Missing cases 901 LCGB8A Q18, pol philosophy of Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 16 .9 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 38 2.1 2.5 3.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 33 1.8 2.2 5.8 M-O-R 4 168 9.1 11.1 16.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 237 12.9 15.7 32.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 751 40.8 49.8 82.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 264 14.4 17.5 100.0 . 233 12.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 99 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1507 Missing cases 332 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCMC8A Q18, pol philosophy of Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 142 7.7 12.8 12.8 LIBERAL 2 534 29.0 48.1 60.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 238 12.9 21.4 82.3 M-O-R 4 132 7.2 11.9 94.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 33 1.8 3.0 97.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 21 1.1 1.9 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 10 .5 .9 100.0 . 306 16.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 423 23.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1110 Missing cases 729 LCRD8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 12 .7 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 30 1.6 2.1 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 59 3.2 4.1 7.0 M-O-R 4 175 9.5 12.2 19.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 314 17.1 21.9 41.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 679 36.9 47.3 88.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 168 9.1 11.7 100.0 . 275 15.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 127 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1437 Missing cases 402 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCMD8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 223 12.1 14.8 14.8 LIBERAL 2 607 33.0 40.2 55.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 366 19.9 24.2 79.2 M-O-R 4 216 11.7 14.3 93.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 44 2.4 2.9 96.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 46 2.5 3.0 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 8 .4 .5 100.0 . 242 13.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 87 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1510 Missing cases 329 LCPD8A Q18, pol philosophy of DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 30 1.6 2.9 2.9 LIBERAL 2 57 3.1 5.6 8.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 64 3.5 6.3 14.8 M-O-R 4 103 5.6 10.1 25.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 136 7.4 13.4 38.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 310 16.9 30.5 68.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 318 17.3 31.2 100.0 . 329 17.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 492 26.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1018 Missing cases 821 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG8A Q18, pol philosophy of Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 98 5.3 8.0 8.0 LIBERAL 2 394 21.4 32.3 40.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 312 17.0 25.6 66.0 M-O-R 4 257 14.0 21.1 87.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 83 4.5 6.8 93.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 66 3.6 5.4 99.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 9 .5 .7 100.0 . 302 16.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 318 17.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1219 Missing cases 620 LCAG8A Q18, pol philosophy of Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 41 2.2 3.7 3.7 LIBERAL 2 236 12.8 21.3 25.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 320 17.4 28.9 53.9 M-O-R 4 255 13.9 23.0 77.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 143 7.8 12.9 89.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 91 4.9 8.2 98.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 21 1.1 1.9 100.0 . 318 17.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 414 22.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1107 Missing cases 732 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAH8A Q18, pol philosophy of Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 33 1.8 2.7 2.7 LIBERAL 2 20 1.1 1.7 4.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 35 1.9 2.9 7.3 M-O-R 4 89 4.8 7.4 14.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 113 6.1 9.4 24.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 394 21.4 32.6 56.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 523 28.4 43.3 100.0 . 314 17.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 318 17.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1207 Missing cases 632 LCGH8A Q18, pol philosophy of Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 415 22.6 31.3 31.3 LIBERAL 2 545 29.6 41.2 72.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 215 11.7 16.2 88.7 M-O-R 4 97 5.3 7.3 96.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 21 1.1 1.6 97.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 23 1.3 1.7 99.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 8 .4 .6 100.0 . 304 16.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 211 11.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1324 Missing cases 515 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ8A Q18, pol philosophy of Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 835 45.4 56.3 56.3 LIBERAL 2 428 23.3 28.9 85.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 98 5.3 6.6 91.8 M-O-R 4 65 3.5 4.4 96.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 23 1.3 1.6 97.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 22 1.2 1.5 99.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 11 .6 .7 100.0 . 257 14.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 100 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1482 Missing cases 357 LCJK8A Q18, pol philosophy of Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 10 .5 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 18 1.0 1.5 2.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 56 3.0 4.6 7.0 M-O-R 4 86 4.7 7.1 14.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 100 5.4 8.3 22.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 409 22.2 33.9 56.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 526 28.6 43.7 100.0 . 303 16.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 331 18.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1205 Missing cases 634 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRR8A Q18, pol philosophy of Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 32 1.7 2.2 2.2 LIBERAL 2 23 1.3 1.6 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 15 .8 1.0 4.7 M-O-R 4 67 3.6 4.5 9.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 86 4.7 5.8 15.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 655 35.6 44.2 59.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 603 32.8 40.7 100.0 . 262 14.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 96 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 358 LCPR8A Q18, pol philosophy of Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 20 1.1 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 29 1.6 2.2 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 24 1.3 1.8 5.6 M-O-R 4 66 3.6 5.0 10.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 59 3.2 4.5 15.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 298 16.2 22.7 37.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 815 44.3 62.2 100.0 . 292 15.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 236 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1311 Missing cases 528 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPS8A Q18, pol philosophy of Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 218 11.9 17.6 17.6 LIBERAL 2 438 23.8 35.3 52.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 226 12.3 18.2 71.0 M-O-R 4 193 10.5 15.5 86.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 74 4.0 6.0 92.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 67 3.6 5.4 97.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 26 1.4 2.1 100.0 . 314 17.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 283 15.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1242 Missing cases 597 LCAV8A Q18, pol philosophy of Am. Voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 10 .5 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 38 2.1 2.6 3.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 231 12.6 15.6 18.9 M-O-R 4 612 33.3 41.4 60.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 465 25.3 31.5 91.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 121 6.6 8.2 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 259 14.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 102 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1478 Missing cases 361 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP8A Q18, pol philosophy of Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 20 1.1 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 30 1.6 2.0 3.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 30 1.6 2.0 5.3 M-O-R 4 76 4.1 5.0 10.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 284 15.4 18.8 29.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 796 43.3 52.7 81.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 275 15.0 18.2 100.0 . 247 13.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1511 Missing cases 328 LCDP8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 204 11.1 13.2 13.2 LIBERAL 2 742 40.3 48.2 61.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 377 20.5 24.5 85.9 M-O-R 4 125 6.8 8.1 94.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 38 2.1 2.5 96.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 40 2.2 2.6 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 14 .8 .9 100.0 . 241 13.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 58 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1540 Missing cases 299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHBB8A Q19, achieve in govt, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.8 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVE 2 274 14.9 30.6 34.5 AVERAGE 3 404 22.0 45.2 79.6 BELOW AVE 4 120 6.5 13.4 93.1 POOR 5 62 3.4 6.9 100.0 . 266 14.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 679 36.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 894 Missing cases 945 ACHGB8A Q19, achieve in govt, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 178 9.7 11.4 11.4 ABOVE AVE 2 408 22.2 26.1 37.5 AVERAGE 3 411 22.3 26.3 63.8 BELOW AVE 4 236 12.8 15.1 78.9 POOR 5 330 17.9 21.1 100.0 . 203 11.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 73 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1563 Missing cases 276 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHRD8A Q19, achieve in govt, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 218 11.9 14.5 14.5 ABOVE AVE 2 696 37.8 46.2 60.6 AVERAGE 3 437 23.8 29.0 89.6 BELOW AVE 4 87 4.7 5.8 95.4 POOR 5 70 3.8 4.6 100.0 . 223 12.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 108 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1508 Missing cases 331 ACHMD8A Q19, achieve in govt,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 138 7.5 10.4 10.4 ABOVE AVE 2 517 28.1 38.9 49.2 AVERAGE 3 447 24.3 33.6 82.9 BELOW AVE 4 134 7.3 10.1 92.9 POOR 5 94 5.1 7.1 100.0 . 371 20.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 138 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1330 Missing cases 509 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPD8A Q19, achieve in govt,Dupont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 2.6 5.7 5.7 ABOVE AVE 2 166 9.0 20.1 25.8 AVERAGE 3 379 20.6 46.0 71.8 BELOW AVE 4 132 7.2 16.0 87.9 POOR 5 100 5.4 12.1 100.0 . 419 22.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 596 32.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 1015 ACHRG8A Q19, achieve in govt, Gebhardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 2.1 3.6 3.6 ABOVE AVE 2 236 12.8 22.3 25.8 AVERAGE 3 553 30.1 52.2 78.0 BELOW AVE 4 169 9.2 15.9 94.0 POOR 5 64 3.5 6.0 100.0 . 411 22.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 368 20.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1060 Missing cases 779 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHAG8A Q19, achieve in govt, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 20 1.1 2.1 2.1 ABOVE AVE 2 166 9.0 17.1 19.1 AVERAGE 3 528 28.7 54.3 73.4 BELOW AVE 4 187 10.2 19.2 92.6 POOR 5 72 3.9 7.4 100.0 . 426 23.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 440 23.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 973 Missing cases 866 ACHAH8A Q19, achieve in govt, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.2 3.4 3.4 ABOVE AVE 2 219 11.9 18.4 21.8 AVERAGE 3 349 19.0 29.4 51.1 BELOW AVE 4 279 15.2 23.5 74.6 POOR 5 302 16.4 25.4 100.0 . 407 22.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 243 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1189 Missing cases 650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHGH8A Q19, achieve in govt, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.0 1.5 1.5 ABOVE AVE 2 148 8.0 12.0 13.5 AVERAGE 3 398 21.6 32.4 45.9 BELOW AVE 4 253 13.8 20.6 66.5 POOR 5 412 22.4 33.5 100.0 . 402 21.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 208 11.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1229 Missing cases 610 ACHJJ8A Q19, achieve in govt, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 76 4.1 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVE 2 175 9.5 15.3 22.0 AVERAGE 3 177 9.6 15.5 37.4 BELOW AVE 4 195 10.6 17.1 54.5 POOR 5 520 28.3 45.5 100.0 . 393 21.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 303 16.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1143 Missing cases 696 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHJK8A Q19, achieve in govt, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 81 4.4 7.4 7.4 ABOVE AVE 2 295 16.0 26.8 34.2 AVERAGE 3 470 25.6 42.7 76.8 BELOW AVE 4 143 7.8 13.0 89.8 POOR 5 112 6.1 10.2 100.0 . 417 22.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 321 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1101 Missing cases 738 ACHPR8A Q19, achieve in govt,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.8 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVE 2 69 3.8 6.0 8.9 AVERAGE 3 127 6.9 11.0 20.0 BELOW AVE 4 193 10.5 16.8 36.8 POOR 5 728 39.6 63.2 100.0 . 255 13.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 433 23.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1151 Missing cases 688 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPS8A Q19, achieve in govt, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 79 4.3 6.3 6.3 ABOVE AVE 2 379 20.6 30.3 36.6 AVERAGE 3 544 29.6 43.5 80.2 BELOW AVE 4 144 7.8 11.5 91.7 POOR 5 104 5.7 8.3 100.0 . 246 13.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 343 18.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1250 Missing cases 589 TVBB8A Q19, performance on TV, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 .9 1.6 1.6 ABOVE AVE 2 142 7.7 13.1 14.6 AVERAGE 3 412 22.4 37.9 52.6 BELOW AVE 4 273 14.8 25.1 77.7 POOR 5 242 13.2 22.3 100.0 . 291 15.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 462 25.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1086 Missing cases 753 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVGB8A Q19, performance on TV, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 58 3.2 3.7 3.7 ABOVE AVE 2 291 15.8 18.8 22.5 AVERAGE 3 593 32.2 38.2 60.7 BELOW AVE 4 306 16.6 19.7 80.5 POOR 5 303 16.5 19.5 100.0 . 242 13.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 46 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1551 Missing cases 288 TVRD8A Q19, performance on TV, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 64 3.5 4.3 4.3 ABOVE AVE 2 454 24.7 30.6 34.9 AVERAGE 3 663 36.1 44.6 79.5 BELOW AVE 4 192 10.4 12.9 92.4 POOR 5 113 6.1 7.6 100.0 . 270 14.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 83 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1486 Missing cases 353 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVMD8A Q19, performance on TV, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 143 7.8 9.3 9.3 ABOVE AVE 2 591 32.1 38.4 47.7 AVERAGE 3 616 33.5 40.0 87.7 BELOW AVE 4 126 6.9 8.2 95.9 POOR 5 63 3.4 4.1 100.0 . 235 12.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 65 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1539 Missing cases 300 TVPD8A Q19, performance on TV, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 1.5 2.7 2.7 ABOVE AVE 2 172 9.4 16.5 19.2 AVERAGE 3 425 23.1 40.7 59.9 BELOW AVE 4 241 13.1 23.1 83.0 POOR 5 177 9.6 17.0 100.0 . 319 17.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 477 25.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 796 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVRG8A Q19, performance on TV, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 68 3.7 5.1 5.1 ABOVE AVE 2 323 17.6 24.2 29.2 AVERAGE 3 653 35.5 48.8 78.1 BELOW AVE 4 208 11.3 15.6 93.6 POOR 5 85 4.6 6.4 100.0 . 279 15.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 223 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1337 Missing cases 502 TVAG8A Q19, performance on TV, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 1.6 2.4 2.4 ABOVE AVE 2 245 13.3 20.1 22.5 AVERAGE 3 577 31.4 47.3 69.8 BELOW AVE 4 235 12.8 19.3 89.1 POOR 5 133 7.2 10.9 100.0 . 287 15.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 333 18.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1219 Missing cases 620 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVAH8A Q19, performance on TV, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 1.3 1.8 1.8 ABOVE AVE 2 134 7.3 10.2 12.0 AVERAGE 3 348 18.9 26.4 38.4 BELOW AVE 4 347 18.9 26.3 64.7 POOR 5 465 25.3 35.3 100.0 . 293 15.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 228 12.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1318 Missing cases 521 TVGH8A Q19, performance on TV, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 2.6 3.3 3.3 ABOVE AVE 2 252 13.7 17.9 21.2 AVERAGE 3 414 22.5 29.3 50.5 BELOW AVE 4 258 14.0 18.3 68.8 POOR 5 440 23.9 31.2 100.0 . 297 16.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 131 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1411 Missing cases 428 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVJJ8A Q19, performance on TV, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 449 24.4 29.3 29.3 ABOVE AVE 2 553 30.1 36.1 65.4 AVERAGE 3 276 15.0 18.0 83.4 BELOW AVE 4 99 5.4 6.5 89.9 POOR 5 155 8.4 10.1 100.0 . 239 13.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 68 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1532 Missing cases 307 TVJK8A Q19, performance on TV, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 59 3.2 4.7 4.7 ABOVE AVE 2 243 13.2 19.3 24.0 AVERAGE 3 608 33.1 48.3 72.2 BELOW AVE 4 208 11.3 16.5 88.7 POOR 5 142 7.7 11.3 100.0 . 294 16.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 285 15.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1260 Missing cases 579 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVPR8A Q19, performance on TV, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 121 6.6 8.5 8.5 ABOVE AVE 2 315 17.1 22.0 30.5 AVERAGE 3 399 21.7 27.9 58.4 BELOW AVE 4 235 12.8 16.4 74.9 POOR 5 359 19.5 25.1 100.0 . 272 14.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 138 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1429 Missing cases 410 TVPS8A Q19, performance on TV, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 31 1.7 2.3 2.3 ABOVE AVE 2 191 10.4 14.4 16.7 AVERAGE 3 561 30.5 42.2 58.9 BELOW AVE 4 319 17.3 24.0 82.9 POOR 5 227 12.3 17.1 100.0 . 284 15.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 226 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1329 Missing cases 510 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORBB8A Q19, moral character, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 150 8.2 16.0 16.0 ABOVE AVE 2 357 19.4 38.1 54.1 AVERAGE 3 372 20.2 39.7 93.7 BELOW AVE 4 33 1.8 3.5 97.2 POOR 5 26 1.4 2.8 100.0 . 294 16.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 607 33.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 938 Missing cases 901 MORGB8A Q19, moral character, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 233 12.7 15.8 15.8 ABOVE AVE 2 413 22.5 27.9 43.7 AVERAGE 3 499 27.1 33.8 77.5 BELOW AVE 4 172 9.4 11.6 89.1 POOR 5 161 8.8 10.9 100.0 . 244 13.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 117 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1478 Missing cases 361 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORRD8A Q19, moral character, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 194 10.5 13.6 13.6 ABOVE AVE 2 546 29.7 38.2 51.8 AVERAGE 3 555 30.2 38.8 90.6 BELOW AVE 4 84 4.6 5.9 96.5 POOR 5 50 2.7 3.5 100.0 . 273 14.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 137 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1429 Missing cases 410 MORMD8A Q19, moral character, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 241 13.1 17.0 17.0 ABOVE AVE 2 573 31.2 40.5 57.5 AVERAGE 3 486 26.4 34.3 91.9 BELOW AVE 4 72 3.9 5.1 97.0 POOR 5 43 2.3 3.0 100.0 . 236 12.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 188 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1415 Missing cases 424 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORPD8A Q19, moral character, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 105 5.7 11.3 11.3 ABOVE AVE 2 304 16.5 32.6 43.9 AVERAGE 3 428 23.3 45.9 89.8 BELOW AVE 4 55 3.0 5.9 95.7 POOR 5 40 2.2 4.3 100.0 . 315 17.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 592 32.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 932 Missing cases 907 MORRG8A Q19, moral character, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 114 6.2 9.8 9.8 ABOVE AVE 2 396 21.5 34.2 44.0 AVERAGE 3 533 29.0 46.0 90.0 BELOW AVE 4 74 4.0 6.4 96.4 POOR 5 42 2.3 3.6 100.0 . 296 16.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 384 20.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1159 Missing cases 680 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORAG8A Q19, moral character, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 72 3.9 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVE 2 333 18.1 30.5 37.1 AVERAGE 3 553 30.1 50.7 87.8 BELOW AVE 4 90 4.9 8.2 96.1 POOR 5 43 2.3 3.9 100.0 . 305 16.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 443 24.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1091 Missing cases 748 MORAH8A Q19, moral character, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 68 3.7 5.7 5.7 ABOVE AVE 2 256 13.9 21.3 27.0 AVERAGE 3 501 27.2 41.7 68.7 BELOW AVE 4 187 10.2 15.6 84.3 POOR 5 189 10.3 15.7 100.0 . 288 15.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 350 19.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1201 Missing cases 638 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORGH8A Q19, moral character, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 .5 .5 ABOVE AVE 2 26 1.4 1.8 2.3 AVERAGE 3 126 6.9 8.6 10.9 BELOW AVE 4 231 12.6 15.8 26.6 POOR 5 1075 58.5 73.4 100.0 . 265 14.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 109 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1465 Missing cases 374 MORJJ8A Q19, moral character, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 225 12.2 15.5 15.5 ABOVE AVE 2 414 22.5 28.5 43.9 AVERAGE 3 455 24.7 31.3 75.2 BELOW AVE 4 153 8.3 10.5 85.8 POOR 5 207 11.3 14.2 100.0 . 247 13.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 138 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1454 Missing cases 385 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORJK8A Q19, moral character, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 166 9.0 13.9 13.9 ABOVE AVE 2 375 20.4 31.5 45.5 AVERAGE 3 545 29.6 45.8 91.3 BELOW AVE 4 65 3.5 5.5 96.7 POOR 5 39 2.1 3.3 100.0 . 305 16.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 344 18.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 649 MORPR8A Q19, moral character, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 239 13.0 17.3 17.3 ABOVE AVE 2 332 18.1 24.0 41.3 AVERAGE 3 394 21.4 28.5 69.8 BELOW AVE 4 187 10.2 13.5 83.3 POOR 5 231 12.6 16.7 100.0 . 266 14.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 190 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1383 Missing cases 456 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORPS8A Q19, moral character, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 227 12.3 18.4 18.4 ABOVE AVE 2 461 25.1 37.4 55.8 AVERAGE 3 456 24.8 37.0 92.7 BELOW AVE 4 53 2.9 4.3 97.0 POOR 5 37 2.0 3.0 100.0 . 291 15.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 314 17.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1234 Missing cases 605 FPOLBB8A Q19, knows for pol, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.0 2.2 2.2 ABOVE AVE 2 94 5.1 11.6 13.8 AVERAGE 3 439 23.9 54.0 67.8 BELOW AVE 4 149 8.1 18.3 86.1 POOR 5 113 6.1 13.9 100.0 . 322 17.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 704 38.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 813 Missing cases 1026 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLGB8A Q19, knows for pol, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 430 23.4 28.5 28.5 ABOVE AVE 2 583 31.7 38.6 67.1 AVERAGE 3 319 17.3 21.1 88.3 BELOW AVE 4 85 4.6 5.6 93.9 POOR 5 92 5.0 6.1 100.0 . 246 13.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 84 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1509 Missing cases 330 FPOLRD8A Q19, knows for pol, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 239 13.0 16.8 16.8 ABOVE AVE 2 686 37.3 48.2 65.0 AVERAGE 3 422 22.9 29.7 94.7 BELOW AVE 4 46 2.5 3.2 98.0 POOR 5 29 1.6 2.0 100.0 . 277 15.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 140 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1422 Missing cases 417 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLMD8A Q19, knows for pol, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 54 2.9 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVE 2 257 14.0 18.3 22.1 AVERAGE 3 661 35.9 47.0 69.1 BELOW AVE 4 261 14.2 18.6 87.7 POOR 5 173 9.4 12.3 100.0 . 247 13.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 186 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1406 Missing cases 433 FPOLPD8A Q19, knows for pol, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 20 1.1 2.3 2.3 ABOVE AVE 2 109 5.9 12.3 14.6 AVERAGE 3 446 24.3 50.5 65.0 BELOW AVE 4 209 11.4 23.6 88.7 POOR 5 100 5.4 11.3 100.0 . 318 17.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 637 34.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 884 Missing cases 955 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLRG8A Q19, knows for pol, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.2 3.5 3.5 ABOVE AVE 2 209 11.4 18.5 22.0 AVERAGE 3 587 31.9 51.9 73.9 BELOW AVE 4 215 11.7 19.0 92.8 POOR 5 81 4.4 7.2 100.0 . 305 16.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 402 21.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1132 Missing cases 707 FPOLAG8A Q19, knows for pol, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 1.5 2.6 2.6 ABOVE AVE 2 203 11.0 19.3 21.9 AVERAGE 3 568 30.9 54.0 75.9 BELOW AVE 4 172 9.4 16.3 92.2 POOR 5 82 4.5 7.8 100.0 . 318 17.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 469 25.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1052 Missing cases 787 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLAH8A Q19, knows for pol, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 298 16.2 21.7 21.7 ABOVE AVE 2 593 32.2 43.3 65.0 AVERAGE 3 327 17.8 23.9 88.8 BELOW AVE 4 80 4.4 5.8 94.7 POOR 5 73 4.0 5.3 100.0 . 290 15.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 178 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1371 Missing cases 468 FPOLGH8A Q19, knows for pol, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 37 2.0 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVE 2 170 9.2 13.8 16.9 AVERAGE 3 509 27.7 41.4 58.3 BELOW AVE 4 228 12.4 18.6 76.9 POOR 5 284 15.4 23.1 100.0 . 312 17.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 299 16.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1228 Missing cases 611 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLJJ8A Q19, knows for pol, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 100 5.4 7.0 7.0 ABOVE AVE 2 266 14.5 18.7 25.7 AVERAGE 3 391 21.3 27.5 53.2 BELOW AVE 4 272 14.8 19.1 72.3 POOR 5 394 21.4 27.7 100.0 . 262 14.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 154 8.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1423 Missing cases 416 FPOLJK8A Q19, knows for pol, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 65 3.5 5.8 5.8 ABOVE AVE 2 252 13.7 22.4 28.1 AVERAGE 3 596 32.4 52.9 81.0 BELOW AVE 4 146 7.9 13.0 94.0 POOR 5 68 3.7 6.0 100.0 . 305 16.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 407 22.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1127 Missing cases 712 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLPR8A Q19, knows for pol, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 76 4.1 6.0 6.0 ABOVE AVE 2 105 5.7 8.3 14.3 AVERAGE 3 216 11.7 17.0 31.3 BELOW AVE 4 294 16.0 23.2 54.5 POOR 5 578 31.4 45.5 100.0 . 289 15.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 281 15.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1269 Missing cases 570 FPOLPS8A Q19, knows for pol, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 63 3.4 5.3 5.3 ABOVE AVE 2 306 16.6 25.7 31.0 AVERAGE 3 608 33.1 51.1 82.1 BELOW AVE 4 128 7.0 10.8 92.9 POOR 5 85 4.6 7.1 100.0 . 287 15.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 362 19.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 649 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALBB8A Q19, Overall Eval, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.2 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVE 2 247 13.4 23.2 26.9 AVERAGE 3 461 25.1 43.3 70.2 BELOW AVE 4 182 9.9 17.1 87.3 POOR 5 135 7.3 12.7 100.0 . 293 15.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 481 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1065 Missing cases 774 EVALGB8A Q19, Overall Eval, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 188 10.2 12.0 12.0 ABOVE AVE 2 436 23.7 27.9 39.9 AVERAGE 3 419 22.8 26.8 66.6 BELOW AVE 4 244 13.3 15.6 82.2 POOR 5 278 15.1 17.8 100.0 . 242 13.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1565 Missing cases 274 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMC8A Q19, Overall Eval, Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 112 6.1 9.6 9.6 ABOVE AVE 2 347 18.9 29.8 39.4 AVERAGE 3 426 23.2 36.6 76.0 BELOW AVE 4 145 7.9 12.5 88.5 POOR 5 134 7.3 11.5 100.0 . 303 16.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 372 20.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1164 Missing cases 675 EVALRD8A Q19, Overall Eval, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 136 7.4 9.2 9.2 ABOVE AVE 2 626 34.0 42.3 51.5 AVERAGE 3 539 29.3 36.4 87.8 BELOW AVE 4 112 6.1 7.6 95.4 POOR 5 68 3.7 4.6 100.0 . 291 15.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 358 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMD8A Q19, Overall Eval, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 172 9.4 11.2 11.2 ABOVE AVE 2 590 32.1 38.5 49.8 AVERAGE 3 507 27.6 33.1 82.9 BELOW AVE 4 149 8.1 9.7 92.6 POOR 5 113 6.1 7.4 100.0 . 252 13.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1531 Missing cases 308 EVALPD8A Q19, Overall Eval, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 2.1 3.6 3.6 ABOVE AVE 2 174 9.5 16.5 20.1 AVERAGE 3 436 23.7 41.4 61.5 BELOW AVE 4 245 13.3 23.3 84.8 POOR 5 160 8.7 15.2 100.0 . 309 16.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 477 25.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 786 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRG8A Q19, Overall Eval, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 2.6 3.7 3.7 ABOVE AVE 2 235 12.8 18.4 22.1 AVERAGE 3 647 35.2 50.7 72.8 BELOW AVE 4 232 12.6 18.2 91.0 POOR 5 115 6.3 9.0 100.0 . 308 16.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 255 13.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1276 Missing cases 563 EVALAG8A Q19, Overall Eval, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.4 2.1 2.1 ABOVE AVE 2 169 9.2 13.8 15.9 AVERAGE 3 645 35.1 52.6 68.5 BELOW AVE 4 257 14.0 21.0 89.5 POOR 5 129 7.0 10.5 100.0 . 305 16.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 308 16.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1226 Missing cases 613 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAH8A Q19, Overall Eval, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.8 2.5 2.5 ABOVE AVE 2 144 7.8 10.5 12.9 AVERAGE 3 409 22.2 29.7 42.7 BELOW AVE 4 392 21.3 28.5 71.1 POOR 5 397 21.6 28.9 100.0 . 299 16.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 164 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1376 Missing cases 463 EVALGH8A Q19, Overall Eval, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 .8 1.0 1.0 ABOVE AVE 2 65 3.5 4.5 5.4 AVERAGE 3 256 13.9 17.5 23.0 BELOW AVE 4 306 16.6 21.0 43.9 POOR 5 818 44.5 56.1 100.0 . 284 15.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 96 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1459 Missing cases 380 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJJ8A Q19, Overall Eval, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 135 7.3 8.9 8.9 ABOVE AVE 2 358 19.5 23.6 32.5 AVERAGE 3 387 21.0 25.5 58.1 BELOW AVE 4 255 13.9 16.8 74.9 POOR 5 380 20.7 25.1 100.0 . 266 14.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 58 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1515 Missing cases 324 EVALJK8A Q19, Overall Eval, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 81 4.4 6.4 6.4 ABOVE AVE 2 265 14.4 21.1 27.5 AVERAGE 3 535 29.1 42.6 70.1 BELOW AVE 4 214 11.6 17.0 87.2 POOR 5 161 8.8 12.8 100.0 . 322 17.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 261 14.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1256 Missing cases 583 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRR8A Q19, Overall Eval, Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 282 15.3 18.5 18.5 ABOVE AVE 2 339 18.4 22.2 40.7 AVERAGE 3 281 15.3 18.4 59.1 BELOW AVE 4 197 10.7 12.9 72.0 POOR 5 427 23.2 28.0 100.0 . 276 15.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1526 Missing cases 313 EVALPR8A Q19, Overall Eval, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 87 4.7 6.1 6.1 ABOVE AVE 2 143 7.8 9.9 16.0 AVERAGE 3 260 14.1 18.1 34.1 BELOW AVE 4 282 15.3 19.6 53.7 POOR 5 666 36.2 46.3 100.0 . 275 15.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 126 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1438 Missing cases 401 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPS8A Q19, Overall Eval, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 74 4.0 5.7 5.7 ABOVE AVE 2 287 15.6 22.0 27.6 AVERAGE 3 574 31.2 43.9 71.5 BELOW AVE 4 221 12.0 16.9 88.4 POOR 5 151 8.2 11.6 100.0 . 288 15.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 244 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1307 Missing cases 532 MIQUAL8A Q20, Most impt quality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACHIEVE IN GOV 1 847 46.1 52.1 52.1 TV PERF 2 10 .5 .6 52.7 MORAL CHAR 3 580 31.5 35.7 88.4 KNOWL FOR POL 4 188 10.2 11.6 100.0 . 214 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1625 Missing cases 214 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METBB8A Q21, met personally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1770 96.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 69 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALBB8A Q21, attended rally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1756 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 83 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTBB8A Q21, contacted, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1653 89.9 89.9 89.9 CHECKED 1 186 10.1 10.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILBB8A Q21, received mail, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1467 79.8 79.8 79.8 CHECKED 1 372 20.2 20.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADBB8A Q21, saw ad, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 726 39.5 39.5 39.5 CHECKED 1 1113 60.5 60.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 METGB8A Q21, met personally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1685 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 154 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALGB8A Q21, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1602 87.1 87.1 87.1 CHECKED 1 237 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGB8A Q21, contacted, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1515 82.4 82.4 82.4 CHECKED 1 324 17.6 17.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MAILGB8A Q21, received mail, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1238 67.3 67.3 67.3 CHECKED 1 601 32.7 32.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADGB8A Q21, saw ad, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 699 38.0 38.0 38.0 CHECKED 1 1140 62.0 62.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRD8A Q21, met personally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1720 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 119 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 RALRD8A Q21, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1675 91.1 91.1 91.1 CHECKED 1 164 8.9 8.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRD8A Q21, contacted, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1570 85.4 85.4 85.4 CHECKED 1 269 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRD8A Q21, received mail, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1259 68.5 68.5 68.5 CHECKED 1 580 31.5 31.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ADRD8A Q21, saw ad, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 721 39.2 39.2 39.2 CHECKED 1 1118 60.8 60.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METMD8A Q21, met personally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1769 96.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 70 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALMD8A Q21, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1730 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 109 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTMD8A Q21, contacted, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1588 86.4 86.4 86.4 CHECKED 1 251 13.6 13.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILMD8A Q21, received mail, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1480 80.5 80.5 80.5 CHECKED 1 359 19.5 19.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADMD8A Q21, saw ad, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 765 41.6 41.6 41.6 CHECKED 1 1074 58.4 58.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 METPD8A Q21, met personally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1789 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALPD8A Q21, attended rally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1793 97.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 46 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPD8A Q21, contacted, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1704 92.7 92.7 92.7 CHECKED 1 135 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MAILPD8A Q21, received mail, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1542 83.8 83.8 83.8 CHECKED 1 297 16.2 16.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPD8A Q21, saw ad, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 743 40.4 40.4 40.4 CHECKED 1 1096 59.6 59.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRG8A Q21, met personally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1745 94.9 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1 94 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 RALRG8A Q21, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1705 92.7 92.7 92.7 CHECKED 1 134 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRG8A Q21, contacted, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1573 85.5 85.5 85.5 CHECKED 1 266 14.5 14.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRG8A Q21, received mail, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1457 79.2 79.2 79.2 CHECKED 1 382 20.8 20.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ADRG8A Q21, saw ad, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 707 38.4 38.4 38.4 CHECKED 1 1132 61.6 61.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METAG8A Q21, met personally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALAG8A Q21, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1786 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 53 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTAG8A Q21, contacted, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1773 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 66 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILAG8A Q21, received mail, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1634 88.9 88.9 88.9 CHECKED 1 205 11.1 11.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAG8A Q21, saw ad, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 681 37.0 37.0 37.0 CHECKED 1 1158 63.0 63.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 METAH8A Q21, met personally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1789 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALAH8A Q21, attended rally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1783 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 56 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTAH8A Q21, contacted, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1806 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 33 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MAILAH8A Q21, received mail, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1658 90.2 90.2 90.2 CHECKED 1 181 9.8 9.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAH8A Q21, saw ad, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 716 38.9 38.9 38.9 CHECKED 1 1123 61.1 61.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METGH8A Q21, met personally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1792 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 47 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 RALGH8A Q21, attended rally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1777 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 62 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGH8A Q21, contacted, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1756 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 83 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILGH8A Q21, received mail, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1591 86.5 86.5 86.5 CHECKED 1 248 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ADGH8A Q21, saw ad, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 671 36.5 36.5 36.5 CHECKED 1 1168 63.5 63.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJJ8A Q21, met personally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1765 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 74 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALJJ8A Q21, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1685 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 154 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTJJ8A Q21, contacted, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1702 92.6 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 137 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJJ8A Q21, received mail, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1596 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1 243 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADJJ8A Q21, saw ad, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 630 34.3 34.3 34.3 CHECKED 1 1209 65.7 65.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 METJK8A Q21, met personally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1728 94.0 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 111 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALJK8A Q21, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1710 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 129 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTJK8A Q21, contacted, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1654 89.9 89.9 89.9 CHECKED 1 185 10.1 10.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MAILJK8A Q21, received mail, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1419 77.2 77.2 77.2 CHECKED 1 420 22.8 22.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADJK8A Q21, saw ad, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 726 39.5 39.5 39.5 CHECKED 1 1113 60.5 60.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPR8A Q21, met personally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1731 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 108 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 RALPR8A Q21, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1661 90.3 90.3 90.3 CHECKED 1 178 9.7 9.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPR8A Q21, contacted, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1577 85.8 85.8 85.8 CHECKED 1 262 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPR8A Q21, received mail, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1328 72.2 72.2 72.2 CHECKED 1 511 27.8 27.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ADPR8A Q21, saw ad, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 690 37.5 37.5 37.5 CHECKED 1 1149 62.5 62.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPS8A Q21, met personally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1755 95.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 84 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALPS8A Q21, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1724 93.7 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 115 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTPS8A Q21, contacted, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1596 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1 243 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPS8A Q21, received mail, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1492 81.1 81.1 81.1 CHECKED 1 347 18.9 18.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPS8A Q21, saw ad, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 709 38.6 38.6 38.6 CHECKED 1 1130 61.4 61.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 RANKBB8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 65 3.5 6.7 6.7 SECOND 2 98 5.3 10.1 16.9 THIRD 3 113 6.1 11.7 28.6 FOURTH 4 167 9.1 17.3 45.9 FIFTH 5 201 10.9 20.8 66.7 SIXTH 6 177 9.6 18.3 85.0 SEVENTH 7 145 7.9 15.0 100.0 . 873 47.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 873 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKMD8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 436 23.7 41.5 41.5 SECOND 2 319 17.3 30.4 71.8 THIRD 3 156 8.5 14.8 86.7 FOURTH 4 60 3.3 5.7 92.4 FIFTH 5 39 2.1 3.7 96.1 SIXTH 6 20 1.1 1.9 98.0 SEVENTH 7 21 1.1 2.0 100.0 . 788 42.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1051 Missing cases 788 RANKRG8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 148 8.0 15.1 15.1 SECOND 2 156 8.5 15.9 31.0 THIRD 3 202 11.0 20.6 51.6 FOURTH 4 171 9.3 17.4 69.1 FIFTH 5 163 8.9 16.6 85.7 SIXTH 6 90 4.9 9.2 94.9 SEVENTH 7 50 2.7 5.1 100.0 . 859 46.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 980 Missing cases 859 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKAG8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 81 4.4 8.4 8.4 SECOND 2 90 4.9 9.3 17.6 THIRD 3 121 6.6 12.5 30.1 FOURTH 4 162 8.8 16.7 46.8 FIFTH 5 180 9.8 18.6 65.4 SIXTH 6 215 11.7 22.2 87.5 SEVENTH 7 121 6.6 12.5 100.0 . 869 47.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 970 Missing cases 869 RANKGH8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 31 1.7 3.2 3.2 SECOND 2 45 2.4 4.6 7.8 THIRD 3 69 3.8 7.1 14.9 FOURTH 4 78 4.2 8.0 22.9 FIFTH 5 99 5.4 10.2 33.1 SIXTH 6 139 7.6 14.3 47.3 SEVENTH 7 513 27.9 52.7 100.0 . 865 47.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 974 Missing cases 865 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJJ8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 171 9.3 16.9 16.9 SECOND 2 163 8.9 16.1 33.1 THIRD 3 119 6.5 11.8 44.9 FOURTH 4 128 7.0 12.7 57.5 FIFTH 5 95 5.2 9.4 66.9 SIXTH 6 145 7.9 14.4 81.3 SEVENTH 7 189 10.3 18.7 100.0 . 829 45.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1010 Missing cases 829 RANKPS8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 146 7.9 14.7 14.7 SECOND 2 155 8.4 15.6 30.4 THIRD 3 179 9.7 18.1 48.4 FOURTH 4 169 9.2 17.1 65.5 FIFTH 5 146 7.9 14.7 80.2 SIXTH 6 123 6.7 12.4 92.6 SEVENTH 7 73 4.0 7.4 100.0 . 848 46.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 991 Missing cases 848 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKGB8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 394 21.4 32.9 32.9 SECOND 2 301 16.4 25.1 58.0 THIRD 3 192 10.4 16.0 74.0 FOURTH 4 111 6.0 9.3 83.2 FIFTH 5 82 4.5 6.8 90.1 SIXTH 6 119 6.5 9.9 100.0 . 640 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 640 RANKRD8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 416 22.6 35.2 35.2 SECOND 2 336 18.3 28.4 63.6 THIRD 3 212 11.5 17.9 81.5 FOURTH 4 138 7.5 11.7 93.2 FIFTH 5 50 2.7 4.2 97.4 SIXTH 6 31 1.7 2.6 100.0 . 656 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1183 Missing cases 656 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKPD8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 74 4.0 6.5 6.5 SECOND 2 156 8.5 13.7 20.2 THIRD 3 215 11.7 18.9 39.2 FOURTH 4 266 14.5 23.4 62.6 FIFTH 5 277 15.1 24.4 87.0 SIXTH 6 148 8.0 13.0 100.0 . 703 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1136 Missing cases 703 RANKAH8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 35 1.9 3.1 3.1 SECOND 2 50 2.7 4.4 7.5 THIRD 3 104 5.7 9.2 16.6 FOURTH 4 222 12.1 19.5 36.2 FIFTH 5 380 20.7 33.5 69.6 SIXTH 6 345 18.8 30.4 100.0 . 703 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1136 Missing cases 703 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJK8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 132 7.2 11.4 11.4 SECOND 2 242 13.2 21.0 32.4 THIRD 3 331 18.0 28.7 61.0 FOURTH 4 256 13.9 22.2 83.2 FIFTH 5 162 8.8 14.0 97.2 SIXTH 6 32 1.7 2.8 100.0 . 684 37.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1155 Missing cases 684 RANKPR8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 157 8.5 13.7 13.7 SECOND 2 72 3.9 6.3 20.0 THIRD 3 60 3.3 5.2 25.2 FOURTH 4 103 5.6 9.0 34.2 FIFTH 5 160 8.7 13.9 48.1 SIXTH 6 595 32.4 51.9 100.0 . 692 37.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1147 Missing cases 692 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMBB8A Q23, chance of nom, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 2 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WIN 2 5 .3 .4 .5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 21 1.1 1.6 2.1 TOSSUP 4 52 2.8 4.0 6.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 124 6.7 9.5 15.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 224 12.2 17.2 32.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 875 47.6 67.2 100.0 . 325 17.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 211 11.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1303 Missing cases 536 NOMMD8A Q23, chance of nom, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 659 35.8 41.0 41.0 PROBABLY WIN 2 462 25.1 28.8 69.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 196 10.7 12.2 82.0 TOSSUP 4 166 9.0 10.3 92.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 59 3.2 3.7 96.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 43 2.3 2.7 98.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 21 1.1 1.3 100.0 . 205 11.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1606 Missing cases 233 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRG8A Q23, chance of nom, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 15 .8 1.1 1.1 PROBABLY WIN 2 46 2.5 3.3 4.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 93 5.1 6.7 11.1 TOSSUP 4 175 9.5 12.6 23.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 204 11.1 14.7 38.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 284 15.4 20.5 58.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 571 31.0 41.1 100.0 . 333 18.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 118 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1388 Missing cases 451 NOMAG8A Q23, chance of nom, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 4 .2 .3 .3 PROBABLY WIN 2 16 .9 1.2 1.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 66 3.6 4.8 6.3 TOSSUP 4 152 8.3 11.1 17.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 215 11.7 15.7 33.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 266 14.5 19.5 52.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 647 35.2 47.4 100.0 . 337 18.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 136 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1366 Missing cases 473 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMGH8A Q23, chance of nom, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 5 .3 .4 .4 PROBABLY WIN 2 8 .4 .6 .9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 20 1.1 1.4 2.3 TOSSUP 4 42 2.3 3.0 5.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 69 3.8 4.8 10.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 117 6.4 8.2 18.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1162 63.2 81.7 100.0 . 328 17.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 88 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1423 Missing cases 416 NOMJJ8A Q23, chance of nom, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 24 1.3 1.6 1.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 76 4.1 5.2 6.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 159 8.6 10.8 17.6 TOSSUP 4 277 15.1 18.8 36.5 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 283 15.4 19.3 55.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 227 12.3 15.4 71.2 CERTAIN LOSE 7 424 23.1 28.8 100.0 . 303 16.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 66 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1470 Missing cases 369 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPS8A Q23, chance of nom, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 8 .4 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 20 1.1 1.4 2.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 55 3.0 4.0 6.0 TOSSUP 4 171 9.3 12.3 18.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 223 12.1 16.1 34.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 263 14.3 19.0 53.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 647 35.2 46.6 100.0 . 341 18.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 111 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1387 Missing cases 452 NOMGB8A Q23, chance of nom, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 750 40.8 47.6 47.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 329 17.9 20.9 68.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 156 8.5 9.9 78.4 TOSSUP 4 162 8.8 10.3 88.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 74 4.0 4.7 93.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 46 2.5 2.9 96.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 59 3.2 3.7 100.0 . 231 12.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1576 Missing cases 263 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRD8A Q23, chance of nom, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 22 1.2 1.5 1.5 PROBABLY WIN 2 147 8.0 10.3 11.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 243 13.2 16.9 28.7 TOSSUP 4 256 13.9 17.9 46.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 198 10.8 13.8 60.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 161 8.8 11.2 71.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 407 22.1 28.4 100.0 . 324 17.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1434 Missing cases 405 NOMPD8A Q23, chance of nom, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 4 .2 .3 .3 PROBABLY WIN 2 8 .4 .6 .9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 31 1.7 2.4 3.3 TOSSUP 4 72 3.9 5.5 8.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 177 9.6 13.5 22.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 232 12.6 17.7 40.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 786 42.7 60.0 100.0 . 350 19.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 179 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1310 Missing cases 529 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMAH8A Q23, chance of nom, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 2 .1 .1 .1 PROBABLY WIN 2 5 .3 .4 .5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 17 .9 1.2 1.7 TOSSUP 4 53 2.9 3.9 5.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 109 5.9 7.9 13.5 PROBABLY LOSE 6 223 12.1 16.2 29.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 965 52.5 70.2 100.0 . 339 18.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 126 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1374 Missing cases 465 NOMJK8A Q23, chance of nom, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .3 .4 .4 PROBABLY WIN 2 27 1.5 2.0 2.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 67 3.6 4.9 7.3 TOSSUP 4 136 7.4 9.9 17.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 189 10.3 13.8 31.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 256 13.9 18.6 49.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 692 37.6 50.4 100.0 . 336 18.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 130 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1373 Missing cases 466 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPR8A Q23, chance of nom, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 8 .4 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 12 .7 .9 1.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 38 2.1 2.7 4.1 TOSSUP 4 71 3.9 5.1 9.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 135 7.3 9.6 18.9 PROBABLY LOSE 6 198 10.8 14.2 33.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 937 51.0 67.0 100.0 . 323 17.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 117 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1399 Missing cases 440 NOVBB8A Q23, chance to win ge, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 9 .5 .8 .8 PROBABLY WIN 2 14 .8 1.2 2.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 39 2.1 3.3 5.3 TOSSUP 4 100 5.4 8.5 13.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 141 7.7 12.0 25.8 PROBABLY LOSE 6 250 13.6 21.3 47.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 623 33.9 53.0 100.0 . 539 29.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 124 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1176 Missing cases 663 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVMD8A Q23, chance to win ge, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 334 18.2 21.1 21.1 PROBABLY WIN 2 384 20.9 24.3 45.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 197 10.7 12.5 57.9 TOSSUP 4 345 18.8 21.8 79.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 170 9.2 10.8 90.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 100 5.4 6.3 96.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 51 2.8 3.2 100.0 . 247 13.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1581 Missing cases 258 NOVRG8A Q23, chance to win ge, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 27 1.5 2.2 2.2 PROBABLY WIN 2 57 3.1 4.5 6.7 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 102 5.5 8.1 14.8 TOSSUP 4 218 11.9 17.4 32.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 223 12.1 17.8 50.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 216 11.7 17.2 67.2 CERTAIN LOSE 7 411 22.3 32.8 100.0 . 502 27.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 83 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1254 Missing cases 585 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVAG8A Q23, chance to win ge, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 10 .5 .8 .8 PROBABLY WIN 2 27 1.5 2.2 3.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 89 4.8 7.2 10.2 TOSSUP 4 191 10.4 15.5 25.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 219 11.9 17.8 43.5 PROBABLY LOSE 6 249 13.5 20.2 63.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 447 24.3 36.3 100.0 . 527 28.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 80 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1232 Missing cases 607 NOVGH8A Q23, chance to win ge, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 7 .4 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 4 .2 .3 .9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 19 1.0 1.6 2.6 TOSSUP 4 42 2.3 3.6 6.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 81 4.4 7.0 13.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 136 7.4 11.7 24.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 874 47.5 75.2 100.0 . 635 34.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1163 Missing cases 676 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVJJ8A Q23, chance to win ge, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 30 1.6 2.5 2.5 PROBABLY WIN 2 59 3.2 4.8 7.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 88 4.8 7.2 14.5 TOSSUP 4 198 10.8 16.3 30.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 222 12.1 18.2 49.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 199 10.8 16.4 65.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 421 22.9 34.6 100.0 . 601 32.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1217 Missing cases 622 NOVPS8A Q23, chance to win ge, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 10 .5 .9 .9 PROBABLY WIN 2 25 1.4 2.2 3.1 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 60 3.3 5.4 8.5 TOSSUP 4 159 8.6 14.2 22.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 199 10.8 17.8 40.6 PROBABLY LOSE 6 221 12.0 19.8 60.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 443 24.1 39.7 100.0 . 663 36.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1117 Missing cases 722 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVGB8A Q23, chance to win ge, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 274 14.9 19.9 19.9 PROBABLY WIN 2 368 20.0 26.7 46.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 192 10.4 13.9 60.4 TOSSUP 4 276 15.0 20.0 80.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 137 7.4 9.9 90.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 59 3.2 4.3 94.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 74 4.0 5.4 100.0 . 447 24.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1380 Missing cases 459 NOVRD8A Q23, chance to win ge, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 54 2.9 4.6 4.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 191 10.4 16.3 20.9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 258 14.0 22.0 42.8 TOSSUP 4 241 13.1 20.5 63.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 145 7.9 12.3 75.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 93 5.1 7.9 83.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 193 10.5 16.4 100.0 . 624 33.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 40 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1175 Missing cases 664 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPD8A Q23, chance to win ge, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .3 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 18 1.0 1.7 2.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 47 2.6 4.4 6.7 TOSSUP 4 105 5.7 9.9 16.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 170 9.2 16.0 32.6 PROBABLY LOSE 6 225 12.2 21.2 53.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 490 26.6 46.2 100.0 . 668 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 110 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 778 NOVAH8A Q23, chance to win ge, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .3 .5 .5 PROBABLY WIN 2 8 .4 .7 1.2 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 21 1.1 1.9 3.1 TOSSUP 4 58 3.2 5.1 8.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 137 7.4 12.1 20.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 222 12.1 19.6 39.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 682 37.1 60.1 100.0 . 654 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 51 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1134 Missing cases 705 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVJK8A Q23, chance to win ge, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 16 .9 1.4 1.4 PROBABLY WIN 2 65 3.5 5.8 7.2 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 78 4.2 7.0 14.2 TOSSUP 4 174 9.5 15.5 29.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 170 9.2 15.2 45.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 207 11.3 18.5 63.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 409 22.2 36.6 100.0 . 653 35.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1119 Missing cases 720 NOVPR8A Q23, chance to win ge, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 16 .9 1.3 1.3 PROBABLY WIN 2 28 1.5 2.2 3.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 55 3.0 4.3 7.8 TOSSUP 4 85 4.6 6.7 14.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 146 7.9 11.4 25.8 PROBABLY LOSE 6 178 9.7 13.9 39.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 769 41.8 60.2 100.0 . 498 27.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 64 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1277 Missing cases 562 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH8A Q24, group member, Teachers Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1252 68.1 83.0 83.0 MEMB ONLY 2 168 9.1 11.1 94.1 ACTIVE MEMB 3 89 4.8 5.9 100.0 . 330 17.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1509 Missing cases 330 BUSORG8A Q24, group member, Bus Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1103 60.0 73.7 73.7 MEMB ONLY 2 275 15.0 18.4 92.1 ACTIVE MEMB 3 118 6.4 7.9 100.0 . 343 18.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1496 Missing cases 343 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN8A Q24, group member, Women's Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1356 73.7 92.6 92.6 MEMB ONLY 2 83 4.5 5.7 98.3 ACTIVE MEMB 3 25 1.4 1.7 100.0 . 375 20.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1464 Missing cases 375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVILR8A Q24, group member, Civil Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1357 73.8 92.1 92.1 MEMB ONLY 2 92 5.0 6.2 98.4 ACTIVE MEMB 3 24 1.3 1.6 100.0 . 366 19.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1473 Missing cases 366 ENVIR8A Q24, group member, Environ Group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1234 67.1 83.3 83.3 MEMB ONLY 2 209 11.4 14.1 97.4 ACTIVE MEMB 3 39 2.1 2.6 100.0 . 357 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1482 Missing cases 357 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPRT8A Q24, group member, Interest Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1218 66.2 82.2 82.2 MEMB ONLY 2 199 10.8 13.4 95.6 ACTIVE MEMB 3 65 3.5 4.4 100.0 . 357 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1482 Missing cases 357 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOR8A Q24, group member, Labor Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1131 61.5 75.8 75.8 MEMB ONLY 2 263 14.3 17.6 93.4 ACTIVE MEMB 3 98 5.3 6.6 100.0 . 347 18.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1492 Missing cases 347 FARM8A Q24, group member, Farm Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1188 64.6 80.9 80.9 MEMB ONLY 2 221 12.0 15.1 96.0 ACTIVE MEMB 3 59 3.2 4.0 100.0 . 371 20.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1468 Missing cases 371 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG8A Q24, group member, Pol Evang Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1322 71.9 90.4 90.4 MEMB ONLY 2 108 5.9 7.4 97.8 ACTIVE MEMB 3 32 1.7 2.2 100.0 . 377 20.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1462 Missing cases 377 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ANTIAB8A Q24, group member, Anti-Abortion Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1284 69.8 86.6 86.6 MEMB ONLY 2 138 7.5 9.3 95.9 ACTIVE MEMB 3 61 3.3 4.1 100.0 . 356 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1483 Missing cases 356 LIBID8A Q24, group member, Liberal Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1349 73.4 92.6 92.6 MEMB ONLY 2 74 4.0 5.1 97.7 ACTIVE MEMB 3 34 1.8 2.3 100.0 . 382 20.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1457 Missing cases 382 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONID8A Q24, group member, Conserv Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1307 71.1 89.6 89.6 MEMB ONLY 2 102 5.5 7.0 96.6 ACTIVE MEMB 3 49 2.7 3.4 100.0 . 381 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1458 Missing cases 381 IMPTGR8A Q25, grp most impt politically Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TEACH 1 113 6.1 9.6 9.6 BUS ORG 2 176 9.6 15.0 24.6 WOMENS GR 3 33 1.8 2.8 27.4 CIVIL RTS 4 45 2.4 3.8 31.2 ENVIRON 5 101 5.5 8.6 39.8 INT GRP 6 96 5.2 8.2 48.0 UNION 7 181 9.8 15.4 63.4 FARM ORG 8 144 7.8 12.3 75.7 EVANG GRP 9 67 3.6 5.7 81.4 ANTI ABORT 10 113 6.1 9.6 91.0 LIBERAL GR 11 45 2.4 3.8 94.8 CONSERV GR 12 61 3.3 5.2 100.0 . 664 36.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1175 Missing cases 664 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYSP8A Q26, party and activity of spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 282 15.3 21.8 21.8 INACT DEM 2 278 15.1 21.5 43.3 ACTIVE REP 3 303 16.5 23.5 66.8 INCAT REP 4 257 14.0 19.9 86.7 ACTIVE INDEP 5 66 3.6 5.1 91.8 INACT INDEP 6 106 5.8 8.2 100.0 . 500 27.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 47 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1292 Missing cases 547 PTYM8A Q26, party and activity of Mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 195 10.6 14.8 14.8 INACT DEM 2 388 21.1 29.5 44.4 ACTIVE REP 3 186 10.1 14.2 58.5 INCAT REP 4 388 21.1 29.5 88.1 ACTIVE INDEP 5 49 2.7 3.7 91.8 INACT INDEP 6 108 5.9 8.2 100.0 . 379 20.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 146 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1314 Missing cases 525 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF8A Q26, party and activity of Father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 234 12.7 18.0 18.0 INACT DEM 2 354 19.2 27.3 45.3 ACTIVE REP 3 220 12.0 16.9 62.2 INCAT REP 4 344 18.7 26.5 88.8 ACTIVE INDEP 5 47 2.6 3.6 92.4 INACT INDEP 6 99 5.4 7.6 100.0 . 404 22.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 137 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1298 Missing cases 541 CANSUP8A Q27, initially supported Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BABBITT 1 49 2.7 3.0 3.0 BUSH 2 270 14.7 16.6 19.6 DOLE 3 176 9.6 10.8 30.5 DUKAKIS 4 286 15.6 17.6 48.1 DUPONT 5 32 1.7 2.0 50.0 GEPHART 6 166 9.0 10.2 60.2 GORE 7 39 2.1 2.4 62.6 HAIG 8 5 .3 .3 63.0 HART 9 16 .9 1.0 63.9 JACKSON 10 131 7.1 8.1 72.0 KEMP 11 97 5.3 6.0 78.0 ROBERTSON 12 159 8.6 9.8 87.8 SIMON 13 139 7.6 8.6 96.3 NONE 14 60 3.3 3.7 100.0 . 214 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1625 Missing cases 214 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBB8A Q28, attended rally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1765 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 74 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDBB8A Q28, fundraising, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBB8A Q28, convince friends, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1791 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 48 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBB8A Q28, canvass, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONBB8A Q28, contribute, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTMD8A Q28, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1673 91.0 91.0 91.0 CHECKED 1 166 9.0 9.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMD8A Q28, fundraising, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1783 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 56 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVMD8A Q28, convince friends, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1610 87.5 87.5 87.5 CHECKED 1 229 12.5 12.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVMD8A Q28, canvass, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1799 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 40 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONMD8A Q28, contribute, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1753 95.3 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 86 4.7 4.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTRG8A Q28, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1710 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 129 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8A Q28, fundraising, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRG8A Q28, convince friends, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1736 94.4 94.4 94.4 CHECKED 1 103 5.6 5.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVRG8A Q28, canvass, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1808 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 31 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG8A Q28, contribute, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 61 3.3 100.0 100.0 NOT CHECKED 0 1778 96.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 61 Missing cases 1778 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAG8A Q28, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1807 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 32 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDAG8A Q28, fundraising, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8A Q28, convince friends, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1801 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 38 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAG8A Q28, canvass, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONAG8A Q28, contribute, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGH8A Q28, attended rally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGH8A Q28, fundraising, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVGH8A Q28, convince friends, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1818 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGH8A Q28, canvass, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONGH8A Q28, contribute, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTJJ8A Q28, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1719 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 120 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJJ8A Q28, fundraising, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1808 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 31 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ8A Q28, convince friends, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1711 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 128 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVJJ8A Q28, canvass, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJJ8A Q28, contribute, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1780 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 59 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS8A Q28, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1725 93.8 93.8 93.8 CHECKED 1 114 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDPS8A Q28, fundraising, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1820 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS8A Q28, convince friends, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1728 94.0 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 111 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS8A Q28, canvass, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 29 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONPS8A Q28, contribute, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1791 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 48 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8A Q28, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1561 84.9 84.9 84.9 CHECKED 1 278 15.1 15.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB8A Q28, fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1759 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 80 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVGB8A Q28, convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1618 88.0 88.0 88.0 CHECKED 1 221 12.0 12.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8A Q28, canvass, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1765 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 74 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONGB8A Q28, contribute, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1708 92.9 92.9 92.9 CHECKED 1 131 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTRD8A Q28, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1694 92.1 92.1 92.1 CHECKED 1 145 7.9 7.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8A Q28, fundraising, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1803 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 36 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD8A Q28, convince friends, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1724 93.7 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 115 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVRD8A Q28, canvass, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1811 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRD8A Q28, contribute, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1771 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 68 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPD8A Q28, attended rally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1792 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 47 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDPD8A Q28, fundraising, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPD8A Q28, convince friends, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1814 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 25 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPD8A Q28, canvass, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1833 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONPD8A Q28, contribute, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAH8A Q28, attended rally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDAH8A Q28, fundraising, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVAH8A Q28, convince friends, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAH8A Q28, canvass, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONAH8A Q28, contribute, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1833 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTJK8A Q28, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1727 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 112 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJK8A Q28, fundraising, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1811 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJK8A Q28, convince friends, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1763 95.9 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 76 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVJK8A Q28, canvass, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJK8A Q28, contribute, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1799 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 40 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPR8A Q28, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1669 90.8 90.8 90.8 CHECKED 1 170 9.2 9.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDPR8A Q28, fundraising, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1796 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 43 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPR8A Q28, convince friends, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1712 93.1 93.1 93.1 CHECKED 1 127 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPR8A Q28, canvass, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1791 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 48 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONPR8A Q28, contribute, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1761 95.8 95.8 95.8 CHECKED 1 78 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE8A Q29, Age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 95 5.2 5.5 5.5 25-29 2 86 4.7 5.0 10.4 30-39 3 313 17.0 18.1 28.5 40-49 4 277 15.1 16.0 44.5 50-59 5 340 18.5 19.6 64.1 60-64 6 184 10.0 10.6 74.7 65+ 7 438 23.8 25.3 100.0 . 106 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1733 Missing cases 106 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX8A Q30, Gender Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 884 48.1 51.1 51.1 FEMALE 2 846 46.0 48.9 100.0 . 109 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1730 Missing cases 109 MARR8A Q31, Married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1303 70.9 76.0 76.0 NO 2 411 22.3 24.0 100.0 . 125 6.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1714 Missing cases 125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL8A Q32, Religion Pref Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 380 20.7 23.2 23.2 JEWISH 2 37 2.0 2.3 25.4 PROTESTANT 3 1057 57.5 64.5 89.9 OTHER 4 35 1.9 2.1 92.1 NO RELIG 5 130 7.1 7.9 100.0 . 200 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1639 Missing cases 200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG8A Q23, born-again Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 534 29.0 31.7 31.7 NO 2 1153 62.7 68.3 100.0 . 152 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1687 Missing cases 152 FUNDAM8A Q34, Fundamentalist Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 376 20.4 23.5 23.5 NO 2 1225 66.6 76.5 100.0 . 238 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1601 Missing cases 238 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL8A Q35, How Religious Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 423 23.0 24.9 24.9 FAIRLY 2 930 50.6 54.8 79.7 NOT VERY 3 240 13.1 14.1 93.8 NOT REL 4 105 5.7 6.2 100.0 . 120 6.5 Missing NOT SURE 5 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1698 Missing cases 141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RACE8A Q36, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 1603 87.2 93.6 93.6 BLACK 2 75 4.1 4.4 98.0 OTHER 3 34 1.8 2.0 100.0 . 127 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1712 Missing cases 127 SCHOOL8A Q37, Schooling Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 1 33 1.8 2.0 2.0 9-11 2 76 4.1 4.6 6.5 12 3 425 23.1 25.4 32.0 13-15 4 422 22.9 25.3 57.2 COLL GRAD 5 401 21.8 24.0 81.3 GRAD SCH 6 313 17.0 18.7 100.0 . 169 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1670 Missing cases 169 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBYOU8A Q38, employment you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SM BUS 1 213 11.6 13.6 13.6 LG BUS 2 396 21.5 25.3 38.9 EDUCATION 3 255 13.9 16.3 55.2 GOVT 4 181 9.8 11.6 66.8 SELFEMP-BUS 5 111 6.0 7.1 73.9 SELFEMP-FARM 6 87 4.7 5.6 79.5 SELFEMP-PROF 7 84 4.6 5.4 84.8 HOUSEWIFE 8 191 10.4 12.2 97.1 STUDENT 9 46 2.5 2.9 100.0 . 275 15.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1564 Missing cases 275 JOBSP8A Q38, employment spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SM BUS 1 187 10.2 15.3 15.3 LG BUS 2 327 17.8 26.7 42.0 EDUCATION 3 154 8.4 12.6 54.6 GOVT 4 130 7.1 10.6 65.2 SELFEMP-BUS 5 85 4.6 7.0 72.2 SELFEMP-FARM 6 83 4.5 6.8 79.0 SELFEMP-PROF 7 49 2.7 4.0 83.0 HOUSEWIFE 8 196 10.7 16.0 99.0 STUDENT 9 12 .7 1.0 100.0 . 616 33.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1223 Missing cases 616 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME8A Q39, Income Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent under $9,999 1 117 6.4 7.0 7.0 $10,000-19,999 2 263 14.3 15.8 22.9 $20,000-29,999 3 338 18.4 20.3 43.2 $30,000-39,999 4 276 15.0 16.6 59.8 $40,000-49,999 5 209 11.4 12.6 72.4 $50,000-59,999 6 171 9.3 10.3 82.7 $60,000-69,999 7 87 4.7 5.2 88.0 $70,000-79,999 8 66 3.6 4.0 91.9 $80,000+ 9 134 7.3 8.1 100.0 . 178 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1661 Missing cases 178 CLASS8A Q40, social class Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UPPER 1 17 .9 1.1 1.1 UPPER MIDDLE 2 335 18.2 21.3 22.4 MIDDLE 3 959 52.1 61.0 83.3 LOWER MIDDLE 4 158 8.6 10.0 93.4 WORKING 5 104 5.7 6.6 100.0 . 118 6.4 Missing OTHER 6 148 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1573 Missing cases 266 DATE8A Q41, Date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 2 .1 .1 .1 4 1 .1 .1 .2 9 1 .1 .1 .2 41 1 .1 .1 .3 318 1 .1 .1 .3 328 1 .1 .1 .4 329 3 .2 .2 .6 330 32 1.7 1.9 2.4 331 13 .7 .8 3.2 401 2 .1 .1 3.3 402 7 .4 .4 3.7 403 2 .1 .1 3.8 404 4 .2 .2 4.1 405 7 .4 .4 4.5 406 1 .1 .1 4.5 407 1 .1 .1 4.6 408 2 .1 .1 4.7 409 2 .1 .1 4.8 410 6 .3 .3 5.2 411 1 .1 .1 5.2 412 1 .1 .1 5.3 413 2 .1 .1 5.4 414 42 2.3 2.4 7.9 415 36 2.0 2.1 10.0 416 10 .5 .6 10.6 417 8 .4 .5 11.0 418 13 .7 .8 11.8 419 6 .3 .3 12.1 420 4 .2 .2 12.4 421 2 .1 .1 12.5 423 2 .1 .1 12.6 424 2 .1 .1 12.7 425 8 .4 .5 13.2 426 4 .2 .2 13.4 427 4 .2 .2 13.6 501 1 .1 .1 13.7 503 1 .1 .1 13.8 504 1 .1 .1 13.8 505 2 .1 .1 13.9 506 23 1.3 1.3 15.3 507 27 1.5 1.6 16.9 508 9 .5 .5 17.4 509 32 1.7 1.9 19.2 510 25 1.4 1.5 20.7 511 9 .5 .5 21.2 512 9 .5 .5 21.7 DATE8A Q41, Date 513 7 .4 .4 22.2 514 5 .3 .3 22.4 515 9 .5 .5 23.0 516 9 .5 .5 23.5 517 10 .5 .6 24.1 518 87 4.7 5.1 29.2 519 53 2.9 3.1 32.2 520 42 2.3 2.4 34.7 521 17 .9 1.0 35.7 522 19 1.0 1.1 36.8 523 24 1.3 1.4 38.2 524 18 1.0 1.0 39.2 525 12 .7 .7 39.9 526 6 .3 .3 40.3 527 3 .2 .2 40.5 529 2 .1 .1 40.6 530 9 .5 .5 41.1 531 14 .8 .8 41.9 532 1 .1 .1 42.0 601 14 .8 .8 42.8 602 4 .2 .2 43.0 603 27 1.5 1.6 44.6 604 28 1.5 1.6 46.2 605 17 .9 1.0 47.2 606 49 2.7 2.9 50.1 607 21 1.1 1.2 51.3 608 18 1.0 1.0 52.4 609 14 .8 .8 53.2 610 10 .5 .6 53.8 611 6 .3 .3 54.1 612 4 .2 .2 54.3 613 5 .3 .3 54.6 614 6 .3 .3 55.0 615 3 .2 .2 55.2 616 3 .2 .2 55.3 617 3 .2 .2 55.5 618 1 .1 .1 55.6 619 2 .1 .1 55.7 620 2 .1 .1 55.8 621 2 .1 .1 55.9 622 2 .1 .1 56.0 623 2 .1 .1 56.2 624 2 .1 .1 56.3 625 5 .3 .3 56.6 626 1 .1 .1 56.6 627 1 .1 .1 56.7 628 1 .1 .1 56.7 701 1 .1 .1 56.8 704 1 .1 .1 56.9 705 3 .2 .2 57.0 DATE8A Q41, Date 706 2 .1 .1 57.1 707 1 .1 .1 57.2 708 2 .1 .1 57.3 709 2 .1 .1 57.4 710 1 .1 .1 57.5 711 49 2.7 2.9 60.3 712 46 2.5 2.7 63.0 713 24 1.3 1.4 64.4 714 52 2.8 3.0 67.5 715 37 2.0 2.2 69.6 716 30 1.6 1.7 71.4 717 12 .7 .7 72.1 718 19 1.0 1.1 73.2 719 12 .7 .7 73.9 720 13 .7 .8 74.6 721 7 .4 .4 75.0 722 6 .3 .3 75.4 723 3 .2 .2 75.6 724 2 .1 .1 75.7 725 6 .3 .3 76.0 726 6 .3 .3 76.4 727 5 .3 .3 76.7 728 1 .1 .1 76.7 729 2 .1 .1 76.9 730 1 .1 .1 76.9 801 3 .2 .2 77.1 802 1 .1 .1 77.1 803 1 .1 .1 77.2 804 1 .1 .1 77.3 805 1 .1 .1 77.3 806 2 .1 .1 77.4 808 36 2.0 2.1 79.5 809 23 1.3 1.3 80.9 810 47 2.6 2.7 83.6 811 33 1.8 1.9 85.5 812 19 1.0 1.1 86.6 813 6 .3 .3 87.0 814 9 .5 .5 87.5 815 15 .8 .9 88.4 816 6 .3 .3 88.7 817 4 .2 .2 89.0 818 4 .2 .2 89.2 819 4 .2 .2 89.4 820 4 .2 .2 89.7 821 3 .2 .2 89.9 822 9 .5 .5 90.4 824 1 .1 .1 90.4 826 1 .1 .1 90.5 827 1 .1 .1 90.6 828 3 .2 .2 90.7 DATE8A Q41, Date 830 2 .1 .1 90.8 831 1 .1 .1 90.9 902 1 .1 .1 91.0 903 1 .1 .1 91.0 909 1 .1 .1 91.1 912 1 .1 .1 91.1 920 4 .2 .2 91.4 921 13 .7 .8 92.1 922 14 .8 .8 92.9 923 17 .9 1.0 93.9 924 12 .7 .7 94.6 925 8 .4 .5 95.1 926 20 1.1 1.2 96.3 927 23 1.3 1.3 97.6 928 8 .4 .5 98.1 929 14 .8 .8 98.9 930 9 .5 .5 99.4 1001 4 .2 .2 99.7 1002 1 .1 .1 99.7 1003 2 .1 .1 99.8 1004 1 .1 .1 99.9 1017 1 .1 .1 99.9 1024 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 124 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1715 Missing cases 124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSPN88A response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 20 1.1 1.1 1.1 YES 1.00 1819 98.9 98.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 **********1988 Post-election Wave********** ATTMD8B Q1, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1653 89.9 89.9 89.9 CHECKED 1 186 10.1 10.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMD8B Q1, fundraising, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1789 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVMD8B Q1, convince friends, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1596 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1 243 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVMD8B Q1, canvass, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1790 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 49 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTMD8B Q1, contribute, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1747 95.0 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 92 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJJ8B Q1, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1768 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 71 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDJJ8B Q1, fundraising, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ8B Q1, convince friends, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1778 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 61 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJJ8B Q1, canvass, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTJJ8B Q1, contribute, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS8B Q1, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1759 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 80 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPS8B Q1, fundraising, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVPS8B Q1, convince friends, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1776 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 63 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS8B Q1, canvass, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPS8B Q1, contribute, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTRG8B Q1, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1737 94.5 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 102 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8B Q1, fundraising, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRG8B Q1, convince friends, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1772 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 67 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVRG8B Q1, canvass, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRG8B Q1, contribute, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAG8B Q1, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1820 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDAG8B Q1, fundraising, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8B Q1, convince friends, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAG8B Q1, canvass, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTAG8B Q1, contribute, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1834 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8B Q1, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1606 87.3 87.3 87.3 CHECKED 1 233 12.7 12.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB8B Q1, fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1771 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 68 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVGB8B Q1, convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1591 86.5 86.5 86.5 CHECKED 1 248 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8B Q1, canvass, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1758 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 81 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGB8B Q1, contribute, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1716 93.3 93.3 93.3 CHECKED 1 123 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTRD8B Q1, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1758 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 81 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8B Q1, fundraising, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD8B Q1, convince friends, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1771 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 68 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVRD8B Q1, canvass, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRD8B Q1, contribute, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1809 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 30 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJK8B Q1, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1732 94.2 94.2 94.2 CHECKED 1 107 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDJK8B Q1, fundraising, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1811 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJK8B Q1, convince friends, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1750 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 89 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJK8B Q1, canvass, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 27 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTJK8B Q1, contribute, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1782 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 57 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPR8B Q1, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1759 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 80 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPR8B Q1, fundraising, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVPR8B Q1, convince friends, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1777 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 62 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPR8B Q1, canvass, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPR8B Q1, contribute, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTBQ8B Q2, attended rally, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1633 88.8 88.8 88.8 CHECKED 1 206 11.2 11.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBQ8B Q2, fundraising, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1765 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 74 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBQ8B Q2, convince friends, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1498 81.5 81.5 81.5 CHECKED 1 341 18.5 18.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVBQ8B Q2, canvass, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1716 93.3 93.3 93.3 CHECKED 1 123 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTBQ8B Q2, contribute, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1685 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 154 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDB8B Q2, attended rally, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1711 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 128 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDDB8B Q2, fundraising, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDB8B Q2, convince friends, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1513 82.3 82.3 82.3 CHECKED 1 326 17.7 17.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDB8B Q2, canvass, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1770 96.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 69 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTDB8B Q2, contribute, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1711 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 128 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDH8B Q2, attended rally, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1773 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 66 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDH8B Q2, fundraising, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVDH8B Q2, convince friends, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1718 93.4 93.4 93.4 CHECKED 1 121 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH8B Q2, canvass, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 29 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTDH8B Q2, contribute, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1780 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 59 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTRH8B Q2, attended rally, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1749 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 90 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRH8B Q2, fundraising, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1799 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 40 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH8B Q2, convince friends, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1704 92.7 92.7 92.7 CHECKED 1 135 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVRH8B Q2, canvass, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1782 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 57 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH8B Q2, contribute, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1747 95.0 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 92 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDL8B Q, attended rally, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1748 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 91 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDDL8B Q2, fundraising, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDL8B Q2, convince friends, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1681 91.4 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 158 8.6 8.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDL8B Q2, canvass, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1802 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 37 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTDL8B Q2, contribute, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1739 94.6 94.6 94.6 CHECKED 1 100 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRL8B Q2, attended rally, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1694 92.1 92.1 92.1 CHECKED 1 145 7.9 7.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRL8B Q2, fundraising, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1777 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 62 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVRL8B Q2, convince friends, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1644 89.4 89.4 89.4 CHECKED 1 195 10.6 10.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRL8B Q2, canvass, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1754 95.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 85 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRL8B Q2, contribute, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1707 92.8 92.8 92.8 CHECKED 1 132 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 VOTE888B Q3, Pres vote in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUSH 1 592 32.2 49.4 49.4 DUKAKIS 2 607 33.0 50.6 100.0 . 623 33.9 Missing OTHER 3 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 640 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VTHR888B Q4, Hse vote in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FOR THE DEMOCRAT 1 604 32.8 50.9 50.9 FOR THE REPUBLICAN 2 583 31.7 49.1 100.0 . 621 33.8 Missing OTHER 3 12 .7 Missing DID NOT VOTE 4 19 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1187 Missing cases 652 PTYID8B Q5, Describe party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 299 16.3 24.4 24.4 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 177 9.6 14.4 38.8 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 129 7.0 10.5 49.3 INDEPENDENT 4 40 2.2 3.3 52.6 INDEPENDENT REP 5 102 5.5 8.3 60.9 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 127 6.9 10.4 71.3 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 352 19.1 28.7 100.0 . 613 33.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1226 Missing cases 613 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS8B Q6, Characterize party involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORKS YEAR AFTER YEA 1 430 23.4 39.3 39.3 WORKS WHEN WORTHWHIL 2 664 36.1 60.7 100.0 . 745 40.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1094 Missing cases 745 LIBCON8B Q7, Describe political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 24 1.3 2.0 2.0 LIBERAL 2 217 11.8 18.2 20.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 154 8.4 12.9 33.2 M-O-R 4 207 11.3 17.4 50.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 203 11.0 17.1 67.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 328 17.8 27.6 95.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 57 3.1 4.8 100.0 . 621 33.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 649 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SWITCH8B Q8, Member another party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 290 15.8 24.1 24.1 NO 2 915 49.8 75.9 100.0 . 634 34.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1205 Missing cases 634 WHEN8B Q8a, year another party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .4 .4 6 1 .1 .4 .7 7 5 .3 1.8 2.5 8 8 .4 2.9 5.4 50 19 1.0 6.9 12.3 51 2 .1 .7 13.0 52 7 .4 2.5 15.5 53 1 .1 .4 15.9 54 1 .1 .4 16.2 55 2 .1 .7 17.0 56 5 .3 1.8 18.8 57 1 .1 .4 19.1 58 3 .2 1.1 20.2 59 2 .1 .7 20.9 60 25 1.4 9.0 30.0 61 1 .1 .4 30.3 62 4 .2 1.4 31.8 63 2 .1 .7 32.5 64 11 .6 4.0 36.5 65 2 .1 .7 37.2 66 3 .2 1.1 38.3 67 1 .1 .4 38.6 68 22 1.2 7.9 46.6 69 1 .1 .4 46.9 70 3 .2 1.1 48.0 71 1 .1 .4 48.4 72 16 .9 5.8 54.2 73 2 .1 .7 54.9 74 2 .1 .7 55.6 75 3 .2 1.1 56.7 76 26 1.4 9.4 66.1 77 2 .1 .7 66.8 78 6 .3 2.2 69.0 79 6 .3 2.2 71.1 80 35 1.9 12.6 83.8 82 2 .1 .7 84.5 84 19 1.0 6.9 91.3 85 1 .1 .4 91.7 86 5 .3 1.8 93.5 87 4 .2 1.4 94.9 88 12 .7 4.3 99.3 89 2 .1 .7 100.0 . 1562 84.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 277 Missing cases 1562 INT88G8B Q9, interest 1988 Pres election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY MUCH INTERESTED 1 805 43.8 66.1 66.1 SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 2 321 17.5 26.4 92.4 NOT MUCH INTERESTED 3 92 5.0 7.6 100.0 . 621 33.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1218 Missing cases 621 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAM888B Q10, general elect. involvmt,1988 Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 492 26.8 41.2 41.2 NO 2 701 38.1 58.8 100.0 . 646 35.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1193 Missing cases 646 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HELPPP8B Q10a, help party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 291 15.8 58.1 58.1 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 163 8.9 32.5 90.6 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 25 1.4 5.0 95.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 22 1.2 4.4 100.0 . 1338 72.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 1338 FRIEND8B Q10b, asked by friend Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 31 1.7 7.8 7.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 105 5.7 26.4 34.2 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 84 4.6 21.1 55.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 178 9.7 44.7 100.0 . 1441 78.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 398 Missing cases 1441 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBER8B Q10c, asked by org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 76 4.1 19.2 19.2 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 97 5.3 24.5 43.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 74 4.0 18.7 62.4 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 149 8.1 37.6 100.0 . 1443 78.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 396 Missing cases 1443 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND8B Q10d, strong support, Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 311 16.9 65.6 65.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 121 6.6 25.5 91.1 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 26 1.4 5.5 96.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 16 .9 3.4 100.0 . 1365 74.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 474 Missing cases 1365 OPPR8B Q10e, strong opposition, Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 310 16.9 66.8 66.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 82 4.5 17.7 84.5 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 30 1.6 6.5 90.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 42 2.3 9.1 100.0 . 1375 74.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 1375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VP8B Q10f, strong support, Vice-Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 115 6.3 26.3 26.3 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 107 5.8 24.4 50.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 106 5.8 24.2 74.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 110 6.0 25.1 100.0 . 1401 76.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1401 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OPVP8B Q10g, strong opposition, Vice-Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 163 8.9 36.8 36.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 71 3.9 16.0 52.8 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 92 5.0 20.8 73.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 117 6.4 26.4 100.0 . 1396 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 443 Missing cases 1396 ISS8B Q10h, issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 394 21.4 79.0 79.0 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 89 4.8 17.8 96.8 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 11 .6 2.2 99.0 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 5 .3 1.0 100.0 . 1340 72.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1340 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXCITE8B Q10i, campaign excitement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 69 3.8 15.8 15.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 113 6.1 25.9 41.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 107 5.8 24.5 66.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 147 8.0 33.7 100.0 . 1403 76.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 436 Missing cases 1403 MIREAS8B Q10a, most important reason Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HELP PARTY 1 117 6.4 20.5 20.5 FRIEND ASKED 2 9 .5 1.6 22.1 ORG ASKED 3 5 .3 .9 23.0 STRONG SUPPORT, PRES 4 120 6.5 21.1 44.0 STRONG OPPOSITION, P 5 89 4.8 15.6 59.6 STRONG SUPPORT, VP C 6 3 .2 .5 60.2 STRONG OPPOSITION, V 7 5 .3 .9 61.1 ISSUES 8 213 11.6 37.4 98.4 CAMPAIGN EXCITEMENT 9 9 .5 1.6 100.0 . 1269 69.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 570 Missing cases 1269 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHIMP8B Q11a, record of achievment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 706 38.4 61.5 61.5 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 386 21.0 33.6 95.1 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 48 2.6 4.2 99.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 8 .4 .7 100.0 . 691 37.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 691 TVIMP8B Q11b, performance on TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 285 15.5 25.5 25.5 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 420 22.8 37.5 63.0 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 280 15.2 25.0 88.0 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 134 7.3 12.0 100.0 . 720 39.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1119 Missing cases 720 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHIMP8B Q11c, moral character Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 820 44.6 71.1 71.1 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 268 14.6 23.2 94.3 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 56 3.0 4.9 99.1 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 10 .5 .9 100.0 . 685 37.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1154 Missing cases 685 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPIMP8B Q11d, foreign policy knowledge Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 620 33.7 54.6 54.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 424 23.1 37.3 91.9 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 87 4.7 7.7 99.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 5 .3 .4 100.0 . 703 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1136 Missing cases 703 PHILAV8B Q11e, represent average voter phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 574 31.2 49.6 49.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 427 23.2 36.9 86.5 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 128 7.0 11.1 97.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 28 1.5 2.4 100.0 . 682 37.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 682 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHILPP8B Q11f, represent pol party phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 329 17.9 29.3 29.3 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 537 29.2 47.8 77.0 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 214 11.6 19.0 96.1 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 44 2.4 3.9 100.0 . 715 38.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1124 Missing cases 715 MIMP8B Q11a, most important to cand success Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RECORD 1 277 15.1 24.2 24.2 TV PERFORMANCE 2 175 9.5 15.3 39.5 MORAL CHARACTER 3 223 12.1 19.5 59.1 FOREIGN POLICY 4 48 2.6 4.2 63.3 AVERAGE VOTER POL PH 5 346 18.8 30.3 93.5 POL PARTY POL PHIL 6 74 4.0 6.5 100.0 . 696 37.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1143 Missing cases 696 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT8B Q12a,opinion, abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 325 17.7 28.8 28.8 FAVOR 2 142 7.7 12.6 41.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 55 3.0 4.9 46.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 56 3.0 5.0 51.2 OPPOSE 6 202 11.0 17.9 69.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 348 18.9 30.9 100.0 . 627 34.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 84 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1128 Missing cases 711 DEFSP8B Q12b,opinion, defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 139 7.6 12.5 12.5 FAVOR 2 191 10.4 17.2 29.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 141 7.7 12.7 42.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 146 7.9 13.1 55.5 OPPOSE 6 268 14.6 24.1 79.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 227 12.3 20.4 100.0 . 629 34.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 98 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1112 Missing cases 727 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT8B Q12c,opinion, affirm. action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 95 5.2 9.4 9.4 FAVOR 2 224 12.2 22.1 31.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 261 14.2 25.7 57.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 160 8.7 15.8 73.0 OPPOSE 6 161 8.8 15.9 88.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 113 6.1 11.1 100.0 . 646 35.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 179 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1014 Missing cases 825 BALBUD8B Q12d,opinion,balanced budget Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 377 20.5 35.5 35.5 FAVOR 2 313 17.0 29.5 65.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 156 8.5 14.7 79.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 68 3.7 6.4 86.1 OPPOSE 6 82 4.5 7.7 93.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 65 3.5 6.1 100.0 . 638 34.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 140 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 778 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLUT8B Q12e,opinion,regs on pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 396 21.5 35.2 35.2 FAVOR 2 399 21.7 35.5 70.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 204 11.1 18.1 88.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 64 3.5 5.7 94.6 OPPOSE 6 42 2.3 3.7 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 19 1.0 1.7 100.0 . 630 34.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 85 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1124 Missing cases 715 CONTRA8B Q12f,opinion,Contra sppt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 126 6.9 13.4 13.4 FAVOR 2 155 8.4 16.5 29.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 125 6.8 13.3 43.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 69 3.8 7.3 50.6 OPPOSE 6 161 8.8 17.1 67.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 303 16.5 32.3 100.0 . 647 35.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 253 13.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 939 Missing cases 900 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARMER8B Q12g,opinion, Farm aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 110 6.0 11.0 11.0 FAVOR 2 195 10.6 19.5 30.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 211 11.5 21.1 51.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 209 11.4 20.9 72.6 OPPOSE 6 167 9.1 16.7 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 106 5.8 10.6 100.0 . 645 35.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 196 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 998 Missing cases 841 TARIFF8B Q12h,opinion,tariffs on for. comp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 196 10.7 19.2 19.2 FAVOR 2 212 11.5 20.7 39.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 200 10.9 19.6 59.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 131 7.1 12.8 72.2 OPPOSE 6 155 8.4 15.2 87.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 129 7.0 12.6 100.0 . 640 34.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 176 9.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1023 Missing cases 816 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SDI8B Q12i,opinion, Strategic Def. Init. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 104 5.7 10.4 10.4 FAVOR 2 130 7.1 12.9 23.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 157 8.5 15.6 38.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 110 6.0 11.0 49.9 OPPOSE 6 204 11.1 20.3 70.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 299 16.3 29.8 100.0 . 632 34.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 203 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1004 Missing cases 835 PRAYER8B Q12j,opinion, prayer in school Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 295 16.0 26.9 26.9 FAVOR 2 255 13.9 23.2 50.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 133 7.2 12.1 62.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 67 3.6 6.1 68.3 OPPOSE 6 124 6.7 11.3 79.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 224 12.2 20.4 100.0 . 625 34.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 116 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1098 Missing cases 741 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ERA8B Q12k,opinion, ERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 266 14.5 25.5 25.5 FAVOR 2 264 14.4 25.3 50.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 161 8.8 15.4 66.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 56 3.0 5.4 71.6 OPPOSE 6 124 6.7 11.9 83.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 172 9.4 16.5 100.0 . 647 35.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 149 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 796 NHI8B Q12l,opinion, NHI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 238 12.9 23.4 23.4 FAVOR 2 258 14.0 25.4 48.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 149 8.1 14.7 63.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 67 3.6 6.6 70.1 OPPOSE 6 143 7.8 14.1 84.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 161 8.8 15.8 100.0 . 630 34.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 193 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1016 Missing cases 823 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NUC8B Q12m,opinion, nuclear power Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 76 4.1 8.1 8.1 FAVOR 2 173 9.4 18.5 26.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 177 9.6 19.0 45.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 135 7.3 14.5 60.1 OPPOSE 6 185 10.1 19.8 80.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 187 10.2 20.0 100.0 . 637 34.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 269 14.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 933 Missing cases 906 MIISS8B Q13, most impt. issue. this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 221 12.0 19.1 19.1 DEFENSE SPENDING 2 128 7.0 11.1 30.2 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3 24 1.3 2.1 32.3 BALANCED BUDGET 4 280 15.2 24.2 56.5 ENVIRON POLLUTION 5 170 9.2 14.7 71.2 CONTRA SUPPORT 6 40 2.2 3.5 74.7 FARMER AID 7 33 1.8 2.9 77.5 TARIFFS 8 71 3.9 6.1 83.7 SDI, STAR WARS 9 55 3.0 4.8 88.4 PRAYER IN SCHOOLS 10 23 1.3 2.0 90.4 ERA AMENDMENT 11 24 1.3 2.1 92.5 NHI 12 65 3.5 5.6 98.1 NUCLEAR POWER 13 22 1.2 1.9 100.0 . 683 37.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1156 Missing cases 683 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCLB8B Q14,pol philosophy of Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 26 1.4 2.5 2.5 LIBERAL 2 211 11.5 20.3 22.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 226 12.3 21.8 44.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 233 12.7 22.4 67.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 180 9.8 17.3 84.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 154 8.4 14.8 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 9 .5 .9 100.0 . 694 37.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 106 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1039 Missing cases 800 LCGB8B Q14,pol philosophy of Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .4 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 26 1.4 2.4 3.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 26 1.4 2.4 5.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 98 5.3 8.9 14.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 237 12.9 21.5 35.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 593 32.2 53.9 89.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 114 6.2 10.4 100.0 . 684 37.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 54 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1101 Missing cases 738 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD8B Q14,pol philosophy of Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 21 1.1 2.1 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 34 1.8 3.3 5.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 145 7.9 14.2 19.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 230 12.5 22.5 42.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 488 26.5 47.7 90.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 102 5.5 10.0 100.0 . 711 38.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 104 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1024 Missing cases 815 LCMD8B Q14,pol philosophy of Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 302 16.4 27.1 27.1 LIBERAL 2 487 26.5 43.6 70.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 196 10.7 17.6 88.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 91 4.9 8.2 96.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 16 .9 1.4 97.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 20 1.1 1.8 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 4 .2 .4 100.0 . 681 37.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 42 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1116 Missing cases 723 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG8B Q14,pol philosophy of Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 48 2.6 5.8 5.8 LIBERAL 2 284 15.4 34.2 40.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 245 13.3 29.5 69.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 177 9.6 21.3 90.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 45 2.4 5.4 96.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 24 1.3 2.9 99.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 8 .4 1.0 100.0 . 757 41.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 251 13.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 831 Missing cases 1008 LCAG8B Q14,pol philosophy of Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 28 1.5 3.6 3.6 LIBERAL 2 173 9.4 22.2 25.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 213 11.6 27.3 53.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 191 10.4 24.5 77.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 113 6.1 14.5 92.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 48 2.6 6.2 98.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 14 .8 1.8 100.0 . 759 41.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 300 16.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 780 Missing cases 1059 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ8B Q14,pol philosophy of Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 630 34.3 59.8 59.8 LIBERAL 2 303 16.5 28.8 88.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 57 3.1 5.4 94.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 29 1.6 2.8 96.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 10 .5 .9 97.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 13 .7 1.2 99.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 11 .6 1.0 100.0 . 715 38.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 71 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 786 LCJK8B Q14,pol philosophy of Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .3 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 9 .5 1.0 1.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 19 1.0 2.1 3.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 68 3.7 7.5 11.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 61 3.3 6.8 18.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 360 19.6 40.0 58.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 378 20.6 42.0 100.0 . 741 40.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 197 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 901 Missing cases 938 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDQ8B Q14,pol philosophy of Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .6 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 15 .8 1.7 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 11 .6 1.2 4.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 66 3.6 7.5 11.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 98 5.3 11.1 22.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 398 21.6 45.1 67.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 283 15.4 32.1 100.0 . 717 39.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 240 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 882 Missing cases 957 LCRR8B Q14,pol philosophy of Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 16 .9 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 22 1.2 2.1 3.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 13 .7 1.2 4.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 37 2.0 3.5 8.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 72 3.9 6.8 15.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 483 26.3 45.6 60.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 416 22.6 39.3 100.0 . 713 38.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1059 Missing cases 780 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPR8B Q14,pol philosophy of Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 14 .8 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 20 1.1 2.2 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 14 .8 1.5 5.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 30 1.6 3.2 8.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 34 1.8 3.7 12.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 215 11.7 23.1 35.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 603 32.8 64.8 100.0 . 723 39.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 186 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 930 Missing cases 909 LCPS8B Q14,pol philosophy of Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 135 7.3 15.6 15.6 LIBERAL 2 340 18.5 39.2 54.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 171 9.3 19.7 74.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 121 6.6 14.0 88.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 41 2.2 4.7 93.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 44 2.4 5.1 98.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 15 .8 1.7 100.0 . 743 40.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 229 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 867 Missing cases 972 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAV8B Q14,pol philosophy of Am Voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 25 1.4 2.3 2.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 118 6.4 10.9 13.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 386 21.0 35.6 49.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 394 21.4 36.3 85.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 147 8.0 13.6 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 10 .5 .9 100.0 . 690 37.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 65 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1084 Missing cases 755 LCST8B Q14,pol philosophy of Am Voter,state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .6 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 69 3.8 6.3 7.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 226 12.3 20.7 28.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 269 14.6 24.6 52.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 300 16.3 27.5 80.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 190 10.3 17.4 97.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 27 1.5 2.5 100.0 . 691 37.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1092 Missing cases 747 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP8B Q14,pol philosophy of Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 14 .8 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 22 1.2 2.0 3.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 16 .9 1.5 4.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 58 3.2 5.4 10.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 228 12.4 21.0 31.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 591 32.1 54.5 85.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 155 8.4 14.3 100.0 . 698 38.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 57 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1084 Missing cases 755 LCDP8B Q14,pol philosophy of Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 127 6.9 11.5 11.5 LIBERAL 2 533 29.0 48.2 59.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 305 16.6 27.6 87.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 89 4.8 8.0 95.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 16 .9 1.4 96.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 27 1.5 2.4 99.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 9 .5 .8 100.0 . 687 37.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 46 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1106 Missing cases 733 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALLB8B Q15,Overall Eval Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 126 6.9 11.8 11.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 435 23.7 40.7 52.5 AVERAGE 3 360 19.6 33.7 86.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 78 4.2 7.3 93.5 POOR 5 70 3.8 6.5 100.0 . 679 36.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 91 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1069 Missing cases 770 EVALGB8B Q15,Overall Eval Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 193 10.5 17.0 17.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 411 22.3 36.2 53.2 AVERAGE 3 321 17.5 28.3 81.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4 115 6.3 10.1 91.5 POOR 5 96 5.2 8.5 100.0 . 675 36.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1136 Missing cases 703 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRD8B Q15,Overall Eval Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 99 5.4 9.0 9.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 497 27.0 45.3 54.3 AVERAGE 3 353 19.2 32.2 86.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 95 5.2 8.7 95.2 POOR 5 53 2.9 4.8 100.0 . 686 37.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1097 Missing cases 742 EVALMD8B Q15,Overall Eval Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 85 4.6 7.4 7.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 357 19.4 31.2 38.6 AVERAGE 3 322 17.5 28.1 66.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 154 8.4 13.5 80.2 POOR 5 226 12.3 19.8 100.0 . 671 36.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1144 Missing cases 695 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRG8B Q15,Overall Eval Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 2.1 4.2 4.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 190 10.3 21.2 25.4 AVERAGE 3 405 22.0 45.2 70.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4 178 9.7 19.9 90.5 POOR 5 85 4.6 9.5 100.0 . 714 38.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 229 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 896 Missing cases 943 EVALAG8B Q15,Overall Eval Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.4 3.1 3.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 151 8.2 17.8 20.9 AVERAGE 3 400 21.8 47.3 68.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 185 10.1 21.9 90.1 POOR 5 84 4.6 9.9 100.0 . 720 39.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 273 14.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 846 Missing cases 993 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJJ8B Q15,Overall Eval Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 109 5.9 10.1 10.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 292 15.9 27.0 37.0 AVERAGE 3 220 12.0 20.3 57.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 169 9.2 15.6 72.9 POOR 5 293 15.9 27.1 100.0 . 699 38.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 57 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1083 Missing cases 756 EVALJK8B Q15,Overall Eval Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 77 4.2 8.1 8.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 271 14.7 28.6 36.7 AVERAGE 3 305 16.6 32.2 69.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4 169 9.2 17.8 86.8 POOR 5 125 6.8 13.2 100.0 . 717 39.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 175 9.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 947 Missing cases 892 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALDQ8B Q15,Overall Eval Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 1.8 3.2 3.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 164 8.9 15.9 19.1 AVERAGE 3 275 15.0 26.7 45.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 209 11.4 20.3 66.1 POOR 5 349 19.0 33.9 100.0 . 693 37.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 116 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1030 Missing cases 809 EVALRR8B Q15,Overall Eval Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 240 13.1 21.3 21.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 285 15.5 25.3 46.7 AVERAGE 3 189 10.3 16.8 63.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 139 7.6 12.4 75.8 POOR 5 272 14.8 24.2 100.0 . 692 37.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1125 Missing cases 714 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPR8B Q15,Overall Eval Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 3.6 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 126 6.9 12.4 19.0 AVERAGE 3 188 10.2 18.5 37.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 195 10.6 19.2 56.7 POOR 5 440 23.9 43.3 100.0 . 701 38.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 122 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1016 Missing cases 823 EVALPS8B Q15,Overall Eval Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 55 3.0 5.9 5.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 266 14.5 28.7 34.6 AVERAGE 3 321 17.5 34.6 69.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 147 8.0 15.9 85.1 POOR 5 138 7.5 14.9 100.0 . 716 38.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 196 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 927 Missing cases 912 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRP8B Q15,Overall Eval Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 69 3.8 6.2 6.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 314 17.1 28.3 34.6 AVERAGE 3 370 20.1 33.4 68.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4 177 9.6 16.0 83.9 POOR 5 178 9.7 16.1 100.0 . 687 37.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1108 Missing cases 731 EVALDP8B Q15,Overall Eval Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 61 3.3 5.5 5.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 225 12.2 20.3 25.7 AVERAGE 3 406 22.1 36.5 62.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 247 13.4 22.2 84.5 POOR 5 172 9.4 15.5 100.0 . 686 37.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 42 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1111 Missing cases 728 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH8B Q16a,opinion,Teacher's Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 145 7.9 12.2 12.2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 297 16.2 25.1 37.3 NEUTRAL 3 310 16.9 26.2 63.5 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 235 12.8 19.8 83.4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 197 10.7 16.6 100.0 . 655 35.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1184 Missing cases 655 BUSORG8B Q16b,opinion,Bus Org. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 129 7.0 10.9 10.9 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 454 24.7 38.5 49.4 NEUTRAL 3 415 22.6 35.2 84.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 143 7.8 12.1 96.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 38 2.1 3.2 100.0 . 660 35.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1179 Missing cases 660 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN8B Q16c,opinion,Women's Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 106 5.8 9.0 9.0 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 280 15.2 23.6 32.6 NEUTRAL 3 296 16.1 25.0 57.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 245 13.3 20.7 78.3 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 257 14.0 21.7 100.0 . 655 35.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1184 Missing cases 655 CIVILR8B Q16d,opinion,Civil Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 127 6.9 10.8 10.8 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 296 16.1 25.2 36.0 NEUTRAL 3 328 17.8 27.9 63.9 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 264 14.4 22.4 86.3 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 161 8.8 13.7 100.0 . 663 36.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1176 Missing cases 663 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR8B Q16e,opinion, Envi. Group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 289 15.7 24.7 24.7 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 392 21.3 33.5 58.2 NEUTRAL 3 328 17.8 28.0 86.2 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 122 6.6 10.4 96.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 40 2.2 3.4 100.0 . 668 36.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1171 Missing cases 668 NONPRT8B Q16f,opinion,Interest Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 261 14.2 22.3 22.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 397 21.6 33.9 56.2 NEUTRAL 3 357 19.4 30.5 86.7 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 107 5.8 9.1 95.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 49 2.7 4.2 100.0 . 668 36.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1171 Missing cases 668 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOR8B Q16g,opinion, Labor Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 113 6.1 9.5 9.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 279 15.2 23.5 33.1 NEUTRAL 3 274 14.9 23.1 56.2 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 333 18.1 28.1 84.2 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 187 10.2 15.8 100.0 . 653 35.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1186 Missing cases 653 FARM8B Q16h,opinion, Farm Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 116 6.3 10.1 10.1 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 381 20.7 33.1 43.2 NEUTRAL 3 463 25.2 40.3 83.5 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 149 8.1 13.0 96.4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 41 2.2 3.6 100.0 . 689 37.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1150 Missing cases 689 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG8B Q16i,opinion,Pol. Evangelical Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 76 4.1 6.5 6.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 148 8.0 12.6 19.0 NEUTRAL 3 199 10.8 16.9 36.0 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 269 14.6 22.9 58.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 484 26.3 41.2 100.0 . 663 36.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1176 Missing cases 663 ANTIAB8B Q16j,opinion, Anti-Abortion Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 206 11.2 17.3 17.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 167 9.1 14.0 31.3 NEUTRAL 3 172 9.4 14.5 45.8 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 228 12.4 19.2 65.0 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 417 22.7 35.0 100.0 . 649 35.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 649 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBID8B Q16k,opinion, Liberal Phil. Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 25 1.4 2.2 2.2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 125 6.8 10.8 13.0 NEUTRAL 3 322 17.5 27.9 40.9 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 267 14.5 23.1 64.0 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 416 22.6 36.0 100.0 . 684 37.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1155 Missing cases 684 CONID8B Q16l,opinion, Conserv. Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 71 3.9 6.2 6.2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 220 12.0 19.1 25.3 NEUTRAL 3 368 20.0 32.0 57.4 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 276 15.0 24.0 81.4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 214 11.6 18.6 100.0 . 690 37.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1149 Missing cases 690 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DP8B Q16m,opinion, Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 225 12.2 19.1 19.1 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 316 17.2 26.8 45.8 NEUTRAL 3 209 11.4 17.7 63.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 239 13.0 20.3 83.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 191 10.4 16.2 100.0 . 659 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1180 Missing cases 659 RP8B Q16n,opinion, Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 232 12.6 19.9 19.9 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 300 16.3 25.7 45.6 NEUTRAL 3 230 12.5 19.7 65.4 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 236 12.8 20.2 85.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 168 9.1 14.4 100.0 . 673 36.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1166 Missing cases 673 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWACT8B Q17,next four years Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE ALWAYS 1 272 14.8 22.5 22.5 ACTIVE ELECTIONS 2 120 6.5 9.9 32.5 ACTIVE ELECTIONS W/I 3 289 15.7 23.9 56.4 NOT ACTIVE 4 129 7.0 10.7 67.1 NOT SURE 5 398 21.6 32.9 100.0 . 631 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1208 Missing cases 631 EVLEXP8B Q18,evaluate nomination exper. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY POSITIVE 1 272 14.8 24.1 24.1 MORE POSITIVE THAN N 2 458 24.9 40.6 64.7 NEUTRAL 3 221 12.0 19.6 84.2 MORE NEGATIVE THAN P 4 145 7.9 12.8 97.1 VERY NEGATIVE 5 33 1.8 2.9 100.0 . 710 38.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1129 Missing cases 710 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE8B Q19, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 44 2.4 3.6 3.6 25-29 2 54 2.9 4.4 8.0 30-39 3 197 10.7 16.1 24.1 40-49 4 180 9.8 14.7 38.9 50-59 5 249 13.5 20.4 59.2 60-64 6 164 8.9 13.4 72.7 65 AND OLDER 7 334 18.2 27.3 100.0 . 617 33.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1222 Missing cases 617 SEX8B Q20, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 639 34.7 52.5 52.5 FEMALE 2 578 31.4 47.5 100.0 . 622 33.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1217 Missing cases 622 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MARR8B Q21, married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARRIED 1 946 51.4 77.8 77.8 DIVORCED 2 64 3.5 5.3 83.1 WIDOWED 3 95 5.2 7.8 90.9 NEVER MARRIED 4 111 6.0 9.1 100.0 . 623 33.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1216 Missing cases 623 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG8B Q22, born again Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 397 21.6 33.5 33.5 NO 2 789 42.9 66.5 100.0 . 653 35.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1186 Missing cases 653 JOBYOU8B Q23, job, you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 428 23.3 37.6 37.6 OWNER/PARTNER 2 177 9.6 15.6 53.2 UPPER-LEVEL MGMT 3 63 3.4 5.5 58.8 MIDDLE-LEVEL MGMT 4 130 7.1 11.4 70.2 SKILLED LABOR 5 150 8.2 13.2 83.4 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 45 2.4 4.0 87.3 OTHER 7 144 7.8 12.7 100.0 . 702 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1137 Missing cases 702 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBSP8B Q23, job, spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 266 14.5 29.1 29.1 OWNER/PARTNER 2 148 8.0 16.2 45.2 UPPER-LEVEL MGMT 3 64 3.5 7.0 52.2 MIDDLE-LEVEL MGMT 4 97 5.3 10.6 62.8 SKILLED LABOR 5 159 8.6 17.4 80.2 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 49 2.7 5.4 85.6 OTHER 7 132 7.2 14.4 100.0 . 924 50.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 915 Missing cases 924 M18B month 1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 351 19.1 28.4 28.4 1 883 48.0 71.6 100.0 . 605 32.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1234 Missing cases 605 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M28B month 2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .1 .1 1 418 22.7 34.1 34.2 2 763 41.5 62.2 96.4 3 40 2.2 3.3 99.7 4 2 .1 .2 99.8 8 1 .1 .1 99.9 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 613 33.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1226 Missing cases 613 D18B day 1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 507 27.6 41.4 41.4 1 259 14.1 21.2 62.6 2 321 17.5 26.2 88.8 3 137 7.4 11.2 100.0 . 615 33.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1224 Missing cases 615 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - D28B day 2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 146 7.9 12.0 12.0 1 145 7.9 11.9 23.8 2 106 5.8 8.7 32.5 3 118 6.4 9.7 42.2 4 89 4.8 7.3 49.5 5 115 6.3 9.4 58.9 6 125 6.8 10.2 69.1 7 89 4.8 7.3 76.4 8 150 8.2 12.3 88.7 9 138 7.5 11.3 100.0 . 618 33.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1221 Missing cases 618 RSPN88B response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 600 32.6 32.6 32.6 YES 1.00 1239 67.4 67.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 **********1992 Post-election Wave********** INT92G2 Q1 Interest in pres campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very interested 1 753 40.9 79.4 79.4 somewhat interested 2 165 9.0 17.4 96.8 not very interested 3 27 1.5 2.8 99.7 not at all intereste 4 3 .2 .3 100.0 . 891 48.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 948 Missing cases 891 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART2 Q2 Participated in nomination race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 395 21.5 41.7 41.7 no 2 552 30.0 58.3 100.0 . 892 48.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 947 Missing cases 892 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTPTY2 Q2 If yes, which party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent dem 1 218 11.9 53.6 53.6 rep 2 189 10.3 46.4 100.0 . 1432 77.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1432 PREF92D Q3 Preferred candidate for 1992 D nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent brown 1 38 2.1 4.8 4.8 clinton 2 285 15.5 36.2 41.0 kerrey 3 27 1.5 3.4 44.5 harkin 4 121 6.6 15.4 59.8 tsongas 5 162 8.8 20.6 80.4 none of the above 6 154 8.4 19.6 100.0 . 1052 57.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 787 Missing cases 1052 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREF92R Q3 Preferred candidate for 1992 R nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent buchanan 1 39 2.1 5.7 5.7 bush 2 399 21.7 57.8 63.5 none of the above 3 252 13.7 36.5 100.0 . 1149 62.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 690 Missing cases 1149 VOTE92 Q4 Vote in 1992 pres election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent bush 1 353 19.2 37.5 37.5 clinton 2 500 27.2 53.1 90.6 perot 3 88 4.8 9.4 100.0 . 887 48.2 Missing other 4 5 .3 Missing did not vote 5 6 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 941 Missing cases 898 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HSEVOT92 Q5 Vote in House election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent dem 1 466 25.3 51.2 51.2 rep 2 444 24.1 48.8 100.0 . 899 48.9 Missing other 3 10 .5 Missing did not vote 4 20 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 910 Missing cases 929 PTYID2 Q6 Describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strong dem 1 253 13.8 26.7 26.7 dem, not so strong 2 153 8.3 16.2 42.9 independent, lean de 3 114 6.2 12.1 55.0 independent 4 28 1.5 3.0 57.9 independent, lean re 5 64 3.5 6.8 64.7 rep, not so strong 6 111 6.0 11.7 76.4 strong rep 7 223 12.1 23.6 100.0 . 890 48.4 Missing other party 8 3 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 946 Missing cases 893 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS2 Q7 Characterize self as someone who Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent work always 1 291 15.8 33.1 33.1 works candidates 2 587 31.9 66.9 100.0 . 961 52.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 878 Missing cases 961 LIBCON2 Q8 Describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 19 1.0 2.1 2.1 lib 2 163 8.9 17.6 19.7 slightly lib 3 146 7.9 15.8 35.5 middle-of-the road 4 180 9.8 19.5 55.0 slightly conservativ 5 148 8.0 16.0 71.0 conservative 6 238 12.9 25.8 96.8 extremely cons 7 30 1.6 3.2 100.0 . 892 48.5 Missing not sure 8 23 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 924 Missing cases 915 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INFL2 Q9 Between now and 1996, most likely to Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent work within dem pty 1 178 9.7 18.7 18.7 work within rep pty 2 198 10.8 20.8 39.5 work within 3rd part 3 21 1.1 2.2 41.7 stay involved, but n 4 260 14.1 27.3 68.9 not be involved in p 5 114 6.2 12.0 80.9 not sure at this tim 6 182 9.9 19.1 100.0 . 886 48.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 953 Missing cases 886 SIGNJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1821 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 18 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 checked 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1767 96.1 96.1 96.1 checked 1 72 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 HMONBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1812 98.5 98.5 98.5 checked 1 27 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1645 89.5 89.5 89.5 checked 1 194 10.5 10.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1812 98.5 98.5 98.5 checked 1 27 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1763 95.9 95.9 95.9 checked 1 76 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LMONBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1833 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 SIGNPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1801 97.9 97.9 97.9 checked 1 38 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1834 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1790 97.3 97.3 97.3 checked 1 49 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 HMONTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1774 96.5 96.5 96.5 checked 1 65 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1820 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1779 96.7 96.7 96.7 checked 1 60 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 checked 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LMONGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1754 95.4 95.4 95.4 checked 1 85 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1806 98.2 98.2 98.2 checked 1 33 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 checked 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1607 87.4 87.4 87.4 checked 1 232 12.6 12.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1801 97.9 97.9 97.9 checked 1 38 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1731 94.1 94.1 94.1 checked 1 108 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 SIGNPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1829 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1820 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 checked 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 HMONRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1779 96.7 96.7 96.7 checked 1 60 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1823 99.1 99.1 99.1 checked 1 16 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LMONBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Bush/Quayl Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1780 96.8 96.8 96.8 checked 1 59 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1810 98.4 98.4 98.4 checked 1 29 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1793 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 46 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1604 87.2 87.2 87.2 checked 1 235 12.8 12.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1808 98.3 98.3 98.3 checked 1 31 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1730 94.1 94.1 94.1 checked 1 109 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 SIGNCG2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONCG2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Clinton/Go Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1751 95.2 95.2 95.2 checked 1 88 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONCG2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1816 98.7 98.7 98.7 checked 1 23 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVCG2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1795 97.6 97.6 97.6 checked 1 44 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVCG2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Clinton/Gor Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1564 85.0 85.0 85.0 checked 1 275 15.0 15.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDCG2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1799 97.8 97.8 97.8 checked 1 40 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTCG2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1723 93.7 93.7 93.7 checked 1 116 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNPS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Perot/Stoc Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 HMONPS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Perot/Stock Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1781 96.8 96.8 96.8 checked 1 58 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDPS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Perot/Stockdal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNDH2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LMONDH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 checked 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONDH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 checked 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVDH2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1750 95.2 95.2 95.2 checked 1 89 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDH2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1817 98.8 98.8 98.8 checked 1 22 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDH2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1793 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 46 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 SIGNRH2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1829 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONRH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1793 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 46 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONRH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1821 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 18 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVRH2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1812 98.5 98.5 98.5 checked 1 27 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1719 93.5 93.5 93.5 checked 1 120 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRH2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1800 97.9 97.9 97.9 checked 1 39 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ATTRH2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1780 96.8 96.8 96.8 checked 1 59 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNDS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONDS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, D state ca Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1792 97.4 97.4 97.4 checked 1 47 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 HMONDS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 checked 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, D state can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1746 94.9 94.9 94.9 checked 1 93 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FUNDDS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1807 98.3 98.3 98.3 checked 1 32 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1793 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 46 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNRS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1823 99.1 99.1 99.1 checked 1 16 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LMONRS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, R state ca Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1794 97.6 97.6 97.6 checked 1 45 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONRS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1821 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 18 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 checked 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVRS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, R state can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1722 93.6 93.6 93.6 checked 1 117 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1798 97.8 97.8 97.8 checked 1 41 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1785 97.1 97.1 97.1 checked 1 54 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CAMPPRD2 Q12 Active in Dem presidential campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 37 2.0 6.1 6.1 fairly active 2 138 7.5 22.7 28.8 not very active 3 171 9.3 28.2 57.0 not active at all 4 261 14.2 43.0 100.0 . 1232 67.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 607 Missing cases 1232 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSEND2 Q12 Active in Dem Senate campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 31 1.7 5.7 5.7 fairly active 2 102 5.5 18.8 24.4 not very active 3 144 7.8 26.5 50.9 not active at all 4 267 14.5 49.1 100.0 . 1295 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 1295 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSED2 Q12 Active in Dem House campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 44 2.4 8.1 8.1 fairly active 2 103 5.6 18.9 27.0 not very active 3 140 7.6 25.7 52.7 not active at all 4 258 14.0 47.3 100.0 . 1294 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1294 CMGOVD2 Q12 Active in Dem Gov campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 34 1.8 6.5 6.5 fairly active 2 105 5.7 20.1 26.6 not very active 3 124 6.7 23.7 50.3 not active at all 4 260 14.1 49.7 100.0 . 1316 71.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 523 Missing cases 1316 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSTD2 Q12 Active in Dem state campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 33 1.8 6.3 6.3 fairly active 2 87 4.7 16.7 23.0 not very active 3 144 7.8 27.6 50.7 not active at all 4 257 14.0 49.3 100.0 . 1318 71.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 521 Missing cases 1318 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLOCD2 Q12 Active in Dem local campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 60 3.3 10.7 10.7 fairly active 2 136 7.4 24.2 34.8 not very active 3 138 7.5 24.5 59.3 not active at all 4 229 12.5 40.7 100.0 . 1276 69.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 563 Missing cases 1276 CAMPPRR2 Q12 Active in Rep presidential campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 43 2.3 8.6 8.6 fairly active 2 103 5.6 20.7 29.3 not very active 3 123 6.7 24.7 54.0 not active at all 4 229 12.5 46.0 100.0 . 1341 72.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 1341 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSENR2 Q12 Active in Rep Senate campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 33 1.8 7.2 7.2 fairly active 2 96 5.2 21.0 28.2 not very active 3 90 4.9 19.7 47.9 not active at all 4 238 12.9 52.1 100.0 . 1382 75.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 457 Missing cases 1382 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSE2 Q12 Active in Rep House campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 58 3.2 12.2 12.2 fairly active 2 98 5.3 20.5 32.7 not very active 3 91 4.9 19.1 51.8 not active at all 4 230 12.5 48.2 100.0 . 1362 74.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 477 Missing cases 1362 CMGOVR2 Q12 Active in Rep Gov campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 45 2.4 9.9 9.9 fairly active 2 76 4.1 16.8 26.7 not very active 3 92 5.0 20.3 47.0 not active at all 4 240 13.1 53.0 100.0 . 1386 75.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 453 Missing cases 1386 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSTR2 Q12 Active in Rep state campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 47 2.6 10.3 10.3 fairly active 2 87 4.7 19.0 29.3 not very active 3 94 5.1 20.5 49.8 not active at all 4 230 12.5 50.2 100.0 . 1381 75.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 458 Missing cases 1381 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLOCR2 Q12 Active in Rep local campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 77 4.2 16.3 16.3 fairly active 2 108 5.9 22.8 39.1 not very active 3 79 4.3 16.7 55.8 not active at all 4 209 11.4 44.2 100.0 . 1366 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 473 Missing cases 1366 MEMBD2 Q13 Member local Dem party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 33 1.8 24.3 24.3 formerly held 2 103 5.6 75.7 100.0 . 1703 92.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 136 Missing cases 1703 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIRD2 Q13 Chair local Dem party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 3 .2 8.6 8.6 formerly held 2 32 1.7 91.4 100.0 . 1804 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 1804 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOCALD2 Q13 Elected local office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 9 .5 31.0 31.0 formerly held 2 20 1.1 69.0 100.0 . 1810 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 29 Missing cases 1810 STNATD2 Q13 Elected state/natl office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent formerly held 2 5 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1834 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 1834 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPTD2 Q13 Appointed govt/pol office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 9 .5 50.0 50.0 formerly held 2 9 .5 50.0 100.0 . 1821 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 1821 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAIDSTD2 Q13 Paid position, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 3 .2 27.3 27.3 formerly held 2 8 .4 72.7 100.0 . 1828 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 1828 DELSTD2 Q13 Delegate to Dem state convention Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 11 .6 14.9 14.9 formerly held 2 63 3.4 85.1 100.0 . 1765 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 74 Missing cases 1765 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBR2 Q13 Member local Rep party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 77 4.2 42.1 42.1 formerly held 2 106 5.8 57.9 100.0 . 1656 90.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 183 Missing cases 1656 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIRR2 Q13 Chair local Rep party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 12 .7 21.8 21.8 formerly held 2 43 2.3 78.2 100.0 . 1784 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 1784 LOCALR2 Q13 Elected local office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 21 1.1 37.5 37.5 formerly held 2 35 1.9 62.5 100.0 . 1783 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 56 Missing cases 1783 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STNATR2 Q13 Elected state/natl office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 4 .2 30.8 30.8 formerly held 2 9 .5 69.2 100.0 . 1826 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1826 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPTR2 Q13 Appointed govt/pol office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 9 .5 30.0 30.0 formerly held 2 21 1.1 70.0 100.0 . 1809 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 1809 PAIDSTR2 Q13 Paid position, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 2 .1 10.0 10.0 formerly held 2 18 1.0 90.0 100.0 . 1819 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1819 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DELSTR2 Q13 Delegate to Rep state convention Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 46 2.5 27.9 27.9 formerly held 2 119 6.5 72.1 100.0 . 1674 91.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 165 Missing cases 1674 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTPR2 Q14a First active in pres campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1477 80.3 80.3 80.3 checked 1 362 19.7 19.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FSTGUB2 Q14a First active in gub campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1796 97.7 97.7 97.7 checked 1 43 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTSEN2 Q14a First active in Sen campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1804 98.1 98.1 98.1 checked 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTHR2 Q14a First active in House campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1755 95.4 95.4 95.4 checked 1 84 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FSTST2 Q14a First active in state leg campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1818 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTLOC2 Q14a First active in local campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1582 86.0 86.0 86.0 checked 1 257 14.0 14.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTDK2 Q14a Cannot recall first activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1728 94.0 94.0 94.0 checked 1 111 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FST92 Q14b Was 1992 first year active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 15 .8 1.8 1.8 no 2 834 45.4 98.2 100.0 . 990 53.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 849 Missing cases 990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAM922 Q15 Involved in pres generl election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 347 18.9 39.2 39.2 no 2 539 29.3 60.8 100.0 . 953 51.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 886 Missing cases 953 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUST2 Q16 Trust government in DC to do right Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent always 1 6 .3 .6 .6 most of the time 2 239 13.0 25.3 25.9 only some of the tim 3 588 32.0 62.2 88.1 never 4 112 6.1 11.9 100.0 . 894 48.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 945 Missing cases 894 GOVRUN2 Q17 In general, government is Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent run by a few 1 723 39.3 79.4 79.4 run for the all peop 2 188 10.2 20.6 100.0 . 928 50.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 911 Missing cases 928 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT2 Q18a Opinion - abortion amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 185 10.1 21.0 21.0 favor 2 92 5.0 10.5 31.5 slightly favor 3 49 2.7 5.6 37.0 slightly oppose 5 33 1.8 3.8 40.8 oppose 6 138 7.5 15.7 56.5 strongly oppose 7 383 20.8 43.5 100.0 . 906 49.3 Missing not sure 4 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 880 Missing cases 959 AFFACT2 Q18a Opinion - affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 96 5.2 11.8 11.8 favor 2 203 11.0 24.9 36.6 slightly favor 3 156 8.5 19.1 55.8 slightly oppose 5 102 5.5 12.5 68.3 oppose 6 133 7.2 16.3 84.6 strongly oppose 7 126 6.9 15.4 100.0 . 912 49.6 Missing not sure 4 111 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 816 Missing cases 1023 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BALBUD2 Q18a Opinion - balanced budget amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 337 18.3 40.9 40.9 favor 2 217 11.8 26.3 67.2 slightly favor 3 98 5.3 11.9 79.1 slightly oppose 5 38 2.1 4.6 83.7 oppose 6 63 3.4 7.6 91.4 strongly oppose 7 71 3.9 8.6 100.0 . 912 49.6 Missing not sure 4 103 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 1015 IMPORT2 Q18a Opinion - limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 225 12.2 27.0 27.0 favor 2 193 10.5 23.2 50.2 slightly favor 3 161 8.8 19.4 69.6 slightly oppose 5 71 3.9 8.5 78.1 oppose 6 117 6.4 14.1 92.2 strongly oppose 7 65 3.5 7.8 100.0 . 909 49.4 Missing not sure 4 98 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 832 Missing cases 1007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHI2 Q18a Opinion - national health insurance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 268 14.6 31.9 31.9 favor 2 181 9.8 21.6 53.5 slightly favor 3 108 5.9 12.9 66.4 slightly oppose 5 38 2.1 4.5 70.9 oppose 6 114 6.2 13.6 84.5 strongly oppose 7 130 7.1 15.5 100.0 . 910 49.5 Missing not sure 4 90 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 839 Missing cases 1000 POLLUT2 Q18a Opinion - gov regulate pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 208 11.3 24.2 24.2 favor 2 271 14.7 31.6 55.8 slightly favor 3 172 9.4 20.0 75.9 slightly oppose 5 54 2.9 6.3 82.2 oppose 6 85 4.6 9.9 92.1 strongly oppose 7 68 3.7 7.9 100.0 . 910 49.5 Missing not sure 4 71 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 858 Missing cases 981 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - USFOR2 Q18a Opinion - decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 121 6.6 14.5 14.5 favor 2 207 11.3 24.8 39.2 slightly favor 3 214 11.6 25.6 64.8 slightly oppose 5 102 5.5 12.2 77.0 oppose 6 147 8.0 17.6 94.6 strongly oppose 7 45 2.4 5.4 100.0 . 911 49.5 Missing not sure 4 92 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 836 Missing cases 1003 TERMLIM2 Q18a Opinion - term limits Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 332 18.1 38.4 38.4 favor 2 192 10.4 22.2 60.6 slightly favor 3 97 5.3 11.2 71.9 slightly oppose 5 41 2.2 4.7 76.6 oppose 6 92 5.0 10.6 87.3 strongly oppose 7 110 6.0 12.7 100.0 . 906 49.3 Missing not sure 4 69 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 864 Missing cases 975 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASTAX2 Q18a Opinion - Federal gas tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 49 2.7 6.1 6.1 favor 2 131 7.1 16.4 22.5 slightly favor 3 154 8.4 19.3 41.8 slightly oppose 5 78 4.2 9.8 51.5 oppose 6 186 10.1 23.3 74.8 strongly oppose 7 202 11.0 25.3 100.0 . 906 49.3 Missing not sure 4 133 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 800 Missing cases 1039 SOCSEC2 Q18a Opinion - increase soc sec tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 239 13.0 28.7 28.7 favor 2 260 14.1 31.3 60.0 slightly favor 3 124 6.7 14.9 74.9 slightly oppose 5 44 2.4 5.3 80.2 oppose 6 82 4.5 9.9 90.0 strongly oppose 7 83 4.5 10.0 100.0 . 912 49.6 Missing not sure 4 95 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 832 Missing cases 1007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOMO2 Q18a Opinion - homosexuals in military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 70 3.8 9.3 9.3 favor 2 152 8.3 20.1 29.4 slightly favor 3 88 4.8 11.6 41.0 slightly oppose 5 41 2.2 5.4 46.4 oppose 6 128 7.0 16.9 63.4 strongly oppose 7 277 15.1 36.6 100.0 . 914 49.7 Missing not sure 4 169 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 756 Missing cases 1083 DEATH2 Q18a Opinion - eliminate death penalty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 88 4.8 10.4 10.4 favor 2 75 4.1 8.8 19.2 slightly favor 3 52 2.8 6.1 25.4 slightly oppose 5 59 3.2 7.0 32.3 oppose 6 219 11.9 25.8 58.1 strongly oppose 7 355 19.3 41.9 100.0 . 905 49.2 Missing not sure 4 86 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 848 Missing cases 991 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS2 Q18b Issue most important to you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 173 9.4 19.8 19.8 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 2 25 1.4 2.9 22.7 BALANCED BUDGET 3 211 11.5 24.1 46.8 IMPORTS 4 56 3.0 6.4 53.2 NATL HEALTH INS 5 237 12.9 27.1 80.3 POLLUTION 6 34 1.8 3.9 84.2 ISOLATIONISM 7 22 1.2 2.5 86.7 TERM LIMITS 8 49 2.7 5.6 92.3 GAS TAX 9 8 .4 .9 93.2 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 10 25 1.4 2.9 96.1 HOMOSEXUALS 11 15 .8 1.7 97.8 DEATH PENALTY 12 19 1.0 2.2 100.0 . 925 50.3 Missing NOT SURE 13 40 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 874 Missing cases 965 LCGB2 Q19 Political philosophy, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 5 .3 .6 .6 lib 2 16 .9 1.9 2.5 slightly lib 3 19 1.0 2.3 4.8 middle-of-the road 4 87 4.7 10.4 15.2 slightly conservativ 5 177 9.6 21.1 36.3 conservative 6 408 22.2 48.7 85.1 extremely cons 7 125 6.8 14.9 100.0 . 935 50.8 Missing not sure 8 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 837 Missing cases 1002 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCBC2 Q19 Political philosophy, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 100 5.4 11.5 11.5 lib 2 305 16.6 35.2 46.7 slightly lib 3 267 14.5 30.8 77.5 middle-of-the road 4 147 8.0 17.0 94.5 slightly conservativ 5 28 1.5 3.2 97.7 conservative 6 16 .9 1.8 99.5 extremely cons 7 4 .2 .5 100.0 . 925 50.3 Missing not sure 8 47 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 867 Missing cases 972 LCHRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 27 1.5 3.7 3.7 lib 2 59 3.2 8.1 11.8 slightly lib 3 82 4.5 11.2 23.0 middle-of-the road 4 145 7.9 19.9 42.9 slightly conservativ 5 126 6.9 17.3 60.2 conservative 6 181 9.8 24.8 85.0 extremely cons 7 109 5.9 15.0 100.0 . 948 51.5 Missing not sure 8 162 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 729 Missing cases 1110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAG2 Q19 Political philosophy, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 170 9.2 20.8 20.8 lib 2 283 15.4 34.6 55.4 slightly lib 3 204 11.1 25.0 80.4 middle-of-the road 4 104 5.7 12.7 93.1 slightly conservativ 5 34 1.8 4.2 97.3 conservative 6 16 .9 2.0 99.3 extremely cons 7 6 .3 .7 100.0 . 963 52.4 Missing not sure 8 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 817 Missing cases 1022 LCDQ2 Q19 Political philosophy, Dan Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 5 .3 .6 .6 lib 2 9 .5 1.2 1.8 slightly lib 3 4 .2 .5 2.3 middle-of-the road 4 35 1.9 4.5 6.8 slightly conservativ 5 52 2.8 6.7 13.5 conservative 6 343 18.7 44.3 57.8 extremely cons 7 327 17.8 42.2 100.0 . 969 52.7 Missing not sure 8 95 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 775 Missing cases 1064 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJS Q19 Political philosophy, James Stockdal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 6 .3 1.6 1.6 lib 2 18 1.0 4.7 6.2 slightly lib 3 19 1.0 4.9 11.2 middle-of-the road 4 63 3.4 16.4 27.5 slightly conservativ 5 58 3.2 15.1 42.6 conservative 6 142 7.7 36.9 79.5 extremely cons 7 79 4.3 20.5 100.0 . 1002 54.5 Missing not sure 8 452 24.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 1454 LCPB2 Q19 Political philosophy, Pat Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 12 .7 1.7 1.7 lib 2 8 .4 1.1 2.8 slightly lib 3 5 .3 .7 3.5 middle-of-the road 4 19 1.0 2.7 6.2 slightly conservativ 5 12 .7 1.7 7.9 conservative 6 89 4.8 12.5 20.4 extremely cons 7 565 30.7 79.6 100.0 . 990 53.8 Missing not sure 8 139 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 710 Missing cases 1129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ2 Q19 Political philosophy, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 427 23.2 54.3 54.3 lib 2 270 14.7 34.4 88.7 slightly lib 3 37 2.0 4.7 93.4 middle-of-the road 4 27 1.5 3.4 96.8 slightly conservativ 5 10 .5 1.3 98.1 conservative 6 9 .5 1.1 99.2 extremely cons 7 6 .3 .8 100.0 . 977 53.1 Missing not sure 8 76 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 786 Missing cases 1053 LCRR2 Q19 Political philosophy, Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 11 .6 1.4 1.4 lib 2 16 .9 2.0 3.4 slightly lib 3 6 .3 .8 4.1 middle-of-the road 4 31 1.7 3.9 8.0 slightly conservativ 5 45 2.4 5.6 13.7 conservative 6 380 20.7 47.7 61.4 extremely cons 7 308 16.7 38.6 100.0 . 970 52.7 Missing not sure 8 72 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 797 Missing cases 1042 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAVAM2 Q19 Political philosophy, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 3 .2 .4 .4 lib 2 33 1.8 4.1 4.4 slightly lib 3 112 6.1 13.8 18.3 middle-of-the road 4 313 17.0 38.6 56.9 slightly conservativ 5 272 14.8 33.6 90.5 conservative 6 75 4.1 9.3 99.8 extremely cons 7 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 960 52.2 Missing not sure 8 69 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 810 Missing cases 1029 LCAVHRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, Avg Perot supp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 15 .8 2.2 2.2 lib 2 33 1.8 4.7 6.9 slightly lib 3 70 3.8 10.1 17.0 middle-of-the road 4 149 8.1 21.4 38.4 slightly conservativ 5 198 10.8 28.4 66.8 conservative 6 177 9.6 25.4 92.2 extremely cons 7 54 2.9 7.8 100.0 . 975 53.0 Missing not sure 8 168 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 696 Missing cases 1143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP2 Q19 Political philosophy, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 146 7.9 17.8 17.8 lib 2 340 18.5 41.5 59.3 slightly lib 3 223 12.1 27.2 86.6 middle-of-the road 4 76 4.1 9.3 95.8 slightly conservativ 5 14 .8 1.7 97.6 conservative 6 16 .9 2.0 99.5 extremely cons 7 4 .2 .5 100.0 . 975 53.0 Missing not sure 8 45 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 819 Missing cases 1020 LCRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 9 .5 1.1 1.1 lib 2 17 .9 2.1 3.2 slightly lib 3 11 .6 1.4 4.6 middle-of-the road 4 24 1.3 3.0 7.6 slightly conservativ 5 180 9.8 22.4 30.0 conservative 6 390 21.2 48.5 78.5 extremely cons 7 173 9.4 21.5 100.0 . 976 53.1 Missing not sure 8 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 804 Missing cases 1035 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDH2 Q19 Political philosophy, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 130 7.1 18.7 18.7 lib 2 237 12.9 34.1 52.7 slightly lib 3 166 9.0 23.9 76.6 middle-of-the road 4 101 5.5 14.5 91.1 slightly conservativ 5 27 1.5 3.9 95.0 conservative 6 30 1.6 4.3 99.3 extremely cons 7 5 .3 .7 100.0 . 1012 55.0 Missing not sure 8 131 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 696 Missing cases 1143 LCRH2 Q19 Political philosophy, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 7 .4 1.0 1.0 lib 2 9 .5 1.2 2.2 slightly lib 3 25 1.4 3.4 5.6 middle-of-the road 4 74 4.0 10.1 15.7 slightly conservativ 5 137 7.4 18.7 34.5 conservative 6 332 18.1 45.4 79.9 extremely cons 7 147 8.0 20.1 100.0 . 994 54.1 Missing not sure 8 114 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 731 Missing cases 1108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACGB2 Q20 Affirm action, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 8 .4 1.1 1.1 favor 2 73 4.0 9.7 10.7 slightly favor 3 140 7.6 18.6 29.3 slightly oppose 5 140 7.6 18.6 47.9 oppose 6 267 14.5 35.4 83.3 strongly oppose 7 126 6.9 16.7 100.0 . 967 52.6 Missing not sure 4 118 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 754 Missing cases 1085 AFACBC2 Q20 Affirm action, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 199 10.8 26.2 26.2 favor 2 362 19.7 47.7 73.9 slightly favor 3 172 9.4 22.7 96.6 slightly oppose 5 13 .7 1.7 98.3 oppose 6 7 .4 .9 99.2 strongly oppose 7 6 .3 .8 100.0 . 965 52.5 Missing not sure 4 115 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 759 Missing cases 1080 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACHRP2 Q20 Affirm action, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 26 1.4 5.6 5.6 favor 2 106 5.8 23.0 28.6 slightly favor 3 98 5.3 21.3 49.9 slightly oppose 5 88 4.8 19.1 69.0 oppose 6 101 5.5 21.9 90.9 strongly oppose 7 42 2.3 9.1 100.0 . 978 53.2 Missing not sure 4 400 21.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 461 Missing cases 1378 AFACAM2 Q20 Affirm action, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 18 1.0 2.8 2.8 favor 2 66 3.6 10.2 12.9 slightly favor 3 184 10.0 28.3 41.2 slightly oppose 5 267 14.5 41.1 82.3 oppose 6 102 5.5 15.7 98.0 strongly oppose 7 13 .7 2.0 100.0 . 978 53.2 Missing not sure 4 211 11.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 650 Missing cases 1189 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACDP2 Q20 Affirm action, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 195 10.6 25.4 25.4 favor 2 363 19.7 47.3 72.8 slightly favor 3 191 10.4 24.9 97.7 slightly oppose 5 8 .4 1.0 98.7 oppose 6 5 .3 .7 99.3 strongly oppose 7 5 .3 .7 100.0 . 980 53.3 Missing not sure 4 92 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 767 Missing cases 1072 AFACRP2 Q20 Affirm action, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 7 .4 .9 .9 favor 2 50 2.7 6.7 7.6 slightly favor 3 117 6.4 15.7 23.3 slightly oppose 5 197 10.7 26.4 49.7 oppose 6 267 14.5 35.8 85.5 strongly oppose 7 108 5.9 14.5 100.0 . 979 53.2 Missing not sure 4 114 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 746 Missing cases 1093 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPGB2 Q20 Foreign imports, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 22 1.2 2.8 2.8 favor 2 73 4.0 9.3 12.1 slightly favor 3 92 5.0 11.7 23.9 slightly oppose 5 120 6.5 15.3 39.2 oppose 6 292 15.9 37.2 76.4 strongly oppose 7 185 10.1 23.6 100.0 . 969 52.7 Missing not sure 4 86 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 784 Missing cases 1055 IMPBC2 Q20 Foreign imports, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 123 6.7 17.1 17.1 favor 2 260 14.1 36.2 53.3 slightly favor 3 235 12.8 32.7 86.1 slightly oppose 5 49 2.7 6.8 92.9 oppose 6 38 2.1 5.3 98.2 strongly oppose 7 13 .7 1.8 100.0 . 955 51.9 Missing not sure 4 166 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 718 Missing cases 1121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPHRP2 Q20 Foreign imports, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 154 8.4 25.5 25.5 favor 2 201 10.9 33.3 58.8 slightly favor 3 123 6.7 20.4 79.1 slightly oppose 5 33 1.8 5.5 84.6 oppose 6 54 2.9 8.9 93.5 strongly oppose 7 39 2.1 6.5 100.0 . 981 53.3 Missing not sure 4 254 13.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 604 Missing cases 1235 IMPAM2 Q20 Foreign imports, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 102 5.5 14.3 14.3 favor 2 284 15.4 39.8 54.1 slightly favor 3 244 13.3 34.2 88.4 slightly oppose 5 53 2.9 7.4 95.8 oppose 6 25 1.4 3.5 99.3 strongly oppose 7 5 .3 .7 100.0 . 975 53.0 Missing not sure 4 151 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 713 Missing cases 1126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPDP2 Q20 Foreign imports, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 145 7.9 20.0 20.0 favor 2 303 16.5 41.7 61.7 slightly favor 3 205 11.1 28.2 89.9 slightly oppose 5 29 1.6 4.0 93.9 oppose 6 34 1.8 4.7 98.6 strongly oppose 7 10 .5 1.4 100.0 . 972 52.9 Missing not sure 4 141 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 726 Missing cases 1113 IMPRP2 Q20 Foreign imports, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 21 1.1 2.9 2.9 favor 2 66 3.6 9.1 12.0 slightly favor 3 106 5.8 14.7 26.7 slightly oppose 5 171 9.3 23.7 50.3 oppose 6 248 13.5 34.3 84.6 strongly oppose 7 111 6.0 15.4 100.0 . 985 53.6 Missing not sure 4 131 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 723 Missing cases 1116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIGB2 Q20 Natl health ins, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 5 .3 .6 .6 favor 2 32 1.7 4.0 4.6 slightly favor 3 67 3.6 8.3 13.0 slightly oppose 5 112 6.1 13.9 26.9 oppose 6 327 17.8 40.7 67.6 strongly oppose 7 260 14.1 32.4 100.0 . 958 52.1 Missing not sure 4 78 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 803 Missing cases 1036 NHIBC2 Q20 Natl health ins, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 375 20.4 43.9 43.9 favor 2 362 19.7 42.3 86.2 slightly favor 3 99 5.4 11.6 97.8 slightly oppose 5 11 .6 1.3 99.1 oppose 6 2 .1 .2 99.3 strongly oppose 7 6 .3 .7 100.0 . 940 51.1 Missing not sure 4 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 855 Missing cases 984 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIHRP2 Q20 Natl health ins, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 60 3.3 11.9 11.9 favor 2 143 7.8 28.4 40.4 slightly favor 3 146 7.9 29.0 69.4 slightly oppose 5 64 3.5 12.7 82.1 oppose 6 65 3.5 12.9 95.0 strongly oppose 7 25 1.4 5.0 100.0 . 973 52.9 Missing not sure 4 363 19.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 1336 NHIAM2 Q20 Natl health ins, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 115 6.3 16.0 16.0 favor 2 275 15.0 38.2 54.2 slightly favor 3 239 13.0 33.2 87.4 slightly oppose 5 56 3.0 7.8 95.1 oppose 6 26 1.4 3.6 98.8 strongly oppose 7 9 .5 1.3 100.0 . 968 52.6 Missing not sure 4 151 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 720 Missing cases 1119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIDP2 Q20 Natl health ins, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 260 14.1 32.9 32.9 favor 2 388 21.1 49.1 81.9 slightly favor 3 122 6.6 15.4 97.3 slightly oppose 5 7 .4 .9 98.2 oppose 6 6 .3 .8 99.0 strongly oppose 7 8 .4 1.0 100.0 . 975 53.0 Missing not sure 4 73 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 791 Missing cases 1048 NHIRP2 Q20 Natl health ins, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 10 .5 1.3 1.3 favor 2 46 2.5 6.2 7.5 slightly favor 3 60 3.3 8.0 15.5 slightly oppose 5 154 8.4 20.6 36.2 oppose 6 321 17.5 43.0 79.2 strongly oppose 7 155 8.4 20.8 100.0 . 979 53.2 Missing not sure 4 114 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 746 Missing cases 1093 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASGB2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 16 .9 2.2 2.2 favor 2 42 2.3 5.8 8.0 slightly favor 3 36 2.0 5.0 12.9 slightly oppose 5 96 5.2 13.2 26.2 oppose 6 331 18.0 45.6 71.8 strongly oppose 7 205 11.1 28.2 100.0 . 973 52.9 Missing not sure 4 140 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 726 Missing cases 1113 GASBC2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 77 4.2 11.7 11.7 favor 2 180 9.8 27.4 39.2 slightly favor 3 209 11.4 31.9 71.0 slightly oppose 5 84 4.6 12.8 83.8 oppose 6 90 4.9 13.7 97.6 strongly oppose 7 16 .9 2.4 100.0 . 957 52.0 Missing not sure 4 226 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 656 Missing cases 1183 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASHRP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 543 29.5 72.4 72.4 favor 2 124 6.7 16.5 88.9 slightly favor 3 43 2.3 5.7 94.7 slightly oppose 5 8 .4 1.1 95.7 oppose 6 17 .9 2.3 98.0 strongly oppose 7 15 .8 2.0 100.0 . 982 53.4 Missing not sure 4 107 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 750 Missing cases 1089 GASAM2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 5 .3 .7 .7 favor 2 20 1.1 2.9 3.6 slightly favor 3 96 5.2 13.8 17.4 slightly oppose 5 188 10.2 27.0 44.4 oppose 6 263 14.3 37.8 82.2 strongly oppose 7 124 6.7 17.8 100.0 . 982 53.4 Missing not sure 4 161 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 696 Missing cases 1143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASDP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 55 3.0 8.9 8.9 favor 2 148 8.0 23.9 32.8 slightly favor 3 196 10.7 31.7 64.5 slightly oppose 5 92 5.0 14.9 79.3 oppose 6 106 5.8 17.1 96.4 strongly oppose 7 22 1.2 3.6 100.0 . 980 53.3 Missing not sure 4 240 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 619 Missing cases 1220 GASRP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 14 .8 2.1 2.1 favor 2 33 1.8 4.9 7.0 slightly favor 3 48 2.6 7.2 14.2 slightly oppose 5 110 6.0 16.5 30.7 oppose 6 320 17.4 47.9 78.6 strongly oppose 7 143 7.8 21.4 100.0 . 991 53.9 Missing not sure 4 180 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 668 Missing cases 1171 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMGB2 Q20 Term limits, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 180 9.8 27.4 27.4 favor 2 170 9.2 25.9 53.3 slightly favor 3 60 3.3 9.1 62.4 slightly oppose 5 39 2.1 5.9 68.3 oppose 6 119 6.5 18.1 86.5 strongly oppose 7 89 4.8 13.5 100.0 . 971 52.8 Missing not sure 4 211 11.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 657 Missing cases 1182 TERMBC2 Q20 Term limits, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 33 1.8 6.0 6.0 favor 2 97 5.3 17.5 23.5 slightly favor 3 87 4.7 15.7 39.2 slightly oppose 5 71 3.9 12.8 52.0 oppose 6 161 8.8 29.1 81.0 strongly oppose 7 105 5.7 19.0 100.0 . 958 52.1 Missing not sure 4 327 17.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 554 Missing cases 1285 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMHRP2 Q20 Term limits, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 205 11.1 39.1 39.1 favor 2 175 9.5 33.4 72.5 slightly favor 3 71 3.9 13.5 86.1 slightly oppose 5 18 1.0 3.4 89.5 oppose 6 31 1.7 5.9 95.4 strongly oppose 7 24 1.3 4.6 100.0 . 982 53.4 Missing not sure 4 333 18.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 1315 TERMAM2 Q20 Term limits, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 168 9.1 23.7 23.7 favor 2 302 16.4 42.6 66.3 slightly favor 3 182 9.9 25.7 92.0 slightly oppose 5 30 1.6 4.2 96.2 oppose 6 19 1.0 2.7 98.9 strongly oppose 7 8 .4 1.1 100.0 . 977 53.1 Missing not sure 4 153 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 709 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMDP2 Q20 Term limits, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 32 1.7 5.4 5.4 favor 2 73 4.0 12.2 17.6 slightly favor 3 75 4.1 12.6 30.2 slightly oppose 5 100 5.4 16.8 46.9 oppose 6 187 10.2 31.3 78.2 strongly oppose 7 130 7.1 21.8 100.0 . 972 52.9 Missing not sure 4 270 14.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 597 Missing cases 1242 TERMRP2 Q20 Term limits, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 90 4.9 15.1 15.1 favor 2 171 9.3 28.6 43.7 slightly favor 3 86 4.7 14.4 58.1 slightly oppose 5 70 3.8 11.7 69.8 oppose 6 109 5.9 18.3 88.1 strongly oppose 7 71 3.9 11.9 100.0 . 979 53.2 Missing not sure 4 263 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 597 Missing cases 1242 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONGB2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 17 .9 1.9 1.9 above average 2 102 5.5 11.4 13.3 average 3 223 12.1 25.0 38.3 below average 4 156 8.5 17.5 55.8 poor 5 394 21.4 44.2 100.0 . 937 51.0 Missing not sure 6 10 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 892 Missing cases 947 ECONBC2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 35 1.9 4.5 4.5 above average 2 286 15.6 36.4 40.9 average 3 233 12.7 29.7 70.6 below average 4 100 5.4 12.7 83.3 poor 5 131 7.1 16.7 100.0 . 927 50.4 Missing not sure 6 127 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 785 Missing cases 1054 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONHRP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 64 3.5 9.1 9.1 above average 2 302 16.4 43.1 52.3 average 3 151 8.2 21.6 73.9 below average 4 79 4.3 11.3 85.1 poor 5 104 5.7 14.9 100.0 . 953 51.8 Missing not sure 6 186 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 700 Missing cases 1139 ECONDP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 24 1.3 3.0 3.0 above average 2 182 9.9 22.6 25.5 average 3 245 13.3 30.4 55.9 below average 4 130 7.1 16.1 72.0 poor 5 226 12.3 28.0 100.0 . 966 52.5 Missing not sure 6 66 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 807 Missing cases 1032 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONRP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 22 1.2 2.7 2.7 above average 2 117 6.4 14.5 17.2 average 3 216 11.7 26.7 43.9 below average 4 185 10.1 22.9 66.8 poor 5 268 14.6 33.2 100.0 . 987 53.7 Missing not sure 6 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 808 Missing cases 1031 CAREGB2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 51 2.8 5.9 5.9 above average 2 127 6.9 14.6 20.4 average 3 210 11.4 24.1 44.5 below average 4 136 7.4 15.6 60.2 poor 5 347 18.9 39.8 100.0 . 938 51.0 Missing not sure 6 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 871 Missing cases 968 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAREBC2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 136 7.4 16.0 16.0 above average 2 299 16.3 35.1 51.1 average 3 248 13.5 29.1 80.2 below average 4 63 3.4 7.4 87.6 poor 5 106 5.8 12.4 100.0 . 920 50.0 Missing not sure 6 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 852 Missing cases 987 CAREHRP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 93 5.1 12.3 12.3 above average 2 248 13.5 32.7 45.0 average 3 218 11.9 28.8 73.7 below average 4 102 5.5 13.5 87.2 poor 5 97 5.3 12.8 100.0 . 945 51.4 Missing not sure 6 136 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 758 Missing cases 1081 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAREDP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 63 3.4 7.5 7.5 above average 2 267 14.5 31.7 39.1 average 3 259 14.1 30.7 69.9 below average 4 98 5.3 11.6 81.5 poor 5 156 8.5 18.5 100.0 . 957 52.0 Missing not sure 6 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 843 Missing cases 996 CARERP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 29 1.6 3.5 3.5 above average 2 111 6.0 13.5 17.1 average 3 210 11.4 25.6 42.7 below average 4 174 9.5 21.2 63.9 poor 5 296 16.1 36.1 100.0 . 982 53.4 Missing not sure 6 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 820 Missing cases 1019 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTGB2 Q21 Trustworthy, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 111 6.0 12.8 12.8 above average 2 152 8.3 17.5 30.2 average 3 205 11.1 23.6 53.8 below average 4 137 7.4 15.7 69.5 poor 5 265 14.4 30.5 100.0 . 936 50.9 Missing not sure 6 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 870 Missing cases 969 TRSTBC2 Q21 Trustworthy, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 49 2.7 5.8 5.8 above average 2 179 9.7 21.1 26.9 average 3 291 15.8 34.4 61.3 below average 4 117 6.4 13.8 75.1 poor 5 211 11.5 24.9 100.0 . 915 49.8 Missing not sure 6 77 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 992 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTHRP2 Q21 Trustworthy, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 51 2.8 7.0 7.0 above average 2 159 8.6 21.8 28.8 average 3 259 14.1 35.6 64.4 below average 4 125 6.8 17.2 81.6 poor 5 134 7.3 18.4 100.0 . 948 51.5 Missing not sure 6 163 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 728 Missing cases 1111 TRSTDP2 Q21 Trustworthy, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 26 1.4 3.2 3.2 above average 2 124 6.7 15.4 18.7 average 3 306 16.6 38.1 56.7 below average 4 132 7.2 16.4 73.1 poor 5 216 11.7 26.9 100.0 . 965 52.5 Missing not sure 6 70 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 804 Missing cases 1035 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTRP2 Q21 Trustworthy, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 30 1.6 3.8 3.8 above average 2 100 5.4 12.5 16.3 average 3 258 14.0 32.3 48.6 below average 4 178 9.7 22.3 70.9 poor 5 232 12.6 29.1 100.0 . 979 53.2 Missing not sure 6 62 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 798 Missing cases 1041 FORNGB2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 229 12.5 25.7 25.7 above average 2 336 18.3 37.8 63.5 average 3 196 10.7 22.0 85.5 below average 4 62 3.4 7.0 92.5 poor 5 67 3.6 7.5 100.0 . 933 50.7 Missing not sure 6 16 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 890 Missing cases 949 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORNBC2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Clint Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 12 .7 2.0 2.0 above average 2 98 5.3 16.0 17.9 average 3 252 13.7 41.1 59.1 below average 4 97 5.3 15.8 74.9 poor 5 154 8.4 25.1 100.0 . 927 50.4 Missing not sure 6 299 16.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 613 Missing cases 1226 FORNHRP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 15 .8 2.8 2.8 above average 2 71 3.9 13.1 15.9 average 3 148 8.0 27.4 43.3 below average 4 123 6.7 22.8 66.1 poor 5 183 10.0 33.9 100.0 . 950 51.7 Missing not sure 6 349 19.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 540 Missing cases 1299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORNDP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, D Par Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 11 .6 1.4 1.4 above average 2 105 5.7 13.8 15.2 average 3 332 18.1 43.5 58.7 below average 4 148 8.0 19.4 78.1 poor 5 167 9.1 21.9 100.0 . 969 52.7 Missing not sure 6 107 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 763 Missing cases 1076 FORNRP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, R Par Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 83 4.5 10.5 10.5 above average 2 222 12.1 28.0 38.5 average 3 325 17.7 41.0 79.5 below average 4 80 4.4 10.1 89.6 poor 5 82 4.5 10.4 100.0 . 975 53.0 Missing not sure 6 72 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 792 Missing cases 1047 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGB2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 53 2.9 6.0 6.0 above average 2 207 11.3 23.6 29.6 average 3 209 11.4 23.8 53.4 below average 4 164 8.9 18.7 72.1 poor 5 245 13.3 27.9 100.0 . 948 51.5 Missing not sure 6 13 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 878 Missing cases 961 EVALBC2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 46 2.5 5.6 5.6 above average 2 295 16.0 35.7 41.3 average 3 229 12.5 27.7 69.0 below average 4 123 6.7 14.9 83.9 poor 5 133 7.2 16.1 100.0 . 932 50.7 Missing not sure 6 81 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 826 Missing cases 1013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALHRP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 25 1.4 3.5 3.5 above average 2 144 7.8 20.0 23.4 average 3 272 14.8 37.7 61.2 below average 4 142 7.7 19.7 80.9 poor 5 138 7.5 19.1 100.0 . 956 52.0 Missing not sure 6 162 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 721 Missing cases 1118 EVALAG2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 57 3.1 7.3 7.3 above average 2 287 15.6 36.7 44.0 average 3 208 11.3 26.6 70.7 below average 4 88 4.8 11.3 81.9 poor 5 141 7.7 18.1 100.0 . 969 52.7 Missing not sure 6 89 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 781 Missing cases 1058 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALDQ2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 34 1.8 4.1 4.1 above average 2 122 6.6 14.6 18.7 average 3 196 10.7 23.5 42.2 below average 4 142 7.7 17.0 59.2 poor 5 341 18.5 40.8 100.0 . 967 52.6 Missing not sure 6 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 835 Missing cases 1004 EVALJS2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 2 .1 .4 .4 above average 2 33 1.8 6.3 6.7 average 3 99 5.4 19.0 25.7 below average 4 137 7.4 26.2 51.9 poor 5 251 13.6 48.1 100.0 . 988 53.7 Missing not sure 6 329 17.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 1317 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPB2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 14 .8 2.0 2.0 above average 2 56 3.0 8.0 10.1 average 3 101 5.5 14.5 24.6 below average 4 110 6.0 15.8 40.4 poor 5 415 22.6 59.6 100.0 . 982 53.4 Missing not sure 6 161 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 696 Missing cases 1143 EVALJJ2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 19 1.0 2.5 2.5 above average 2 81 4.4 10.5 13.0 average 3 158 8.6 20.6 33.6 below average 4 124 6.7 16.1 49.7 poor 5 386 21.0 50.3 100.0 . 978 53.2 Missing not sure 6 93 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 768 Missing cases 1071 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRR2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 99 5.4 12.0 12.0 above average 2 150 8.2 18.2 30.2 average 3 144 7.8 17.5 47.7 below average 4 117 6.4 14.2 61.9 poor 5 314 17.1 38.1 100.0 . 985 53.6 Missing not sure 6 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 1015 EVALDH2 Q21 Overall evaluation, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 40 2.2 5.7 5.7 above average 2 171 9.3 24.3 30.0 average 3 243 13.2 34.5 64.5 below average 4 92 5.0 13.1 77.6 poor 5 158 8.6 22.4 100.0 . 1022 55.6 Missing not sure 6 113 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 704 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRH2 Q21 Overall evaluation, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 72 3.9 10.0 10.0 above average 2 164 8.9 22.8 32.9 average 3 243 13.2 33.8 66.7 below average 4 105 5.7 14.6 81.3 poor 5 134 7.3 18.7 100.0 . 1015 55.2 Missing not sure 6 106 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 718 Missing cases 1121 EVALDP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 27 1.5 3.2 3.2 above average 2 193 10.5 22.7 25.9 average 3 290 15.8 34.1 60.0 below average 4 130 7.1 15.3 75.3 poor 5 210 11.4 24.7 100.0 . 955 51.9 Missing not sure 6 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 850 Missing cases 989 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 31 1.7 3.7 3.7 above average 2 149 8.1 17.8 21.6 average 3 247 13.4 29.6 51.1 below average 4 215 11.7 25.7 76.9 poor 5 193 10.5 23.1 100.0 . 967 52.6 Missing not sure 6 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 835 Missing cases 1004 EVALCNG2 Q21 Overall evaluation, US Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 8 .4 1.0 1.0 above average 2 54 2.9 6.4 7.4 average 3 259 14.1 30.8 38.1 below average 4 243 13.2 28.9 67.0 poor 5 278 15.1 33.0 100.0 . 967 52.6 Missing not sure 6 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 842 Missing cases 997 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALSC2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 15 .8 1.8 1.8 above average 2 136 7.4 16.5 18.4 average 3 303 16.5 36.9 55.2 below average 4 200 10.9 24.3 79.6 poor 5 168 9.1 20.4 100.0 . 965 52.5 Missing not sure 6 52 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 822 Missing cases 1017 EVALBUS2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Business Corp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 10 .5 1.3 1.3 above average 2 101 5.5 12.8 14.1 average 3 324 17.6 41.1 55.1 below average 4 174 9.5 22.1 77.2 poor 5 180 9.8 22.8 100.0 . 972 52.9 Missing not sure 6 78 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 1050 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMIL2 Q21 Overall evaluation, US military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 86 4.7 10.4 10.4 above average 2 290 15.8 35.1 45.5 average 3 294 16.0 35.6 81.1 below average 4 88 4.8 10.7 91.8 poor 5 68 3.7 8.2 100.0 . 965 52.5 Missing not sure 6 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 826 Missing cases 1013 PNECON2 Q22 Nations economy, past 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 168 9.1 18.8 18.8 somewhat worse 2 311 16.9 34.7 53.5 stayed the same 3 208 11.3 23.2 76.7 somewhat better 4 194 10.5 21.7 98.3 much better 5 15 .8 1.7 100.0 . 943 51.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 896 Missing cases 943 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON2 Q22 Nations economy, next 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 52 2.8 6.0 6.0 somewhat worse 2 108 5.9 12.5 18.5 stayed the same 3 194 10.5 22.4 40.9 somewhat better 4 458 24.9 52.9 93.9 much better 5 53 2.9 6.1 100.0 . 974 53.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 865 Missing cases 974 PPECON2 Q22 Family financial, past 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 75 4.1 8.4 8.4 somewhat worse 2 228 12.4 25.5 33.9 stayed the same 3 405 22.0 45.4 79.3 somewhat better 4 152 8.3 17.0 96.3 much better 5 33 1.8 3.7 100.0 . 946 51.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 893 Missing cases 946 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPECON2 Q22 Family financial, next 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 37 2.0 4.3 4.3 somewhat worse 2 115 6.3 13.3 17.6 stayed the same 3 384 20.9 44.3 61.9 somewhat better 4 288 15.7 33.3 95.2 much better 5 42 2.3 4.8 100.0 . 973 52.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 866 Missing cases 973 WIFE2 Q23a Cant be good wife/mother & hold off Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 196 10.7 24.8 24.8 disagree 2 368 20.0 46.6 71.5 agree 4 174 9.5 22.1 93.5 strongly agree 5 51 2.8 6.5 100.0 . 923 50.2 Missing not sure 3 127 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 1050 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEN2 Q23b Men better, emotionally, than women Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 270 14.7 33.4 33.4 disagree 2 356 19.4 44.1 77.5 agree 4 138 7.5 17.1 94.6 strongly agree 5 44 2.4 5.4 100.0 . 929 50.5 Missing not sure 3 102 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 808 Missing cases 1031 DIVGVT2 Q23c Diff parties control Congres/Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 115 6.3 15.6 15.6 disagree 2 365 19.8 49.6 65.2 agree 4 191 10.4 26.0 91.2 strongly agree 5 65 3.5 8.8 100.0 . 931 50.6 Missing not sure 3 172 9.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 736 Missing cases 1103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETJOB2 Q23d I could do better in offc than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 85 4.6 15.3 15.3 disagree 2 175 9.5 31.6 46.9 agree 4 228 12.4 41.2 88.1 strongly agree 5 66 3.6 11.9 100.0 . 948 51.5 Missing not sure 3 337 18.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 554 Missing cases 1285 RIDPTY2 Q23e Get rid of parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 247 13.4 34.5 34.5 disagree 2 347 18.9 48.5 83.1 agree 4 78 4.2 10.9 94.0 strongly agree 5 43 2.3 6.0 100.0 . 928 50.5 Missing not sure 3 196 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 715 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYCONF2 Q23f Parties confuse issues/no choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 96 5.2 12.1 12.1 disagree 2 296 16.1 37.4 49.5 agree 4 322 17.5 40.7 90.2 strongly agree 5 78 4.2 9.8 100.0 . 938 51.0 Missing not sure 3 109 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 792 Missing cases 1047 HUSB2 Q23g Cant be good husband/father & hold Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 254 13.8 30.8 30.8 disagree 2 456 24.8 55.3 86.1 agree 4 92 5.0 11.2 97.2 strongly agree 5 23 1.3 2.8 100.0 . 923 50.2 Missing not sure 3 91 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 825 Missing cases 1014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH2 Q24 Teacher organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 710 38.6 79.7 79.7 formerly a member 2 112 6.1 12.6 92.3 currently a member 3 49 2.7 5.5 97.8 currently active or 4 20 1.1 2.2 100.0 . 948 51.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 891 Missing cases 948 BUSORG2 Q24 Business organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 613 33.3 69.9 69.9 formerly a member 2 124 6.7 14.1 84.0 currently a member 3 100 5.4 11.4 95.4 currently active or 4 40 2.2 4.6 100.0 . 962 52.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 877 Missing cases 962 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VET2 Q24 Veterans groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 689 37.5 78.8 78.8 formerly a member 2 50 2.7 5.7 84.6 currently a member 3 107 5.8 12.2 96.8 currently active or 4 28 1.5 3.2 100.0 . 965 52.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 874 Missing cases 965 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN2 Q18 Womens rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 794 43.2 91.5 91.5 formerly a member 2 38 2.1 4.4 95.9 currently a member 3 32 1.7 3.7 99.5 currently active or 4 4 .2 .5 100.0 . 971 52.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 868 Missing cases 971 CIVILR2 Q24 Civil rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 785 42.7 89.6 89.6 formerly a member 2 50 2.7 5.7 95.3 currently a member 3 32 1.7 3.7 99.0 currently active or 4 9 .5 1.0 100.0 . 963 52.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 876 Missing cases 963 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR2 Q24 Environmental groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 700 38.1 80.4 80.4 formerly a member 2 62 3.4 7.1 87.5 currently a member 3 97 5.3 11.1 98.6 currently active or 4 12 .7 1.4 100.0 . 968 52.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 871 Missing cases 968 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPRT2 Q24 Non-partisan interest groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 704 38.3 79.9 79.9 formerly a member 2 102 5.5 11.6 91.5 currently a member 3 60 3.3 6.8 98.3 currently active or 4 15 .8 1.7 100.0 . 958 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 881 Missing cases 958 LABOR2 Q24 Labor union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 633 34.4 72.3 72.3 formerly a member 2 153 8.3 17.5 89.8 currently a member 3 55 3.0 6.3 96.1 currently active or 4 34 1.8 3.9 100.0 . 964 52.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 875 Missing cases 964 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARM2 Q24 Farm organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 657 35.7 76.5 76.5 formerly a member 2 88 4.8 10.2 86.7 currently a member 3 89 4.8 10.4 97.1 currently active or 4 25 1.4 2.9 100.0 . 980 53.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 859 Missing cases 980 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAN2 Q24 Evangelical group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 805 43.8 92.4 92.4 formerly a member 2 24 1.3 2.8 95.2 currently a member 3 30 1.6 3.4 98.6 currently active or 4 12 .7 1.4 100.0 . 968 52.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 871 Missing cases 968 ANTIAB2 Q24 Anti-abortion group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 771 41.9 88.7 88.7 formerly a member 2 26 1.4 3.0 91.7 currently a member 3 55 3.0 6.3 98.0 currently active or 4 17 .9 2.0 100.0 . 970 52.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 869 Missing cases 970 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBID2 Q24 Liberal ideol group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 805 43.8 92.4 92.4 formerly a member 2 32 1.7 3.7 96.1 currently a member 3 24 1.3 2.8 98.9 currently active or 4 10 .5 1.1 100.0 . 968 52.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 871 Missing cases 968 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONID2 Q24 Conservative ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 807 43.9 92.8 92.8 formerly a member 2 22 1.2 2.5 95.3 currently a member 3 28 1.5 3.2 98.5 currently active or 4 13 .7 1.5 100.0 . 969 52.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 870 Missing cases 969 TCHNEV2 Q25 Teachers org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1106 60.1 60.1 60.1 CHECKED 1 733 39.9 39.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOLD2 Q25 Teachers org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1775 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 64 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPRO2 Q25 Teachers org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 TCHFRD2 Q25 Teachers org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1818 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPD2 Q25 Teachers org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1774 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 65 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHATT2 Q25 Teachers org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1789 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 BUSNEV2 Q25 Business org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1204 65.5 65.5 65.5 CHECKED 1 635 34.5 34.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSOLD2 Q25 Business org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1755 95.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 84 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPRO2 Q25 Business org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 BUSFRD2 Q25 Business org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1814 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 25 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPD2 Q25 Business org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1731 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 108 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSATT2 Q25 Business org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1747 95.0 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 92 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 VETNEV2 Q25 Veterans groups, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1146 62.3 62.3 62.3 CHECKED 1 693 37.7 37.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETOLD2 Q25 Veterans groups, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 97.6 97.6 97.6 CHECKED 1 44 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPRO2 Q25 Veterans groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 VETFRD2 Q25 Veterans groups, tried convince othe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1818 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPD2 Q25 Veterans groups, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1743 94.8 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1 96 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETATT2 Q25 Veterans groups, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1788 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 51 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 WOMNEV2 Q25 Womens rights, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1070 58.2 58.2 58.2 CHECKED 1 769 41.8 41.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOLD2 Q25 Womens rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1811 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPRO2 Q25 Womens rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 WOMFRD2 Q25 Womens rights, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPD2 Q25 Womens rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1814 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 25 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMATT2 Q25 Womens rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1823 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 16 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CIVNEV2 Q25 Civil rights, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 58.5 58.5 58.5 CHECKED 1 763 41.5 41.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVOLD2 Q25 Civil rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1809 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 30 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPRO2 Q25 Civil rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CIVFRD2 Q25 Civil rights, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPD2 Q25 Civil rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1802 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 37 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVATT2 Q25 Civil rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ENVNEV2 Q25 Enviro groups, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1142 62.1 62.1 62.1 CHECKED 1 697 37.9 37.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVOLD2 Q25 Enviro groups, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1797 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 42 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPRO2 Q25 Enviro groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1834 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ENVFRD2 Q25 Enviro groups, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPD2 Q25 Enviro groups, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1749 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 90 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVATT2 Q25 Enviro groups, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1803 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 36 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 INTNEV2 Q25 Non-partisan, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1142 62.1 62.1 62.1 CHECKED 1 697 37.9 37.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOLD2 Q25 Non-partisan, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1766 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 73 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPRO2 Q25 Non-partisan, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 INTFRD2 Q25 Non-partisan, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPD2 Q25 Non-partisan, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1781 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 58 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTATT2 Q25 Non-partisan, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1803 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 36 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LABNEV2 Q25 Labor union, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1158 63.0 63.0 63.0 CHECKED 1 681 37.0 37.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOLD2 Q25 Labor union, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1763 95.9 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 76 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPRO2 Q25 Labor union, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1821 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 18 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LABFRD2 Q25 Labor union, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1821 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 18 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPD2 Q25 Labor union, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1759 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 80 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABATT2 Q25 Labor union, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1783 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 56 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FRMNEV2 Q25 Farm org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1161 63.1 63.1 63.1 CHECKED 1 678 36.9 36.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMOLD2 Q25 Farm org, active but not in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1774 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 65 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPRO2 Q25 Farm org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FRMFRD2 Q25 Farm org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPD2 Q25 Farm org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1748 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 91 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMATT2 Q25 Farm org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1796 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 43 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 JESNEV2 Q25 Evangelical group, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1073 58.3 58.3 58.3 CHECKED 1 766 41.7 41.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOLD2 Q25 Evangelical group, not active in las Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 27 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPRO2 Q25 Evangelical group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 JESFRD2 Q25 Evangelical group, tried convince ot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 10 .5 .5 99.9 4 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPD2 Q25 Evangelical group, paid membership d Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1815 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 24 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESATT2 Q25 Evangelical group, attend group meet Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1823 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 16 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ABNEV2 Q25 Anti-abortion, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1098 59.7 59.7 59.7 CHECKED 1 741 40.3 40.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOLD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1806 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 33 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPRO2 Q25 Anti-abortion, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1815 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 24 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ABFRD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1798 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 41 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABATT2 Q25 Anti-abortion, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LIBNEV2 Q25 Liberal ideol, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1060 57.6 57.6 57.6 CHECKED 1 779 42.4 42.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBOLD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPRO2 Q25 Liberal ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LIBFRD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 29 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBATT2 Q25 Liberal ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONNEV2 Q25 Cons ideol, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1058 57.5 57.5 57.5 CHECKED 1 781 42.5 42.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOLD2 Q25 Cons ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1814 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 25 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPRO2 Q25 Cons ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1834 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONFRD2 Q25 Cons ideol, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPD2 Q25 Cons ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONATT2 Q25 Cons ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 AGE2 Q26 What is your age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 13 .7 1.4 1.4 25-29 2 24 1.3 2.5 3.9 30-39 3 97 5.3 10.2 14.1 40-49 4 163 8.9 17.2 31.4 50-59 5 171 9.3 18.1 49.4 60-64 6 115 6.3 12.1 61.6 65 and older 7 364 19.8 38.4 100.0 . 892 48.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 947 Missing cases 892 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX2 Q27 What is your sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent male 1 494 26.9 52.4 52.4 female 2 448 24.4 47.6 100.0 . 897 48.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 942 Missing cases 897 HOWREL2 Q28 How religious do you consider yourse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very religious 1 207 11.3 22.2 22.2 fairly religious 2 527 28.7 56.6 78.8 not very religious 3 140 7.6 15.0 93.9 not religious at all 4 57 3.1 6.1 100.0 . 899 48.9 Missing not sure 5 9 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 931 Missing cases 908 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME2 Q29 Approximate family income last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent under 9999 1 53 2.9 5.8 5.8 10000-19999 2 120 6.5 13.1 18.9 20000-29999 3 168 9.1 18.4 37.3 30000-39999 4 169 9.2 18.5 55.7 40000-49999 5 116 6.3 12.7 68.4 50000-59999 6 78 4.2 8.5 76.9 60000-69999 7 57 3.1 6.2 83.2 70000-79999 8 39 2.1 4.3 87.4 80000-89999 9 24 1.3 2.6 90.1 90000-99999 10 25 1.4 2.7 92.8 over 100000 11 66 3.6 7.2 100.0 . 924 50.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 915 Missing cases 924 CHILD2 Q30 Children under 12 yrs at home Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 123 6.7 13.2 13.2 no 2 806 43.8 86.8 100.0 . 910 49.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 929 Missing cases 910 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL2 Q31 How much formal schooling completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 1 21 1.1 2.3 2.3 9-11 2 41 2.2 4.5 6.7 12 3 218 11.9 23.7 30.5 13-15 4 219 11.9 23.8 54.3 college graduate 5 228 12.4 24.8 79.1 graduate school 6 192 10.4 20.9 100.0 . 920 50.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 919 Missing cases 920 RACE2 Q32 What is your race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent white 1 898 48.8 95.7 95.7 black 2 30 1.6 3.2 98.9 hispanic 3 4 .2 .4 99.4 native american 4 1 .1 .1 99.5 asian american 5 1 .1 .1 99.6 other 6 4 .2 .4 100.0 . 901 49.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 938 Missing cases 901 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL2 Q33 What is your religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent catholic 1 214 11.6 23.4 23.4 jewish 2 20 1.1 2.2 25.6 protestant 3 575 31.3 63.0 88.6 no religious prefere 4 74 4.0 8.1 96.7 other 5 30 1.6 3.3 100.0 . 926 50.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 913 Missing cases 926 MILDUTY2 Q34 Served active military duty-at least Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 237 12.9 25.7 25.7 no 2 686 37.3 74.3 100.0 . 916 49.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 923 Missing cases 916 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH2 Q35 month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 17 .9 1.9 1.9 2 7 .4 .8 2.7 3 7 .4 .8 3.5 4 2 .1 .2 3.7 9 2 .1 .2 3.9 10 3 .2 .3 4.2 11 720 39.2 80.4 84.6 12 136 7.4 15.2 99.8 17 1 .1 .1 99.9 19 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 943 51.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 896 Missing cases 943 DAY2 Q35 day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .1 .1 1 10 .5 1.1 1.2 2 9 .5 1.0 2.2 3 1 .1 .1 2.3 4 4 .2 .4 2.8 5 7 .4 .8 3.6 6 20 1.1 2.2 5.8 7 135 7.3 15.1 20.9 8 73 4.0 8.2 29.1 9 119 6.5 13.3 42.3 10 83 4.5 9.3 51.6 11 49 2.7 5.5 57.1 12 55 3.0 6.1 63.2 13 39 2.1 4.4 67.6 14 32 1.7 3.6 71.2 15 33 1.8 3.7 74.9 16 46 2.5 5.1 80.0 17 32 1.7 3.6 83.6 18 34 1.8 3.8 87.4 19 15 .8 1.7 89.1 20 17 .9 1.9 90.9 21 17 .9 1.9 92.8 22 12 .7 1.3 94.2 23 12 .7 1.3 95.5 24 13 .7 1.5 97.0 25 1 .1 .1 97.1 26 4 .2 .4 97.5 27 5 .3 .6 98.1 28 2 .1 .2 98.3 29 8 .4 .9 99.2 30 5 .3 .6 99.8 31 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 944 51.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 895 Missing cases 944 RSPN92 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 884 48.1 48.1 48.1 YES 1.00 955 51.9 51.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 **********1994 Post-election Wave********** INT94 Q1 Interest in Hse campaign this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY INTERESTED 1 569 30.9 65.8 65.8 2 218 11.9 25.2 91.0 3 69 3.8 8.0 99.0 NOT AT ALL INTERESTE 4 9 .5 1.0 100.0 . 974 53.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 865 Missing cases 974 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HSEVOT94 Q2 Vote in the Hse race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 403 21.9 48.1 48.1 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 424 23.1 50.7 98.8 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 10 .5 1.2 100.0 . 979 53.2 Missing DID NOT VOTE 4 23 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 837 Missing cases 1002 VOTE9294 Q3 Vote in the 1992 presidential electio Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GEORGE BUSH 1 355 19.3 41.6 41.6 BILL CLINTON 2 434 23.6 50.8 92.4 H. ROSS PEROT 3 65 3.5 7.6 100.0 . 974 53.0 Missing OTHER 4 8 .4 Missing DID NOT VOTE 5 3 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 854 Missing cases 985 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPBC94 Q4 Approve/disapprove of Clinton handlin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 58 3.2 6.9 6.9 2 285 15.5 34.1 41.0 3 111 6.0 13.3 54.3 4 172 9.4 20.6 74.9 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 5 210 11.4 25.1 100.0 . 973 52.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 836 Missing cases 1003 PTYID94 Q5 Party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strong democrat 1 202 11.0 23.5 23.5 weak democrat 2 137 7.4 15.9 39.5 leaning democrat 3 88 4.8 10.2 49.7 independent 4 25 1.4 2.9 52.6 leaning republican 5 66 3.6 7.7 60.3 weak republican 6 113 6.1 13.2 73.5 strong republican 7 228 12.4 26.5 100.0 . 974 53.0 Missing not sure 8 6 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 859 Missing cases 980 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS94 Q6 Characterize self as someone who Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED IN YEAR AFT 1 565 30.7 66.9 66.9 INVOLVED ONLY WHEN T 2 280 15.2 33.1 100.0 . 994 54.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 845 Missing cases 994 TRUST94 Q7 Trust govt in DC to do right Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 7 .4 .8 .8 MOST OF THE TIME 2 181 9.8 21.0 21.8 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 545 29.6 63.2 84.9 ALMOST NEVER 4 130 7.1 15.1 100.0 . 976 53.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 863 Missing cases 976 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBCON94 Q8 Political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .6 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 127 6.9 15.0 16.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 127 6.9 15.0 31.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 150 8.2 17.7 49.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 121 6.6 14.3 63.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 250 13.6 29.6 92.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 44 2.4 5.2 98.1 9 16 .9 1.9 100.0 . 978 53.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 846 Missing cases 993 CMHSED94 Q9 Active in Dem hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 29 1.6 4.9 4.9 2 132 7.2 22.2 27.1 3 142 7.7 23.9 50.9 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 292 15.9 49.1 100.0 . 1244 67.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 595 Missing cases 1244 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSER94 Q9 Active in Rep hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 44 2.4 7.3 7.3 2 139 7.6 23.0 30.3 3 146 7.9 24.2 54.5 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 275 15.0 45.5 100.0 . 1235 67.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 604 Missing cases 1235 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSEI94 Q9 Active in Ind hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 2 .1 .7 .7 2 5 .3 1.7 2.3 3 16 .9 5.3 7.6 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 280 15.2 92.4 100.0 . 1536 83.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 303 Missing cases 1536 DHNOM94 Q10 Vote for party hse nomination, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTED FOR THE NOMINA 1 205 11.1 84.7 84.7 VOTED FOR ANOTHER CA 2 37 2.0 15.3 100.0 . 1413 76.8 Missing DID NOT VOTE 3 103 5.6 Missing NO NOMINATION CONTES 4 81 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 242 Missing cases 1597 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RHNOM94 Q10 Vote for party hse nomination, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTED FOR THE NOMINA 1 225 12.2 83.0 83.0 VOTED FOR ANOTHER CA 2 46 2.5 17.0 100.0 . 1379 75.0 Missing DID NOT VOTE 3 92 5.0 Missing NO NOMINATION CONTES 4 97 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 271 Missing cases 1568 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FMEMR94 Q11 Formerly member local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1719 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 120 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CMEMR94 Q11 Currently member local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 27 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FMEMD94 Q11 Formerly member local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1799 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 40 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMEMD94 Q11 Currently member local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FCHRR94 Q11 Formerly chair local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCHRR94 Q11 Currently chair local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1748 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 91 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCHRD94 Q11 Formerly chair local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CCHRD94 Q11 Currently chair local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1807 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 32 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FLCLR94 Q11 Formerly other local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1820 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLCLR94 Q11 Currently other local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FLCLD94 Q11 Formerly other local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1749 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 90 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLCLD94 Q11 Currently other local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCDR94 Q11 Formerly cong dist party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1817 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CCDR94 Q11 Currently cong dist party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCDD94 Q11 Formerly cong dist party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1833 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCDD94 Q11 Currently cong dist party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1803 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 36 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FCCR94 Q11 Formerly state central comm, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCCR94 Q11 Currently state central comm, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCCD94 Q11 Formerly state central comm, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CCCD94 Q11 Currenty state central comm, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH94 Q12 Canvassing, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1802 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 37 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVDH94 Q12 Tried to convince friemds, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1647 89.6 89.6 89.6 CHECKED 1 192 10.4 10.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDH94 Q12 Contributed money, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1717 93.4 93.4 93.4 CHECKED 1 122 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH94 Q12 Other activity, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1778 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 61 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVRH94 Q12 Canvassing, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1788 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 51 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH94 Q12 Tried to convince friends, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1629 88.6 88.6 88.6 CHECKED 1 210 11.4 11.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONRH94 Q12 Contributed money, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1692 92.0 92.0 92.0 CHECKED 1 147 8.0 8.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRH94 Q12 Other activity, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1738 94.5 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 101 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVIH94 Q12 Canvassing, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CLRKIH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVIH94 Q12 Tried to convince friends, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONIH94 Q12 Contributed money, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 OTHRIH94 Q12 Other activity, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SENGUB94 Q13 A Sen or gub race in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 762 41.4 94.2 94.2 NO 2 47 2.6 5.8 100.0 . 1030 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 809 Missing cases 1030 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SENVOT94 S1 Vote in Senate election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 256 13.9 48.6 48.6 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 250 13.6 47.4 96.0 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 21 1.1 4.0 100.0 . 1293 70.3 Missing DID NOT VOTE 4 19 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 1312 CANVDS94 S2 Canvassing, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDS94 S2 Clerical/office, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1834 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1718 93.4 93.4 93.4 CHECKED 1 121 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONDS94 S2 Contributed money, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1789 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDS94 S2 Other activity, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1803 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 36 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS94 S2 Canvassing, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 29 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CLRKRS94 S2 Clerical/office, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1696 92.2 92.2 92.2 1 143 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRS94 S2 Contributed money, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1751 95.2 95.2 95.2 1 88 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 OTHRRS94 S2 Other activity, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1773 96.4 96.4 96.4 1 66 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVIS94 S2 Canvassing, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKIS94 S2 Clerical/office, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVIS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONIS94 S2 Contributed money, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1833 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRIS94 S2 Other activity, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ARMDS94 S3 Gun control, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 112 6.1 29.8 29.8 2 164 8.9 43.6 73.4 3 41 2.2 10.9 84.3 4 16 .9 4.3 88.6 5 16 .9 4.3 92.8 6 13 .7 3.5 96.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 14 .8 3.7 100.0 . 1397 76.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 66 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 376 Missing cases 1463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMRS94 S3 Gun control, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 .6 3.2 3.2 2 21 1.1 6.1 9.2 3 23 1.3 6.6 15.9 4 16 .9 4.6 20.5 5 23 1.3 6.6 27.1 6 112 6.1 32.3 59.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 141 7.7 40.6 100.0 . 1437 78.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 55 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 347 Missing cases 1492 NHIDS94 S3 Natl health ins, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 123 6.7 30.8 30.8 2 183 10.0 45.8 76.5 3 47 2.6 11.8 88.3 4 13 .7 3.3 91.5 5 7 .4 1.8 93.3 6 10 .5 2.5 95.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 17 .9 4.3 100.0 . 1391 75.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 400 Missing cases 1439 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRS94 S3 Natl health ins, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 8 .4 2.3 2.3 2 21 1.1 6.0 8.3 3 18 1.0 5.1 13.4 4 12 .7 3.4 16.8 5 24 1.3 6.8 23.6 6 117 6.4 33.3 57.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 151 8.2 43.0 100.0 . 1438 78.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 50 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 351 Missing cases 1488 DEFDS94 S3 Reduce deficit/up tax, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 60 3.3 17.2 17.2 2 105 5.7 30.1 47.3 3 68 3.7 19.5 66.8 4 31 1.7 8.9 75.6 5 23 1.3 6.6 82.2 6 40 2.2 11.5 93.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 22 1.2 6.3 100.0 . 1415 76.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 75 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 349 Missing cases 1490 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRS94 S3 Reduce deficit/up tax, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 34 1.8 11.1 11.1 2 55 3.0 17.9 29.0 3 38 2.1 12.4 41.4 4 21 1.1 6.8 48.2 5 28 1.5 9.1 57.3 6 61 3.3 19.9 77.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 70 3.8 22.8 100.0 . 1448 78.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 84 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 307 Missing cases 1532 GOV94 S4 Was there also a governors race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 475 25.8 78.5 78.5 NO 2 130 7.1 21.5 100.0 . 1234 67.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 605 Missing cases 1234 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GUBVOT94 G1 Vote in gubernatorial election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 322 17.5 47.1 47.1 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 359 19.5 52.5 99.6 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 3 .2 .4 100.0 . 1137 61.8 Missing DID NOT VOTE 4 18 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 684 Missing cases 1155 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDG94 G2 Canvassing, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CLRKDG94 G2 Clerical/office, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1649 89.7 89.7 89.7 CHECKED 1 190 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDG94 G2 Contributed money, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1750 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 89 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 OTHRDG94 G2 Other activity, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1772 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 67 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRG94 G2 Canvassing, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 29 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRG94 G2 Clerical/office, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONVRG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1661 90.3 90.3 90.3 CHECKED 1 178 9.7 9.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG94 G2 Contributed money, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1735 94.3 94.3 94.3 CHECKED 1 104 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRG94 G2 Other activity, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1768 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 71 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CANVIG94 G2 Canvassing, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKIG94 G2 Clerical/office, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVIG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Ind gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MONIG94 G2 Contributed money, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRIG94 G2 Other activity, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDG94 G3 Position-gun control, Dem gubernatori Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 141 7.7 28.5 28.5 2 230 12.5 46.5 74.9 3 58 3.2 11.7 86.7 4 23 1.3 4.6 91.3 5 9 .5 1.8 93.1 6 17 .9 3.4 96.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 17 .9 3.4 100.0 . 1261 68.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 83 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 495 Missing cases 1344 ARMRG94 G3 Position-gun control, Rep gubernatori Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 27 1.5 5.7 5.7 2 63 3.4 13.3 18.9 3 30 1.6 6.3 25.3 4 46 2.5 9.7 34.9 5 49 2.7 10.3 45.3 6 143 7.8 30.1 75.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 117 6.4 24.6 100.0 . 1298 70.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 66 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 475 Missing cases 1364 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAXDG94 G3 Position-tax concessions, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 33 1.8 7.6 7.6 2 148 8.0 34.0 41.6 3 106 5.8 24.4 66.0 4 56 3.0 12.9 78.9 5 37 2.0 8.5 87.4 6 36 2.0 8.3 95.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 19 1.0 4.4 100.0 . 1288 70.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 116 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 435 Missing cases 1404 TAXRG94 G3 Position-tax concessions, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 173 9.4 35.5 35.5 2 210 11.4 43.0 78.5 3 53 2.9 10.9 89.3 4 21 1.1 4.3 93.6 5 10 .5 2.0 95.7 6 9 .5 1.8 97.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 12 .7 2.5 100.0 . 1295 70.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 488 Missing cases 1351 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLDG94 G3 Position-control pollution, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 128 7.0 27.8 27.8 2 215 11.7 46.7 74.6 3 68 3.7 14.8 89.3 4 35 1.9 7.6 97.0 5 5 .3 1.1 98.0 6 6 .3 1.3 99.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1273 69.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 106 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 460 Missing cases 1379 POLLRG94 G3 Position-control pollution, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 22 1.2 5.0 5.0 2 51 2.8 11.5 16.5 3 60 3.3 13.6 30.1 4 76 4.1 17.2 47.3 5 51 2.8 11.5 58.8 6 115 6.3 26.0 84.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 67 3.6 15.2 100.0 . 1303 70.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 94 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 442 Missing cases 1397 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYHRS94 Q14 Hours per week for camp/party activi Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 493 26.8 57.5 57.5 LESS THAN 2 HOURS 2 227 12.3 26.5 84.0 TWO TO 5 HOURS 3 86 4.7 10.0 94.0 FIVE TO 10 HOURS 4 22 1.2 2.6 96.6 MORE THAN 10 HOURS 5 29 1.6 3.4 100.0 . 982 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 857 Missing cases 982 METDH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1733 94.2 94.2 94.2 CHECKED 1 106 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALDH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1741 94.7 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 98 5.3 5.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTDH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1663 90.4 90.4 90.4 CHECKED 1 176 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 MAILDH94 Q15 Received mail, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1346 73.2 73.2 73.2 CHECKED 1 493 26.8 26.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1287 70.0 70.0 70.0 CHECKED 1 552 30.0 30.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1684 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 155 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 RALRH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1695 92.2 92.2 92.2 CHECKED 1 144 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1632 88.7 88.7 88.7 CHECKED 1 207 11.3 11.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRH94 Q15 Received mail, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1329 72.3 72.3 72.3 CHECKED 1 510 27.7 27.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ADRH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1296 70.5 70.5 70.5 CHECKED 1 543 29.5 29.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METIH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1833 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALIH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTIH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILIH94 Q15 Received mail, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1802 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 37 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADIH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1763 95.9 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 76 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 INFL94 Q16 Next couple years, most likely to Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORK WITHIN THE DEMO 1 131 7.1 19.4 19.4 WORK WITHIN THE REPU 2 197 10.7 29.2 48.7 WORK WITHIN A THIRD 3 8 .4 1.2 49.9 STAY INVOLVED BUT NO 4 215 11.7 31.9 81.8 NOT BE INVOLVED IN P 5 123 6.7 18.2 100.0 . 985 53.6 Missing NOT SURE AT THIS TIM 6 180 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 674 Missing cases 1165 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHNEV94 Q17 Teacher org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1291 70.2 70.2 70.2 CHECKED 1 548 29.8 29.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOLD94 Q17 Teacher org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1809 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 30 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 TCHPRO94 Q17 Teacher org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOTH94 Q17 Teacher org, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPD94 Q17 Teacher org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1793 97.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 46 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 TCHATT94 Q17 Teacher org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1811 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHLDR94 Q17 Teacher org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSNEV94 Q17 Business org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1333 72.5 72.5 72.5 CHECKED 1 506 27.5 27.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 BUSOLD94 Q17 Business org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPRO94 Q17 Business org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSOTH94 Q17 Business org, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 BUSPD94 Q17 Business org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1783 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 56 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSATT94 Q17 Business org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1782 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 57 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSLDR94 Q17 Business org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 VETNEV94 Q17 Veterans group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1348 73.3 73.3 73.3 CHECKED 1 491 26.7 26.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETOLD94 Q17 Veterans group, not active in last y Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1786 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 53 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPRO94 Q17 Veterans group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 VETOTH94 Q17 Veterans group, tried to convince ot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPD94 Q17 Veterans group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1775 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 64 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETATT94 Q17 Veterans group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 VETLDR94 Q17 Veterans group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMNEV94 Q17 Womens group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1281 69.7 69.7 69.7 CHECKED 1 558 30.3 30.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOLD94 Q17 Womens group, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 WOMPRO94 Q17 Womens group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOTH94 Q17 Womens group, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPD94 Q17 Womens group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 WOMATT94 Q17 Womens group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMLDR94 Q17 Womens group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVNEV94 Q17 Civil rights, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1285 69.9 69.9 69.9 CHECKED 1 554 30.1 30.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CIVOLD94 Q17 Civil rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPRO94 Q17 Civil rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVOTH94 Q17 Civil rights, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CIVPD94 Q17 Civil rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1818 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVATT94 Q17 Civil rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVLDR94 Q17 Civil rights, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ENVNEV94 Q17 Environ group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1334 72.5 72.5 72.5 CHECKED 1 505 27.5 27.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVOLD94 Q17 Environ group, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1805 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPRO94 Q17 Environ group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ENVOTH94 Q17 Environ group, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPD94 Q17 Environ group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1781 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 58 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVATT94 Q17 Environ group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1820 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ENVLDR94 Q17 Environ group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTNEV94 Q17 Interest groups, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1304 70.9 70.9 70.9 CHECKED 1 535 29.1 29.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOLD94 Q17 Interest groups, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 INTPRO94 Q17 Interest groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOTH94 Q17 Interest groups, tried to convince o Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPD94 Q17 Interest groups, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1808 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 31 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 INTATT94 Q17 Interest groups, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTLDR94 Q17 Interest groups, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABNEV94 Q17 Labor Union, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1323 71.9 71.9 71.9 CHECKED 1 516 28.1 28.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LABOLD94 Q17 Labor Union, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1806 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 33 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPRO94 Q17 Labor Union, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOTH94 Q17 Labor Union, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1823 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 16 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LABPD94 Q17 Labor Union, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1786 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 53 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABATT94 Q17 Labor Union, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1797 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 42 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABLDR94 Q17 Labor Union, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FRMNEV94 Q17 Farm org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1335 72.6 72.6 72.6 CHECKED 1 504 27.4 27.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMOLD94 Q17 Farm org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1798 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 41 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPRO94 Q17 Farm org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FRMOTH94 Q17 Farm org, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPD94 Q17 Farm org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1782 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 57 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMATT94 Q17 Farm org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1803 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 36 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FRMLDR94 Q17 Farm org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESNEV94 Q17 Evangelical, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1307 71.1 71.1 71.1 CHECKED 1 532 28.9 28.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOLD94 Q17 Evangelical, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 29 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 JESPRO94 Q17 Evangelical, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 7 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOTH94 Q17 Evangelical, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPD94 Q17 Evangelical, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1818 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 JESATT94 Q17 Evangelical, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1818 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESLDR94 Q17 Evangelical, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABNEV94 Q17 Anti-abortion, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1330 72.3 72.3 72.3 CHECKED 1 509 27.7 27.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ABOLD94 Q17 Anti-abortion, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 97.6 97.6 97.6 CHECKED 1 44 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPRO94 Q17 Anti-abortion, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOTH94 Q17 Anti-abortion, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 ABPD94 Q17 Anti-abortion, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1801 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 38 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABATT94 Q17 Anti-abortion, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1815 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 24 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABLDR94 Q17 Anti-abortion, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LIBNEV94 Q17 Liberal ideol, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1282 69.7 69.7 69.7 CHECKED 1 557 30.3 30.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBOLD94 Q17 Liberal ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPRO94 Q17 Liberal ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LIBOTH94 Q17 Liberal ideol, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPD94 Q17 Liberal ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBATT94 Q17 Liberal ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LIBLDR94 Q17 Liberal ideol, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONNEV94 Q17 Cons ideol, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1296 70.5 70.5 70.5 CHECKED 1 543 29.5 29.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOLD94 Q17 Cons ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONPRO94 Q17 Cons ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOTH94 Q17 Cons ideol, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPD94 Q17 Cons ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONATT94 Q17 Cons ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONLDR94 Q17 Cons ideol, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1834 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABNEV94 Q17 Neighborhood, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1345 73.1 73.1 73.1 CHECKED 1 494 26.9 26.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 NABOLD94 Q17 Neighborhood, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1785 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 54 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABPRO94 Q17 Neighborhood, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1833 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABOTH94 Q17 Neighborhood, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1824 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 NABPD94 Q17 Neighborhood, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 10 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABATT94 Q17 Neighborhood, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1803 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 36 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABLDR94 Q17 Neighborhood, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 14 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 EDNEV94 Q17 Educational, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1335 72.6 72.6 72.6 CHECKED 1 504 27.4 27.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDOLD94 Q17 Educational, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1811 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDPRO94 Q17 Educational, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 EDOTH94 Q17 Educational, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDPD94 Q17 Educational, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1796 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 43 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDATT94 Q17 Educational, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1787 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 52 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 EDLDR94 Q17 Educational, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSNEV94 Q17 United We Stand, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1298 70.6 70.6 70.6 CHECKED 1 541 29.4 29.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSOLD94 Q17 United We Stand, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1820 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 UWSPRO94 Q17 United We Stand, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSOTH94 Q17 United We Stand, tried to convince o Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSPD94 Q17 United We Stand, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 UWSATT94 Q17 United We Stand, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSLDR94 Q17 United We Stand, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUNEV94 Q17 Church, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1569 85.3 85.3 85.3 CHECKED 1 270 14.7 14.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CHUOLD94 Q17 Church, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1737 94.5 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 102 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUPRO94 Q17 Church, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUOTH94 Q17 Church, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1765 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 74 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CHUPD94 Q17 Church, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1724 93.7 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 115 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUATT94 Q17 Church, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1633 88.8 88.8 88.8 CHECKED 1 206 11.2 11.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHULDR94 Q17 Church, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1697 92.3 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 142 7.7 7.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 LDPFRD94 Q18 Friends in local Democratic party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 242 13.2 37.8 37.8 ONE OR TWO 2 138 7.5 21.6 59.4 THREE OR MORE 3 260 14.1 40.6 100.0 . 1115 60.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 84 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 640 Missing cases 1199 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRPFRD94 Q18 Friends in local Republican party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 207 11.3 32.0 32.0 ONE OR TWO 2 133 7.2 20.6 52.6 THREE OR MORE 3 307 16.7 47.4 100.0 . 1128 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 64 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 647 Missing cases 1192 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSFRD94 Q18 Friends in United We Stand, America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 473 25.7 89.1 89.1 ONE OR TWO 2 32 1.7 6.0 95.1 THREE OR MORE 3 26 1.4 4.9 100.0 . 1217 66.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 91 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 531 Missing cases 1308 VETFRD94 Q18 Friends in Veterans groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 285 15.5 47.5 47.5 ONE OR TWO 2 137 7.4 22.8 70.3 THREE OR MORE 3 178 9.7 29.7 100.0 . 1176 63.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 63 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 1239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMFRD94 Q18 Friends in Womens rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 416 22.6 76.5 76.5 ONE OR TWO 2 73 4.0 13.4 89.9 THREE OR MORE 3 55 3.0 10.1 100.0 . 1215 66.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 80 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 1295 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVFRD94 Q18 Friends in Civil rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 446 24.3 80.9 80.9 ONE OR TWO 2 64 3.5 11.6 92.6 THREE OR MORE 3 41 2.2 7.4 100.0 . 1219 66.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 69 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 551 Missing cases 1288 ENVFRD94 Q18 Friends in environmental groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 375 20.4 66.6 66.6 ONE OR TWO 2 109 5.9 19.4 86.0 THREE OR MORE 3 79 4.3 14.0 100.0 . 1211 65.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 65 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 563 Missing cases 1276 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTFRD94 Q18 Friends in interest groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 378 20.6 69.5 69.5 ONE OR TWO 2 94 5.1 17.3 86.8 THREE OR MORE 3 72 3.9 13.2 100.0 . 1208 65.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 87 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 1295 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESFRD94 Q18 Friends in evangelical groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 399 21.7 71.1 71.1 ONE OR TWO 2 83 4.5 14.8 85.9 THREE OR MORE 3 79 4.3 14.1 100.0 . 1203 65.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 75 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 561 Missing cases 1278 ABFRD94 Q18 Friends in anti-abortion groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 372 20.2 64.9 64.9 ONE OR TWO 2 82 4.5 14.3 79.2 THREE OR MORE 3 119 6.5 20.8 100.0 . 1195 65.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 71 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 573 Missing cases 1266 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBFRD94 Q18 Friends in lib ideological groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 440 23.9 81.6 81.6 ONE OR TWO 2 50 2.7 9.3 90.9 THREE OR MORE 3 49 2.7 9.1 100.0 . 1225 66.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 75 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 539 Missing cases 1300 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONFRD94 Q18 Friends in cons ideological groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 393 21.4 73.0 73.0 ONE OR TWO 2 53 2.9 9.9 82.9 THREE OR MORE 3 92 5.0 17.1 100.0 . 1218 66.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 83 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 538 Missing cases 1301 NABFRD94 Q18 Friends in crime/neighborhood groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 335 18.2 59.7 59.7 ONE OR TWO 2 107 5.8 19.1 78.8 THREE OR MORE 3 119 6.5 21.2 100.0 . 1196 65.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 82 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 561 Missing cases 1278 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDFRD94 Q18 Friends in educational groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 243 13.2 41.0 41.0 ONE OR TWO 2 141 7.7 23.8 64.8 THREE OR MORE 3 209 11.4 35.2 100.0 . 1187 64.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 593 Missing cases 1246 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUFRD94 Q18 Friends in church groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 119 6.5 17.2 17.2 ONE OR TWO 2 126 6.9 18.2 35.4 THREE OR MORE 3 447 24.3 64.6 100.0 . 1108 60.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 692 Missing cases 1147 NECON94 Q19 Rate national economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 40 2.2 4.7 4.7 2 107 5.8 12.5 17.2 3 263 14.3 30.7 47.9 4 359 19.5 41.9 89.8 MUCH BETTER 5 87 4.7 10.2 100.0 . 983 53.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 856 Missing cases 983 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PECON94 Q19 Rate family financial situation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 28 1.5 3.3 3.3 2 130 7.1 15.5 18.8 3 449 24.4 53.4 72.2 4 192 10.4 22.8 95.0 MUCH BETTER 5 42 2.3 5.0 100.0 . 998 54.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 841 Missing cases 998 SECON94 Q19 Rate state economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 22 1.2 2.6 2.6 2 93 5.1 11.1 13.7 3 289 15.7 34.4 48.2 4 329 17.9 39.2 87.4 MUCH BETTER 5 106 5.8 12.6 100.0 . 1000 54.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 839 Missing cases 1000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON94 Q20 Rate future national economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 35 1.9 4.1 4.1 2 175 9.5 20.4 24.5 3 336 18.3 39.3 63.8 4 278 15.1 32.5 96.3 MUCH BETTER 5 32 1.7 3.7 100.0 . 983 53.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 856 Missing cases 983 FPECON94 Q20 Rate future family financial situati Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 17 .9 2.0 2.0 2 105 5.7 12.5 14.6 3 501 27.2 59.8 74.3 4 190 10.3 22.7 97.0 MUCH BETTER 5 25 1.4 3.0 100.0 . 1001 54.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 838 Missing cases 1001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSECON94 Q20 Rate future state economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 26 1.4 3.1 3.1 2 115 6.3 13.6 16.7 3 377 20.5 44.7 61.4 4 272 14.8 32.2 93.6 MUCH BETTER 5 54 2.9 6.4 100.0 . 995 54.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 844 Missing cases 995 PTYM94 Q21 Partisanship, mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 50 2.7 11.8 11.8 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 109 5.9 25.8 37.6 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 62 3.4 14.7 52.2 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 156 8.5 36.9 89.1 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 12 .7 2.8 92.0 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 34 1.8 8.0 100.0 . 1369 74.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 47 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 423 Missing cases 1416 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF94 Q21 Partisanship, father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 58 3.2 16.6 16.6 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 77 4.2 22.0 38.6 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 60 3.3 17.1 55.7 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 114 6.2 32.6 88.3 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 11 .6 3.1 91.4 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 30 1.6 8.6 100.0 . 1438 78.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 51 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 350 Missing cases 1489 PTYSP94 Q21 Partisanship, spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 111 6.0 17.7 17.7 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 144 7.8 22.9 40.6 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 147 8.0 23.4 64.0 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 157 8.5 25.0 89.0 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 22 1.2 3.5 92.5 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 47 2.6 7.5 100.0 . 1180 64.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 31 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 628 Missing cases 1211 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT94 Q22a Opinion-amendment banning abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 149 8.1 18.2 18.2 2 109 5.9 13.3 31.5 3 55 3.0 6.7 38.2 4 57 3.1 7.0 45.2 5 27 1.5 3.3 48.5 6 125 6.8 15.3 63.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 297 16.2 36.3 100.0 . 990 53.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 819 Missing cases 1020 IMPORT94 Q22b Opinion-limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 131 7.1 16.0 16.0 2 154 8.4 18.8 34.8 3 149 8.1 18.2 52.9 4 88 4.8 10.7 63.7 5 78 4.2 9.5 73.2 6 121 6.6 14.8 87.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 99 5.4 12.1 100.0 . 987 53.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 820 Missing cases 1019 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT94 Q22c Opinion-affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 35 1.9 4.3 4.3 2 94 5.1 11.5 15.8 3 119 6.5 14.6 30.4 4 160 8.7 19.6 49.9 5 100 5.4 12.2 62.2 6 136 7.4 16.6 78.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 173 9.4 21.2 100.0 . 998 54.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 817 Missing cases 1022 POLLUT94 Q22d Opinion-gov regulation on pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 122 6.6 14.6 14.6 2 190 10.3 22.7 37.3 3 162 8.8 19.4 56.6 4 70 3.8 8.4 65.0 5 62 3.4 7.4 72.4 6 113 6.1 13.5 85.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 118 6.4 14.1 100.0 . 990 53.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 837 Missing cases 1002 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOL94 Q22e Opinion-decrease US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 139 7.6 16.8 16.8 2 166 9.0 20.0 36.8 3 168 9.1 20.3 57.1 4 106 5.8 12.8 69.9 5 99 5.4 12.0 81.9 6 103 5.6 12.4 94.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 47 2.6 5.7 100.0 . 994 54.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 828 Missing cases 1011 HOMO94 Q22f Opinion-homosexuals in military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 51 2.8 6.2 6.2 2 140 7.6 16.9 23.0 3 41 2.2 4.9 28.0 4 200 10.9 24.1 52.1 5 45 2.4 5.4 57.5 6 108 5.9 13.0 70.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 244 13.3 29.4 100.0 . 988 53.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 829 Missing cases 1010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARM94 Q22g Opinion-gun control Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 262 14.2 31.0 31.0 2 156 8.5 18.5 49.5 3 87 4.7 10.3 59.8 4 40 2.2 4.7 64.6 5 44 2.4 5.2 69.8 6 89 4.8 10.5 80.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 166 9.0 19.7 100.0 . 983 53.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 844 Missing cases 995 TERM94 Q22h Opinion-term limits Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 253 13.8 30.6 30.6 2 219 11.9 26.5 57.1 3 110 6.0 13.3 70.5 4 64 3.5 7.7 78.2 5 35 1.9 4.2 82.4 6 69 3.8 8.4 90.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 76 4.1 9.2 100.0 . 984 53.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 29 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 826 Missing cases 1013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFTX94 Q22i Opinion-reduce deficit/increase tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 104 5.7 12.8 12.8 2 208 11.3 25.6 38.3 3 166 9.0 20.4 58.7 4 74 4.0 9.1 67.8 5 62 3.4 7.6 75.4 6 94 5.1 11.5 87.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 106 5.8 13.0 100.0 . 989 53.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 36 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 814 Missing cases 1025 NHI94 Q22j Opinion-national health insurance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 147 8.0 17.9 17.9 2 140 7.6 17.0 34.9 3 93 5.1 11.3 46.2 4 45 2.4 5.5 51.6 5 35 1.9 4.3 55.9 6 115 6.3 14.0 69.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 248 13.5 30.1 100.0 . 983 53.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 823 Missing cases 1016 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAX94 Q22k Opinion-make tax concessions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 64 3.5 7.9 7.9 2 189 10.3 23.2 31.1 3 211 11.5 25.9 57.0 4 124 6.7 15.2 72.2 5 83 4.5 10.2 82.4 6 91 4.9 11.2 93.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 52 2.8 6.4 100.0 . 991 53.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 814 Missing cases 1025 DEFGP94 Q22l Opinion-reduce deficit/cut programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 209 11.4 25.5 25.5 2 229 12.5 28.0 53.5 3 174 9.5 21.2 74.7 4 52 2.8 6.3 81.1 5 61 3.3 7.4 88.5 6 62 3.4 7.6 96.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 32 1.7 3.9 100.0 . 989 53.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 819 Missing cases 1020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEATH94 Q22m Opinion-death penalty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 77 4.2 9.6 9.6 2 77 4.2 9.6 19.3 3 33 1.8 4.1 23.4 4 83 4.5 10.4 33.8 5 47 2.6 5.9 39.6 6 153 8.3 19.1 58.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 330 17.9 41.3 100.0 . 985 53.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 54 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 800 Missing cases 1039 MIISS94 Q23 Most important issue Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION AMENDMENT 1 113 6.1 14.0 14.0 LIMIT FOREIGN IMPORT 2 26 1.4 3.2 17.2 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3 17 .9 2.1 19.4 CONTROL POLLUTION 4 34 1.8 4.2 23.6 DECREASE US INVOLVEM 5 38 2.1 4.7 28.3 HOMOSEXUALS IN MILIT 6 9 .5 1.1 29.4 GUN CONTROL 7 78 4.2 9.7 39.1 TERM LIMITS 8 59 3.2 7.3 46.4 REDUCE DEFICIT/UP TA 9 98 5.3 12.2 58.6 NATL HEALTH INS 10 161 8.8 20.0 78.5 TAX CONCESSIONS 11 10 .5 1.2 79.8 REDUCE DEFICIT/CUT P 12 138 7.5 17.1 96.9 DEATH PENALTY 13 25 1.4 3.1 100.0 . 994 54.1 Missing NOT SURE 14 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 806 Missing cases 1033 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFDP94 Q24 Effectiveness of Dem party in CD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 99 5.4 14.3 14.3 2 289 15.7 41.8 56.2 3 227 12.3 32.9 89.0 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 76 4.1 11.0 100.0 . 1056 57.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 92 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 691 Missing cases 1148 EFFRP94 Q24 Effectiveness of Rep party in CD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 210 11.4 31.7 31.7 2 305 16.6 46.0 77.7 3 120 6.5 18.1 95.8 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 28 1.5 4.2 100.0 . 1088 59.2 Missing NOT SURE 5 88 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 663 Missing cases 1176 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFUWS94 Q24 Effectiveness of United We Stand in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 12 .7 4.1 4.1 2 37 2.0 12.6 16.7 3 68 3.7 23.1 39.8 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 177 9.6 60.2 100.0 . 1200 65.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 345 18.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 294 Missing cases 1545 ARMBC94 Q25 Gun control, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 315 17.1 41.5 41.5 2 329 17.9 43.3 84.8 3 71 3.9 9.4 94.2 4 10 .5 1.3 95.5 5 8 .4 1.1 96.6 6 9 .5 1.2 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 17 .9 2.2 100.0 . 1031 56.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 49 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 759 Missing cases 1080 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMHRP94 Q25 Gun control, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 14 .8 3.4 3.4 2 63 3.4 15.5 18.9 3 48 2.6 11.8 30.7 4 47 2.6 11.5 42.3 5 42 2.3 10.3 52.6 6 107 5.8 26.3 78.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 86 4.7 21.1 100.0 . 1098 59.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 334 18.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1432 ARMBD94 Q25 Gun control, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .4 1.1 1.1 2 48 2.6 7.7 8.8 3 57 3.1 9.1 17.9 4 29 1.6 4.6 22.5 5 85 4.6 13.6 36.0 6 237 12.9 37.8 73.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 164 8.9 26.2 100.0 . 1080 58.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 132 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 627 Missing cases 1212 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDP94 Q25 Gun control, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 205 11.1 29.8 29.8 2 311 16.9 45.3 75.1 3 118 6.4 17.2 92.3 4 14 .8 2.0 94.3 5 10 .5 1.5 95.8 6 12 .7 1.7 97.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 17 .9 2.5 100.0 . 1078 58.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 74 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 687 Missing cases 1152 ARMRP94 Q25 Gun control, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 .6 1.7 1.7 2 43 2.3 6.5 8.2 3 40 2.2 6.1 14.3 4 22 1.2 3.3 17.7 5 84 4.6 12.8 30.4 6 271 14.7 41.2 71.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 186 10.1 28.3 100.0 . 1090 59.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 92 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 657 Missing cases 1182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDH94 Q25 Gun control, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 146 7.9 25.9 25.9 2 237 12.9 42.0 67.9 3 100 5.4 17.7 85.6 4 22 1.2 3.9 89.5 5 18 1.0 3.2 92.7 6 21 1.1 3.7 96.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 20 1.1 3.5 100.0 . 1100 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 175 9.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 564 Missing cases 1275 ARMRH94 Q25 Gun control, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 15 .8 2.6 2.6 2 43 2.3 7.5 10.1 3 58 3.2 10.1 20.3 4 30 1.6 5.2 25.5 5 61 3.3 10.7 36.2 6 194 10.5 33.9 70.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 171 9.3 29.9 100.0 . 1089 59.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 178 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 572 Missing cases 1267 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIBC94 Q25 Natl health ins, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 659 35.8 81.4 81.4 2 115 6.3 14.2 95.6 3 11 .6 1.4 96.9 4 1 .1 .1 97.0 5 5 .3 .6 97.7 6 5 .3 .6 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 14 .8 1.7 100.0 . 1017 55.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 810 Missing cases 1029 NHIHRP94 Q25 Natl health ins, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .5 2.1 2.1 2 30 1.6 6.8 8.9 3 47 2.6 10.7 19.6 4 26 1.4 5.9 25.6 5 49 2.7 11.2 36.8 6 130 7.1 29.7 66.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 147 8.0 33.6 100.0 . 1092 59.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 309 16.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1401 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIBD94 Q25 Natl health ins, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .4 1.0 1.0 2 34 1.8 4.9 5.9 3 83 4.5 12.0 17.9 4 27 1.5 3.9 21.8 5 76 4.1 11.0 32.7 6 259 14.1 37.3 70.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 208 11.3 30.0 100.0 . 1069 58.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 76 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 694 Missing cases 1145 NHIDP94 Q25 Natl health ins, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 277 15.1 38.2 38.2 2 290 15.8 39.9 78.1 3 119 6.5 16.4 94.5 4 16 .9 2.2 96.7 5 9 .5 1.2 97.9 6 5 .3 .7 98.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 10 .5 1.4 100.0 . 1072 58.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 726 Missing cases 1113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRP94 Q25 Natl health ins, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 8 .4 1.1 1.1 2 31 1.7 4.4 5.5 3 69 3.8 9.7 15.2 4 26 1.4 3.7 18.9 5 64 3.5 9.0 27.9 6 284 15.4 40.0 67.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 228 12.4 32.1 100.0 . 1070 58.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 710 Missing cases 1129 NHIDH94 Q25 Natl health ins, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 205 11.1 33.9 33.9 2 247 13.4 40.8 74.7 3 102 5.5 16.9 91.6 4 23 1.3 3.8 95.4 5 10 .5 1.7 97.0 6 7 .4 1.2 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 11 .6 1.8 100.0 . 1099 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 135 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 605 Missing cases 1234 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRH94 Q25 Natl health ins, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .5 1.5 1.5 2 29 1.6 4.8 6.2 3 60 3.3 9.9 16.1 4 34 1.8 5.6 21.7 5 48 2.6 7.9 29.6 6 222 12.1 36.5 66.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 207 11.3 34.0 100.0 . 1084 58.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 146 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 609 Missing cases 1230 DEFBC94 Q25 Budget deficit, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 160 8.7 22.6 22.6 2 213 11.6 30.0 52.6 3 129 7.0 18.2 70.8 4 23 1.3 3.2 74.0 5 52 2.8 7.3 81.4 6 83 4.5 11.7 93.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 49 2.7 6.9 100.0 . 1057 57.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 73 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 709 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFHRP94 Q25 Budget deficit, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 112 6.1 22.8 22.8 2 150 8.2 30.5 53.4 3 57 3.1 11.6 65.0 4 28 1.5 5.7 70.7 5 24 1.3 4.9 75.6 6 61 3.3 12.4 88.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 59 3.2 12.0 100.0 . 1107 60.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 241 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 491 Missing cases 1348 DEFBD94 Q25 Budget deficit, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 53 2.9 8.5 8.5 2 121 6.6 19.4 27.9 3 86 4.7 13.8 41.7 4 46 2.5 7.4 49.0 5 75 4.1 12.0 61.1 6 138 7.5 22.1 83.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 105 5.7 16.8 100.0 . 1094 59.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 121 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 624 Missing cases 1215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDP94 Q25 Budget deficit, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 110 6.0 17.1 17.1 2 171 9.3 26.6 43.6 3 136 7.4 21.1 64.8 4 43 2.3 6.7 71.4 5 41 2.2 6.4 77.8 6 95 5.2 14.8 92.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 48 2.6 7.5 100.0 . 1100 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 95 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 644 Missing cases 1195 DEFRP94 Q25 Budget deficit, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 64 3.5 10.1 10.1 2 111 6.0 17.5 27.5 3 74 4.0 11.6 39.2 4 44 2.4 6.9 46.1 5 72 3.9 11.3 57.4 6 156 8.5 24.5 81.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 115 6.3 18.1 100.0 . 1104 60.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 99 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 636 Missing cases 1203 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDH94 Q25 Budget deficit, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 81 4.4 15.4 15.4 2 135 7.3 25.7 41.1 3 110 6.0 20.9 62.0 4 37 2.0 7.0 69.0 5 44 2.4 8.4 77.4 6 79 4.3 15.0 92.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 40 2.2 7.6 100.0 . 1129 61.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 184 10.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 526 Missing cases 1313 DEFRH94 Q25 Budget deficit, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 53 2.9 9.7 9.7 2 98 5.3 17.9 27.6 3 64 3.5 11.7 39.2 4 34 1.8 6.2 45.4 5 66 3.6 12.0 57.5 6 125 6.8 22.8 80.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 108 5.9 19.7 100.0 . 1118 60.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 173 9.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 548 Missing cases 1291 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPBC94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 71 3.9 11.8 11.8 2 113 6.1 18.8 30.7 3 91 4.9 15.2 45.8 4 37 2.0 6.2 52.0 5 69 3.8 11.5 63.5 6 140 7.6 23.3 86.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 79 4.3 13.2 100.0 . 1079 58.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 160 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 1239 IMPHRP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 176 9.6 36.7 36.7 2 156 8.5 32.5 69.2 3 51 2.8 10.6 79.8 4 15 .8 3.1 82.9 5 14 .8 2.9 85.8 6 32 1.7 6.7 92.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 36 2.0 7.5 100.0 . 1118 60.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 241 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 480 Missing cases 1359 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPBD94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 28 1.5 5.4 5.4 2 91 4.9 17.6 23.0 3 78 4.2 15.1 38.1 4 49 2.7 9.5 47.6 5 77 4.2 14.9 62.5 6 136 7.4 26.3 88.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 58 3.2 11.2 100.0 . 1109 60.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 213 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 517 Missing cases 1322 IMPDP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 73 4.0 13.1 13.1 2 144 7.8 25.9 39.0 3 123 6.7 22.1 61.0 4 33 1.8 5.9 67.0 5 52 2.8 9.3 76.3 6 88 4.8 15.8 92.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 44 2.4 7.9 100.0 . 1112 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 170 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 557 Missing cases 1282 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPRP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 34 1.8 6.5 6.5 2 81 4.4 15.5 22.0 3 74 4.0 14.2 36.2 4 43 2.3 8.2 44.4 5 76 4.1 14.6 59.0 6 144 7.8 27.6 86.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 70 3.8 13.4 100.0 . 1112 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 205 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 1317 IMPDH94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 59 3.2 13.2 13.2 2 115 6.3 25.8 39.0 3 90 4.9 20.2 59.2 4 37 2.0 8.3 67.5 5 49 2.7 11.0 78.5 6 64 3.5 14.3 92.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 32 1.7 7.2 100.0 . 1130 61.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 263 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 446 Missing cases 1393 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPRH94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 33 1.8 7.3 7.3 2 67 3.6 14.9 22.2 3 74 4.0 16.4 38.6 4 39 2.1 8.6 47.2 5 61 3.3 13.5 60.8 6 117 6.4 25.9 86.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 60 3.3 13.3 100.0 . 1119 60.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 269 14.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 451 Missing cases 1388 LCBC94 Q26 Political philosophy, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 202 11.0 25.7 25.7 LIBERAL 2 318 17.3 40.4 66.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 163 8.9 20.7 86.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 82 4.5 10.4 97.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 12 .7 1.5 98.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 10 .5 1.3 100.0 . 1025 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 27 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 787 Missing cases 1052 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 15 .8 2.3 2.3 LIBERAL 2 24 1.3 3.7 6.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 30 1.6 4.6 10.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 96 5.2 14.9 25.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 119 6.5 18.4 44.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 226 12.3 35.0 78.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 136 7.4 21.1 100.0 . 1066 58.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 127 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 646 Missing cases 1193 LCBD94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 9 .5 1.2 1.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 11 .6 1.5 3.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 45 2.4 6.0 9.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 125 6.8 16.7 25.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 420 22.8 56.2 82.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 134 7.3 17.9 100.0 . 1046 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 46 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 747 Missing cases 1092 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJK94 Q26 Political philosophy, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 12 .7 1.9 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 16 .9 2.5 4.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 40 2.2 6.3 11.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 116 6.3 18.4 29.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 305 16.6 48.3 78.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 139 7.6 22.0 100.0 . 1082 58.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 126 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 631 Missing cases 1208 LCBK94 Q26 Political philosophy, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 29 1.6 5.9 5.9 LIBERAL 2 106 5.8 21.7 27.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 134 7.3 27.4 55.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 110 6.0 22.5 77.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 48 2.6 9.8 87.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 49 2.7 10.0 97.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 13 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1106 60.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 244 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 489 Missing cases 1350 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDQ94 Q26 Political philosophy, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .3 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 6 .3 .8 1.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 7 .4 1.0 2.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 21 1.1 2.9 5.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 42 2.3 5.8 11.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 333 18.1 46.1 57.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 308 16.7 42.7 100.0 . 1056 57.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 61 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 722 Missing cases 1117 LCAV94 Q26 Political philosophy, avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .1 .1 LIBERAL 2 20 1.1 2.7 2.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 50 2.7 6.7 9.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 230 12.5 31.0 40.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 313 17.0 42.2 82.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 123 6.7 16.6 99.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 5 .3 .7 100.0 . 1053 57.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 742 Missing cases 1097 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 116 6.3 15.3 15.3 LIBERAL 2 361 19.6 47.7 63.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 211 11.5 27.9 90.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 47 2.6 6.2 97.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 12 .7 1.6 98.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 8 .4 1.1 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .1 .3 100.0 . 1057 57.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 25 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 757 Missing cases 1082 LCRP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 9 .5 1.2 1.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 8 .4 1.1 2.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 20 1.1 2.7 5.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 113 6.1 15.1 20.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 460 25.0 61.5 82.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 134 7.3 17.9 100.0 . 1060 57.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 748 Missing cases 1091 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCUWS94 Q26 Political philosophy, United We Stan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 13 .7 3.5 4.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 15 .8 4.0 8.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 50 2.7 13.3 21.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 68 3.7 18.1 39.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 122 6.6 32.4 72.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 105 5.7 27.9 100.0 . 1118 60.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 345 18.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 376 Missing cases 1463 LCDH94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 91 4.9 14.4 14.4 LIBERAL 2 275 15.0 43.6 58.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 171 9.3 27.1 85.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 67 3.6 10.6 95.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 15 .8 2.4 98.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 10 .5 1.6 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .1 .3 100.0 . 1100 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 108 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 631 Missing cases 1208 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRH94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 7 .4 1.1 1.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 12 .7 1.8 3.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 38 2.1 5.7 9.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 101 5.5 15.2 24.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 356 19.4 53.6 78.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 146 7.9 22.0 100.0 . 1082 58.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 93 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 664 Missing cases 1175 LCDS94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem Senate can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 74 4.0 19.3 19.3 LIBERAL 2 159 8.6 41.4 60.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 91 4.9 23.7 84.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 45 2.4 11.7 96.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 10 .5 2.6 98.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 4 .2 1.0 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 1399 76.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 384 Missing cases 1455 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRS94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep Senate can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 2 .1 .5 .8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 6 .3 1.6 2.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 20 1.1 5.2 7.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 36 2.0 9.4 16.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 184 10.0 47.9 64.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 135 7.3 35.2 100.0 . 1397 76.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 58 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 384 Missing cases 1455 LCDG94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 105 5.7 19.6 19.6 LIBERAL 2 238 12.9 44.3 63.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 116 6.3 21.6 85.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 64 3.5 11.9 97.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 5 .3 .9 98.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 7 .4 1.3 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .1 .4 100.0 . 1254 68.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 537 Missing cases 1302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 3 .2 .5 1.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 13 .7 2.3 3.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 26 1.4 4.6 8.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 79 4.3 14.1 22.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 316 17.2 56.4 78.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 120 6.5 21.4 100.0 . 1235 67.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 1279 HLPBC94 Q27 Can help state/district, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 1.5 3.6 3.6 2 173 9.4 22.4 26.0 3 213 11.6 27.6 53.6 4 125 6.8 16.2 69.7 POOR 5 234 12.7 30.3 100.0 . 1024 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 42 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 773 Missing cases 1066 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPHRP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 1.2 1.2 2 36 2.0 6.0 7.2 3 126 6.9 21.1 28.3 4 146 7.9 24.4 52.7 POOR 5 283 15.4 47.3 100.0 . 1053 57.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 188 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 598 Missing cases 1241 HLPBD94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 22 1.2 3.1 3.1 2 165 9.0 23.3 26.4 3 275 15.0 38.8 65.2 4 118 6.4 16.6 81.8 POOR 5 129 7.0 18.2 100.0 . 1045 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 85 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 709 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 1.0 2.6 2.6 2 145 7.9 19.5 22.0 3 243 13.2 32.7 54.7 4 136 7.4 18.3 73.0 POOR 5 201 10.9 27.0 100.0 . 1050 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 45 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 744 Missing cases 1095 HLPRP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 21 1.1 2.9 2.9 2 198 10.8 27.3 30.2 3 261 14.2 36.0 66.3 4 122 6.6 16.9 83.1 POOR 5 122 6.6 16.9 100.0 . 1056 57.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 724 Missing cases 1115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDH94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem hse can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.2 6.1 6.1 2 155 8.4 23.6 29.7 3 219 11.9 33.3 63.0 4 88 4.8 13.4 76.4 POOR 5 155 8.4 23.6 100.0 . 1077 58.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 105 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 657 Missing cases 1182 HLPRH94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep hse can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 52 2.8 7.7 7.7 2 175 9.5 26.0 33.8 3 230 12.5 34.2 68.0 4 100 5.4 14.9 82.9 POOR 5 115 6.3 17.1 100.0 . 1061 57.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 106 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 672 Missing cases 1167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDS94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 1.0 4.9 4.9 2 104 5.7 27.1 32.0 3 108 5.9 28.1 60.2 4 48 2.6 12.5 72.7 POOR 5 105 5.7 27.3 100.0 . 1396 75.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 384 Missing cases 1455 HLPRS94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 31 1.7 8.2 8.2 2 122 6.6 32.2 40.4 3 100 5.4 26.4 66.8 4 42 2.3 11.1 77.8 POOR 5 84 4.6 22.2 100.0 . 1390 75.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 70 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 379 Missing cases 1460 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDG94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem gub can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 21 1.1 4.1 4.1 2 125 6.8 24.4 28.5 3 137 7.4 26.8 55.3 4 69 3.8 13.5 68.8 POOR 5 160 8.7 31.3 100.0 . 1268 69.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 512 Missing cases 1327 HLPRG94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep gub can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 69 3.8 12.5 12.5 2 179 9.7 32.5 45.1 3 147 8.0 26.7 71.8 4 69 3.8 12.5 84.4 POOR 5 86 4.7 15.6 100.0 . 1240 67.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 49 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 550 Missing cases 1289 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARBC94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 91 4.9 11.4 11.4 2 210 11.4 26.4 37.8 3 197 10.7 24.7 62.6 4 83 4.5 10.4 73.0 POOR 5 215 11.7 27.0 100.0 . 1024 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 19 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 796 Missing cases 1043 CARHRP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 1.0 2.9 2.9 2 69 3.8 10.5 13.4 3 202 11.0 30.8 44.2 4 136 7.4 20.7 64.9 POOR 5 230 12.5 35.1 100.0 . 1053 57.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 130 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 656 Missing cases 1183 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARBD94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.0 2.3 2.3 2 164 8.9 21.4 23.7 3 253 13.8 33.0 56.7 4 141 7.7 18.4 75.1 POOR 5 191 10.4 24.9 100.0 . 1039 56.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 767 Missing cases 1072 CARDP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 45 2.4 5.8 5.8 2 192 10.4 24.8 30.6 3 219 11.9 28.3 58.8 4 116 6.3 15.0 73.8 POOR 5 203 11.0 26.2 100.0 . 1043 56.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 775 Missing cases 1064 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 23 1.3 3.0 3.0 2 170 9.2 22.2 25.2 3 246 13.4 32.2 57.4 4 145 7.9 19.0 76.3 POOR 5 181 9.8 23.7 100.0 . 1041 56.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 765 Missing cases 1074 CARDH94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 42 2.3 6.2 6.2 2 172 9.4 25.4 31.6 3 214 11.6 31.6 63.2 4 91 4.9 13.4 76.7 POOR 5 158 8.6 23.3 100.0 . 1079 58.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 83 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 677 Missing cases 1162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRH94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 45 2.4 6.4 6.4 2 159 8.6 22.8 29.2 3 238 12.9 34.1 63.3 4 104 5.7 14.9 78.2 POOR 5 152 8.3 21.8 100.0 . 1063 57.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 78 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 698 Missing cases 1141 CARDS94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 25 1.4 6.1 6.1 2 92 5.0 22.5 28.6 3 124 6.7 30.3 58.9 4 50 2.7 12.2 71.1 POOR 5 118 6.4 28.9 100.0 . 1398 76.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 409 Missing cases 1430 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRS94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 1.3 6.0 6.0 2 101 5.5 25.1 31.1 3 109 5.9 27.1 58.2 4 47 2.6 11.7 69.9 POOR 5 121 6.6 30.1 100.0 . 1387 75.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 50 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 1437 CARDG94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 35 1.9 6.5 6.5 2 139 7.6 26.0 32.5 3 148 8.0 27.7 60.2 4 77 4.2 14.4 74.6 POOR 5 136 7.4 25.4 100.0 . 1263 68.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 535 Missing cases 1304 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRG94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 58 3.2 10.3 10.3 2 131 7.1 23.4 33.7 3 161 8.8 28.7 62.4 4 86 4.7 15.3 77.7 POOR 5 125 6.8 22.3 100.0 . 1237 67.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 561 Missing cases 1278 ECNBC94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 31 1.7 3.9 3.9 2 178 9.7 22.3 26.2 3 208 11.3 26.1 52.3 4 107 5.8 13.4 65.7 POOR 5 273 14.8 34.3 100.0 . 1028 55.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 14 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 797 Missing cases 1042 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNHRP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .9 2.5 2.5 2 83 4.5 12.7 15.2 3 150 8.2 23.0 38.2 4 121 6.6 18.6 56.7 POOR 5 282 15.3 43.3 100.0 . 1050 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 137 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 652 Missing cases 1187 ECNBD94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 12 .7 1.6 1.6 2 165 9.0 22.3 23.9 3 282 15.3 38.1 62.0 4 129 7.0 17.4 79.5 POOR 5 152 8.3 20.5 100.0 . 1041 56.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 58 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 740 Missing cases 1099 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 .7 1.7 1.7 2 108 5.9 14.1 15.8 3 230 12.5 30.1 45.9 4 131 7.1 17.1 63.0 POOR 5 283 15.4 37.0 100.0 . 1046 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 765 Missing cases 1074 ECNRP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 22 1.2 2.9 2.9 2 193 10.5 25.8 28.8 3 237 12.9 31.7 60.5 4 144 7.8 19.3 79.8 POOR 5 151 8.2 20.2 100.0 . 1045 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 47 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 747 Missing cases 1092 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDH94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .9 2.5 2.5 2 107 5.8 16.4 18.9 3 192 10.4 29.5 48.4 4 115 6.3 17.7 66.1 POOR 5 221 12.0 33.9 100.0 . 1087 59.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 101 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 651 Missing cases 1188 ECNRH94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 32 1.7 4.8 4.8 2 164 8.9 24.6 29.4 3 212 11.5 31.8 61.3 4 105 5.7 15.8 77.0 POOR 5 153 8.3 23.0 100.0 . 1071 58.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 102 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 666 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDS94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .3 1.3 1.3 2 77 4.2 19.8 21.1 3 115 6.3 29.6 50.8 4 60 3.3 15.5 66.2 POOR 5 131 7.1 33.8 100.0 . 1405 76.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 46 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 388 Missing cases 1451 ECNRS94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 1.5 7.6 7.6 2 93 5.1 25.2 32.8 3 96 5.2 26.0 58.8 4 52 2.8 14.1 72.9 POOR 5 100 5.4 27.1 100.0 . 1406 76.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 64 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 369 Missing cases 1470 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDG94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .9 3.2 3.2 2 79 4.3 16.0 19.2 3 136 7.4 27.5 46.8 4 78 4.2 15.8 62.6 POOR 5 185 10.1 37.4 100.0 . 1281 69.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 64 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 494 Missing cases 1345 ECNRG94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 55 3.0 10.5 10.5 2 127 6.9 24.2 34.7 3 156 8.5 29.8 64.5 4 71 3.9 13.5 78.1 POOR 5 115 6.3 21.9 100.0 . 1261 68.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 54 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 1315 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 56 3.0 6.8 6.8 2 225 12.2 27.5 34.3 3 165 9.0 20.1 54.5 4 107 5.8 13.1 67.5 POOR 5 266 14.5 32.5 100.0 . 1011 55.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 9 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 819 Missing cases 1020 EVAHRP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 9 .5 1.3 1.3 2 48 2.6 7.1 8.4 3 143 7.8 21.1 29.5 4 167 9.1 24.7 54.2 POOR 5 310 16.9 45.8 100.0 . 1036 56.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 126 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 677 Missing cases 1162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABD94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 1.3 3.1 3.1 2 204 11.1 26.2 29.3 3 258 14.0 33.2 62.5 4 121 6.6 15.6 78.0 POOR 5 171 9.3 22.0 100.0 . 1027 55.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 778 Missing cases 1061 EVADQ94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.2 5.2 5.2 2 148 8.0 19.2 24.4 3 164 8.9 21.3 45.7 4 129 7.0 16.7 62.4 POOR 5 290 15.8 37.6 100.0 . 1020 55.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 771 Missing cases 1068 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAJK94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 52 2.8 7.5 7.5 2 159 8.6 22.8 30.3 3 232 12.6 33.3 63.6 4 133 7.2 19.1 82.6 POOR 5 121 6.6 17.4 100.0 . 1049 57.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 93 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 697 Missing cases 1142 EVARL94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Limbaugh Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 84 4.6 11.1 11.1 2 108 5.9 14.2 25.3 3 81 4.4 10.7 36.0 4 52 2.8 6.9 42.9 POOR 5 433 23.5 57.1 100.0 . 1030 56.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 51 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 758 Missing cases 1081 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAON94 Q27 Overall evaluation, North Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 1.8 4.4 4.4 2 81 4.4 10.8 15.3 3 93 5.1 12.4 27.7 4 71 3.9 9.5 37.2 POOR 5 469 25.5 62.8 100.0 . 1030 56.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 62 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 747 Missing cases 1092 EVAJJ94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.0 2.4 2.4 2 67 3.6 8.8 11.2 3 169 9.2 22.2 33.3 4 132 7.2 17.3 50.7 POOR 5 376 20.4 49.3 100.0 . 1034 56.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 43 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 762 Missing cases 1077 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 61 3.3 7.7 7.7 2 212 11.5 26.8 34.6 3 188 10.2 23.8 58.4 4 115 6.3 14.6 72.9 POOR 5 214 11.6 27.1 100.0 . 1026 55.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 23 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 790 Missing cases 1049 EVAHC94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Hillary Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 69 3.8 8.8 8.8 2 187 10.2 23.7 32.5 3 133 7.2 16.9 49.4 4 74 4.0 9.4 58.8 POOR 5 325 17.7 41.2 100.0 . 1022 55.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 29 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 788 Missing cases 1051 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAPR94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 1.5 3.6 3.6 2 53 2.9 7.1 10.7 3 111 6.0 14.9 25.6 4 107 5.8 14.3 39.9 POOR 5 449 24.4 60.1 100.0 . 1036 56.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 747 Missing cases 1092 EVACP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 3.6 10.1 10.1 2 249 13.5 37.6 47.7 3 256 13.9 38.7 86.4 4 53 2.9 8.0 94.4 POOR 5 37 2.0 5.6 100.0 . 1035 56.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 142 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 662 Missing cases 1177 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABK94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Kerrey Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 .7 2.3 2.3 2 100 5.4 18.0 20.3 3 238 12.9 42.8 63.1 4 112 6.1 20.1 83.3 POOR 5 93 5.1 16.7 100.0 . 1057 57.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 226 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 1283 EVAJB94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 36 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1803 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 1803 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAPT94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 .8 2.3 2.3 2 97 5.3 16.1 18.4 3 200 10.9 33.1 51.5 4 126 6.9 20.9 72.4 POOR 5 167 9.1 27.6 100.0 . 1057 57.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 178 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 604 Missing cases 1235 EVASN94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Nunn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 .7 2.2 2.2 2 102 5.5 17.3 19.5 3 251 13.6 42.5 62.0 4 109 5.9 18.5 80.5 POOR 5 115 6.3 19.5 100.0 . 1064 57.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 185 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 590 Missing cases 1249 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 1.3 3.0 3.0 2 131 7.1 16.6 19.6 3 240 13.1 30.4 50.0 4 135 7.3 17.1 67.1 POOR 5 260 14.1 32.9 100.0 . 1034 56.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 790 Missing cases 1049 EVARP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 1.5 3.6 3.6 2 200 10.9 25.9 29.5 3 243 13.2 31.5 61.0 4 130 7.1 16.8 77.8 POOR 5 171 9.3 22.2 100.0 . 1038 56.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 29 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 772 Missing cases 1067 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADH94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 1.8 4.9 4.9 2 130 7.1 19.1 24.0 3 205 11.1 30.2 54.2 4 102 5.5 15.0 69.2 POOR 5 209 11.4 30.8 100.0 . 1080 58.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 80 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 679 Missing cases 1160 EVARH94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 48 2.6 7.0 7.0 2 168 9.1 24.5 31.4 3 209 11.4 30.4 61.9 4 105 5.7 15.3 77.1 POOR 5 157 8.5 22.9 100.0 . 1075 58.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 77 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 687 Missing cases 1152 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADS94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem Senate cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 .8 3.4 3.4 2 86 4.7 21.1 24.6 3 109 5.9 26.8 51.4 4 60 3.3 14.7 66.1 POOR 5 138 7.5 33.9 100.0 . 1396 75.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 36 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1432 EVARS94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep Senate cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 1.8 8.3 8.3 2 105 5.7 26.3 34.5 3 90 4.9 22.5 57.0 4 62 3.4 15.5 72.5 POOR 5 110 6.0 27.5 100.0 . 1391 75.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 400 Missing cases 1439 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 1.6 5.3 5.3 2 112 6.1 20.4 25.7 3 128 7.0 23.3 49.0 4 82 4.5 14.9 63.9 POOR 5 198 10.8 36.1 100.0 . 1251 68.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 549 Missing cases 1290 EVARG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 68 3.7 11.9 11.9 2 150 8.2 26.2 38.1 3 154 8.4 26.9 65.0 4 82 4.5 14.3 79.4 POOR 5 118 6.4 20.6 100.0 . 1231 66.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 36 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 572 Missing cases 1267 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAIND94 Q28 How favorable, independents Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 60 3.3 7.8 7.8 2 187 10.2 24.3 32.1 3 331 18.0 43.0 75.2 4 106 5.8 13.8 88.9 UNFAVORABLE 5 85 4.6 11.1 100.0 . 1013 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 57 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 769 Missing cases 1070 EVACON94 Q28 How favorable, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 11 .6 1.4 1.4 2 143 7.8 17.9 19.3 3 123 6.7 15.4 34.7 4 264 14.4 33.0 67.7 UNFAVORABLE 5 258 14.0 32.3 100.0 . 1014 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 26 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 799 Missing cases 1040 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVASC94 Q28 How favorable, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 42 2.3 5.3 5.3 2 251 13.6 31.7 37.0 3 220 12.0 27.8 64.9 4 184 10.0 23.3 88.1 UNFAVORABLE 5 94 5.1 11.9 100.0 . 1015 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 791 Missing cases 1048 EVAMIL94 Q28 How favorable, military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 177 9.6 22.2 22.2 2 335 18.2 41.9 64.1 3 176 9.6 22.0 86.1 4 76 4.1 9.5 95.6 UNFAVORABLE 5 35 1.9 4.4 100.0 . 1014 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 26 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 799 Missing cases 1040 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMM94 Q28 How favorable, mass media Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 13 .7 1.6 1.6 2 52 2.8 6.5 8.2 3 108 5.9 13.6 21.8 4 210 11.4 26.4 48.2 UNFAVORABLE 5 412 22.4 51.8 100.0 . 1017 55.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 27 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 795 Missing cases 1044 EVABUS94 Q28 How favorable, business corp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 27 1.5 3.5 3.5 2 202 11.0 26.2 29.7 3 260 14.1 33.7 63.3 4 169 9.2 21.9 85.2 UNFAVORABLE 5 114 6.2 14.8 100.0 . 1024 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 43 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 772 Missing cases 1067 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAB94 Q28 How favorable, labor unions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 65 3.5 8.1 8.1 2 147 8.0 18.4 26.5 3 161 8.8 20.2 46.7 4 196 10.7 24.5 71.2 UNFAVORABLE 5 230 12.5 28.8 100.0 . 1012 55.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 799 Missing cases 1040 EVAUWS94 Q28 How favorable, United We Stand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 28 1.5 5.5 5.5 2 67 3.6 13.2 18.7 3 137 7.4 26.9 45.6 4 97 5.3 19.1 64.6 UNFAVORABLE 5 180 9.8 35.4 100.0 . 1046 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 284 15.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 509 Missing cases 1330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAFC94 Q28 How favorable, Fundamentalist Christ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 79 4.3 11.1 11.1 2 76 4.1 10.7 21.7 3 109 5.9 15.3 37.0 4 109 5.9 15.3 52.3 UNFAVORABLE 5 340 18.5 47.7 100.0 . 1029 56.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 97 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 713 Missing cases 1126 EVAWOM94 Q28 How favorable, womens movement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 49 2.7 6.4 6.4 2 160 8.7 21.1 27.5 3 200 10.9 26.3 53.8 4 154 8.4 20.3 74.1 UNFAVORABLE 5 197 10.7 25.9 100.0 . 1022 55.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 57 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 760 Missing cases 1079 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAENV94 Q28 How favorable, environmentalists Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 112 6.1 14.2 14.2 2 241 13.1 30.7 44.9 3 170 9.2 21.6 66.5 4 129 7.0 16.4 83.0 UNFAVORABLE 5 134 7.3 17.0 100.0 . 1017 55.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 36 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 786 Missing cases 1053 FIRM94 Q29a Better be party supporter than ind Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 63 3.4 7.8 7.8 2 188 10.2 23.4 31.2 3 208 11.3 25.9 57.1 4 249 13.5 31.0 88.1 STRONGLY AGREE 5 96 5.2 11.9 100.0 . 996 54.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 804 Missing cases 1035 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPECIA94 Q29b Special interests have power Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 24 1.3 3.0 3.0 2 133 7.2 16.4 19.3 3 96 5.2 11.8 31.2 4 363 19.7 44.7 75.9 STRONGLY AGREE 5 196 10.7 24.1 100.0 . 996 54.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 31 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 812 Missing cases 1027 TRUPEO94 Q29c Most people can be trusted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 46 2.5 5.8 5.8 2 224 12.2 28.1 33.8 3 181 9.8 22.7 56.5 4 321 17.5 40.2 96.7 STRONGLY AGREE 5 26 1.4 3.3 100.0 . 1000 54.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 798 Missing cases 1041 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYCON94 Q29d Parties confuse issues/no choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 36 2.0 4.4 4.4 2 163 8.9 20.0 24.4 3 118 6.4 14.5 38.9 4 337 18.3 41.3 80.2 STRONGLY AGREE 5 161 8.8 19.8 100.0 . 998 54.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 26 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 1024 EQUAL94 Q29e Everyone have equal opportunity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 41 2.2 5.1 5.1 2 105 5.7 13.0 18.0 3 133 7.2 16.4 34.5 4 376 20.4 46.5 81.0 STRONGLY AGREE 5 154 8.4 19.0 100.0 . 1002 54.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 809 Missing cases 1030 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETTER94 Q29f I am better informed than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 15 .8 2.0 2.0 2 66 3.6 8.8 10.8 3 215 11.7 28.6 39.3 4 303 16.5 40.2 79.5 STRONGLY AGREE 5 154 8.4 20.5 100.0 . 1001 54.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 85 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 753 Missing cases 1086 RADICA94 Q29g Government needs radical change Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 30 1.6 3.7 3.7 2 172 9.4 21.4 25.2 3 131 7.1 16.3 41.5 4 308 16.7 38.4 79.9 STRONGLY AGREE 5 161 8.8 20.1 100.0 . 1001 54.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 36 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 802 Missing cases 1037 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOOKOU94 Q29h People looking out for themselves Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 10 .5 1.2 1.2 2 75 4.1 9.1 10.3 3 119 6.5 14.5 24.8 4 468 25.4 56.9 81.7 STRONGLY AGREE 5 151 8.2 18.3 100.0 . 998 54.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 18 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 823 Missing cases 1016 WELREP94 Q29i People like me well represented Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 110 6.0 14.2 14.2 2 335 18.2 43.3 57.5 3 176 9.6 22.7 80.2 4 134 7.3 17.3 97.5 STRONGLY AGREE 5 19 1.0 2.5 100.0 . 1006 54.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 774 Missing cases 1065 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FAMTIE94 Q29j More emphasis on family ties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 30 1.6 3.7 3.7 2 50 2.7 6.2 9.8 3 98 5.3 12.1 21.9 4 324 17.6 39.9 61.7 STRONGLY AGREE 5 311 16.9 38.3 100.0 . 998 54.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 813 Missing cases 1026 WRDGOD94 Q29k Bible is actual word of God Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 222 12.1 27.9 27.9 2 183 10.0 23.0 50.9 3 140 7.6 17.6 68.5 4 125 6.8 15.7 84.2 STRONGLY AGREE 5 126 6.9 15.8 100.0 . 999 54.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 796 Missing cases 1043 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RIDPTY94 Q29l More efficient if rid of parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 220 12.0 29.3 29.3 2 301 16.4 40.1 69.5 3 118 6.4 15.7 85.2 4 61 3.3 8.1 93.3 STRONGLY AGREE 5 50 2.7 6.7 100.0 . 999 54.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 90 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 750 Missing cases 1089 SEX94 Q30 What is your sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 455 24.7 53.2 53.2 FEMALE 2 401 21.8 46.8 100.0 . 983 53.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 856 Missing cases 983 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME94 Q31 What was your income last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER 20,000 1 157 8.5 19.3 19.3 20,000 - 39,999 2 263 14.3 32.4 51.7 40,000 - 59,999 3 181 9.8 22.3 74.0 60,000 - 79,999 4 93 5.1 11.5 85.5 80,000 - 99,999 5 46 2.5 5.7 91.1 OVER 100,000 6 72 3.9 8.9 100.0 . 1027 55.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 812 Missing cases 1027 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VET94 Q32 Are you or your spouse a veteran Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 418 22.7 48.8 48.8 NO 2 438 23.8 51.2 100.0 . 983 53.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 856 Missing cases 983 WWII94 Q33 If yes, World War II Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1626 88.4 88.4 88.4 CHECKED 1 213 11.6 11.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - KOREA94 Q33 If yes, Korea Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1743 94.8 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1 96 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VIET94 Q33 If yes, Vietnam Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1773 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 66 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 PGULF94 Q33 If yes, Persian Gulf Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1836 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL94 Q34 What is your religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 191 10.4 25.4 25.4 PROTESTANT 2 489 26.6 65.1 90.5 JEWISH 3 16 .9 2.1 92.7 BAPTIST 4 55 3.0 7.3 100.0 . 985 53.6 Missing NO PREFERENCE 5 67 3.6 Missing OTHER 6 36 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 751 Missing cases 1088 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG94 Q35 Do you consider self born-again Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 240 13.1 28.7 28.7 NO 2 595 32.4 71.3 100.0 . 1004 54.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 835 Missing cases 1004 CHRIST94 Q36 Do you consider self fundamentalist Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 159 8.6 19.9 19.9 NO 2 641 34.9 80.1 100.0 . 1039 56.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 800 Missing cases 1039 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH94 Q37 Month of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .1 .1 1 85 4.6 10.1 10.2 2 6 .3 .7 10.9 3 2 .1 .2 11.1 5 1 .1 .1 11.3 8 1 .1 .1 11.4 10 7 .4 .8 12.2 11 673 36.6 79.7 91.9 12 65 3.5 7.7 99.6 14 1 .1 .1 99.8 15 1 .1 .1 99.9 18 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 995 54.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 844 Missing cases 995 DAY94 Q37 Day of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 12 .7 1.4 1.4 2 9 .5 1.1 2.5 3 3 .2 .4 2.9 4 8 .4 1.0 3.8 5 11 .6 1.3 5.1 6 4 .2 .5 5.6 7 1 .1 .1 5.7 8 3 .2 .4 6.1 9 8 .4 1.0 7.0 10 5 .3 .6 7.6 11 2 .1 .2 7.9 12 13 .7 1.5 9.4 13 13 .7 1.5 11.0 14 210 11.4 25.0 36.0 15 115 6.3 13.7 49.7 16 74 4.0 8.8 58.5 17 50 2.7 6.0 64.5 18 47 2.6 5.6 70.1 19 30 1.6 3.6 73.7 20 24 1.3 2.9 76.5 21 26 1.4 3.1 79.6 22 23 1.3 2.7 82.4 23 13 .7 1.5 83.9 24 11 .6 1.3 85.2 25 16 .9 1.9 87.1 26 21 1.1 2.5 89.6 27 19 1.0 2.3 91.9 28 26 1.4 3.1 95.0 29 15 .8 1.8 96.8 30 17 .9 2.0 98.8 31 8 .4 1.0 99.8 36 1 .1 .1 99.9 39 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 1000 54.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 839 Missing cases 1000 YEAR94 Q37 Year of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 94 845 45.9 100.0 100.0 . 994 54.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 845 Missing cases 994 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSPN94 Responded to 1994 wave Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 962 52.3 52.3 52.3 YES 1.00 877 47.7 47.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 **********1996 Pre-election Wave********** PTYHRS6A Q1, hours per week to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT INVOLVED 1 370 20.1 68.6 68.6 TWO HOURS OR LESS 2 115 6.3 21.3 90.0 THREE TO FIVE HOURS 3 37 2.0 6.9 96.8 SIX TO TEN HOURS 4 7 .4 1.3 98.1 MORE THAN TEN HOURS 5 10 .5 1.9 100.0 . 1300 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 539 Missing cases 1300 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTRN6A Q2, Rep Pres nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 201 10.9 38.3 38.3 2 84 4.6 16.0 54.3 3 75 4.1 14.3 68.6 4 44 2.4 8.4 77.0 5 31 1.7 5.9 82.9 6 17 .9 3.2 86.1 NOT INTERESTED 7 73 4.0 13.9 100.0 . 1314 71.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 525 Missing cases 1314 INTGE6A Q2, general election for President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 389 21.2 72.8 72.8 2 80 4.4 15.0 87.8 3 32 1.7 6.0 93.8 4 20 1.1 3.7 97.6 5 6 .3 1.1 98.7 NOT INTERESTED 7 7 .4 1.3 100.0 . 1305 71.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 534 Missing cases 1305 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTHRD6A Q2, US House race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 242 13.2 47.0 47.0 2 97 5.3 18.8 65.8 3 80 4.4 15.5 81.4 4 39 2.1 7.6 88.9 5 22 1.2 4.3 93.2 6 16 .9 3.1 96.3 NOT INTERESTED 7 19 1.0 3.7 100.0 . 1324 72.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 1324 INTHRN6A Q2, US House races nationally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 165 9.0 32.2 32.2 2 103 5.6 20.1 52.2 3 96 5.2 18.7 71.0 4 68 3.7 13.3 84.2 5 34 1.8 6.6 90.8 6 28 1.5 5.5 96.3 NOT INTERESTED 7 19 1.0 3.7 100.0 . 1326 72.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 513 Missing cases 1326 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTSLR6A Q2, other state and local races Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 236 12.8 45.1 45.1 2 108 5.9 20.7 65.8 3 94 5.1 18.0 83.7 4 45 2.4 8.6 92.4 5 18 1.0 3.4 95.8 6 10 .5 1.9 97.7 NOT INTERESTED 7 12 .7 2.3 100.0 . 1316 71.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 523 Missing cases 1316 HVOT926A Q3, How vote in the 1992 presidential ra Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GEORGE BUSH 1 238 12.9 43.7 43.7 BILL CLINTON 2 265 14.4 48.6 92.3 H. ROSS PEROT 3 40 2.2 7.3 99.6 OTHER/WRITE-IN 4 2 .1 .4 100.0 . 1294 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 1294 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTEWT6A Q3. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 690 37.5 99.3 99.3 1 5 .3 .7 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HVOT946A Q4, How vote in the 1994 US House race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 259 14.1 47.7 47.7 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 275 15.0 50.6 98.3 OTHER/WRITE-IN 3 3 .2 .6 98.9 DID NOT VOTE 4 6 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 543 Missing cases 1296 HVOTWT6A Q4. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 691 37.6 99.4 99.4 1 4 .2 .6 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDH6A Q5, Dem House, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 623 33.9 89.6 89.6 CHECKED 1 72 3.9 10.4 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDH6A Q5, Dem House, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 599 32.6 86.2 86.2 CHECKED 1 96 5.2 13.8 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 CLRKDH6A Q5, Dem House, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 688 37.4 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH6A Q5, Dem House, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 679 36.9 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 16 .9 2.3 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH6A Q5, Dem House, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 662 36.0 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 33 1.8 4.7 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 MONRH6A Q5, Rep House, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 604 32.8 86.9 86.9 CHECKED 1 91 4.9 13.1 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH6A Q5, Rep House, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 591 32.1 85.0 85.0 CHECKED 1 104 5.7 15.0 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH6A Q5, Rep House, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 687 37.4 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.2 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 CANVRH6A Q5, Rep House, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 671 36.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 24 1.3 3.5 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRH6A Q5, Rep House, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 639 34.7 91.9 91.9 CHECKED 1 56 3.0 8.1 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 653 35.5 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 42 2.3 6.0 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 CONVDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 632 34.4 90.9 90.9 CHECKED 1 63 3.4 9.1 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 692 37.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .4 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 689 37.5 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .9 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 OTHRDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 675 36.7 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 2.9 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 637 34.6 91.7 91.7 CHECKED 1 58 3.2 8.3 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 613 33.3 88.2 88.2 CHECKED 1 82 4.5 11.8 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 CLRKRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 688 37.4 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 681 37.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 14 .8 2.0 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 657 35.7 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 38 2.1 5.5 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 MONDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 655 35.6 94.2 94.2 CHECKED 1 40 2.2 5.8 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 628 34.1 90.4 90.4 CHECKED 1 67 3.6 9.6 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 690 37.5 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 5 .3 .7 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 CANVDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 683 37.1 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 1.7 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 673 36.6 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 3.2 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 631 34.3 90.8 90.8 CHECKED 1 64 3.5 9.2 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 CONVRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 593 32.2 85.3 85.3 CHECKED 1 102 5.5 14.7 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 687 37.4 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.2 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 676 36.8 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 2.7 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 OTHRRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 654 35.6 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 41 2.2 5.9 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYID6A Q6, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 126 6.9 23.3 23.3 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 77 4.2 14.3 37.6 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 65 3.5 12.0 49.6 INDEPENDENT 4 14 .8 2.6 52.2 INDEPENDENT REP 5 32 1.7 5.9 58.1 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 64 3.5 11.9 70.0 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 162 8.8 30.0 100.0 . 1297 70.5 Missing OTHER PTY WRITE-IN 8 2 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 540 Missing cases 1299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYWT6A Q6. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 693 37.7 99.7 99.7 1 2 .1 .3 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 LIBCON6A Q7, describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 9 .5 1.7 1.7 LIBERAL 2 93 5.1 17.5 19.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 59 3.2 11.1 30.4 MIDDLE OF-THE-ROAD 4 103 5.6 19.4 49.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 87 4.7 16.4 66.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 152 8.3 28.7 94.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 27 1.5 5.1 100.0 . 1297 70.5 Missing OTHER/WRITE-IN 8 6 .3 Missing NOT SURE 9 6 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 530 Missing cases 1309 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCWT6A Q7. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 689 37.5 99.1 99.1 1 6 .3 .9 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 CHAR6A Q8, characterize yourself: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED CONSISTENTL 1 293 15.9 55.2 55.2 INVOLVED WORTHWHILE 2 238 12.9 44.8 100.0 . 1308 71.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 531 Missing cases 1308 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT6A Q9, amendment to prohibit abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 93 5.1 18.6 18.6 FAVOR 2 59 3.2 11.8 30.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 42 2.3 8.4 38.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 1.5 5.6 44.4 OPPOSE 5 78 4.2 15.6 60.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 200 10.9 40.0 100.0 . 1306 71.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1339 INVOL6A Q9, decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 60 3.3 11.5 11.5 FAVOR 2 116 6.3 22.1 33.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 125 6.8 23.9 57.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 64 3.5 12.2 69.7 OPPOSE 5 96 5.2 18.3 88.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 63 3.4 12.0 100.0 . 1298 70.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 1315 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFTX6A Q9, reduce deficit, higher taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 68 3.7 13.1 13.1 FAVOR 2 133 7.2 25.6 38.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 109 5.9 21.0 59.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 55 3.0 10.6 70.3 OPPOSE 5 78 4.2 15.0 85.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 76 4.1 14.6 100.0 . 1303 70.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 519 Missing cases 1320 POLLUT6A Q9, more regulation to control pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 86 4.7 16.3 16.3 FAVOR 2 131 7.1 24.8 41.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 110 6.0 20.8 61.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 55 3.0 10.4 72.3 OPPOSE 5 83 4.5 15.7 88.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 63 3.4 11.9 100.0 . 1299 70.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 528 Missing cases 1311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPORT6A Q9, limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 71 3.9 14.3 14.3 FAVOR 2 102 5.5 20.6 34.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 119 6.5 24.0 58.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 65 3.5 13.1 72.0 OPPOSE 5 94 5.1 19.0 90.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 45 2.4 9.1 100.0 . 1301 70.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 42 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 496 Missing cases 1343 AFFACT6A Q9, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 24 1.3 4.6 4.6 FAVOR 2 71 3.9 13.7 18.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 107 5.8 20.7 39.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 71 3.9 13.7 52.7 OPPOSE 5 122 6.6 23.6 76.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 123 6.7 23.7 100.0 . 1301 70.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 20 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 518 Missing cases 1321 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERM6A Q9, term limits for Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 142 7.7 27.2 27.2 FAVOR 2 139 7.6 26.6 53.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 80 4.4 15.3 69.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 31 1.7 5.9 75.1 OPPOSE 5 62 3.4 11.9 87.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 68 3.7 13.0 100.0 . 1297 70.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 20 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 1317 NHI6A Q9, national health insurance plan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 94 5.1 18.5 18.5 FAVOR 2 97 5.3 19.1 37.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 74 4.0 14.6 52.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 33 1.8 6.5 58.8 OPPOSE 5 74 4.0 14.6 73.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 135 7.3 26.6 100.0 . 1298 70.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 507 Missing cases 1332 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFGP6A Q9, reduce deficit, program cuts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 140 7.6 26.7 26.7 FAVOR 2 133 7.2 25.4 52.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 113 6.1 21.6 73.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 48 2.6 9.2 82.8 OPPOSE 5 61 3.3 11.6 94.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 29 1.6 5.5 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 19 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 1315 SHFTST6A Q9, domestic programs to the states Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 138 7.5 26.5 26.5 FAVOR 2 151 8.2 29.0 55.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 93 5.1 17.9 73.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 37 2.0 7.1 80.4 OPPOSE 5 66 3.6 12.7 93.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 36 2.0 6.9 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 521 Missing cases 1318 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARM6A Q9, increased firearms regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 165 9.0 31.3 31.3 FAVOR 2 120 6.5 22.8 54.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 61 3.3 11.6 65.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 24 1.3 4.6 70.2 OPPOSE 5 70 3.8 13.3 83.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 87 4.7 16.5 100.0 . 1299 70.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 13 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 1312 FLTTAX6A Q9, flat tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 66 3.6 14.3 14.3 FAVOR 2 72 3.9 15.7 30.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 87 4.7 18.9 48.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.4 5.7 54.6 OPPOSE 5 86 4.7 18.7 73.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 123 6.7 26.7 100.0 . 1299 70.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 80 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 460 Missing cases 1379 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS6A Q10, most important issue in Q9: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 72 3.9 14.0 14.0 US INVOLVEMENT 2 15 .8 2.9 16.9 TAX INCREASE 3 53 2.9 10.3 27.2 POLLUTION 4 31 1.7 6.0 33.2 IMPORTS 5 21 1.1 4.1 37.3 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 6 13 .7 2.5 39.8 TERM LIMITS 7 23 1.3 4.5 44.3 NATL HEALTH INSUR 8 82 4.5 15.9 60.2 PROGRAM CUTS 9 108 5.9 21.0 81.2 DOMESTIC PROGRAMS 10 28 1.5 5.4 86.6 FIREARMS 11 27 1.5 5.2 91.8 FLAT TAX 12 42 2.3 8.2 100.0 . 1301 70.7 Missing NOT SURE 13 23 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 1324 PRIORP6A Q11, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 164 8.9 32.8 32.8 PRIORITY 2 173 9.4 34.6 67.4 NOT A PRIORITY 3 163 8.9 32.6 100.0 . 1305 71.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1339 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIODP6A Q11, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 68 3.7 13.8 13.8 PRIORITY 2 183 10.0 37.0 50.8 NOT A PRIORITY 3 243 13.2 49.2 100.0 . 1310 71.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 35 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 494 Missing cases 1345 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORE6A Q11, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 43 2.3 21.4 21.4 PRIORITY 2 69 3.8 34.3 55.7 NOT A PRIORITY 3 89 4.8 44.3 100.0 . 1318 71.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 320 17.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 201 Missing cases 1638 MIISLA6A Q12, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 24 1.3 8.4 8.4 FAVOR 2 110 6.0 38.3 46.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 69 3.8 24.0 70.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 21 1.1 7.3 78.0 OPPOSE 5 40 2.2 13.9 92.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 1.3 8.0 100.0 . 1357 73.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 195 10.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 287 Missing cases 1552 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISBB6A Q12, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 13 .7 6.8 6.8 FAVOR 2 52 2.8 27.1 33.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 40 2.2 20.8 54.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 23 1.3 12.0 66.7 OPPOSE 5 39 2.1 20.3 87.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 25 1.4 13.0 100.0 . 1374 74.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 273 14.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 192 Missing cases 1647 MIISPB6A Q12, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 118 6.4 32.1 32.1 FAVOR 2 87 4.7 23.6 55.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 47 2.6 12.8 68.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 6 .3 1.6 70.1 OPPOSE 5 35 1.9 9.5 79.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 75 4.1 20.4 100.0 . 1356 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 115 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 368 Missing cases 1471 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISBC6A Q12, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 81 4.4 18.3 18.3 FAVOR 2 83 4.5 18.8 37.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 50 2.7 11.3 48.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 24 1.3 5.4 53.8 OPPOSE 5 91 4.9 20.6 74.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 113 6.1 25.6 100.0 . 1344 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 442 Missing cases 1397 MIISRD6A Q12, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 50 2.7 11.8 11.8 FAVOR 2 137 7.4 32.2 44.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 91 4.9 21.4 65.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 40 2.2 9.4 74.8 OPPOSE 5 71 3.9 16.7 91.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 36 2.0 8.5 100.0 . 1344 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 70 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 425 Missing cases 1414 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISSF6A Q12, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 67 3.6 22.5 22.5 FAVOR 2 75 4.1 25.2 47.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 62 3.4 20.8 68.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 22 1.2 7.4 75.8 OPPOSE 5 37 2.0 12.4 88.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 35 1.9 11.7 100.0 . 1354 73.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 187 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 298 Missing cases 1541 MIISPG6A Q12, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 93 5.1 27.0 27.0 FAVOR 2 96 5.2 27.8 54.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 38 2.1 11.0 65.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 9 .5 2.6 68.4 OPPOSE 5 38 2.1 11.0 79.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 71 3.9 20.6 100.0 . 1356 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 138 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 345 Missing cases 1494 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRL6A Q12, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 20 1.1 8.3 8.3 FAVOR 2 81 4.4 33.5 41.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 59 3.2 24.4 66.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 21 1.1 8.7 74.8 OPPOSE 5 42 2.3 17.4 92.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 19 1.0 7.9 100.0 . 1366 74.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 231 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 242 Missing cases 1597 MIIHRP6A Q12, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 59 3.2 25.1 25.1 FAVOR 2 67 3.6 28.5 53.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 28 1.5 11.9 65.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 20 1.1 8.5 74.0 OPPOSE 5 36 2.0 15.3 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 25 1.4 10.6 100.0 . 1362 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 242 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 235 Missing cases 1604 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISAA6A Q12, Average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 62 3.4 14.0 14.0 FAVOR 2 168 9.1 37.8 51.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 124 6.7 27.9 79.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 2.3 9.5 89.2 OPPOSE 5 37 2.0 8.3 97.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 11 .6 2.5 100.0 . 1345 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 50 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 MIISDP6A Q12, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 51 2.8 11.4 11.4 FAVOR 2 106 5.8 23.6 35.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 65 3.5 14.5 49.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 40 2.2 8.9 58.4 OPPOSE 5 107 5.8 23.8 82.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 80 4.4 17.8 100.0 . 1342 73.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 449 Missing cases 1390 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRP6A Q12, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 84 4.6 19.1 19.1 FAVOR 2 138 7.5 31.4 50.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 64 3.5 14.6 65.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.4 5.9 71.1 OPPOSE 5 77 4.2 17.5 88.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 50 2.7 11.4 100.0 . 1347 73.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 439 Missing cases 1400 MIISRE6A Q12, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 26 1.4 18.6 18.6 FAVOR 2 34 1.8 24.3 42.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 34 1.8 24.3 67.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 13 .7 9.3 76.4 OPPOSE 5 21 1.1 15.0 91.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 .7 8.6 100.0 . 1367 74.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 332 18.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 140 Missing cases 1699 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUGOV6A Q13, the US government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 4 .2 .7 .7 MOST OF THE TIME 2 111 6.0 20.4 21.1 SOME OF THE TIME 3 339 18.4 62.3 83.5 ALMOST NEVER 4 79 4.3 14.5 98.0 NEVER 5 11 .6 2.0 100.0 . 1295 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 1295 APPBC6A Q14, Bill Clinton as President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 69 3.8 12.9 12.9 APPROVE 2 213 11.6 39.8 52.7 DISAPPROVE 3 126 6.9 23.6 76.3 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 127 6.9 23.7 100.0 . 1295 70.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 9 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 535 Missing cases 1304 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPNG6A Q14, Newt Gingrich as Speaker Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 70 3.8 13.2 13.2 APPROVE 2 146 7.9 27.6 40.8 DISAPPROVE 3 118 6.4 22.3 63.1 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 195 10.6 36.9 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing NOT SURE 5 14 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 529 Missing cases 1310 APPRD6A Q14, Robert Dole as Sen Maj Leader Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 57 3.1 11.0 11.0 APPROVE 2 244 13.3 47.3 58.3 DISAPPROVE 3 143 7.8 27.7 86.0 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 72 3.9 14.0 100.0 . 1298 70.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 25 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 516 Missing cases 1323 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NECON6A Q15, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 22 1.2 4.0 4.0 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 148 8.0 27.2 31.3 ABOUT THE SAME 3 267 14.5 49.1 80.3 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 90 4.9 16.5 96.9 MUCH WORSE 5 17 .9 3.1 100.0 . 1295 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 1295 PECON6A Q15, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 25 1.4 4.6 4.6 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 118 6.4 21.9 26.5 ABOUT THE SAME 3 330 17.9 61.1 87.6 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 54 2.9 10.0 97.6 MUCH WORSE 5 13 .7 2.4 100.0 . 1299 70.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 540 Missing cases 1299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON6A Q16, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 9 .5 1.7 1.7 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 97 5.3 17.8 19.5 ABOUT THE SAME 3 307 16.7 56.4 75.9 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 113 6.1 20.8 96.7 MUCH WORSE 5 18 1.0 3.3 100.0 . 1295 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 1295 FPECON6A Q16, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 12 .7 2.2 2.2 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 95 5.2 17.6 19.8 ABOUT THE SAME 3 365 19.8 67.6 87.4 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 59 3.2 10.9 98.3 MUCH WORSE 5 9 .5 1.7 100.0 . 1299 70.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 540 Missing cases 1299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECPR6A Q17, How certain are you for Q16a? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 41 2.2 7.6 7.6 CERTAIN 2 257 14.0 47.3 54.9 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 228 12.4 42.0 96.9 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 17 .9 3.1 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 543 Missing cases 1296 FPECPR6A Q18, How certain are you for Q16b? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 69 3.8 12.7 12.7 CERTAIN 2 274 14.9 50.5 63.2 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 186 10.1 34.3 97.4 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 14 .8 2.6 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 543 Missing cases 1296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCLA6A Q19, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 2 4 .2 1.0 1.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 24 1.3 5.8 6.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 93 5.1 22.3 29.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 128 7.0 30.7 59.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 153 8.3 36.7 96.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 15 .8 3.6 100.0 . 1336 72.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 86 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 417 Missing cases 1422 LCBB6A Q19, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 20 1.1 6.5 6.5 LIBERAL 2 81 4.4 26.2 32.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 84 4.6 27.2 59.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 66 3.6 21.4 81.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 33 1.8 10.7 91.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 20 1.1 6.5 98.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 5 .3 1.6 100.0 . 1342 73.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 188 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 309 Missing cases 1530 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPB6A Q19, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 2 6 .3 1.3 1.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 2 .1 .4 1.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 12 .7 2.5 4.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 18 1.0 3.8 8.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 99 5.4 20.9 28.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 337 18.3 71.1 100.0 . 1331 72.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 474 Missing cases 1365 LCBC6A Q19, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 119 6.5 23.9 23.9 LIBERAL 2 195 10.6 39.2 63.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 112 6.1 22.5 85.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 59 3.2 11.9 97.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 5 .3 1.0 98.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 6 .3 1.2 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1321 71.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 497 Missing cases 1342 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD6A Q19, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 7 .4 1.4 2.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 15 .8 3.0 5.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 76 4.1 15.3 20.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 120 6.5 24.1 44.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 240 13.1 48.2 92.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 37 2.0 7.4 100.0 . 1324 72.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 1341 LCSF6A Q19, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 17 .9 4.2 4.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 21 1.1 5.2 10.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 59 3.2 14.5 24.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 104 5.7 25.6 50.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 158 8.6 38.8 88.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 45 2.4 11.1 100.0 . 1332 72.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 100 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1432 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCNG6A Q19, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .3 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 4 .2 .8 1.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 4 .2 .8 2.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 14 .8 2.9 5.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 24 1.3 5.0 10.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 190 10.3 39.8 50.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 236 12.8 49.5 100.0 . 1327 72.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 35 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 477 Missing cases 1362 LCPG6A Q19, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 2 6 .3 1.4 1.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 5 .3 1.2 2.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 20 1.1 4.7 7.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 38 2.1 8.9 16.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 169 9.2 39.5 55.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 190 10.3 44.4 100.0 . 1338 72.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 73 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 428 Missing cases 1411 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ6A Q19, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 274 14.9 59.1 59.1 LIBERAL 2 120 6.5 25.9 84.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 33 1.8 7.1 92.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 19 1.0 4.1 96.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 9 .5 1.9 98.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 4 .2 .9 98.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1332 72.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 43 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 1375 LCRL6A Q19, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 4 .2 1.2 1.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 22 1.2 6.6 8.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 89 4.8 26.7 34.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 77 4.2 23.1 58.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 118 6.4 35.4 93.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 22 1.2 6.6 100.0 . 1341 72.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 165 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 333 Missing cases 1506 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP6A Q19, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 2 12 .7 3.3 3.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 19 1.0 5.2 8.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 62 3.4 17.1 25.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 85 4.6 23.5 49.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 126 6.9 34.8 84.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 58 3.2 16.0 100.0 . 1336 72.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 141 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 362 Missing cases 1477 LCCP6A Q19, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .1 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 24 1.3 6.5 7.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 46 2.5 12.5 19.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 153 8.3 41.7 61.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 89 4.8 24.3 85.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 50 2.7 13.6 99.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 3 .2 .8 100.0 . 1331 72.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 141 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 367 Missing cases 1472 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAA6A Q19, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .2 .2 LIBERAL 2 13 .7 2.7 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 69 3.8 14.2 17.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 204 11.1 42.0 59.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 156 8.5 32.1 91.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 42 2.3 8.6 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1324 72.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 29 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 486 Missing cases 1353 LCDP6A Q19, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 88 4.8 17.7 17.7 LIBERAL 2 225 12.2 45.4 63.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 140 7.6 28.2 91.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 31 1.7 6.3 97.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 7 .4 1.4 99.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 5 .3 1.0 100.0 . 1323 71.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 20 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 496 Missing cases 1343 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP6A Q19, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 4 .2 .8 1.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 5 .3 1.0 2.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 21 1.1 4.3 6.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 85 4.6 17.3 24.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 294 16.0 60.0 84.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 77 4.2 15.7 100.0 . 1328 72.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 490 Missing cases 1349 LCUWS6A Q19, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 8 .4 3.2 4.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 9 .5 3.6 8.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 53 2.9 21.5 29.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 52 2.8 21.1 50.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 83 4.5 33.6 84.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 39 2.1 15.8 100.0 . 1335 72.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 257 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 247 Missing cases 1592 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRE6A Q19, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .1 1.7 1.7 LIBERAL 2 8 .4 7.0 8.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 8 .4 7.0 15.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 30 1.6 26.1 41.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 21 1.1 18.3 60.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 29 1.6 25.2 85.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 17 .9 14.8 100.0 . 1339 72.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 385 20.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 115 Missing cases 1724 EVALA6A Q20, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 75 4.1 18.6 20.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 113 6.1 28.0 48.3 AVERAGE 4 134 7.3 33.2 81.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 43 2.3 10.6 92.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 17 .9 4.2 96.3 POOR 7 15 .8 3.7 100.0 . 1344 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 91 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 404 Missing cases 1435 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABB6A Q20, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 1.3 7.7 7.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 83 4.5 26.8 34.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 76 4.1 24.5 59.0 AVERAGE 4 68 3.7 21.9 81.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 28 1.5 9.0 90.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 16 .9 5.2 95.2 POOR 7 15 .8 4.8 100.0 . 1349 73.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 180 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 310 Missing cases 1529 EVAPB6A Q20, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 .8 3.2 3.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 57 3.1 12.3 15.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 66 3.6 14.3 29.9 AVERAGE 4 80 4.4 17.3 47.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 59 3.2 12.8 60.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 81 4.4 17.5 77.5 POOR 7 104 5.7 22.5 100.0 . 1344 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 462 Missing cases 1377 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC6A Q20, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 39 2.1 7.9 7.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 126 6.9 25.6 33.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 81 4.4 16.5 50.0 AVERAGE 4 69 3.8 14.0 64.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 33 1.8 6.7 70.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 48 2.6 9.8 80.5 POOR 7 96 5.2 19.5 100.0 . 1337 72.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 10 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 492 Missing cases 1347 EVARD6A Q20, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 25 1.4 5.1 5.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 103 5.6 21.1 26.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 123 6.7 25.2 51.4 AVERAGE 4 142 7.7 29.1 80.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 46 2.5 9.4 90.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 27 1.5 5.5 95.5 POOR 7 22 1.2 4.5 100.0 . 1336 72.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 488 Missing cases 1351 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVASF6A Q20, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .3 1.2 1.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 28 1.5 6.9 8.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 82 4.5 20.3 28.5 AVERAGE 4 102 5.5 25.3 53.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 68 3.7 16.9 70.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 60 3.3 14.9 85.6 POOR 7 58 3.2 14.4 100.0 . 1346 73.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 90 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 403 Missing cases 1436 EVAAG6A Q20, Albert Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 1.6 6.2 6.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 113 6.1 24.1 30.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 80 4.4 17.1 47.3 AVERAGE 4 78 4.2 16.6 64.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 57 3.1 12.2 76.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 42 2.3 9.0 85.1 POOR 7 70 3.8 14.9 100.0 . 1346 73.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 469 Missing cases 1370 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG6A Q20, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 39 2.1 8.2 8.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 71 3.9 15.0 23.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 75 4.1 15.9 39.1 AVERAGE 4 63 3.4 13.3 52.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 42 2.3 8.9 61.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 51 2.8 10.8 72.1 POOR 7 132 7.2 27.9 100.0 . 1343 73.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 23 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 473 Missing cases 1366 EVAPG6A Q20, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 .8 3.2 3.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 44 2.4 10.0 13.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 66 3.6 15.0 28.2 AVERAGE 4 92 5.0 21.0 49.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 63 3.4 14.4 63.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 63 3.4 14.4 77.9 POOR 7 97 5.3 22.1 100.0 . 1347 73.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 439 Missing cases 1400 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAJJ6A Q20, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 1.6 1.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 29 1.6 6.4 8.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 56 3.0 12.4 20.4 AVERAGE 4 78 4.2 17.3 37.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 64 3.5 14.2 52.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 77 4.2 17.1 69.1 POOR 7 139 7.6 30.9 100.0 . 1345 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 450 Missing cases 1389 EVARL6A Q20, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 11 .6 3.2 3.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 57 3.1 16.6 19.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 65 3.5 18.9 38.7 AVERAGE 4 114 6.2 33.1 71.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 53 2.9 15.4 87.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 18 1.0 5.2 92.4 POOR 7 26 1.4 7.6 100.0 . 1352 73.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 143 7.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 344 Missing cases 1495 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAHRP6A Q20, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 22 1.2 5.4 7.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 48 2.6 11.8 18.9 AVERAGE 4 89 4.8 21.8 40.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 88 4.8 21.6 62.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 70 3.8 17.2 79.4 POOR 7 84 4.6 20.6 100.0 . 1351 73.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 80 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 408 Missing cases 1431 EVACP6A Q20, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 37 2.0 9.3 9.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 92 5.0 23.2 32.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 100 5.4 25.3 57.8 AVERAGE 4 118 6.4 29.8 87.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 26 1.4 6.6 94.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 16 .9 4.0 98.2 POOR 7 7 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1344 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 99 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 396 Missing cases 1443 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAS6A Q20, Arlen Specter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 2 .1 .7 .7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 22 1.2 7.9 8.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 43 2.3 15.4 23.9 AVERAGE 4 68 3.7 24.3 48.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 65 3.5 23.2 71.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 38 2.1 13.6 85.0 POOR 7 42 2.3 15.0 100.0 . 1356 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 203 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 280 Missing cases 1559 EVAHC6A Q20, Hillary Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 37 2.0 7.8 7.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 93 5.1 19.5 27.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 71 3.9 14.9 42.2 AVERAGE 4 57 3.1 12.0 54.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 37 2.0 7.8 62.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 40 2.2 8.4 70.4 POOR 7 141 7.7 29.6 100.0 . 1339 72.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 476 Missing cases 1363 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADP6A Q20, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .9 3.3 3.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 73 4.0 14.9 18.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 91 4.9 18.5 36.7 AVERAGE 4 115 6.3 23.4 60.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 53 2.9 10.8 70.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 50 2.7 10.2 81.1 POOR 7 93 5.1 18.9 100.0 . 1339 72.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 9 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 491 Missing cases 1348 EVARP6A Q20, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 21 1.1 4.3 4.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 68 3.7 14.0 18.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 93 5.1 19.2 37.6 AVERAGE 4 131 7.1 27.1 64.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 61 3.3 12.6 77.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 45 2.4 9.3 86.6 POOR 7 65 3.5 13.4 100.0 . 1340 72.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 484 Missing cases 1355 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAUWS6A Q20, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .2 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 13 .7 5.5 7.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 23 1.3 9.7 16.9 AVERAGE 4 49 2.7 20.8 37.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 51 2.8 21.6 59.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 40 2.2 16.9 76.3 POOR 7 56 3.0 23.7 100.0 . 1359 73.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 244 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 236 Missing cases 1603 EVARE6A Q20, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 1 .1 .8 .8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 5 .3 4.1 4.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 6 .3 4.9 9.8 AVERAGE 4 27 1.5 22.1 32.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 26 1.4 21.3 53.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 24 1.3 19.7 73.0 POOR 7 33 1.8 27.0 100.0 . 1364 74.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 353 19.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 122 Missing cases 1717 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACON6A Q20, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .3 1.1 1.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 25 1.4 5.3 6.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 70 3.8 14.9 21.3 AVERAGE 4 133 7.2 28.4 49.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 83 4.5 17.7 67.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 90 4.9 19.2 86.6 POOR 7 63 3.4 13.4 100.0 . 1349 73.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 469 Missing cases 1370 EVASC6A Q20, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 8 .4 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 49 2.7 10.7 12.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 93 5.1 20.3 32.7 AVERAGE 4 176 9.6 38.3 71.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 70 3.8 15.3 86.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 34 1.8 7.4 93.7 POOR 7 29 1.6 6.3 100.0 . 1352 73.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 459 Missing cases 1380 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMIL6A Q20, US Military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 42 2.3 9.3 9.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 109 5.9 24.0 33.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 124 6.7 27.3 60.6 AVERAGE 4 112 6.1 24.7 85.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 42 2.3 9.3 94.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 14 .8 3.1 97.6 POOR 7 11 .6 2.4 100.0 . 1350 73.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 35 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 454 Missing cases 1385 EVACHR6A Q20, Fundamentalist Christians Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 11 .6 2.9 2.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 41 2.2 10.9 13.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 42 2.3 11.1 24.9 AVERAGE 4 51 2.8 13.5 38.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 41 2.2 10.9 49.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 61 3.3 16.2 65.5 POOR 7 130 7.1 34.5 100.0 . 1349 73.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 113 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 377 Missing cases 1462 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAUN6A Q20, The United Nations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 1.6 1.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 23 1.3 5.2 6.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 71 3.9 16.2 23.0 AVERAGE 4 128 7.0 29.2 52.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 60 3.3 13.7 65.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 64 3.5 14.6 80.4 POOR 7 86 4.7 19.6 100.0 . 1346 73.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 54 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 439 Missing cases 1400 TVLA6A Q21, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .9 3.9 3.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 67 3.6 16.2 20.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 113 6.1 27.4 47.5 AVERAGE 4 143 7.8 34.6 82.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 39 2.1 9.4 91.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 18 1.0 4.4 95.9 POOR 7 17 .9 4.1 100.0 . 1327 72.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 99 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 413 Missing cases 1426 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVBB6A Q21, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 .9 6.0 6.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 55 3.0 19.5 25.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 60 3.3 21.3 46.8 AVERAGE 4 93 5.1 33.0 79.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 31 1.7 11.0 90.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 14 .8 5.0 95.7 POOR 7 12 .7 4.3 100.0 . 1330 72.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 227 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 282 Missing cases 1557 TVPB6A Q21, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.4 5.3 5.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 91 4.9 18.7 24.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 101 5.5 20.8 44.9 AVERAGE 4 116 6.3 23.9 68.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 47 2.6 9.7 78.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 35 1.9 7.2 85.6 POOR 7 70 3.8 14.4 100.0 . 1322 71.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 486 Missing cases 1353 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVBC6A Q21, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 138 7.5 27.1 27.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 173 9.4 33.9 61.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 74 4.0 14.5 75.5 AVERAGE 4 61 3.3 12.0 87.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 17 .9 3.3 90.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 17 .9 3.3 94.1 POOR 7 30 1.6 5.9 100.0 . 1315 71.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 14 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 510 Missing cases 1329 TVRD6A Q21, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 .7 2.6 2.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 47 2.6 9.3 11.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 110 6.0 21.7 33.6 AVERAGE 4 161 8.8 31.8 65.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 76 4.1 15.0 80.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 49 2.7 9.7 90.1 POOR 7 50 2.7 9.9 100.0 . 1316 71.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 506 Missing cases 1333 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVSF6A Q21, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 1.5 1.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 30 1.6 6.4 7.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 77 4.2 16.3 24.2 AVERAGE 4 146 7.9 31.0 55.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 102 5.5 21.7 76.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 39 2.1 8.3 85.1 POOR 7 70 3.8 14.9 100.0 . 1321 71.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 47 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 471 Missing cases 1368 TVPG6A Q21, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .2 .9 .9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 18 1.0 3.9 4.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 56 3.0 12.3 17.1 AVERAGE 4 126 6.9 27.6 44.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 101 5.5 22.1 66.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 67 3.6 14.7 81.4 POOR 7 85 4.6 18.6 100.0 . 1330 72.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 52 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 457 Missing cases 1382 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVJJ6A Q21, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 11 .6 2.4 2.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 80 4.4 17.4 19.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 76 4.1 16.5 36.3 AVERAGE 4 109 5.9 23.7 60.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 50 2.7 10.9 70.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 54 2.9 11.7 82.6 POOR 7 80 4.4 17.4 100.0 . 1324 72.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 55 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 460 Missing cases 1379 TVRL6A Q21, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 6 .3 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 36 2.0 9.9 11.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 63 3.4 17.4 29.0 AVERAGE 4 121 6.6 33.4 62.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 70 3.8 19.3 81.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 31 1.7 8.6 90.3 POOR 7 35 1.9 9.7 100.0 . 1328 72.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 149 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 362 Missing cases 1477 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVHRP6A Q21, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 .8 3.3 3.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 46 2.5 10.0 13.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 67 3.6 14.6 27.9 AVERAGE 4 118 6.4 25.7 53.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 64 3.5 13.9 67.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 63 3.4 13.7 81.3 POOR 7 86 4.7 18.7 100.0 . 1319 71.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 61 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 459 Missing cases 1380 AFFLA6A Q22a, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .2 1.2 1.2 FAVOR 2 12 .7 4.6 5.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 47 2.6 18.1 23.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 83 4.5 31.9 55.8 OPPOSE 5 92 5.0 35.4 91.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 1.3 8.8 100.0 . 1356 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 223 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 260 Missing cases 1579 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBB6A Q22a, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 21 1.1 9.3 9.3 FAVOR 2 94 5.1 41.6 50.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 75 4.1 33.2 84.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 16 .9 7.1 91.2 OPPOSE 5 16 .9 7.1 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 4 .2 1.8 100.0 . 1360 74.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 253 13.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 226 Missing cases 1613 AFFPB6A Q22a, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .3 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 12 .7 3.2 4.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 19 1.0 5.1 9.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 25 1.4 6.7 16.4 OPPOSE 5 81 4.4 21.8 38.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 230 12.5 61.8 100.0 . 1355 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 112 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 372 Missing cases 1467 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBC6A Q22a, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 129 7.0 29.5 29.5 FAVOR 2 197 10.7 45.0 74.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 89 4.8 20.3 94.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 11 .6 2.5 97.3 OPPOSE 5 2 .1 .5 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1345 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1401 AFFRD6A Q22a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .3 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 24 1.3 6.2 7.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 64 3.5 16.5 23.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 120 6.5 30.8 54.8 OPPOSE 5 142 7.7 36.5 91.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 34 1.8 8.7 100.0 . 1350 73.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 100 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 389 Missing cases 1450 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFSF6A Q22a, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .2 1.2 1.2 FAVOR 2 13 .7 5.3 6.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 37 2.0 15.0 21.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 56 3.0 22.8 44.3 OPPOSE 5 96 5.2 39.0 83.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 41 2.2 16.7 100.0 . 1358 73.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 235 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 246 Missing cases 1593 AFFPG6A Q22a, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .2 1.2 1.2 FAVOR 2 10 .5 3.0 4.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 20 1.1 6.0 10.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 45 2.4 13.6 23.9 OPPOSE 5 116 6.3 35.0 58.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 136 7.4 41.1 100.0 . 1355 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 153 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 331 Missing cases 1508 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRL6A Q22a, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1 .1 .4 .4 FAVOR 2 14 .8 6.2 6.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 43 2.3 18.9 25.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 80 4.4 35.2 60.8 OPPOSE 5 66 3.6 29.1 89.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 1.3 10.1 100.0 . 1361 74.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 251 13.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 227 Missing cases 1612 AFFHRP6A Q22a, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .1 .9 .9 FAVOR 2 8 .4 3.5 4.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 27 1.5 11.7 16.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 46 2.5 20.0 36.1 OPPOSE 5 90 4.9 39.1 75.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 57 3.1 24.8 100.0 . 1357 73.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 252 13.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 230 Missing cases 1609 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFAA6A Q22a, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .3 1.2 1.2 FAVOR 2 28 1.5 6.5 7.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 73 4.0 16.9 24.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 148 8.0 34.3 58.9 OPPOSE 5 142 7.7 32.9 91.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 35 1.9 8.1 100.0 . 1354 73.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 54 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 431 Missing cases 1408 AFFDP6A Q22a, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 94 5.1 21.4 21.4 FAVOR 2 196 10.7 44.5 65.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 124 6.7 28.2 94.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 18 1.0 4.1 98.2 OPPOSE 5 3 .2 .7 98.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1352 73.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 47 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 440 Missing cases 1399 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRP6A Q22a, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 6 .3 1.4 1.4 FAVOR 2 14 .8 3.3 4.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 29 1.6 6.9 11.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 96 5.2 22.7 34.4 OPPOSE 5 185 10.1 43.8 78.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 92 5.0 21.8 100.0 . 1355 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 62 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 422 Missing cases 1417 AFFRE6A Q22a, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1 .1 1.1 1.1 FAVOR 2 3 .2 3.4 4.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 12 .7 13.5 18.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.4 29.2 47.2 OPPOSE 5 25 1.4 28.1 75.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 22 1.2 24.7 100.0 . 1366 74.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 384 20.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 89 Missing cases 1750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFLA6A Q22b, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 30 1.6 8.8 8.8 FAVOR 2 174 9.5 51.3 60.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 109 5.9 32.2 92.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 13 .7 3.8 96.2 OPPOSE 5 11 .6 3.2 99.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 2 .1 .6 100.0 . 1362 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 138 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 339 Missing cases 1500 DEFBB6A Q22b, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 8 .4 3.4 3.4 FAVOR 2 41 2.2 17.4 20.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 52 2.8 22.0 42.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 2.3 17.8 60.6 OPPOSE 5 65 3.5 27.5 88.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 28 1.5 11.9 100.0 . 1366 74.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 237 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 236 Missing cases 1603 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFPB6A Q22b, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 183 10.0 44.0 44.0 FAVOR 2 154 8.4 37.0 81.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 58 3.2 13.9 95.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 10 .5 2.4 97.4 OPPOSE 5 5 .3 1.2 98.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1362 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 61 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 416 Missing cases 1423 DEFBC6A Q22b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 15 .8 3.2 3.2 FAVOR 2 39 2.1 8.4 11.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 62 3.4 13.3 24.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 64 3.5 13.7 38.5 OPPOSE 5 139 7.6 29.8 68.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 148 8.0 31.7 100.0 . 1348 73.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 467 Missing cases 1372 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRD6A Q22b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 69 3.8 15.0 15.0 FAVOR 2 211 11.5 46.0 61.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 121 6.6 26.4 87.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 37 2.0 8.1 95.4 OPPOSE 5 11 .6 2.4 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .5 2.2 100.0 . 1354 73.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 26 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 459 Missing cases 1380 DEFSF6A Q22b, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 59 3.2 18.3 18.3 FAVOR 2 143 7.8 44.4 62.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 81 4.4 25.2 87.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 21 1.1 6.5 94.4 OPPOSE 5 7 .4 2.2 96.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 11 .6 3.4 100.0 . 1361 74.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 156 8.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 322 Missing cases 1517 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFPG6A Q22b, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 156 8.5 40.7 40.7 FAVOR 2 141 7.7 36.8 77.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 58 3.2 15.1 92.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 11 .6 2.9 95.6 OPPOSE 5 3 .2 .8 96.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 14 .8 3.7 100.0 . 1363 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 93 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 383 Missing cases 1456 DEFRL6A Q22b, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 29 1.6 10.4 10.4 FAVOR 2 114 6.2 40.9 51.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 102 5.5 36.6 87.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 25 1.4 9.0 96.8 OPPOSE 5 6 .3 2.2 98.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 3 .2 1.1 100.0 . 1367 74.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 193 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 279 Missing cases 1560 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFHRP6A Q22b, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 100 5.4 32.5 32.5 FAVOR 2 118 6.4 38.3 70.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 53 2.9 17.2 88.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 13 .7 4.2 92.2 OPPOSE 5 15 .8 4.9 97.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .5 2.9 100.0 . 1363 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 168 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 308 Missing cases 1531 DEFAA6A Q22b, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 24 1.3 5.6 5.6 FAVOR 2 113 6.1 26.2 31.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 161 8.8 37.3 69.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 81 4.4 18.8 87.7 OPPOSE 5 45 2.4 10.4 98.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .4 1.9 100.0 . 1364 74.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 43 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 432 Missing cases 1407 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDP6A Q22b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 .6 2.5 2.5 FAVOR 2 35 1.9 7.8 10.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 56 3.0 12.5 22.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 80 4.4 17.9 40.6 OPPOSE 5 159 8.6 35.5 76.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 107 5.8 23.9 100.0 . 1362 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 29 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 448 Missing cases 1391 DEFRP6A Q22b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 117 6.4 26.2 26.2 FAVOR 2 224 12.2 50.1 76.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 76 4.1 17.0 93.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 11 .6 2.5 95.7 OPPOSE 5 13 .7 2.9 98.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 6 .3 1.3 100.0 . 1362 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 447 Missing cases 1392 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRE6A Q22b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 27 1.5 26.7 26.7 FAVOR 2 23 1.3 22.8 49.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 31 1.7 30.7 80.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 10 .5 9.9 90.1 OPPOSE 5 6 .3 5.9 96.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 4 .2 4.0 100.0 . 1378 74.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 360 19.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 101 Missing cases 1738 ABORLA6A Q22c, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.0 7.4 7.4 FAVOR 2 70 3.8 28.9 36.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 71 3.9 29.3 65.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 31 1.7 12.8 78.5 OPPOSE 5 47 2.6 19.4 97.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 5 .3 2.1 100.0 . 1384 75.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 213 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 242 Missing cases 1597 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORBB6A Q22c, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .5 4.6 4.6 FAVOR 2 14 .8 7.1 11.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 25 1.4 12.7 24.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 21 1.1 10.7 35.0 OPPOSE 5 85 4.6 43.1 78.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 43 2.3 21.8 100.0 . 1383 75.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 259 14.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 197 Missing cases 1642 ABORPB6A Q22c, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 301 16.4 74.9 74.9 FAVOR 2 69 3.8 17.2 92.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 14 .8 3.5 95.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 2 .1 .5 96.0 OPPOSE 5 5 .3 1.2 97.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 11 .6 2.7 100.0 . 1366 74.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 71 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 1437 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORBC6A Q22c, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .5 2.2 2.2 FAVOR 2 17 .9 4.1 6.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 21 1.1 5.0 11.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 37 2.0 8.9 20.1 OPPOSE 5 130 7.1 31.1 51.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 204 11.1 48.8 100.0 . 1360 74.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 61 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 418 Missing cases 1421 ABORRD6A Q22c, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 45 2.4 11.3 11.3 FAVOR 2 132 7.2 33.2 44.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 136 7.4 34.3 78.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 59 3.2 14.9 93.7 OPPOSE 5 22 1.2 5.5 99.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 3 .2 .8 100.0 . 1365 74.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 77 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 397 Missing cases 1442 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORSF6A Q22c, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 14 .8 5.9 5.9 FAVOR 2 41 2.2 17.2 23.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 68 3.7 28.6 51.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 57 3.1 23.9 75.6 OPPOSE 5 49 2.7 20.6 96.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .5 3.8 100.0 . 1374 74.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 227 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 238 Missing cases 1601 ABORPG6A Q22c, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 135 7.3 41.2 41.2 FAVOR 2 121 6.6 36.9 78.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 50 2.7 15.2 93.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 7 .4 2.1 95.4 OPPOSE 5 10 .5 3.0 98.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 5 .3 1.5 100.0 . 1369 74.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 142 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 328 Missing cases 1511 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORRL6A Q22c, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.0 8.4 8.4 FAVOR 2 57 3.1 26.6 35.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 73 4.0 34.1 69.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 34 1.8 15.9 85.0 OPPOSE 5 29 1.6 13.6 98.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 3 .2 1.4 100.0 . 1370 74.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 255 13.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 214 Missing cases 1625 ABOHRP6A Q22c, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 13 .7 8.8 8.8 FAVOR 2 24 1.3 16.3 25.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 33 1.8 22.4 47.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 32 1.7 21.8 69.4 OPPOSE 5 29 1.6 19.7 89.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 16 .9 10.9 100.0 . 1370 74.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 322 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 147 Missing cases 1692 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORAA6A Q22c, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .5 2.2 2.2 FAVOR 2 45 2.4 10.8 13.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 97 5.3 23.4 36.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 96 5.2 23.1 59.5 OPPOSE 5 141 7.7 34.0 93.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 27 1.5 6.5 100.0 . 1357 73.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 415 Missing cases 1424 ABORDP6A Q22c, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .5 2.1 2.1 FAVOR 2 26 1.4 6.0 8.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 30 1.6 7.0 15.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 55 3.0 12.8 27.8 OPPOSE 5 162 8.8 37.6 65.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 149 8.1 34.6 100.0 . 1355 73.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 431 Missing cases 1408 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORRP6A Q22c, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 68 3.7 16.0 16.0 FAVOR 2 172 9.4 40.5 56.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 124 6.7 29.2 85.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 30 1.6 7.1 92.7 OPPOSE 5 22 1.2 5.2 97.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .5 2.1 100.0 . 1357 73.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 57 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 425 Missing cases 1414 ABORRE6A Q22c, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 12 .7 14.1 14.1 FAVOR 2 10 .5 11.8 25.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 23 1.3 27.1 52.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 20 1.1 23.5 76.5 OPPOSE 5 14 .8 16.5 92.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 6 .3 7.1 100.0 . 1369 74.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 385 20.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1754 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVLA6A Q22d, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 12 .7 4.8 4.8 FAVOR 2 39 2.1 15.6 20.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 81 4.4 32.4 52.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 49 2.7 19.6 72.4 OPPOSE 5 61 3.3 24.4 96.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .4 3.2 100.0 . 1379 75.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 210 11.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 1589 INVBB6A Q22d, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 6 .3 3.0 3.0 FAVOR 2 17 .9 8.4 11.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 23 1.3 11.4 22.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 45 2.4 22.3 45.0 OPPOSE 5 83 4.5 41.1 86.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 28 1.5 13.9 100.0 . 1380 75.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 257 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 202 Missing cases 1637 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVPB6A Q22d, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 241 13.1 62.0 62.0 FAVOR 2 90 4.9 23.1 85.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 18 1.0 4.6 89.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 7 .4 1.8 91.5 OPPOSE 5 18 1.0 4.6 96.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 15 .8 3.9 100.0 . 1365 74.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 85 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 389 Missing cases 1450 INVBC6A Q22d, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .5 2.3 2.3 FAVOR 2 30 1.6 6.8 9.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 19 1.0 4.3 13.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 2.3 9.6 23.1 OPPOSE 5 180 9.8 41.1 64.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 157 8.5 35.8 100.0 . 1360 74.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1401 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRD6A Q22d, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 15 .8 3.8 3.8 FAVOR 2 63 3.4 15.9 19.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 106 5.8 26.8 46.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 85 4.6 21.5 67.9 OPPOSE 5 109 5.9 27.5 95.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 18 1.0 4.5 100.0 . 1371 74.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 72 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 396 Missing cases 1443 INVSF6A Q22d, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 15 .8 6.8 6.8 FAVOR 2 44 2.4 20.1 26.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 63 3.4 28.8 55.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 46 2.5 21.0 76.7 OPPOSE 5 41 2.2 18.7 95.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .5 4.6 100.0 . 1381 75.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 239 13.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 219 Missing cases 1620 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVPG6A Q22d, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 46 2.5 15.6 15.6 FAVOR 2 96 5.2 32.7 48.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 74 4.0 25.2 73.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 1.5 9.5 83.0 OPPOSE 5 41 2.2 13.9 96.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .5 3.1 100.0 . 1381 75.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 164 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 294 Missing cases 1545 INVRL6A Q22d, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 12 .7 5.4 5.4 FAVOR 2 29 1.6 13.1 18.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 60 3.3 27.0 45.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 39 2.1 17.6 63.1 OPPOSE 5 60 3.3 27.0 90.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 22 1.2 9.9 100.0 . 1380 75.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 237 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 222 Missing cases 1617 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVHRP6A Q22d, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 46 2.5 20.9 20.9 FAVOR 2 66 3.6 30.0 50.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 49 2.7 22.3 73.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.4 11.8 85.0 OPPOSE 5 24 1.3 10.9 95.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .5 4.1 100.0 . 1378 74.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 241 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 220 Missing cases 1619 INVAA6A Q22d, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 25 1.4 6.0 6.0 FAVOR 2 104 5.7 24.8 30.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 184 10.0 43.8 74.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 3.7 16.2 90.7 OPPOSE 5 33 1.8 7.9 98.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1366 74.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 420 Missing cases 1419 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVDP6A Q22d, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 8 .4 1.9 1.9 FAVOR 2 31 1.7 7.5 9.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 45 2.4 10.9 20.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 95 5.2 23.1 43.4 OPPOSE 5 164 8.9 39.8 83.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 69 3.8 16.7 100.0 . 1371 74.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 412 Missing cases 1427 INVRP6A Q22d, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 27 1.5 6.7 6.7 FAVOR 2 115 6.3 28.3 35.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 132 7.2 32.5 67.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 72 3.9 17.7 85.2 OPPOSE 5 53 2.9 13.1 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 7 .4 1.7 100.0 . 1372 74.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 61 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 406 Missing cases 1433 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRE6A Q22d, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.0 19.1 19.1 FAVOR 2 22 1.2 23.4 42.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 27 1.5 28.7 71.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 16 .9 17.0 88.3 OPPOSE 5 7 .4 7.4 95.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 4 .2 4.3 100.0 . 1389 75.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 356 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 94 Missing cases 1745 DISPTY6A Q23, I dislike both parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 133 7.2 26.6 26.6 DISAGREE 2 255 13.9 51.0 77.6 AGREE 3 85 4.6 17.0 94.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 27 1.5 5.4 100.0 . 1319 71.7 Missing NOT SURE 5 20 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 1339 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JBPUOF6A Q23, good a job in public office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 50 2.7 10.3 10.3 DISAGREE 2 142 7.7 29.3 39.7 AGREE 3 199 10.8 41.1 80.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 93 5.1 19.2 100.0 . 1321 71.8 Missing NOT SURE 5 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 484 Missing cases 1355 POLCOM6A Q23, politics/government seem complicate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 96 5.2 18.5 18.5 DISAGREE 2 201 10.9 38.8 57.3 AGREE 3 170 9.2 32.8 90.2 STRONGLY AGREE 4 51 2.8 9.8 100.0 . 1315 71.5 Missing NOT SURE 5 6 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 518 Missing cases 1321 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYPRO6A Q23, the major parties never deliver Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 18 1.0 3.4 3.4 DISAGREE 2 189 10.3 36.2 39.7 AGREE 3 233 12.7 44.6 84.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 82 4.5 15.7 100.0 . 1312 71.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 5 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 1317 RADICA6A Q23, our country needs radical change Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 43 2.3 8.6 8.6 DISAGREE 2 193 10.5 38.4 47.0 AGREE 3 187 10.2 37.3 84.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 79 4.3 15.7 100.0 . 1319 71.7 Missing NOT SURE 5 18 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 502 Missing cases 1337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUPEO6A Q23, most people can be trusted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 25 1.4 4.9 4.9 DISAGREE 2 160 8.7 31.5 36.4 AGREE 3 285 15.5 56.1 92.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 38 2.1 7.5 100.0 . 1312 71.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 19 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 508 Missing cases 1331 NEIPTY6A Q23, neither pty stands for what is impo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 53 2.9 10.8 10.8 DISAGREE 2 280 15.2 56.9 67.7 AGREE 3 132 7.2 26.8 94.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 27 1.5 5.5 100.0 . 1318 71.7 Missing NOT SURE 5 29 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 492 Missing cases 1347 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EQUAL6A Q23, equal opportunity to succeed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 31 1.7 6.2 6.2 DISAGREE 2 106 5.8 21.1 27.2 AGREE 3 263 14.3 52.3 79.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 103 5.6 20.5 100.0 . 1315 71.5 Missing NOT SURE 5 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 1336 VOTPER6A Q23, I vote for person not party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 34 1.8 6.6 6.6 DISAGREE 2 123 6.7 24.0 30.6 AGREE 3 245 13.3 47.8 78.4 STRONGLY AGREE 4 111 6.0 21.6 100.0 . 1317 71.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 9 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 513 Missing cases 1326 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOOKOU6A Q23, people just look out for themselves Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 13 .7 2.5 2.5 DISAGREE 2 142 7.7 27.7 30.2 AGREE 3 287 15.6 55.9 86.2 STRONGLY AGREE 4 71 3.9 13.8 100.0 . 1313 71.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 13 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 513 Missing cases 1326 FAMTIE6A Q23, emphasis on traditional family ties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 16 .9 3.1 3.1 DISAGREE 2 44 2.4 8.6 11.7 AGREE 3 257 14.0 50.2 61.9 STRONGLY AGREE 4 195 10.6 38.1 100.0 . 1311 71.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 16 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 512 Missing cases 1327 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANPTY6A Q23, I support the candidates of my part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 29 1.6 5.8 5.8 DISAGREE 2 126 6.9 25.0 30.8 AGREE 3 274 14.9 54.4 85.1 STRONGLY AGREE 4 75 4.1 14.9 100.0 . 1323 71.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 504 Missing cases 1335 WRDGOD6A Q23, the Bible is to be taken literally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 152 8.3 31.4 31.4 DISAGREE 2 144 7.8 29.8 61.2 AGREE 3 94 5.1 19.4 80.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 94 5.1 19.4 100.0 . 1313 71.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 42 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 484 Missing cases 1355 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DECIMM6A Q23, immigrants decreased Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 27 1.5 5.7 5.7 DISAGREE 2 128 7.0 27.1 32.8 AGREE 3 192 10.4 40.7 73.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 125 6.8 26.5 100.0 . 1312 71.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 55 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 472 Missing cases 1367 ISOLAT6A Q23, no concern with world problems Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 137 7.4 27.2 27.2 DISAGREE 2 264 14.4 52.5 79.7 AGREE 3 63 3.4 12.5 92.2 STRONGLY AGREE 4 39 2.1 7.8 100.0 . 1311 71.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 25 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 1336 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNBB6A Q24, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 1 .1 .3 .3 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 3 .2 .8 1.1 LIKELY TO RUN 3 6 .3 1.6 2.7 TOSS-UP 4 26 1.4 7.1 9.8 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 54 2.9 14.8 24.6 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 153 8.3 41.8 66.4 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 123 6.7 33.6 100.0 . 1316 71.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 157 8.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 366 Missing cases 1473 RUNJJ6A Q24, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 4 .2 .9 .9 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 14 .8 3.1 4.0 LIKELY TO RUN 3 16 .9 3.6 7.6 TOSS-UP 4 55 3.0 12.3 20.0 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 72 3.9 16.1 36.1 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 179 9.7 40.1 76.2 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 106 5.8 23.8 100.0 . 1315 71.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 78 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 446 Missing cases 1393 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNHRP6A Q24, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 8 .4 1.8 1.8 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 21 1.1 4.8 6.6 LIKELY TO RUN 3 44 2.4 10.1 16.7 TOSS-UP 4 76 4.1 17.4 34.1 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 74 4.0 16.9 51.0 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 138 7.5 31.6 82.6 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 76 4.1 17.4 100.0 . 1316 71.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 86 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 437 Missing cases 1402 RUNOTH6A Q24, other candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 1 .1 1.9 1.9 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 6 .3 11.1 13.0 LIKELY TO RUN 3 4 .2 7.4 20.4 TOSS-UP 4 6 .3 11.1 31.5 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 8 .4 14.8 46.3 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 17 .9 31.5 77.8 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 12 .7 22.2 100.0 . 1677 91.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 108 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 1785 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNWT6A See Q24. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 24 1.3 100.0 100.0 . 1815 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1815 NOMLA6A Q25a, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 8 .4 1.7 1.9 LIKELY TO WIN 3 56 3.0 11.6 13.5 TOSS-UP 4 123 6.7 25.5 38.9 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 97 5.3 20.1 59.0 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 88 4.8 18.2 77.2 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 110 6.0 22.8 100.0 . 1329 72.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 27 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 483 Missing cases 1356 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPB6A Q25a, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 22 1.2 4.3 4.5 LIKELY TO WIN 3 59 3.2 11.6 16.2 TOSS-UP 4 106 5.8 20.9 37.1 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 111 6.0 21.9 59.0 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 120 6.5 23.7 82.6 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 88 4.8 17.4 100.0 . 1321 71.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 507 Missing cases 1332 NOMRD6A Q25a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 56 3.0 10.9 10.9 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 192 10.4 37.4 48.2 LIKELY TO WIN 3 121 6.6 23.5 71.8 TOSS-UP 4 93 5.1 18.1 89.9 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 30 1.6 5.8 95.7 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 16 .9 3.1 98.8 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 6 .3 1.2 100.0 . 1318 71.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 7 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 514 Missing cases 1325 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMSF6A Q25a, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 3 .2 .6 .6 LIKELY TO WIN 3 22 1.2 4.5 5.1 TOSS-UP 4 64 3.5 13.1 18.2 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 100 5.4 20.4 38.7 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 138 7.5 28.2 66.9 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 162 8.8 33.1 100.0 . 1328 72.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 489 Missing cases 1350 NOMPG6A Q25a, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 4 .2 .8 1.0 LIKELY TO WIN 3 8 .4 1.7 2.7 TOSS-UP 4 26 1.4 5.4 8.1 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 47 2.6 9.7 17.8 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 105 5.7 21.7 39.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 293 15.9 60.5 100.0 . 1333 72.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 484 Missing cases 1355 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRL6A Q25a, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIKELY TO WIN 3 3 .2 .6 .6 TOSS-UP 4 15 .8 3.2 3.9 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 51 2.8 11.0 14.8 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 109 5.9 23.4 38.3 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 287 15.6 61.7 100.0 . 1327 72.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 47 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 465 Missing cases 1374 NOVLA6A Q25b, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 11 .6 2.4 2.4 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 31 1.7 6.8 9.2 LIKELY TO WIN 3 36 2.0 7.8 17.0 TOSS-UP 4 97 5.3 21.1 38.1 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 79 4.3 17.2 55.3 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 79 4.3 17.2 72.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 126 6.9 27.5 100.0 . 1345 73.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 35 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 459 Missing cases 1380 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPB6A Q25b, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 4 .2 .8 .8 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 29 1.6 6.1 6.9 LIKELY TO WIN 3 34 1.8 7.1 14.0 TOSS-UP 4 56 3.0 11.7 25.7 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 75 4.1 15.7 41.4 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 84 4.6 17.6 59.0 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 196 10.7 41.0 100.0 . 1343 73.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 18 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 478 Missing cases 1361 NOVBC6A Q25b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 106 5.8 20.7 20.7 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 145 7.9 28.4 49.1 LIKELY TO WIN 3 99 5.4 19.4 68.5 TOSS-UP 4 93 5.1 18.2 86.7 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 23 1.3 4.5 91.2 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 24 1.3 4.7 95.9 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 21 1.1 4.1 100.0 . 1320 71.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 8 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 1328 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVRD6A Q25b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 27 1.5 5.4 5.4 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 55 3.0 11.0 16.5 LIKELY TO WIN 3 63 3.4 12.7 29.1 TOSS-UP 4 129 7.0 25.9 55.0 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 130 7.1 26.1 81.1 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 47 2.6 9.4 90.6 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 47 2.6 9.4 100.0 . 1330 72.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 1341 NOVSF6A Q25b, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 2 .1 .4 .4 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 9 .5 1.9 2.4 LIKELY TO WIN 3 22 1.2 4.7 7.1 TOSS-UP 4 61 3.3 13.1 20.2 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 87 4.7 18.7 38.9 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 98 5.3 21.1 60.0 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 186 10.1 40.0 100.0 . 1342 73.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 465 Missing cases 1374 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPG6A Q25b, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 8 .4 1.7 2.0 LIKELY TO WIN 3 13 .7 2.8 4.8 TOSS-UP 4 35 1.9 7.6 12.4 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 49 2.7 10.7 23.1 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 84 4.6 18.3 41.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 268 14.6 58.5 100.0 . 1350 73.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 458 Missing cases 1381 NOVRL6A Q25b, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 5 .3 1.2 1.2 LIKELY TO WIN 3 14 .8 3.2 4.4 TOSS-UP 4 38 2.1 8.8 13.2 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 60 3.3 13.9 27.1 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 78 4.2 18.1 45.2 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 236 12.8 54.8 100.0 . 1346 73.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 62 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 431 Missing cases 1408 PCDGE6A Q26a, Dem nominee, general election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2 .1 .4 .4 27 1 .1 .2 .6 29 1 .1 .2 .8 30 2 .1 .4 1.3 33 2 .1 .4 1.7 34 1 .1 .2 1.9 35 6 .3 1.3 3.2 38 2 .1 .4 3.6 39 3 .2 .6 4.2 40 18 1.0 3.8 8.0 41 4 .2 .8 8.9 42 8 .4 1.7 10.6 43 8 .4 1.7 12.3 44 12 .7 2.5 14.8 45 36 2.0 7.6 22.4 46 9 .5 1.9 24.3 47 11 .6 2.3 26.6 48 30 1.6 6.3 33.0 49 25 1.4 5.3 38.3 50 9 .5 1.9 40.2 51 54 2.9 11.4 51.6 52 36 2.0 7.6 59.2 53 18 1.0 3.8 63.0 54 20 1.1 4.2 67.2 55 40 2.2 8.5 75.7 56 10 .5 2.1 77.8 57 7 .4 1.5 79.3 58 9 .5 1.9 81.2 59 2 .1 .4 81.6 60 36 2.0 7.6 89.2 61 1 .1 .2 89.4 63 4 .2 .8 90.3 65 16 .9 3.4 93.7 66 4 .2 .8 94.5 67 1 .1 .2 94.7 68 1 .1 .2 94.9 70 7 .4 1.5 96.4 74 1 .1 .2 96.6 75 7 .4 1.5 98.1 80 4 .2 .8 98.9 89 1 .1 .2 99.2 90 1 .1 .2 99.4 98 1 .1 .2 99.6 99 2 .1 .4 100.0 . 1366 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 PCDGE6A Q26a, Dem nominee, general election Valid cases 473 Missing cases 1366 PCRGE6A Q26b, Rep nominee, general election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .2 .2 20 2 .1 .4 .6 22 1 .1 .2 .8 23 1 .1 .2 1.1 24 1 .1 .2 1.3 25 3 .2 .6 1.9 26 2 .1 .4 2.3 30 6 .3 1.3 3.6 32 2 .1 .4 4.0 33 3 .2 .6 4.7 34 1 .1 .2 4.9 35 14 .8 3.0 7.8 37 2 .1 .4 8.3 38 3 .2 .6 8.9 39 2 .1 .4 9.3 40 42 2.3 8.9 18.2 41 6 .3 1.3 19.5 42 9 .5 1.9 21.4 43 10 .5 2.1 23.5 44 20 1.1 4.2 27.8 45 40 2.2 8.5 36.2 46 16 .9 3.4 39.6 47 23 1.3 4.9 44.5 48 42 2.3 8.9 53.4 49 54 2.9 11.4 64.8 50 14 .8 3.0 67.8 51 28 1.5 5.9 73.7 52 27 1.5 5.7 79.4 53 8 .4 1.7 81.1 54 8 .4 1.7 82.8 55 33 1.8 7.0 89.8 56 7 .4 1.5 91.3 57 4 .2 .8 92.2 58 4 .2 .8 93.0 59 2 .1 .4 93.4 60 14 .8 3.0 96.4 65 5 .3 1.1 97.5 66 1 .1 .2 97.7 67 2 .1 .4 98.1 69 1 .1 .2 98.3 70 3 .2 .6 98.9 72 1 .1 .2 99.2 80 1 .1 .2 99.4 87 1 .1 .2 99.6 88 1 .1 .2 99.8 PCRGE6A Q26b, Rep nominee, general election 95 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1367 74.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 472 Missing cases 1367 PCDHRP6A Q27a, Dem nominee, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 3 .2 .7 .7 10 3 .2 .7 1.3 11 1 .1 .2 1.6 15 1 .1 .2 1.8 20 2 .1 .4 2.2 26 2 .1 .4 2.7 27 2 .1 .4 3.1 30 12 .7 2.7 5.8 31 2 .1 .4 6.3 33 3 .2 .7 6.9 34 2 .1 .4 7.4 35 18 1.0 4.0 11.4 36 5 .3 1.1 12.5 37 4 .2 .9 13.4 38 6 .3 1.3 14.7 39 9 .5 2.0 16.7 40 45 2.4 10.0 26.8 41 8 .4 1.8 28.6 42 21 1.1 4.7 33.3 43 31 1.7 6.9 40.2 44 20 1.1 4.5 44.6 45 63 3.4 14.1 58.7 46 17 .9 3.8 62.5 47 17 .9 3.8 66.3 48 17 .9 3.8 70.1 49 4 .2 .9 71.0 50 48 2.6 10.7 81.7 51 10 .5 2.2 83.9 52 8 .4 1.8 85.7 53 3 .2 .7 86.4 54 3 .2 .7 87.1 55 18 1.0 4.0 91.1 56 1 .1 .2 91.3 57 3 .2 .7 92.0 58 3 .2 .7 92.6 59 1 .1 .2 92.9 60 15 .8 3.3 96.2 63 1 .1 .2 96.4 65 3 .2 .7 97.1 66 4 .2 .9 98.0 68 1 .1 .2 98.2 70 3 .2 .7 98.9 75 1 .1 .2 99.1 76 1 .1 .2 99.3 85 1 .1 .2 99.6 90 1 .1 .2 99.8 PCDHRP6A Q27a, Dem nominee, Perot as cand 99 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1391 75.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 448 Missing cases 1391 PCRHRP6A Q27b, Rep nominee, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 3 .2 .7 .7 15 1 .1 .2 .9 20 7 .4 1.6 2.4 22 3 .2 .7 3.1 23 1 .1 .2 3.3 24 1 .1 .2 3.6 25 8 .4 1.8 5.3 26 1 .1 .2 5.6 27 2 .1 .4 6.0 28 5 .3 1.1 7.1 29 1 .1 .2 7.3 30 34 1.8 7.6 14.9 31 4 .2 .9 15.8 32 6 .3 1.3 17.1 33 10 .5 2.2 19.3 34 6 .3 1.3 20.7 35 44 2.4 9.8 30.4 36 3 .2 .7 31.1 37 13 .7 2.9 34.0 38 18 1.0 4.0 38.0 39 16 .9 3.6 41.6 40 76 4.1 16.9 58.4 41 15 .8 3.3 61.8 42 28 1.5 6.2 68.0 43 18 1.0 4.0 72.0 44 20 1.1 4.4 76.4 45 35 1.9 7.8 84.2 46 10 .5 2.2 86.4 47 4 .2 .9 87.3 48 12 .7 2.7 90.0 49 3 .2 .7 90.7 50 17 .9 3.8 94.4 51 1 .1 .2 94.7 52 8 .4 1.8 96.4 54 2 .1 .4 96.9 55 3 .2 .7 97.6 56 1 .1 .2 97.8 57 1 .1 .2 98.0 60 4 .2 .9 98.9 61 1 .1 .2 99.1 66 1 .1 .2 99.3 70 2 .1 .4 99.8 75 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1389 75.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 PCRHRP6A Q27b, Rep nominee, Perot as cand Valid cases 450 Missing cases 1389 PCHRP6A Q27c, H. Ross Perot, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 19 1.0 4.2 4.2 1 4 .2 .9 5.1 2 6 .3 1.3 6.4 3 4 .2 .9 7.3 4 1 .1 .2 7.6 5 19 1.0 4.2 11.8 6 5 .3 1.1 12.9 7 1 .1 .2 13.1 8 10 .5 2.2 15.3 9 10 .5 2.2 17.6 10 92 5.0 20.4 38.0 11 7 .4 1.6 39.6 12 31 1.7 6.9 46.4 13 9 .5 2.0 48.4 14 9 .5 2.0 50.4 15 66 3.6 14.7 65.1 16 6 .3 1.3 66.4 17 8 .4 1.8 68.2 18 12 .7 2.7 70.9 19 6 .3 1.3 72.2 20 58 3.2 12.9 85.1 21 3 .2 .7 85.8 22 8 .4 1.8 87.6 23 3 .2 .7 88.2 24 4 .2 .9 89.1 25 14 .8 3.1 92.2 26 1 .1 .2 92.4 27 5 .3 1.1 93.6 28 3 .2 .7 94.2 30 9 .5 2.0 96.2 31 2 .1 .4 96.7 33 1 .1 .2 96.9 35 2 .1 .4 97.3 37 1 .1 .2 97.6 40 4 .2 .9 98.4 43 2 .1 .4 98.9 44 2 .1 .4 99.3 50 2 .1 .4 99.8 77 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1389 75.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 450 Missing cases 1389 PCDJJ6A Q28a, Dem nominee, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2 .1 .5 .5 1 1 .1 .2 .7 10 2 .1 .5 1.1 20 1 .1 .2 1.4 22 2 .1 .5 1.8 24 2 .1 .5 2.3 25 2 .1 .5 2.7 28 2 .1 .5 3.2 30 20 1.1 4.5 7.7 31 1 .1 .2 7.9 32 4 .2 .9 8.8 33 6 .3 1.4 10.2 34 3 .2 .7 10.8 35 28 1.5 6.3 17.2 36 2 .1 .5 17.6 37 7 .4 1.6 19.2 38 9 .5 2.0 21.2 39 6 .3 1.4 22.6 40 63 3.4 14.2 36.8 41 15 .8 3.4 40.2 42 19 1.0 4.3 44.5 43 15 .8 3.4 47.9 44 17 .9 3.8 51.7 45 43 2.3 9.7 61.4 46 11 .6 2.5 63.9 47 12 .7 2.7 66.6 48 20 1.1 4.5 71.1 49 6 .3 1.4 72.5 50 40 2.2 9.0 81.5 51 12 .7 2.7 84.2 52 9 .5 2.0 86.2 53 2 .1 .5 86.7 54 3 .2 .7 87.4 55 15 .8 3.4 90.7 56 5 .3 1.1 91.9 57 1 .1 .2 92.1 58 4 .2 .9 93.0 59 1 .1 .2 93.2 60 10 .5 2.3 95.5 63 2 .1 .5 95.9 65 7 .4 1.6 97.5 66 1 .1 .2 97.7 70 4 .2 .9 98.6 77 1 .1 .2 98.9 80 1 .1 .2 99.1 82 1 .1 .2 99.3 PCDJJ6A Q28a, Dem nominee, Jackson as cand 85 1 .1 .2 99.5 90 1 .1 .2 99.8 99 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1396 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 443 Missing cases 1396 PCRJJ6A Q28b, Rep nominee, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 3 .2 .7 .7 10 1 .1 .2 .9 18 3 .2 .7 1.6 20 6 .3 1.4 2.9 22 3 .2 .7 3.6 24 2 .1 .5 4.1 25 4 .2 .9 5.0 29 1 .1 .2 5.2 30 22 1.2 5.0 10.2 31 2 .1 .5 10.6 32 4 .2 .9 11.5 33 5 .3 1.1 12.6 34 2 .1 .5 13.1 35 26 1.4 5.9 19.0 36 6 .3 1.4 20.3 37 2 .1 .5 20.8 38 4 .2 .9 21.7 39 7 .4 1.6 23.3 40 35 1.9 7.9 31.2 41 6 .3 1.4 32.5 42 15 .8 3.4 35.9 43 9 .5 2.0 37.9 44 17 .9 3.8 41.8 45 41 2.2 9.3 51.0 46 19 1.0 4.3 55.3 47 22 1.2 5.0 60.3 48 24 1.3 5.4 65.7 49 16 .9 3.6 69.3 50 48 2.6 10.8 80.1 51 20 1.1 4.5 84.7 52 16 .9 3.6 88.3 53 6 .3 1.4 89.6 54 3 .2 .7 90.3 55 18 1.0 4.1 94.4 56 2 .1 .5 94.8 57 3 .2 .7 95.5 58 3 .2 .7 96.2 59 1 .1 .2 96.4 60 8 .4 1.8 98.2 65 2 .1 .5 98.6 66 1 .1 .2 98.9 67 2 .1 .5 99.3 70 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1396 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 PCRJJ6A Q28b, Rep nominee, Jackson as cand Valid cases 443 Missing cases 1396 PCJJ6A Q28c, Jesse Jackson, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 26 1.4 5.9 5.9 1 14 .8 3.2 9.1 2 15 .8 3.4 12.5 3 6 .3 1.4 13.8 4 9 .5 2.0 15.9 5 43 2.3 9.8 25.6 6 13 .7 2.9 28.6 7 13 .7 2.9 31.5 8 22 1.2 5.0 36.5 9 11 .6 2.5 39.0 10 90 4.9 20.4 59.4 11 14 .8 3.2 62.6 12 18 1.0 4.1 66.7 13 6 .3 1.4 68.0 14 6 .3 1.4 69.4 15 39 2.1 8.8 78.2 16 3 .2 .7 78.9 17 2 .1 .5 79.4 18 7 .4 1.6 81.0 19 4 .2 .9 81.9 20 22 1.2 5.0 86.8 21 6 .3 1.4 88.2 22 9 .5 2.0 90.2 23 3 .2 .7 90.9 24 3 .2 .7 91.6 25 15 .8 3.4 95.0 26 2 .1 .5 95.5 30 6 .3 1.4 96.8 31 1 .1 .2 97.1 33 1 .1 .2 97.3 34 1 .1 .2 97.5 35 2 .1 .5 98.0 37 1 .1 .2 98.2 40 1 .1 .2 98.4 44 1 .1 .2 98.6 48 1 .1 .2 98.9 50 2 .1 .5 99.3 56 1 .1 .2 99.5 60 1 .1 .2 99.8 99 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1398 76.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 441 Missing cases 1398 PCDBB6A Q29a, Dem nominee, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 4 .2 1.0 1.0 10 1 .1 .2 1.2 11 1 .1 .2 1.5 20 3 .2 .7 2.2 25 2 .1 .5 2.7 27 2 .1 .5 3.2 28 1 .1 .2 3.5 30 16 .9 4.0 7.5 31 3 .2 .7 8.2 32 5 .3 1.2 9.5 33 7 .4 1.7 11.2 34 4 .2 1.0 12.2 35 20 1.1 5.0 17.2 36 5 .3 1.2 18.5 37 7 .4 1.7 20.2 38 12 .7 3.0 23.2 39 11 .6 2.7 25.9 40 51 2.8 12.7 38.7 41 11 .6 2.7 41.4 42 17 .9 4.2 45.6 43 17 .9 4.2 49.9 44 12 .7 3.0 52.9 45 35 1.9 8.7 61.6 46 7 .4 1.7 63.3 47 9 .5 2.2 65.6 48 12 .7 3.0 68.6 49 6 .3 1.5 70.1 50 40 2.2 10.0 80.0 51 11 .6 2.7 82.8 52 4 .2 1.0 83.8 53 3 .2 .7 84.5 54 5 .3 1.2 85.8 55 15 .8 3.7 89.5 56 7 .4 1.7 91.3 58 1 .1 .2 91.5 59 1 .1 .2 91.8 60 11 .6 2.7 94.5 63 1 .1 .2 94.8 64 2 .1 .5 95.3 65 6 .3 1.5 96.8 66 1 .1 .2 97.0 69 1 .1 .2 97.3 70 5 .3 1.2 98.5 75 2 .1 .5 99.0 78 1 .1 .2 99.3 85 1 .1 .2 99.5 PCDBB6A Q29a, Dem nominee, Bradley as cand 90 1 .1 .2 99.8 99 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1438 78.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 1438 PCRBB6A Q29b, Rep nominee, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 4 .2 1.0 1.0 10 2 .1 .5 1.5 11 1 .1 .3 1.8 20 6 .3 1.5 3.3 24 2 .1 .5 3.8 25 8 .4 2.0 5.8 26 1 .1 .3 6.0 27 1 .1 .3 6.3 28 1 .1 .3 6.5 29 1 .1 .3 6.8 30 16 .9 4.0 10.8 31 1 .1 .3 11.1 32 4 .2 1.0 12.1 33 6 .3 1.5 13.6 34 5 .3 1.3 14.8 35 36 2.0 9.0 23.9 36 6 .3 1.5 25.4 37 3 .2 .8 26.1 38 10 .5 2.5 28.6 39 5 .3 1.3 29.9 40 51 2.8 12.8 42.7 41 3 .2 .8 43.5 42 11 .6 2.8 46.2 43 10 .5 2.5 48.7 44 21 1.1 5.3 54.0 45 39 2.1 9.8 63.8 46 15 .8 3.8 67.6 47 9 .5 2.3 69.8 48 19 1.0 4.8 74.6 49 13 .7 3.3 77.9 50 30 1.6 7.5 85.4 51 5 .3 1.3 86.7 52 11 .6 2.8 89.4 53 5 .3 1.3 90.7 54 7 .4 1.8 92.5 55 8 .4 2.0 94.5 56 1 .1 .3 94.7 58 2 .1 .5 95.2 59 1 .1 .3 95.5 60 9 .5 2.3 97.7 62 1 .1 .3 98.0 65 1 .1 .3 98.2 66 2 .1 .5 98.7 70 1 .1 .3 99.0 72 1 .1 .3 99.2 75 1 .1 .3 99.5 PCRBB6A Q29b, Rep nominee, Bradley as cand 80 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1441 78.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 398 Missing cases 1441 PCBB6A Q29c, Bill Bradley, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 38 2.1 9.6 9.6 1 22 1.2 5.6 15.2 2 13 .7 3.3 18.4 3 10 .5 2.5 21.0 4 3 .2 .8 21.7 5 31 1.7 7.8 29.5 6 5 .3 1.3 30.8 7 1 .1 .3 31.1 8 10 .5 2.5 33.6 9 7 .4 1.8 35.4 10 56 3.0 14.1 49.5 11 5 .3 1.3 50.8 12 14 .8 3.5 54.3 13 3 .2 .8 55.1 14 6 .3 1.5 56.6 15 41 2.2 10.4 66.9 16 8 .4 2.0 68.9 17 10 .5 2.5 71.5 18 6 .3 1.5 73.0 19 1 .1 .3 73.2 20 42 2.3 10.6 83.8 21 4 .2 1.0 84.8 22 8 .4 2.0 86.9 23 1 .1 .3 87.1 24 5 .3 1.3 88.4 25 14 .8 3.5 91.9 26 1 .1 .3 92.2 27 1 .1 .3 92.4 28 1 .1 .3 92.7 29 1 .1 .3 92.9 30 12 .7 3.0 96.0 32 2 .1 .5 96.5 33 4 .2 1.0 97.5 34 1 .1 .3 97.7 35 4 .2 1.0 98.7 38 2 .1 .5 99.2 45 1 .1 .3 99.5 50 1 .1 .3 99.7 67 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 1443 78.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 396 Missing cases 1443 DEMVOT6A Q30a, Democratic primary or caucus Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 293 15.9 100.0 100.0 . 1473 80.1 Missing OTHER/WRITE-IN 2 73 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 293 Missing cases 1546 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DVWT6A Democratic write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 645 35.1 92.8 92.8 1 50 2.7 7.2 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REPVOT6A Q30b, Republican primary or caucus Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAMAR ALEXANDER 1 92 5.0 23.7 23.7 PATRICK BUCHANAN 2 57 3.1 14.7 38.4 ROBERT DOLE 3 151 8.2 38.9 77.3 STEVE FORBES 4 40 2.2 10.3 87.6 PHIL GRAMM 5 10 .5 2.6 90.2 RICHARD LUGAR 6 38 2.1 9.8 100.0 . 1407 76.5 Missing OTHER/WRITE-IN 7 44 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 388 Missing cases 1451 RVWT6A Republican write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 655 35.6 94.2 94.2 1 40 2.2 5.8 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERLA6A Q31, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 464 25.2 66.8 66.8 CHECKED 1 231 12.6 33.2 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERPB6A Q31, Pat Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 375 20.4 54.0 54.0 CHECKED 1 320 17.4 46.0 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 SERRD6A Q31, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 509 27.7 73.2 73.2 CHECKED 1 186 10.1 26.8 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERSF6A Q31, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 401 21.8 57.7 57.7 CHECKED 1 294 16.0 42.3 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERPG6A Q31, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 372 20.2 53.5 53.5 CHECKED 1 323 17.6 46.5 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 SERRL6A Q31, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 368 20.0 52.9 52.9 CHECKED 1 327 17.8 47.1 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKLA6A Q32, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 50 2.7 14.8 14.8 SECOND CHOICE 2 96 5.2 28.5 43.3 THIRD CHOICE 3 97 5.3 28.8 72.1 FOURTH CHOICE 4 94 5.1 27.9 100.0 . 1502 81.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 1502 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKBB6A Q32, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 14 .8 6.9 6.9 SECOND CHOICE 2 87 4.7 42.9 49.8 THIRD CHOICE 3 45 2.4 22.2 71.9 FOURTH CHOICE 4 57 3.1 28.1 100.0 . 1636 89.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 203 Missing cases 1636 RNKPB6A Q32, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 48 2.6 23.8 23.8 SECOND CHOICE 2 56 3.0 27.7 51.5 THIRD CHOICE 3 37 2.0 18.3 69.8 FOURTH CHOICE 4 61 3.3 30.2 100.0 . 1637 89.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 202 Missing cases 1637 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKBC6A Q32, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 242 13.2 76.6 76.6 SECOND CHOICE 2 29 1.6 9.2 85.8 THIRD CHOICE 3 13 .7 4.1 89.9 FOURTH CHOICE 4 32 1.7 10.1 100.0 . 1523 82.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 316 Missing cases 1523 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKRD6A Q32, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 111 6.0 28.8 28.8 SECOND CHOICE 2 105 5.7 27.3 56.1 THIRD CHOICE 3 92 5.0 23.9 80.0 FOURTH CHOICE 4 77 4.2 20.0 100.0 . 1454 79.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 1454 RNKSF6A Q32, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 28 1.5 13.9 13.9 SECOND CHOICE 2 43 2.3 21.3 35.1 THIRD CHOICE 3 57 3.1 28.2 63.4 FOURTH CHOICE 4 74 4.0 36.6 100.0 . 1637 89.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 202 Missing cases 1637 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKPG6A Q32, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 15 .8 9.0 9.0 SECOND CHOICE 2 34 1.8 20.5 29.5 THIRD CHOICE 3 49 2.7 29.5 59.0 FOURTH CHOICE 4 68 3.7 41.0 100.0 . 1673 91.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 166 Missing cases 1673 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKJJ6A Q32, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 3 .2 2.8 2.8 SECOND CHOICE 2 22 1.2 20.2 22.9 THIRD CHOICE 3 36 2.0 33.0 56.0 FOURTH CHOICE 4 48 2.6 44.0 100.0 . 1730 94.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 109 Missing cases 1730 RNKRL6A Q32, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 12 .7 6.9 6.9 SECOND CHOICE 2 22 1.2 12.6 19.4 THIRD CHOICE 3 60 3.3 34.3 53.7 FOURTH CHOICE 4 81 4.4 46.3 100.0 . 1664 90.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 175 Missing cases 1664 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKHRP6A Q32, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 6 .3 6.3 6.3 SECOND CHOICE 2 22 1.2 23.2 29.5 THIRD CHOICE 3 18 1.0 18.9 48.4 FOURTH CHOICE 4 49 2.7 51.6 100.0 . 1744 94.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 1744 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLIND6A Q33, Are you a political independent? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 266 14.5 49.5 49.5 NO 2 271 14.7 50.5 100.0 . 1302 70.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 537 Missing cases 1302 STIND6A Q33a, If so, how strongly independent? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 96 5.2 30.3 30.3 NOT SO STRONGLY 2 148 8.0 46.7 77.0 NOT AT ALL STRONG 3 73 4.0 23.0 100.0 . 1522 82.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 317 Missing cases 1522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL6A Q34, formal schooling completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 YEARS 1 5 .3 .9 .9 9-11 YEARS 2 21 1.1 4.0 4.9 12 YEARS 3 120 6.5 22.6 27.5 13-15 YEARS 4 122 6.6 23.0 50.6 COLLEGE GRADUATE 5 139 7.6 26.2 76.8 GRADUATE SCHOOL 6 123 6.7 23.2 100.0 . 1309 71.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 530 Missing cases 1309 AGE6A Q35, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 25-29 2 3 .2 .6 .6 30-39 3 30 1.6 5.5 6.1 40-49 4 78 4.2 14.4 20.4 50-59 5 108 5.9 19.9 40.3 60-64 6 71 3.9 13.1 53.4 65 AND OLDER 7 253 13.8 46.6 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 543 Missing cases 1296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX6A Q36, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 309 16.8 56.9 56.9 FEMALE 2 234 12.7 43.1 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 543 Missing cases 1296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RACE6A Q37, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 528 28.7 98.0 98.0 BLACK/AFRICAN-AMERIC 2 11 .6 2.0 100.0 . 1295 70.4 Missing OTHER/WRITE-IN 6 5 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 539 Missing cases 1300 RACWT6A See Q37. Race write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 687 37.4 98.8 98.8 1 8 .4 1.2 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME6A Q38, approx family income before taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $20,000 1 77 4.2 15.3 15.3 $20,000-39,999 2 164 8.9 32.6 47.9 $40,000-59,999 3 110 6.0 21.9 69.8 $60,000-79,999 4 65 3.5 12.9 82.7 $80,000-99,999 5 29 1.6 5.8 88.5 OVER $100,000 6 58 3.2 11.5 100.0 . 1336 72.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 1336 REL6A Q39, religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 110 6.0 21.0 21.0 JEWISH 2 12 .7 2.3 23.2 PROTESTANT (INCLUDIN 3 354 19.2 67.4 90.7 NO RELIGIOUS PREFERE 4 49 2.7 9.3 100.0 . 1296 70.5 Missing OTHER/WRITE-IN 5 18 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 525 Missing cases 1314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RELWT6A See Q39. Religion write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 675 36.7 97.1 97.1 1 20 1.1 2.9 100.0 . 1144 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL6A Q40, How religious are you? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY RELIGIOUS 1 134 7.3 24.9 24.9 FAIRLY RELIGIOUS 2 291 15.8 54.0 78.8 NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3 87 4.7 16.1 95.0 NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL 4 27 1.5 5.0 100.0 . 1297 70.5 Missing NOT SURE 5 3 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 539 Missing cases 1300 BNAG6A Q41, Are you a born-again Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 156 8.5 29.1 29.1 NO 2 381 20.7 70.9 100.0 . 1302 70.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 537 Missing cases 1302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRIST6A Q42, Are you a fundamentalist Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 101 5.5 19.1 19.1 NO 2 427 23.2 80.9 100.0 . 1311 71.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 528 Missing cases 1311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAXCAM6A Q43, regularly mark the contributions bo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 203 11.0 38.1 38.1 NO 2 330 17.9 61.9 100.0 . 1306 71.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 533 Missing cases 1306 MONTH6A Q44, month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 2 477 25.9 89.0 89.0 3 21 1.1 3.9 92.9 4 30 1.6 5.6 98.5 5 6 .3 1.1 99.6 6 1 .1 .2 99.8 10 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1303 70.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 536 Missing cases 1303 DAY6A Q44, day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 4 .2 .8 .8 2 2 .1 .4 1.1 3 4 .2 .8 1.9 4 3 .2 .6 2.5 5 2 .1 .4 2.9 6 1 .1 .2 3.0 7 1 .1 .2 3.2 8 1 .1 .2 3.4 9 1 .1 .2 3.6 10 2 .1 .4 4.0 11 11 .6 2.1 6.1 12 109 5.9 20.7 26.8 13 71 3.9 13.5 40.3 14 50 2.7 9.5 49.8 15 37 2.0 7.0 56.8 16 29 1.6 5.5 62.4 17 26 1.4 4.9 67.3 18 18 1.0 3.4 70.7 19 32 1.7 6.1 76.8 20 22 1.2 4.2 81.0 21 7 .4 1.3 82.3 22 26 1.4 4.9 87.3 23 19 1.0 3.6 90.9 24 11 .6 2.1 93.0 25 10 .5 1.9 94.9 26 8 .4 1.5 96.4 27 8 .4 1.5 97.9 28 3 .2 .6 98.5 29 6 .3 1.1 99.6 30 2 .1 .4 100.0 . 1313 71.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 526 Missing cases 1313 YEAR6A Q44, year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 40 1 .1 .2 .2 69 1 .1 .2 .4 95 1 .1 .2 .6 96 522 28.4 99.4 100.0 . 1314 71.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 525 Missing cases 1314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESPON6A wave response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 1292 70.3 70.3 70.3 YES 1.00 547 29.7 29.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 FIRST6A ranking - first choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 48 2.6 9.1 9.1 Bill Bradley 2.00 14 .8 2.7 11.8 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 47 2.6 9.0 20.8 Bill Clinton 4.00 241 13.1 45.9 66.7 Robert Dole 5.00 111 6.0 21.1 87.8 Steve Forbes 6.00 28 1.5 5.3 93.1 Phil Gramm 7.00 15 .8 2.9 96.0 Jesse Jackson 8.00 3 .2 .6 96.6 Richard Lugar 9.00 12 .7 2.3 98.9 H. Ross Perot 10.00 6 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1314 71.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 525 Missing cases 1314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SECOND6A ranking - second choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 89 4.8 17.9 17.9 Bill Bradley 2.00 84 4.6 16.9 34.9 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 50 2.7 10.1 45.0 Bill Clinton 4.00 28 1.5 5.6 50.6 Robert Dole 5.00 104 5.7 21.0 71.6 Steve Forbes 6.00 42 2.3 8.5 80.0 Phil Gramm 7.00 33 1.8 6.7 86.7 Jesse Jackson 8.00 22 1.2 4.4 91.1 Richard Lugar 9.00 22 1.2 4.4 95.6 H. Ross Perot 10.00 22 1.2 4.4 100.0 . 1343 73.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 496 Missing cases 1343 THIRD6A ranking - third choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 90 4.9 18.8 18.8 Bill Bradley 2.00 43 2.3 9.0 27.8 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 32 1.7 6.7 34.5 Bill Clinton 4.00 12 .7 2.5 37.0 Robert Dole 5.00 86 4.7 18.0 55.0 Steve Forbes 6.00 55 3.0 11.5 66.5 Phil Gramm 7.00 48 2.6 10.0 76.6 Jesse Jackson 8.00 35 1.9 7.3 83.9 Richard Lugar 9.00 59 3.2 12.3 96.2 H. Ross Perot 10.00 18 1.0 3.8 100.0 . 1361 74.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 478 Missing cases 1361 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FOURTH6A ranking - fourth choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 78 4.2 16.8 16.8 Bill Bradley 2.00 38 2.1 8.2 24.9 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 38 2.1 8.2 33.1 Bill Clinton 4.00 22 1.2 4.7 37.8 Robert Dole 5.00 71 3.9 15.3 53.1 Steve Forbes 6.00 49 2.7 10.5 63.7 Phil Gramm 7.00 39 2.1 8.4 72.0 Jesse Jackson 8.00 19 1.0 4.1 76.1 Richard Lugar 9.00 62 3.4 13.3 89.5 H. Ross Perot 10.00 49 2.7 10.5 100.0 . 1374 74.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 465 Missing cases 1374 **********1996 Post-election Wave********** RESPON6B response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO 0 1395 75.9 75.9 75.9 YES 1 444 24.1 24.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTGE6B Q1, the general election for President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 283 15.4 64.3 64.3 2 73 4.0 16.6 80.9 3 36 2.0 8.2 89.1 4 19 1.0 4.3 93.4 5 15 .8 3.4 96.8 6 10 .5 2.3 99.1 NOT INTERESTED 7 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1399 76.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 440 Missing cases 1399 INTHRD6B Q1, US House race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 235 12.8 54.5 54.5 2 87 4.7 20.2 74.7 3 54 2.9 12.5 87.2 4 23 1.3 5.3 92.6 5 14 .8 3.2 95.8 6 8 .4 1.9 97.7 NOT INTERESTED 7 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1408 76.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 431 Missing cases 1408 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTHRN6B Q1, US House races nationally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 156 8.5 36.1 36.1 2 103 5.6 23.8 60.0 3 60 3.3 13.9 73.8 4 52 2.8 12.0 85.9 5 31 1.7 7.2 93.1 6 16 .9 3.7 96.8 NOT INTERESTED 7 14 .8 3.2 100.0 . 1407 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 432 Missing cases 1407 INTSLR6B Q1, other state and local races Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 161 8.8 38.2 38.2 2 79 4.3 18.7 56.9 3 73 4.0 17.3 74.2 4 49 2.7 11.6 85.8 5 18 1.0 4.3 90.0 6 19 1.0 4.5 94.5 NOT INTERESTED 7 23 1.3 5.5 100.0 . 1417 77.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 422 Missing cases 1417 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HVOT966B Q2, How vote in the 1996 presidential ra Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 217 11.8 49.5 49.5 ROBERT DOLE 2 198 10.8 45.2 94.7 H. ROSS PEROT 3 20 1.1 4.6 99.3 DID NOT VOTE 5 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1396 75.9 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 4 5 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1401 HVHR966B Q3, How vote in the 1996 House race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 204 11.1 46.4 46.4 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 227 12.3 51.6 98.0 REFORM PARTY CANDIDA 3 3 .2 .7 98.6 DID NOT VOTE 5 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1397 76.0 Missing OTHER 4 2 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 440 Missing cases 1399 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREFDP6B Q4, Democratic Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 253 13.8 100.0 100.0 . 1534 83.4 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 2 52 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 253 Missing cases 1586 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREFRE6B Q4, Reform Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RICHARD LAMM 1 76 4.1 40.4 40.4 H. ROSS PEROT 2 112 6.1 59.6 100.0 . 1634 88.9 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 3 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 188 Missing cases 1651 PREFRP6B Q4, Republican Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAMAR ALEXANDER 1 75 4.1 22.4 22.4 PATRICK BUCHANAN 2 40 2.2 11.9 34.3 ROBERT DOLE 3 141 7.7 42.1 76.4 STEVE FORBES 4 50 2.7 14.9 91.3 ALAN KEYES 5 29 1.6 8.7 100.0 . 1466 79.7 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 6 38 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 335 Missing cases 1504 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 323 17.6 72.7 72.7 CHECKED 1 121 6.6 27.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CANVBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 422 22.9 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 5.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 393 21.4 88.5 88.5 CHECKED 1 51 2.8 11.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LETRBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 418 22.7 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 5.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 422 22.9 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 5.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CLRKLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 MORELA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CONVPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 433 23.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 11 .6 2.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LESSPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OTHRPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 356 19.4 80.2 80.2 CHECKED 1 88 4.8 19.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CANVRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 427 23.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 17 .9 3.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 416 22.6 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 6.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORERD6B Q5, Robert Dole, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 431 23.4 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 13 .7 2.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LETRRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 415 22.6 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 29 1.6 6.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 426 23.2 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 18 1.0 4.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CLRKSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 MORESF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CONVAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LESSAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OTHRAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVWT6B Q5, write-in, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 434 23.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKWT6B Q5, write-in, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CANVWT6B Q5, write-in, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSWT6B Q5, write-in, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREWT6B Q5, write-in, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LETRWT6B Q5, write-in, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRWT6B Q5, write-in, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYHRS6B Q6, hours per week to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT INVOLVED 1 282 15.3 64.5 64.5 TWO HOURS OR LESS 2 99 5.4 22.7 87.2 THREE TO FIVE HOURS 3 34 1.8 7.8 95.0 SIX TO TEN HOURS 4 12 .7 2.7 97.7 MORE THAN TEN HOURS 5 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1402 76.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 437 Missing cases 1402 REFSIG6B Q7, signed a ballot petition Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFCOL6B Q7, collected signatures Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFVOT6B Q7, received ballot and voted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 418 22.7 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 5.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 REFNVT6B Q7, received ballot no vote Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 429 23.3 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 15 .8 3.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 318 17.3 71.6 71.6 CHECKED 1 126 6.9 28.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CANVCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 433 23.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 11 .6 2.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 397 21.6 89.4 89.4 CHECKED 1 47 2.6 10.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORECG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 434 23.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LETRCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 423 23.0 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 4.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 328 17.8 73.9 73.9 CHECKED 1 116 6.3 26.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CLRKDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 430 23.4 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 14 .8 3.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 425 23.1 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 4.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 414 22.5 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.6 6.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 MOREDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 429 23.3 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 15 .8 3.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 411 22.3 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 33 1.8 7.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CONVPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LESSPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OTHRPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 390 21.2 87.8 87.8 CHECKED 1 54 2.9 12.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CANVDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 422 22.9 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 5.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LETRDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 373 20.3 84.0 84.0 CHECKED 1 71 3.9 16.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CLRKRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 427 23.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 17 .9 3.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 MORERH6B Q8, Rep House cand, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 428 23.3 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 16 .9 3.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 423 23.0 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 4.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CONVDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 379 20.6 85.4 85.4 CHECKED 1 65 3.5 14.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LESSDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 424 23.1 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 4.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OTHRDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 431 23.4 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 13 .7 2.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 389 21.2 87.6 87.6 CHECKED 1 55 3.0 12.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CANVRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 433 23.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 11 .6 2.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORERT6B Q8, Rep ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 428 23.3 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 16 .9 3.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LETRRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 422 22.9 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 5.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CLRKRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 MORERE6B Q8, Reform ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 SLDP6B Q9, State or local Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 70 3.8 3.8 3.8 $50-$100 2 24 1.3 1.3 5.1 $100-$250 3 6 .3 .3 5.4 $250 and above 4 1 .1 .1 5.5 Did NOT contribute 5 1738 94.5 94.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SLRP6B Q9, State or local Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 48 2.6 2.6 2.6 $50-$100 2 23 1.3 1.3 3.9 $100-$250 3 9 .5 .5 4.4 $250 and above 4 6 .3 .3 4.7 Did NOT contribute 5 1753 95.3 95.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NDP6B Q9, National Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 36 2.0 2.0 2.0 $50-$100 2 17 .9 .9 2.9 $100-$250 3 7 .4 .4 3.3 $250 and above 4 2 .1 .1 3.4 Did NOT contribute 5 1777 96.6 96.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 NRP6B Q9, National Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 29 1.6 1.6 1.6 $50-$100 2 18 1.0 1.0 2.6 $100-$250 3 9 .5 .5 3.0 $250 and above 4 7 .4 .4 3.4 Did NOT contribute 5 1776 96.6 96.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFP6B Q9, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 3 .2 .2 .2 $250 and above 4 1 .1 .1 .2 Did NOT contribute 5 1835 99.8 99.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOLV6B Q10, involved in 1996 Pres campaign? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 135 7.3 32.7 32.7 NO 2 278 15.1 67.3 100.0 . 1426 77.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 413 Missing cases 1426 IMPPOL6B Q10a, to help own political career Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 2 .1 2.3 2.3 3 3 .2 3.5 5.8 4 3 .2 3.5 9.3 6 6 .3 7.0 16.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 72 3.9 83.7 100.0 . 1695 92.2 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 58 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 86 Missing cases 1753 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPCOB6B Q10a, to fulfill sense of obligation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 44 2.4 35.5 35.5 2 31 1.7 25.0 60.5 3 16 .9 12.9 73.4 4 19 1.0 15.3 88.7 5 7 .4 5.6 94.4 6 1 .1 .8 95.2 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 6 .3 4.8 100.0 . 1690 91.9 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 25 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 124 Missing cases 1715 IMPISS6B Q10a, because of the issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 100 5.4 69.9 69.9 2 25 1.4 17.5 87.4 3 9 .5 6.3 93.7 4 5 .3 3.5 97.2 5 3 .2 2.1 99.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 1 .1 .7 100.0 . 1686 91.7 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 10 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 1696 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPFR6B Q10a, because of social contacts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 12 .7 12.6 12.6 2 9 .5 9.5 22.1 3 13 .7 13.7 35.8 4 13 .7 13.7 49.5 5 9 .5 9.5 58.9 6 8 .4 8.4 67.4 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 31 1.7 32.6 100.0 . 1694 92.1 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 50 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 1744 IMPPID6B Q10a, because of commitment to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 53 2.9 42.1 42.1 2 16 .9 12.7 54.8 3 21 1.1 16.7 71.4 4 10 .5 7.9 79.4 5 9 .5 7.1 86.5 6 5 .3 4.0 90.5 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 12 .7 9.5 100.0 . 1691 92.0 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 126 Missing cases 1713 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPORG6B Q10a, because of group membership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 17 .9 18.5 18.5 2 10 .5 10.9 29.3 3 9 .5 9.8 39.1 4 5 .3 5.4 44.6 5 6 .3 6.5 51.1 6 7 .4 7.6 58.7 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 38 2.1 41.3 100.0 . 1696 92.2 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 51 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 1747 IMPJOB6B Q10a, to help in own profession/job Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 3 .2 3.3 3.3 2 2 .1 2.2 5.6 3 1 .1 1.1 6.7 4 5 .3 5.6 12.2 5 3 .2 3.3 15.6 6 11 .6 12.2 27.8 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 65 3.5 72.2 100.0 . 1690 91.9 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 90 Missing cases 1749 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTDH6B Q11, Democratic House campaign in distri Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 132 7.2 7.2 7.2 NO 2 1707 92.8 92.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH6B Q11, Republican House campaign in distri Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 168 9.1 9.1 9.1 NO 2 1671 90.9 90.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONREH6B Q11, Reform Party House campaign in dist Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 12 .7 .7 .7 NO 2 1827 99.3 99.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTDP6B Q11, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 185 10.1 10.1 10.1 NO 2 1654 89.9 89.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRE6B Q11, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 12 .7 .7 .7 NO 2 1827 99.3 99.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 CONTRP6B Q11, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 217 11.8 11.8 11.8 NO 2 1622 88.2 88.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYID6B Q12, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 113 6.1 26.0 26.0 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 57 3.1 13.1 39.1 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 42 2.3 9.7 48.7 INDEPENDENT 4 12 .7 2.8 51.5 INDEPENDENT REP 5 41 2.2 9.4 60.9 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 67 3.6 15.4 76.3 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 103 5.6 23.7 100.0 . 1400 76.1 Missing OTHR PTY WRITE-IN 8 4 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 435 Missing cases 1404 LIBCON6B Q13, describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .3 1.4 1.4 LIBERAL 2 78 4.2 18.3 19.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 54 2.9 12.7 32.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 74 4.0 17.4 49.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 67 3.6 15.7 65.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 128 7.0 30.0 95.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 19 1.0 4.5 100.0 . 1398 76.0 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 9 .5 Missing NOT SURE 9 6 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 426 Missing cases 1413 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETWN6B Q14, work between now and 2000: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent IN DEM PARTY 1 58 3.2 17.6 17.6 IN REP PARTY 2 81 4.4 24.5 42.1 IN REFORM PARTY 3 2 .1 .6 42.7 IN OTHR 3RD PTY 4 2 .1 .6 43.3 INVOLVED NO WORK 5 90 4.9 27.3 70.6 NO INVOLVEMENT 6 97 5.3 29.4 100.0 . 1401 76.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 108 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 330 Missing cases 1509 ABORT6B Q15, amendment to prohibit abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 71 3.9 17.2 17.2 FAVOR 2 55 3.0 13.3 30.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 33 1.8 8.0 38.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.4 6.3 44.8 OPPOSE 5 69 3.8 16.7 61.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 159 8.6 38.5 100.0 . 1402 76.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 413 Missing cases 1426 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOL6B Q15, decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 44 2.4 10.5 10.5 FAVOR 2 100 5.4 23.9 34.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 105 5.7 25.1 59.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 39 2.1 9.3 68.9 OPPOSE 5 81 4.4 19.4 88.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 49 2.7 11.7 100.0 . 1405 76.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 16 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 418 Missing cases 1421 DEFTX6B Q15, reduce deficit, higher taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 44 2.4 10.6 10.6 FAVOR 2 115 6.3 27.6 38.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 101 5.5 24.3 62.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 36 2.0 8.7 71.2 OPPOSE 5 58 3.2 13.9 85.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 62 3.4 14.9 100.0 . 1405 76.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 18 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 416 Missing cases 1423 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPORT6B Q15, limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 57 3.1 13.8 13.8 FAVOR 2 75 4.1 18.2 32.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 106 5.8 25.7 57.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 50 2.7 12.1 69.9 OPPOSE 5 78 4.2 18.9 88.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 46 2.5 11.2 100.0 . 1402 76.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 25 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 412 Missing cases 1427 AFFACT6B Q15, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 30 1.6 7.3 7.3 FAVOR 2 62 3.4 15.2 22.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 73 4.0 17.8 40.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 56 3.0 13.7 54.0 OPPOSE 5 94 5.1 23.0 77.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 94 5.1 23.0 100.0 . 1407 76.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 23 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 409 Missing cases 1430 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERM6B Q15, term limits for Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 112 6.1 26.4 26.4 FAVOR 2 121 6.6 28.5 55.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 65 3.5 15.3 70.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 19 1.0 4.5 74.8 OPPOSE 5 50 2.7 11.8 86.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 57 3.1 13.4 100.0 . 1401 76.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 14 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 424 Missing cases 1415 NHI6B Q15, national health insurance plan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 57 3.1 14.5 14.5 FAVOR 2 62 3.4 15.8 30.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 60 3.3 15.3 45.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 23 1.3 5.9 51.5 OPPOSE 5 56 3.0 14.3 65.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 134 7.3 34.2 100.0 . 1402 76.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 45 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 392 Missing cases 1447 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFGP6B Q15, reduce deficit, program cuts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 4.9 21.9 21.9 FAVOR 2 120 6.5 28.8 50.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 87 4.7 20.9 71.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 46 2.5 11.1 82.7 OPPOSE 5 45 2.4 10.8 93.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 27 1.5 6.5 100.0 . 1401 76.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 416 Missing cases 1423 SHFTST6B Q15, domestic programs to states Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 94 5.1 22.1 22.1 FAVOR 2 139 7.6 32.7 54.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 61 3.3 14.4 69.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 45 2.4 10.6 79.8 OPPOSE 5 53 2.9 12.5 92.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 33 1.8 7.8 100.0 . 1399 76.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 425 Missing cases 1414 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARM6B Q15, increased firearms regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 140 7.6 32.9 32.9 FAVOR 2 94 5.1 22.1 55.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 41 2.2 9.6 64.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 22 1.2 5.2 69.9 OPPOSE 5 53 2.9 12.5 82.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 75 4.1 17.6 100.0 . 1401 76.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 13 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 425 Missing cases 1414 SLIMIG6B Q15, stricter limits on immigrants Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 103 5.6 25.3 25.3 FAVOR 2 99 5.4 24.3 49.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 104 5.7 25.6 75.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 41 2.2 10.1 85.3 OPPOSE 5 42 2.3 10.3 95.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 18 1.0 4.4 100.0 . 1399 76.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 407 Missing cases 1432 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS6B Q15a, most important issue in Q15: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 61 3.3 14.2 14.2 US INVOLVEMENT 2 15 .8 3.5 17.7 FEDERAL DEFICIT, TAX 3 61 3.3 14.2 31.9 IMPORTS 4 16 .9 3.7 35.6 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5 14 .8 3.3 38.8 TERM LIMITS 6 26 1.4 6.0 44.9 NATIONAL HEALTH INSU 7 65 3.5 15.1 60.0 FEDERAL DEFICIT, PRO 8 80 4.4 18.6 78.6 SHIFT DOMESTIC PROG 9 28 1.5 6.5 85.1 FIREARMS 10 39 2.1 9.1 94.2 STRICTER LIMITS ON I 11 25 1.4 5.8 100.0 . 1397 76.0 Missing NOT SURE 12 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430 Missing cases 1409 PRIORP6B Q15b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 99 5.4 25.2 25.2 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 169 9.2 43.0 68.2 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 125 6.8 31.8 100.0 . 1408 76.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 38 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 393 Missing cases 1446 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIODP6B Q15b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 68 3.7 17.5 17.5 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 150 8.2 38.6 56.0 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 171 9.3 44.0 100.0 . 1416 77.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 34 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 389 Missing cases 1450 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORE6B Q15b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 89 4.8 44.3 44.3 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 51 2.8 25.4 69.7 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 61 3.3 30.3 100.0 . 1427 77.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 211 11.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 201 Missing cases 1638 MIISBC6B Q16, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 79 4.3 21.1 21.1 FAVOR 2 78 4.2 20.9 42.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 55 3.0 14.7 56.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 18 1.0 4.8 61.5 OPPOSE 5 68 3.7 18.2 79.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 76 4.1 20.3 100.0 . 1419 77.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 46 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 374 Missing cases 1465 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRD6B Q16, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 64 3.5 17.0 17.0 FAVOR 2 114 6.2 30.3 47.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 66 3.6 17.6 64.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 24 1.3 6.4 71.3 OPPOSE 5 52 2.8 13.8 85.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 56 3.0 14.9 100.0 . 1425 77.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 38 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 376 Missing cases 1463 MIIHRP6B Q16, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 88 4.8 36.2 36.2 FAVOR 2 62 3.4 25.5 61.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 20 1.1 8.2 70.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 11 .6 4.5 74.5 OPPOSE 5 36 2.0 14.8 89.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 26 1.4 10.7 100.0 . 1444 78.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 152 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 243 Missing cases 1596 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISDH6B Q16, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 36 2.0 12.3 12.3 FAVOR 2 69 3.8 23.6 36.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 42 2.3 14.4 50.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.4 8.9 59.2 OPPOSE 5 56 3.0 19.2 78.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 63 3.4 21.6 100.0 . 1443 78.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 104 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 292 Missing cases 1547 MIISRH6B Q16, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 62 3.4 19.3 19.3 FAVOR 2 111 6.0 34.6 53.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 42 2.3 13.1 67.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 15 .8 4.7 71.7 OPPOSE 5 40 2.2 12.5 84.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 51 2.8 15.9 100.0 . 1432 77.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 86 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 321 Missing cases 1518 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISAA6B Q16, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 28 1.5 8.1 8.1 FAVOR 2 140 7.6 40.7 48.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 101 5.5 29.4 78.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 39 2.1 11.3 89.5 OPPOSE 5 28 1.5 8.1 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .4 2.3 100.0 . 1430 77.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 65 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 344 Missing cases 1495 MIISRP6B Q16, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 46 2.5 12.7 12.7 FAVOR 2 137 7.4 38.0 50.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 45 2.4 12.5 63.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 23 1.3 6.4 69.5 OPPOSE 5 52 2.8 14.4 83.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 58 3.2 16.1 100.0 . 1425 77.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 361 Missing cases 1478 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISDP6B Q16, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 33 1.8 9.2 9.2 FAVOR 2 88 4.8 24.5 33.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 63 3.4 17.5 51.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 1.5 7.8 59.1 OPPOSE 5 83 4.5 23.1 82.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 64 3.5 17.8 100.0 . 1427 77.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 53 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 359 Missing cases 1480 MIISRE6B Q16, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 52 2.8 28.6 28.6 FAVOR 2 62 3.4 34.1 62.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 20 1.1 11.0 73.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 8 .4 4.4 78.0 OPPOSE 5 20 1.1 11.0 89.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 20 1.1 11.0 100.0 . 1435 78.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 222 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 182 Missing cases 1657 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAR6B Q17, characterize yourself: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED CONSISTENTL 1 236 12.8 53.9 53.9 INVOLVED WORTHWHILE 2 94 5.1 21.5 75.3 NEWCOMER TO POLITICS 3 5 .3 1.1 76.5 NOT INVOLVED 4 103 5.6 23.5 100.0 . 1401 76.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1401 LCBC6B Q18, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 67 3.6 16.3 16.3 LIBERAL 2 169 9.2 41.0 57.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 100 5.4 24.3 81.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 63 3.4 15.3 96.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 7 .4 1.7 98.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 5 .3 1.2 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1411 76.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 16 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 412 Missing cases 1427 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD6B Q18, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .3 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 3 .2 .7 2.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 11 .6 2.7 4.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 32 1.7 7.8 12.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 91 4.9 22.2 34.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 218 11.9 53.2 87.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 50 2.7 12.2 100.0 . 1414 76.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 410 Missing cases 1429 LCRG6B Q18, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 99 5.4 28.9 28.9 LIBERAL 2 123 6.7 35.9 64.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 64 3.5 18.7 83.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 27 1.5 7.9 91.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 14 .8 4.1 95.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 11 .6 3.2 98.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 5 .3 1.5 100.0 . 1429 77.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 343 Missing cases 1496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCNG6B Q18, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 4 .2 1.0 1.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 3 .2 .8 2.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 8 .4 2.0 4.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 22 1.2 5.6 10.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 156 8.5 39.8 50.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 196 10.7 50.0 100.0 . 1422 77.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 25 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 392 Missing cases 1447 LCAG6B Q18, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 90 4.9 22.6 22.6 LIBERAL 2 153 8.3 38.3 60.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 98 5.3 24.6 85.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 43 2.3 10.8 96.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 6 .3 1.5 97.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 7 .4 1.8 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1419 77.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 399 Missing cases 1440 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJK6B Q18, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 1 .1 .3 1.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 5 .3 1.3 2.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 47 2.6 12.2 14.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 86 4.7 22.3 36.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 197 10.7 51.2 88.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 46 2.5 11.9 100.0 . 1421 77.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 385 Missing cases 1454 LCDL6B Q18, Dick Lamm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 2.5 2.5 LIBERAL 2 15 .8 9.5 12.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 17 .9 10.8 22.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 26 1.4 16.5 39.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 25 1.4 15.8 55.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 54 2.9 34.2 89.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 17 .9 10.8 100.0 . 1450 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 231 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 158 Missing cases 1681 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP6B Q18, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 4 .2 1.4 2.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 14 .8 4.9 7.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 32 1.7 11.2 18.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 43 2.3 15.1 33.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 119 6.5 41.8 75.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 70 3.8 24.6 100.0 . 1431 77.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 123 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 285 Missing cases 1554 LCCP6B Q18, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .9 .9 LIBERAL 2 8 .4 2.4 3.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 34 1.8 10.2 13.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 112 6.1 33.5 47.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 104 5.7 31.1 78.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 67 3.6 20.1 98.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 6 .3 1.8 100.0 . 1422 77.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 83 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 334 Missing cases 1505 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAA6B Q18, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .1 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 9 .5 2.3 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 70 3.8 18.2 21.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 190 10.3 49.5 70.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 87 4.7 22.7 93.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 25 1.4 6.5 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 1424 77.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 384 Missing cases 1455 LCDH6B Q18, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 59 3.2 17.2 17.2 LIBERAL 2 128 7.0 37.3 54.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 93 5.1 27.1 81.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 39 2.1 11.4 93.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 13 .7 3.8 96.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 7 .4 2.0 98.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 4 .2 1.2 100.0 . 1436 78.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 60 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 343 Missing cases 1496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRH6B Q18, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 3 .2 .8 1.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 6 .3 1.7 2.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 42 2.3 11.8 14.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 50 2.7 14.0 28.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 182 9.9 51.0 79.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 73 4.0 20.4 100.0 . 1434 78.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 357 Missing cases 1482 LCDP6B Q18, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 66 3.6 16.5 16.5 LIBERAL 2 188 10.2 47.1 63.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 103 5.6 25.8 89.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 28 1.5 7.0 96.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 7 .4 1.8 98.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 5 .3 1.3 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1418 77.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 399 Missing cases 1440 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP6B Q18, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .2 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 5 .3 1.3 2.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 2 .1 .5 2.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 13 .7 3.3 5.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 72 3.9 18.0 23.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 231 12.6 57.8 81.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 74 4.0 18.5 100.0 . 1418 77.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 400 Missing cases 1439 LCRE6B Q18, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .1 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 7 .4 3.4 4.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 9 .5 4.3 8.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 31 1.7 14.9 23.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 42 2.3 20.2 43.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 71 3.9 34.1 77.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 46 2.5 22.1 100.0 . 1427 77.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 204 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 208 Missing cases 1631 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBC6B Q19a, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 87 4.7 22.0 22.0 FAVOR 2 198 10.8 50.1 72.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 87 4.7 22.0 94.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 15 .8 3.8 98.0 OPPOSE 5 7 .4 1.8 99.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 1414 76.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 395 Missing cases 1444 AFFRD6B Q19a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .2 .8 .8 FAVOR 2 21 1.1 5.5 6.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 35 1.9 9.2 15.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 81 4.4 21.4 36.9 OPPOSE 5 165 9.0 43.5 80.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 74 4.0 19.5 100.0 . 1422 77.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 38 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 379 Missing cases 1460 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFHRP6B Q19a, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .1 .8 .8 FAVOR 2 6 .3 2.5 3.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 17 .9 7.1 10.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 40 2.2 16.8 27.3 OPPOSE 5 103 5.6 43.3 70.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 70 3.8 29.4 100.0 . 1434 78.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 167 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 238 Missing cases 1601 AFFAA6B Q19a, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .2 1.1 1.1 FAVOR 2 21 1.1 5.8 6.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 69 3.8 19.0 25.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 126 6.9 34.7 60.6 OPPOSE 5 122 6.6 33.6 94.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 21 1.1 5.8 100.0 . 1428 77.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 48 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 363 Missing cases 1476 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFDP6B Q19a, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 78 4.2 20.7 20.7 FAVOR 2 188 10.2 49.9 70.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 87 4.7 23.1 93.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 13 .7 3.4 97.1 OPPOSE 5 6 .3 1.6 98.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 5 .3 1.3 100.0 . 1429 77.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 377 Missing cases 1462 AFFRP6B Q19a, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1 .1 .3 .3 FAVOR 2 15 .8 4.0 4.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 33 1.8 8.8 13.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 59 3.2 15.7 28.7 OPPOSE 5 179 9.7 47.6 76.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 89 4.8 23.7 100.0 . 1425 77.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 38 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 376 Missing cases 1463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRE6B Q19a, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .1 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 3 .2 1.9 3.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 12 .7 7.6 10.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 34 1.8 21.5 32.3 OPPOSE 5 70 3.8 44.3 76.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 37 2.0 23.4 100.0 . 1440 78.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 241 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 158 Missing cases 1681 DEFBC6B Q19b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .4 1.7 1.7 FAVOR 2 41 2.2 10.2 11.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 76 4.1 18.9 30.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 60 3.3 14.9 45.7 OPPOSE 5 142 7.7 35.2 80.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 77 4.2 19.1 100.0 . 1416 77.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 20 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 403 Missing cases 1436 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRD6B Q19b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 4.9 22.6 22.6 FAVOR 2 199 10.8 49.4 72.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 70 3.8 17.4 89.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 20 1.1 5.0 94.3 OPPOSE 5 15 .8 3.7 98.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .4 2.0 100.0 . 1420 77.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 16 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 403 Missing cases 1436 DEFHRP6B Q19b, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 122 6.6 40.9 40.9 FAVOR 2 122 6.6 40.9 81.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 33 1.8 11.1 93.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 11 .6 3.7 96.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .5 3.4 100.0 . 1430 77.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 111 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 298 Missing cases 1541 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFAA6B Q19b, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 13 .7 3.5 3.5 FAVOR 2 90 4.9 24.3 27.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 146 7.9 39.5 67.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 72 3.9 19.5 86.8 OPPOSE 5 40 2.2 10.8 97.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .5 2.4 100.0 . 1432 77.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 370 Missing cases 1469 DEFDP6B Q19b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .2 .8 .8 FAVOR 2 35 1.9 9.1 9.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 57 3.1 14.8 24.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 73 4.0 19.0 43.8 OPPOSE 5 132 7.2 34.4 78.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 84 4.6 21.9 100.0 . 1430 77.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 25 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 384 Missing cases 1455 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRP6B Q19b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 4.9 23.5 23.5 FAVOR 2 201 10.9 51.8 75.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 63 3.4 16.2 91.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 14 .8 3.6 95.1 OPPOSE 5 13 .7 3.4 98.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 6 .3 1.5 100.0 . 1427 77.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 388 Missing cases 1451 DEFRE6B Q19b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 74 4.0 35.1 35.1 FAVOR 2 84 4.6 39.8 74.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 31 1.7 14.7 89.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 13 .7 6.2 95.7 OPPOSE 5 2 .1 .9 96.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 7 .4 3.3 100.0 . 1442 78.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 186 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 211 Missing cases 1628 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOBC6B Q19c, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 8 .4 2.0 2.0 FAVOR 2 39 2.1 9.9 11.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 16 .9 4.1 16.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 35 1.9 8.9 24.9 OPPOSE 5 108 5.9 27.4 52.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 188 10.2 47.7 100.0 . 1418 77.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 27 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 394 Missing cases 1445 ABORD6B Q19c, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 74 4.0 20.1 20.1 FAVOR 2 145 7.9 39.4 59.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 77 4.2 20.9 80.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 39 2.1 10.6 91.0 OPPOSE 5 25 1.4 6.8 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .4 2.2 100.0 . 1425 77.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 46 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 368 Missing cases 1471 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOHRP6B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.0 11.1 11.1 FAVOR 2 39 2.1 24.1 35.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 26 1.4 16.0 51.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 24 1.3 14.8 66.0 OPPOSE 5 38 2.1 23.5 89.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 17 .9 10.5 100.0 . 1443 78.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 234 12.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 1677 ABOAA6B Q19c, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .1 .6 .6 FAVOR 2 41 2.2 11.6 12.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 78 4.2 22.0 34.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 101 5.5 28.5 62.7 OPPOSE 5 119 6.5 33.6 96.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 13 .7 3.7 100.0 . 1433 77.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 52 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 1485 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABODP6B Q19c, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .3 1.4 1.4 FAVOR 2 29 1.6 8.0 9.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 27 1.5 7.4 16.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 40 2.2 11.0 27.8 OPPOSE 5 140 7.6 38.6 66.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 122 6.6 33.6 100.0 . 1437 78.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 363 Missing cases 1476 ABORP6B Q19c, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 73 4.0 20.2 20.2 FAVOR 2 162 8.8 44.8 64.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 76 4.1 21.0 85.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.4 7.2 93.1 OPPOSE 5 17 .9 4.7 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .4 2.2 100.0 . 1428 77.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 49 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 362 Missing cases 1477 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORE6B Q19c, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.0 15.4 15.4 FAVOR 2 26 1.4 22.2 37.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 23 1.3 19.7 57.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 23 1.3 19.7 76.9 OPPOSE 5 17 .9 14.5 91.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .5 8.5 100.0 . 1449 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 273 14.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 117 Missing cases 1722 INVBC6B Q19d, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .2 1.1 1.1 FAVOR 2 25 1.4 6.6 7.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 40 2.2 10.6 18.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 58 3.2 15.3 33.5 OPPOSE 5 143 7.8 37.7 71.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 109 5.9 28.8 100.0 . 1423 77.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 379 Missing cases 1460 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRD6B Q19d, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.0 4.9 4.9 FAVOR 2 79 4.3 21.5 26.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 90 4.9 24.5 50.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 60 3.3 16.3 67.1 OPPOSE 5 91 4.9 24.7 91.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 30 1.6 8.2 100.0 . 1428 77.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 43 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 368 Missing cases 1471 INVHRP6B Q19d, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 46 2.5 18.5 18.5 FAVOR 2 89 4.8 35.9 54.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 42 2.3 16.9 71.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 1.5 11.3 82.7 OPPOSE 5 24 1.3 9.7 92.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 19 1.0 7.7 100.0 . 1445 78.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 146 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 248 Missing cases 1591 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVAA6B Q19d, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 13 .7 3.6 3.6 FAVOR 2 94 5.1 25.7 29.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 144 7.8 39.3 68.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 75 4.1 20.5 89.1 OPPOSE 5 31 1.7 8.5 97.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .5 2.5 100.0 . 1431 77.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 42 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 366 Missing cases 1473 INVDP6B Q19d, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .3 1.5 1.5 FAVOR 2 27 1.5 7.9 9.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 49 2.7 14.3 23.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 70 3.8 20.5 44.2 OPPOSE 5 135 7.3 39.5 83.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 56 3.0 16.4 100.0 . 1438 78.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 59 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 342 Missing cases 1497 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRP6B Q19d, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 16 .9 4.7 4.7 FAVOR 2 92 5.0 26.8 31.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 96 5.2 28.0 59.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 49 2.7 14.3 73.8 OPPOSE 5 71 3.9 20.7 94.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 19 1.0 5.5 100.0 . 1435 78.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 61 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 343 Missing cases 1496 INVRE6B Q19d, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 28 1.5 17.8 17.8 FAVOR 2 57 3.1 36.3 54.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 37 2.0 23.6 77.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 12 .7 7.6 85.4 OPPOSE 5 12 .7 7.6 93.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 11 .6 7.0 100.0 . 1451 78.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 231 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 157 Missing cases 1682 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC6B Q20, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 1.5 6.7 6.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 117 6.4 29.2 35.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 62 3.4 15.5 51.4 AVERAGE 4 56 3.0 14.0 65.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 30 1.6 7.5 72.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 44 2.4 11.0 83.8 POOR 7 65 3.5 16.2 100.0 . 1434 78.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 4 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 1438 EVARD6B Q20, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 11 .6 2.8 2.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 103 5.6 26.1 28.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 104 5.7 26.3 55.2 AVERAGE 4 94 5.1 23.8 79.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 33 1.8 8.4 87.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 27 1.5 6.8 94.2 POOR 7 23 1.3 5.8 100.0 . 1438 78.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 6 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 395 Missing cases 1444 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVARG6B Q20, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 2.0 2.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 52 2.8 14.8 16.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 88 4.8 25.0 41.8 AVERAGE 4 85 4.6 24.1 65.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 39 2.1 11.1 77.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 40 2.2 11.4 88.4 POOR 7 41 2.2 11.6 100.0 . 1450 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 1487 EVANG6B Q20, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 1.3 6.2 6.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 56 3.0 14.4 20.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 55 3.0 14.2 34.8 AVERAGE 4 59 3.2 15.2 50.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 38 2.1 9.8 59.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 67 3.6 17.3 77.1 POOR 7 89 4.8 22.9 100.0 . 1442 78.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 9 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 388 Missing cases 1451 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAG6B Q20, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 1.5 7.0 7.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 102 5.5 26.4 33.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 60 3.3 15.5 48.8 AVERAGE 4 63 3.4 16.3 65.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 50 2.7 12.9 78.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 38 2.1 9.8 87.9 POOR 7 47 2.6 12.1 100.0 . 1440 78.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 387 Missing cases 1452 EVAJK6B Q20, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 23 1.3 6.1 6.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 72 3.9 19.1 25.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 93 5.1 24.7 50.0 AVERAGE 4 108 5.9 28.7 78.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 45 2.4 12.0 90.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 20 1.1 5.3 96.0 POOR 7 15 .8 4.0 100.0 . 1443 78.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 20 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 376 Missing cases 1463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADL6B Q20, Dick Lamm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 6 .3 3.8 3.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 22 1.2 13.8 17.5 AVERAGE 4 62 3.4 38.8 56.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 26 1.4 16.3 72.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 29 1.6 18.1 90.6 POOR 7 15 .8 9.4 100.0 . 1465 79.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 214 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 160 Missing cases 1679 EVAHRP6B Q20, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .3 1.5 1.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 33 1.8 10.2 11.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 38 2.1 11.8 23.5 AVERAGE 4 49 2.7 15.2 38.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 44 2.4 13.6 52.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 64 3.5 19.8 72.1 POOR 7 90 4.9 27.9 100.0 . 1455 79.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 61 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 323 Missing cases 1516 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACP6B Q20, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 35 1.9 10.4 10.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 89 4.8 26.4 36.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 95 5.2 28.2 65.0 AVERAGE 4 77 4.2 22.8 87.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 16 .9 4.7 92.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 9 .5 2.7 95.3 POOR 7 16 .9 4.7 100.0 . 1446 78.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 1502 EVADP6B Q20, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 10 .5 2.7 2.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 58 3.2 15.4 18.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 60 3.3 15.9 34.0 AVERAGE 4 95 5.2 25.2 59.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 46 2.5 12.2 71.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 47 2.6 12.5 83.8 POOR 7 61 3.3 16.2 100.0 . 1445 78.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 377 Missing cases 1462 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVARP6B Q20, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 8 .4 2.1 2.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 47 2.6 12.6 14.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 87 4.7 23.3 38.0 AVERAGE 4 101 5.5 27.0 65.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 53 2.9 14.2 79.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 35 1.9 9.4 88.5 POOR 7 43 2.3 11.5 100.0 . 1446 78.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 19 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 374 Missing cases 1465 EVARE6B Q20, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 1 .1 .5 .5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 8 .4 4.3 4.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 17 .9 9.0 13.8 AVERAGE 4 46 2.5 24.5 38.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 29 1.6 15.4 53.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 39 2.1 20.7 74.5 POOR 7 48 2.6 25.5 100.0 . 1488 80.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 163 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 188 Missing cases 1651 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADH6B Q20, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 .7 3.9 3.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 46 2.5 13.8 17.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 68 3.7 20.4 38.1 AVERAGE 4 97 5.3 29.1 67.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 28 1.5 8.4 75.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 30 1.6 9.0 84.7 POOR 7 51 2.8 15.3 100.0 . 1464 79.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 42 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 333 Missing cases 1506 EVARH6B Q20, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.4 7.4 7.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 75 4.1 21.4 28.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 64 3.5 18.3 47.1 AVERAGE 4 81 4.4 23.1 70.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 30 1.6 8.6 78.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 38 2.1 10.9 89.7 POOR 7 36 2.0 10.3 100.0 . 1456 79.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 350 Missing cases 1489 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACON6B Q20, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .3 1.3 1.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 36 2.0 9.5 10.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 62 3.4 16.4 27.3 AVERAGE 4 142 7.7 37.7 65.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 74 4.0 19.6 84.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 28 1.5 7.4 92.0 POOR 7 30 1.6 8.0 100.0 . 1450 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 377 Missing cases 1462 EVASC6B Q20, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 1.9 1.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 36 2.0 9.8 11.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 78 4.2 21.1 32.8 AVERAGE 4 120 6.5 32.5 65.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 60 3.3 16.3 81.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 43 2.3 11.7 93.2 POOR 7 25 1.4 6.8 100.0 . 1449 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 369 Missing cases 1470 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMIL6B Q20, US Military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 1.0 5.1 5.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 93 5.1 24.9 30.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 94 5.1 25.2 55.2 AVERAGE 4 101 5.5 27.1 82.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 39 2.1 10.5 92.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 18 1.0 4.8 97.6 POOR 7 9 .5 2.4 100.0 . 1450 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 16 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 373 Missing cases 1466 EVAUN6B Q20, United Nations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 2 .1 .6 .6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 19 1.0 5.3 5.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 58 3.2 16.1 21.9 AVERAGE 4 101 5.5 28.1 50.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 56 3.0 15.6 65.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 48 2.6 13.3 78.9 POOR 7 76 4.1 21.1 100.0 . 1453 79.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 26 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 360 Missing cases 1479 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAB6B Q20, labor unions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .2 1.1 1.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 19 1.0 5.1 6.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 47 2.6 12.6 18.7 AVERAGE 4 85 4.6 22.7 41.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 64 3.5 17.1 58.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 64 3.5 17.1 75.7 POOR 7 91 4.9 24.3 100.0 . 1447 78.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 18 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 374 Missing cases 1465 EVABUS6B Q20, business corporations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .3 1.4 1.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 17 .9 4.7 6.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 60 3.3 16.7 22.8 AVERAGE 4 119 6.5 33.1 56.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 70 3.8 19.5 75.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 47 2.6 13.1 88.6 POOR 7 41 2.2 11.4 100.0 . 1450 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 30 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 359 Missing cases 1480 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GOVRUN6B Q21, government is run: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BY A FEW BIG INTERES 1 276 15.0 67.0 67.0 FOR ALL THE PEOPLE 2 136 7.4 33.0 100.0 . 1427 77.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 412 Missing cases 1427 NECON6B Q22, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 30 1.6 6.9 6.9 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 164 8.9 38.0 44.9 ABOUT THE SAME 3 184 10.0 42.6 87.5 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 45 2.4 10.4 97.9 MUCH WORSE 5 9 .5 2.1 100.0 . 1407 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 432 Missing cases 1407 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PECON6B Q22, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 25 1.4 5.9 5.9 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 100 5.4 23.6 29.5 ABOUT THE SAME 3 236 12.8 55.7 85.1 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 49 2.7 11.6 96.7 MUCH WORSE 5 14 .8 3.3 100.0 . 1415 76.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 424 Missing cases 1415 FNECON6B Q23, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 14 .8 3.2 3.2 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 95 5.2 21.9 25.2 ABOUT THE SAME 3 225 12.2 52.0 77.1 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 84 4.6 19.4 96.5 MUCH WORSE 5 15 .8 3.5 100.0 . 1406 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 433 Missing cases 1406 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPECON6B Q23, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 15 .8 3.6 3.6 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 78 4.2 18.6 22.1 ABOUT THE SAME 3 265 14.4 63.1 85.2 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 56 3.0 13.3 98.6 MUCH WORSE 5 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1419 77.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 420 Missing cases 1419 FNECPR6B Q24, How certain are you for Q23? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 35 1.9 8.2 8.2 CERTAIN 2 203 11.0 47.5 55.7 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 170 9.2 39.8 95.6 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 19 1.0 4.4 100.0 . 1412 76.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 427 Missing cases 1412 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETINF6B Q25, I'm more informed than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 6 .3 1.5 1.5 DISAGREE 2 63 3.4 15.7 17.2 AGREE 3 225 12.2 56.1 73.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 107 5.8 26.7 100.0 . 1414 76.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 1438 DEMPRO6B Q25, demonstrators allowed to protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 44 2.4 11.0 11.0 DISAGREE 2 109 5.9 27.3 38.3 AGREE 3 188 10.2 47.0 85.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 59 3.2 14.8 100.0 . 1415 76.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 400 Missing cases 1439 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLVIO6B Q25, the police stop violent protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 10 .5 2.5 2.5 DISAGREE 2 39 2.1 9.7 12.2 AGREE 3 256 13.9 63.5 75.7 STRONGLY AGREE 4 98 5.3 24.3 100.0 . 1414 76.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 403 Missing cases 1436 WELREP6B Q25, people like me are well represented Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 45 2.4 11.7 11.7 DISAGREE 2 196 10.7 51.0 62.8 AGREE 3 128 7.0 33.3 96.1 STRONGLY AGREE 4 15 .8 3.9 100.0 . 1419 77.2 Missing NOT SURE 5 36 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 384 Missing cases 1455 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRSPCH6B Q25, free speech granted to everyone Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 16 .9 3.9 3.9 DISAGREE 2 90 4.9 21.9 25.8 AGREE 3 232 12.6 56.4 82.2 STRONGLY AGREE 4 73 4.0 17.8 100.0 . 1413 76.8 Missing NOT SURE 5 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 411 Missing cases 1428 POLNV6B Q25, the police stop disruptive protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 27 1.5 7.0 7.0 DISAGREE 2 116 6.3 30.0 37.0 AGREE 3 191 10.4 49.4 86.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 53 2.9 13.7 100.0 . 1413 76.8 Missing NOT SURE 5 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 387 Missing cases 1452 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPGOV6B Q25, speech against government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 92 5.0 23.4 23.4 DISAGREE 2 115 6.3 29.2 52.5 AGREE 3 128 7.0 32.5 85.0 STRONGLY AGREE 4 59 3.2 15.0 100.0 . 1417 77.1 Missing NOT SURE 5 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 394 Missing cases 1445 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFPID6B Q26, Identify with Reform Party? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 35 1.9 8.3 8.3 NO 2 387 21.0 91.7 100.0 . 1417 77.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 422 Missing cases 1417 STRREF6B Q26a, How strongly? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 3 .2 4.7 4.7 STRONGLY 2 12 .7 18.8 23.4 NOT SO STRONGLY 3 49 2.7 76.6 100.0 . 1775 96.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 64 Missing cases 1775 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 363 19.7 81.8 81.8 CHECKED 1 81 4.4 18.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 402 21.9 90.5 90.5 CHECKED 1 42 2.3 9.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 DPFMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 394 21.4 88.7 88.7 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 11.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 422 22.9 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 5.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Reform current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 RPFCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 423 23.0 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 4.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 427 23.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 17 .9 3.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 DPCCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 400 21.8 90.1 90.1 CHECKED 1 44 2.4 9.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 RPCOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 425 23.1 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 4.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 427 23.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 17 .9 3.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DECOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 RECOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 414 22.5 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.6 6.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 DPFMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 RPFMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 DPCMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFOTH6B Q27, othr office, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 RPCOTH6B Q27, othr office, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFOTH6B Q27, othr office, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCOTH6B Q27, othr office, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 RECOTH6B Q27, othr office, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMTEA6B Q28, not member, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 208 11.3 46.8 46.8 CHECKED 1 236 12.8 53.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMTEA6B Q28, inactive member, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 COTEA6B Q28, convince, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDTEA6B Q28, paid dues, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 422 22.9 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 22 1.2 5.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMTEA6B Q28, attended mtg, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 430 23.4 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 14 .8 3.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LRTEA6B Q28, leader role, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMTEA6B Q28, gave money, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OATEA6B Q28, other activities, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 NMBUS6B Q28, not member, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 223 12.1 50.2 50.2 CHECKED 1 221 12.0 49.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMBUS6B Q28, inactive member, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 433 23.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 11 .6 2.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COBUS6B Q28, convince, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 PDBUS6B Q28, paid dues, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 423 23.0 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 4.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMBUS6B Q28, attended mtg, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRBUS6B Q28, leader role, business orga Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 GMBUS6B Q28, gave money, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OABUS6B Q28, other activities, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMVET6B Q28, not member, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 239 13.0 53.8 53.8 CHECKED 1 205 11.1 46.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 IMVET6B Q28, inactive member, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 425 23.1 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 4.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COVET6B Q28, convince, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDVET6B Q28, paid dues, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 402 21.9 90.5 90.5 CHECKED 1 42 2.3 9.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 AMVET6B Q28, attended mtg, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 434 23.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRVET6B Q28, leader role, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMVET6B Q28, gave money, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 425 23.1 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 4.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OAVET6B Q28, other activities, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMWRG6B Q28, not member, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 202 11.0 45.5 45.5 CHECKED 1 242 13.2 54.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMWRG6B Q28, inactive member, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 COWRG6B Q28, convince, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDWRG6B Q28, paid dues, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 431 23.4 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 13 .7 2.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMWRG6B Q28, attended mtg, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LRWRG6B Q28, leader role, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMWRG6B Q28, gave money, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAWRG6B Q28, other activities, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 NMCIVL6B Q28, not member, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 202 11.0 45.5 45.5 CHECKED 1 242 13.2 54.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCIVL6B Q28, inactive member, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCIVL6B Q28, convince, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 PDCIVL6B Q28, paid dues, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCIVL6B Q28, attended mtg, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LACIVL6B Q28, leader role, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 GMCIVL6B Q28, gave money, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACIVL6B Q28, other activities, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMENV6B Q28, not member, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 244 13.3 55.0 55.0 CHECKED 1 200 10.9 45.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 IMENV6B Q28, inactive member, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 425 23.1 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 4.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COENV6B Q28, convince, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDENV6B Q28, paid dues, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 399 21.7 89.9 89.9 CHECKED 1 45 2.4 10.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 AMENV6B Q28, attended mtg, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRENV6B Q28, leader role, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMENV6B Q28, gave money, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 421 22.9 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 5.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OAENV6B Q28, other activities, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMNPIG6B Q28, not member, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 218 11.9 49.1 49.1 CHECKED 1 226 12.3 50.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMNPIG6B Q28, inactive member, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 431 23.4 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 13 .7 2.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 CONPIG6B Q28, convince, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDNPIG6B Q28, paid dues, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 421 22.9 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1 23 1.3 5.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMNPIG6B Q28, attended mtg, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LRNPIG6B Q28, leader role, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMNPIG6B Q28, gave money, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OANPIG6B Q28, other activities, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 NMFARM6B Q28, not member, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 234 12.7 52.7 52.7 CHECKED 1 210 11.4 47.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMFARM6B Q28, inactive member, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 419 22.8 94.4 94.4 CHECKED 1 25 1.4 5.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COFARM6B Q28, convince, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 PDFARM6B Q28, paid dues, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 402 21.9 90.5 90.5 CHECKED 1 42 2.3 9.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMFARM6B Q28, attended mtg, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 428 23.3 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 16 .9 3.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRFARM6B Q28, leader role, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 GMFARM6B Q28, gave money, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAFARM6B Q28, other activities, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMEVAN6B Q28, not member, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 214 11.6 48.2 48.2 CHECKED 1 230 12.5 51.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 IMEVAN6B Q28, inactive member, political evang gr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COEVAN6B Q28, convince, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDEVAN6B Q28, paid dues, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 AMEVAN6B Q28, attended mtg, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LREVAN6B Q28, leader role, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMEVAN6B Q28, gave money, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 430 23.4 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 14 .8 3.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OAEVAN6B Q28, other activities, political evang g Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMABOR6B Q28, not member, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 219 11.9 49.3 49.3 CHECKED 1 225 12.2 50.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMABOR6B Q28, inactive member, anti/pro-abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 COABOR6B Q28, convince, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDABOR6B Q28, paid dues, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 431 23.4 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 13 .7 2.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMABOR6B Q28, attended mtg, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LRABOR6B Q28, leader role, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 23.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 5 .3 1.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMABOR6B Q28, gave money, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 423 23.0 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 4.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAABOR6B Q28, other activities, anti/pro-abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 NMLIBG6B Q28, not member, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 209 11.4 47.1 47.1 CHECKED 1 235 12.8 52.9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMLIBG6B Q28, inactive member, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COLIBG6B Q28, convince, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 PDLIBG6B Q28, paid dues, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 436 23.7 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 8 .4 1.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMLIBG6B Q28, attended mtg, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRLIBG6B Q28, leader role, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 GMLIBG6B Q28, gave money, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 434 23.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OALIBG6B Q28, other activities, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCONG6B Q28, not member, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 221 12.0 49.8 49.8 CHECKED 1 223 12.1 50.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 IMCONG6B Q28, inactive member, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCONG6B Q28, convince, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCONG6B Q28, paid dues, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 434 23.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 AMCONG6B Q28, attended mtg, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCONG6B Q28, leader role, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCONG6B Q28, gave money, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 434 23.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 10 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OACONG6B Q28, other activities, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 437 23.8 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 7 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCRIM6B Q28, not member, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 246 13.4 55.4 55.4 CHECKED 1 198 10.8 44.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCRIM6B Q28, inactive member, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 419 22.8 94.4 94.4 CHECKED 1 25 1.4 5.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 COCRIM6B Q28, convince, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCRIM6B Q28, paid dues, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCRIM6B Q28, attended mtg, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 424 23.1 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 4.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LRCRIM6B Q28, leader role, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 438 23.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 6 .3 1.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCRIM6B Q28, gave money, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACRIM6B Q28, other activities, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 23.7 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 9 .5 2.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 NMEDUC6B Q28, not member, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 246 13.4 55.4 55.4 CHECKED 1 198 10.8 44.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMEDUC6B Q28, inactive member, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 427 23.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 17 .9 3.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COEDUC6B Q28, convince, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 24.0 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 PDEDUC6B Q28, paid dues, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 428 23.3 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 16 .9 3.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMEDUC6B Q28, attended mtg, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 424 23.1 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 4.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LREDUC6B Q28, leader role, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 432 23.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 12 .7 2.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 GMEDUC6B Q28, gave money, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 430 23.4 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 14 .8 3.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAEDUC6B Q28, other activities, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 428 23.3 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 16 .9 3.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCHUR6B Q28, not member, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 359 19.5 80.9 80.9 CHECKED 1 85 4.6 19.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 IMCHUR6B Q28, inactive member, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 414 22.5 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.6 6.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCHUR6B Q28, convince, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 406 22.1 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 38 2.1 8.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCHUR6B Q28, paid dues, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 373 20.3 84.0 84.0 CHECKED 1 71 3.9 16.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 AMCHUR6B Q28, attended mtg, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 343 18.7 77.3 77.3 CHECKED 1 101 5.5 22.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCHUR6B Q28, leader role, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 359 19.5 80.9 80.9 CHECKED 1 85 4.6 19.1 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCHUR6B Q28, gave money, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 316 17.2 71.2 71.2 CHECKED 1 128 7.0 28.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 OACHUR6B Q28, other activities, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 361 19.6 81.3 81.3 CHECKED 1 83 4.5 18.7 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMUWSA6B Q28, not member, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 203 11.0 45.7 45.7 CHECKED 1 241 13.1 54.3 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMUWSA6B Q28, inactive member, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 COUWSA6B Q28, convince, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 444 24.1 100.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDUWSA6B Q28, paid dues, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 440 23.9 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 4 .2 .9 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMUWSA6B Q28, attended mtg, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 LRUWSA6B Q28, leader role, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMUWSA6B Q28, gave money, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 24.1 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAUWSA6B Q28, other activities, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 442 24.0 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 NMCIVC6B Q28, not member, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 254 13.8 57.2 57.2 CHECKED 1 190 10.3 42.8 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCIVC6B Q28, inactive member, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 430 23.4 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 14 .8 3.2 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCIVC6B Q28, convince, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 424 23.1 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 4.5 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 PDCIVC6B Q28, paid dues, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 397 21.6 89.4 89.4 CHECKED 1 47 2.6 10.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCIVC6B Q28, attended mtg, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 404 22.0 91.0 91.0 CHECKED 1 40 2.2 9.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCIVC6B Q28, leader role, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 406 22.1 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 38 2.1 8.6 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 GMCIVC6B Q28, gave money, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 413 22.5 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 31 1.7 7.0 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACIVC6B Q28, other activities, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 420 22.8 94.6 94.6 CHECKED 1 24 1.3 5.4 100.0 . 1395 75.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 444 Missing cases 1395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUGOV6B Q29, the US Government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 10 .5 2.3 2.3 MOST OF THE TIME 2 165 9.0 38.4 40.7 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 202 11.0 47.0 87.7 ALMOST NEVER 4 44 2.4 10.2 97.9 NEVER 5 9 .5 2.1 100.0 . 1409 76.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430 Missing cases 1409 TRSGOV6B Q29, your state government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 20 1.1 4.6 4.6 MOST OF THE TIME 2 216 11.7 49.9 54.5 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 175 9.5 40.4 94.9 ALMOST NEVER 4 20 1.1 4.6 99.5 NEVER 5 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1406 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 433 Missing cases 1406 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRLGOV6B Q29, your local governemnt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 41 2.2 9.5 9.5 MOST OF THE TIME 2 213 11.6 49.4 58.9 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 149 8.1 34.6 93.5 ALMOST NEVER 4 19 1.0 4.4 97.9 NEVER 5 9 .5 2.1 100.0 . 1408 76.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 431 Missing cases 1408 FFLDPO6B Q30, local Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 117 6.4 34.7 34.7 ONE OR TWO 2 84 4.6 24.9 59.6 THREE OR MORE 3 136 7.4 40.4 100.0 . 1465 79.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 1502 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFLRPO6B Q30, local Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 87 4.7 25.4 25.4 ONE OR TWO 2 87 4.7 25.4 50.9 THREE OR MORE 3 168 9.1 49.1 100.0 . 1465 79.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 342 Missing cases 1497 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFUWSA6B Q30, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 218 11.9 90.1 90.1 ONE OR TWO 2 18 1.0 7.4 97.5 THREE OR MORE 3 6 .3 2.5 100.0 . 1502 81.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 95 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 242 Missing cases 1597 FFREFP6B Q30, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 217 11.8 89.3 89.3 ONE OR TWO 2 22 1.2 9.1 98.4 THREE OR MORE 3 4 .2 1.6 100.0 . 1504 81.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 92 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 243 Missing cases 1596 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFTEA6B Q30, teacher's organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 111 6.0 34.4 34.4 ONE OR TWO 2 101 5.5 31.3 65.6 THREE OR MORE 3 111 6.0 34.4 100.0 . 1479 80.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 323 Missing cases 1516 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFBUS6B Q30, business organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 142 7.7 53.4 53.4 ONE OR TWO 2 53 2.9 19.9 73.3 THREE OR MORE 3 71 3.9 26.7 100.0 . 1500 81.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 73 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 266 Missing cases 1573 FFVET6B Q30, veteran's group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 109 5.9 34.5 34.5 ONE OR TWO 2 80 4.4 25.3 59.8 THREE OR MORE 3 127 6.9 40.2 100.0 . 1482 80.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 316 Missing cases 1523 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFWRG6B Q30, women's rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 186 10.1 66.4 66.4 ONE OR TWO 2 61 3.3 21.8 88.2 THREE OR MORE 3 33 1.8 11.8 100.0 . 1497 81.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 62 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 280 Missing cases 1559 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCIVL6B Q30, civil rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 203 11.0 74.4 74.4 ONE OR TWO 2 40 2.2 14.7 89.0 THREE OR MORE 3 30 1.6 11.0 100.0 . 1502 81.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 64 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 273 Missing cases 1566 FFENV6B Q30, environmental group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 157 8.5 55.9 55.9 ONE OR TWO 2 63 3.4 22.4 78.3 THREE OR MORE 3 61 3.3 21.7 100.0 . 1503 81.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 55 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 281 Missing cases 1558 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFNPIG6B Q30, non-partisan interest group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 161 8.8 59.2 59.2 ONE OR TWO 2 63 3.4 23.2 82.4 THREE OR MORE 3 48 2.6 17.6 100.0 . 1498 81.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 69 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 272 Missing cases 1567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFFARM6B Q30, farm organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 146 7.9 45.9 45.9 ONE OR TWO 2 68 3.7 21.4 67.3 THREE OR MORE 3 104 5.7 32.7 100.0 . 1488 80.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 33 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 318 Missing cases 1521 FFEVAN6B Q30, political concerned evang group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 172 9.4 62.3 62.3 ONE OR TWO 2 52 2.8 18.8 81.2 THREE OR MORE 3 52 2.8 18.8 100.0 . 1500 81.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 63 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 276 Missing cases 1563 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFABOR6B Q30, anti-abortion or pro-life group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 143 7.8 49.5 49.5 ONE OR TWO 2 62 3.4 21.5 70.9 THREE OR MORE 3 84 4.6 29.1 100.0 . 1493 81.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 57 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 289 Missing cases 1550 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFLIBG6B Q30, liberal ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 188 10.2 72.6 72.6 ONE OR TWO 2 37 2.0 14.3 86.9 THREE OR MORE 3 34 1.8 13.1 100.0 . 1508 82.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 72 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 259 Missing cases 1580 FFCONG6B Q30, conservative ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 167 9.1 62.3 62.3 ONE OR TWO 2 40 2.2 14.9 77.2 THREE OR MORE 3 61 3.3 22.8 100.0 . 1505 81.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 66 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 268 Missing cases 1571 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCRIM6B Q30, crime or neighborhood watch group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 135 7.3 48.6 48.6 ONE OR TWO 2 69 3.8 24.8 73.4 THREE OR MORE 3 74 4.0 26.6 100.0 . 1498 81.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 63 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 278 Missing cases 1561 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFEDUC6B Q30, educational group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 84 4.6 27.5 27.5 ONE OR TWO 2 88 4.8 28.8 56.2 THREE OR MORE 3 134 7.3 43.8 100.0 . 1493 81.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 40 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 306 Missing cases 1533 FFCHUR6B Q30, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 29 1.6 7.7 7.7 ONE OR TWO 2 68 3.7 18.1 25.9 THREE OR MORE 3 278 15.1 74.1 100.0 . 1450 78.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 14 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 375 Missing cases 1464 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCIVC6B Q30, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 76 4.1 23.2 23.2 ONE OR TWO 2 77 4.2 23.5 46.8 THREE OR MORE 3 174 9.5 53.2 100.0 . 1475 80.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 327 Missing cases 1512 PIDSPO6B Q31, PID your spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 63 3.4 17.1 17.1 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 80 4.4 21.7 38.8 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 87 4.7 23.6 62.3 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 83 4.5 22.5 84.8 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 16 .9 4.3 89.2 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 40 2.2 10.8 100.0 . 1470 79.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 369 Missing cases 1470 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PIDMOM6B Q31, PID your mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 50 2.7 12.5 12.5 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 125 6.8 31.3 43.9 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 52 2.8 13.0 56.9 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 128 7.0 32.1 89.0 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 8 .4 2.0 91.0 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 36 2.0 9.0 100.0 . 1440 78.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 399 Missing cases 1440 PIDDAD6B Q31, PID your father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 81 4.4 20.2 20.2 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 106 5.8 26.4 46.6 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 63 3.4 15.7 62.3 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 117 6.4 29.2 91.5 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 8 .4 2.0 93.5 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 26 1.4 6.5 100.0 . 1438 78.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 1438 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL6B Q32, formal schooling completed? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GRADE SCHOOL OR LESS 1 4 .2 .9 .9 SOME HIGH SCHOOL 9-1 2 17 .9 4.0 4.9 GRADUATED HIGH SCHOO 3 96 5.2 22.4 27.3 SOME COLLEGE 13-15YR 4 100 5.4 23.4 50.7 COLLEGE GRADUATE 5 109 5.9 25.5 76.2 GRADUATE SCHOOL 6 102 5.5 23.8 100.0 . 1411 76.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 428 Missing cases 1411 AGE6B Q33, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 25-29 2 1 .1 .2 .2 30-39 3 24 1.3 5.5 5.7 40-49 4 60 3.3 13.8 19.5 50-59 5 82 4.5 18.9 38.4 60-64 6 47 2.6 10.8 49.2 65 AND OLDER 7 221 12.0 50.8 100.0 . 1404 76.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 435 Missing cases 1404 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX6B Q34, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 245 13.3 56.7 56.7 FEMALE 2 187 10.2 43.3 100.0 . 1407 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 432 Missing cases 1407 RACE6B Q35, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 422 22.9 97.7 97.7 BLACK AFRICAN-AMERIC 2 8 .4 1.9 99.5 HISPANIC-LATINO 4 1 .1 .2 99.8 NATIVE AMERICAN 5 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 1404 76.3 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 6 3 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 432 Missing cases 1407 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME6B Q36, approx family income before taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $20000 1 60 3.3 14.5 14.5 $20000-$39999 2 142 7.7 34.2 48.7 $40000-$59999 3 85 4.6 20.5 69.2 $60000-$79999 4 53 2.9 12.8 81.9 $80000-$99999 5 35 1.9 8.4 90.4 OVER $100000 6 40 2.2 9.6 100.0 . 1424 77.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 415 Missing cases 1424 REL6B Q37, religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 81 4.4 19.2 19.2 JEWISH 2 10 .5 2.4 21.6 PROTESTANT (INCL. BA 3 292 15.9 69.2 90.8 NO RELIGIOUS PREFERE 4 39 2.1 9.2 100.0 . 1402 76.2 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 5 15 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 422 Missing cases 1417 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL6B Q38, How religious are you? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY RELIGIOUS 1 109 5.9 25.2 25.2 FAIRLY RELIGIOUS 2 219 11.9 50.7 75.9 NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3 80 4.4 18.5 94.4 NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL 4 24 1.3 5.6 100.0 . 1403 76.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 4 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 432 Missing cases 1407 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG6B Q39, Are you a born-again Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 130 7.1 30.4 30.4 NO 2 298 16.2 69.6 100.0 . 1411 76.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 428 Missing cases 1411 FUNDCH6B Q40, Are you a fundamentalist Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 77 4.2 18.8 18.8 NO 2 333 18.1 81.2 100.0 . 1429 77.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 410 Missing cases 1429 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCSOC6B Q41, political philosophy on social issu Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 27 1.5 6.4 6.4 LIBERAL 2 94 5.1 22.1 28.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 53 2.9 12.5 40.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 68 3.7 16.0 56.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 51 2.8 12.0 68.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 103 5.6 24.2 93.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 29 1.6 6.8 100.0 . 1404 76.3 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 5 .3 Missing NOT SURE 9 5 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 425 Missing cases 1414 LCECON6B Q42, political philosophy on economic is Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .3 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 61 3.3 14.3 15.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 44 2.4 10.3 25.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 79 4.3 18.5 44.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 69 3.8 16.2 60.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 134 7.3 31.5 92.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 34 1.8 8.0 100.0 . 1404 76.3 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 2 .1 Missing NOT SURE 9 7 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 426 Missing cases 1413 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH6B Q43, month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 2 .1 .5 .5 2 31 1.7 7.0 7.5 3 9 .5 2.0 9.5 10 1 .1 .2 9.8 11 387 21.0 87.8 97.5 12 11 .6 2.5 100.0 . 1398 76.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 441 Missing cases 1398 DAY6B Q43, day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 2 .1 .5 .5 2 5 .3 1.1 1.6 3 1 .1 .2 1.8 4 2 .1 .5 2.3 6 3 .2 .7 3.0 7 2 .1 .5 3.4 8 58 3.2 13.2 16.7 9 54 2.9 12.3 29.0 10 25 1.4 5.7 34.7 11 44 2.4 10.0 44.7 12 46 2.5 10.5 55.3 13 33 1.8 7.5 62.8 14 20 1.1 4.6 67.4 15 13 .7 3.0 70.3 16 25 1.4 5.7 76.0 17 6 .3 1.4 77.4 18 21 1.1 4.8 82.2 19 18 1.0 4.1 86.3 20 14 .8 3.2 89.5 21 9 .5 2.1 91.6 22 8 .4 1.8 93.4 23 7 .4 1.6 95.0 24 4 .2 .9 95.9 25 7 .4 1.6 97.5 26 4 .2 .9 98.4 27 2 .1 .5 98.9 28 3 .2 .7 99.5 30 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 1401 76.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1401 YEAR6B Q43, year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1403 76.3 76.3 76.3 8 2 .1 .1 76.4 69 1 .1 .1 76.5 95 1 .1 .1 76.5 96 392 21.3 21.3 97.8 97 39 2.1 2.1 99.9 99 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1839 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 0