Codebook for the 1988 cross-section survey of Democratic and Republican Caucus Attenders in Iowa, Michigan, and Virginia. Includes a pre- and post-election wave. PIs: Ronald B. Rapoport and Walter J. Stone co-PI: Alan I. Abramowitz **1988A** LIVED8A Q1, years lived in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 90 4.8 5.2 5.2 5-10 years 2 80 4.3 4.6 9.8 10-20 years 3 176 9.4 10.1 19.9 20+ years 4 1395 74.3 80.1 100.0 . 137 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1741 Missing cases 137 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIVE8A Q2, years active in party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 695 37.0 41.1 41.1 5-10 years 2 259 13.8 15.3 56.4 10-20 years 3 302 16.1 17.9 74.3 20+ years 4 435 23.2 25.7 100.0 . 187 10.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1691 Missing cases 187 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART888A Q3, 1988 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1450 77.2 77.2 77.2 NO 2 428 22.8 22.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 PART848A Q3, 1984 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 830 44.2 44.2 44.2 NO 2 1048 55.8 55.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART808A Q3, 1980 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 691 36.8 36.8 36.8 NO 2 1187 63.2 63.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART768A Q3, 1976 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 501 26.7 26.7 26.7 NO 2 1377 73.3 73.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 PART728A Q3, 1972 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 375 20.0 20.0 20.0 NO 2 1503 80.0 80.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART688A Q3, 1968 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 304 16.2 16.2 16.2 NO 2 1574 83.8 83.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART648A Q3, 1964 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 246 13.1 13.1 13.1 NO 2 1632 86.9 86.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 PART608A Q3, 1960 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 198 10.5 10.5 10.5 NO 2 1680 89.5 89.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMB8A Q4, member position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1330 70.8 70.8 70.8 CHECKED 1 548 29.2 29.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIR8A Q4, chair position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1763 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 115 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 LOCAL8A Q4, local position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1752 93.3 93.3 93.3 CHECKED 1 126 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STNAT8A Q4, state/nat'l position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1864 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 14 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPT8A Q4, appointed position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 83 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 PAIDST8A Q4, paid position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 97.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 47 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DELST8A Q4, state delegate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1485 79.1 79.1 79.1 CHECKED 1 393 20.9 20.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTE848A Q5, Pres. vote in 1984 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1 868 46.2 50.1 50.1 MONDALE 2 794 42.3 45.8 95.8 DID NOT VOTE 3 72 3.8 4.2 100.0 . 144 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1734 Missing cases 144 NOM84D8A Q6, Cand. pref for party nom 84, Dems Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MONDALE 1 471 25.1 59.0 59.0 HART 2 248 13.2 31.1 90.1 JACKSON 3 79 4.2 9.9 100.0 . 944 50.3 Missing OTHER 4 136 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 798 Missing cases 1080 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOM84R8A Q6, Cand. pref for party nom 84, Reps Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1 771 41.1 100.0 100.0 . 975 51.9 Missing OTHER 2 132 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 771 Missing cases 1107 PTYID8A Q7, Describe party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 444 23.6 25.5 25.5 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 218 11.6 12.5 38.0 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 232 12.4 13.3 51.3 INDEPENDENT 4 67 3.6 3.8 55.1 INDEPENDENT REP 5 130 6.9 7.5 62.6 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 190 10.1 10.9 73.5 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 463 24.7 26.5 100.0 . 134 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1744 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS8A Q8, Characterize party involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORKS EVERY YEAR 1 609 32.4 39.3 39.3 ONLY IF GOOD CAND 2 941 50.1 60.7 100.0 . 328 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1550 Missing cases 328 LIBCON8A Q9, Describe political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 50 2.7 3.0 3.0 LIBERAL 2 301 16.0 18.1 21.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 219 11.7 13.1 34.2 M-O-R 4 269 14.3 16.1 50.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 287 15.3 17.2 67.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 451 24.0 27.1 94.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 90 4.8 5.4 100.0 . 148 7.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 63 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1667 Missing cases 211 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMPRES8A Q10, Pres campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1652 88.0 88.2 88.2 VERY ACTIVE 1 109 5.8 5.8 94.0 FAIRLY 2 41 2.2 2.2 96.2 NOT ACTIVE 3 33 1.8 1.8 97.9 4 19 1.0 1.0 98.9 5 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 . 4 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1874 Missing cases 4 CMSEN8A Q10, Sen. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 148 7.9 9.6 9.6 FAIRLY 2 513 27.3 33.1 42.7 NOT ACTIVE 3 887 47.2 57.3 100.0 . 330 17.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1548 Missing cases 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSE8A Q10, Hse. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 187 10.0 12.0 12.0 FAIRLY 2 501 26.7 32.2 44.3 NOT ACTIVE 3 866 46.1 55.7 100.0 . 324 17.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1554 Missing cases 324 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMGOV8A Q10, Gov. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 183 9.7 11.7 11.7 FAIRLY 2 500 26.6 32.0 43.7 NOT ACTIVE 3 880 46.9 56.3 100.0 . 315 16.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1563 Missing cases 315 CMLOC8A Q10, Local campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 320 17.0 19.9 19.9 FAIRLY 2 591 31.5 36.8 56.7 NOT ACTIVE 3 695 37.0 43.3 100.0 . 272 14.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1606 Missing cases 272 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTENT8A Q11, Attn. to newspapers for 1988 Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 508 27.1 29.1 29.1 QUITE A BIT 2 560 29.8 32.1 61.2 SOME 3 480 25.6 27.5 88.8 VERY LITTLE 4 156 8.3 8.9 97.7 NONE 5 40 2.1 2.3 100.0 . 134 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1744 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HELPPP8A Q12, part in local nom, help party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 576 30.7 36.8 36.8 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 560 29.8 35.8 72.6 NOT VERY IMPT 3 234 12.5 15.0 87.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 195 10.4 12.5 100.0 . 313 16.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1565 Missing cases 313 GROUP8A Q12, part in local nom, rep groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 214 11.4 14.7 14.7 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 360 19.2 24.8 39.6 NOT VERY IMPT 3 290 15.4 20.0 59.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 587 31.3 40.5 100.0 . 427 22.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1451 Missing cases 427 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND8A Q12, part, in local nom, sppt cand. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 980 52.2 61.5 61.5 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 471 25.1 29.5 91.0 NOT VERY IMPT 3 85 4.5 5.3 96.4 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 58 3.1 3.6 100.0 . 284 15.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1594 Missing cases 284 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISS8A Q12, party in local nom, rep. issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1047 55.8 65.5 65.5 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 443 23.6 27.7 93.2 NOT VERY IMPT 3 71 3.8 4.4 97.7 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 37 2.0 2.3 100.0 . 280 14.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1598 Missing cases 280 MIREAS8A Q13, best reason to part in nom process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PARTY 1 267 14.2 16.0 16.0 GROUP 2 32 1.7 1.9 17.9 CANDIDATE 3 608 32.4 36.5 54.4 ISSUE 4 759 40.4 45.6 100.0 . 212 11.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1666 Missing cases 212 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOV8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,winner Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 534 28.4 34.1 34.1 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 494 26.3 31.5 65.6 NOT VERY IMPT 3 264 14.1 16.8 82.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 275 14.6 17.5 100.0 . 311 16.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1567 Missing cases 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHIL8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,pol. phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1117 59.5 68.9 68.9 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 442 23.5 27.3 96.2 NOT VERY IMPT 3 39 2.1 2.4 98.6 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 23 1.2 1.4 100.0 . 257 13.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1621 Missing cases 257 ISTOME8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 934 49.7 58.3 58.3 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 534 28.4 33.3 91.6 NOT VERY IMPT 3 106 5.6 6.6 98.2 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 29 1.5 1.8 100.0 . 275 14.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1603 Missing cases 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOM8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,win nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 475 25.3 30.5 30.5 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 557 29.7 35.7 66.2 NOT VERY IMPT 3 292 15.5 18.7 84.9 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 235 12.5 15.1 100.0 . 319 17.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1559 Missing cases 319 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MISUP8A Q15, best reason to sppt cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOV GE 1 283 15.1 16.4 16.4 POL PHIL 2 799 42.5 46.3 62.7 ISSUES 3 528 28.1 30.6 93.2 WIN NOM 4 117 6.2 6.8 100.0 . 151 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1727 Missing cases 151 ABORT8A Q16, opinion, abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 513 27.3 32.1 32.1 FAVOR 2 189 10.1 11.8 43.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 67 3.6 4.2 48.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 71 3.8 4.4 52.6 OPPOSE 6 272 14.5 17.0 69.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 486 25.9 30.4 100.0 . 160 8.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 120 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1598 Missing cases 280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSP8A Q16, opinion, defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 242 12.9 15.4 15.4 FAVOR 2 268 14.3 17.1 32.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 183 9.7 11.7 44.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 187 10.0 11.9 56.1 OPPOSE 6 320 17.0 20.4 76.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 370 19.7 23.6 100.0 . 168 8.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 140 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1570 Missing cases 308 AFFACT8A Q16, opinion, affirm. action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 186 9.9 12.7 12.7 FAVOR 2 324 17.3 22.2 34.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 332 17.7 22.7 57.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 220 11.7 15.1 72.7 OPPOSE 6 216 11.5 14.8 87.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 182 9.7 12.5 100.0 . 170 9.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 248 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1460 Missing cases 418 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BALBUD8A Q16, opinion, bal bud Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 569 30.3 37.5 37.5 FAVOR 2 418 22.3 27.5 65.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 228 12.1 15.0 80.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 75 4.0 4.9 84.9 OPPOSE 6 111 5.9 7.3 92.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 118 6.3 7.8 100.0 . 168 8.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 191 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1519 Missing cases 359 POLLUT8A Q16, opinion, regs on poll Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 608 32.4 38.3 38.3 FAVOR 2 513 27.3 32.3 70.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 290 15.4 18.3 88.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 68 3.6 4.3 93.1 OPPOSE 6 79 4.2 5.0 98.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 30 1.6 1.9 100.0 . 171 9.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 119 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1588 Missing cases 290 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRA8A Q16, opinion, Contra sppt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 230 12.2 16.6 16.6 FAVOR 2 215 11.4 15.5 32.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 164 8.7 11.8 43.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 69 3.7 5.0 48.8 OPPOSE 6 239 12.7 17.2 66.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 472 25.1 34.0 100.0 . 191 10.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 298 15.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1389 Missing cases 489 FARMER8A Q16, opinion, Farm aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 213 11.3 14.7 14.7 FAVOR 2 324 17.3 22.4 37.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 307 16.3 21.2 58.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 212 11.3 14.6 72.9 OPPOSE 6 239 12.7 16.5 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 153 8.1 10.6 100.0 . 181 9.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 249 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1448 Missing cases 430 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TARIFF8A Q16, opinion, tariffs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 326 17.4 22.1 22.1 FAVOR 2 344 18.3 23.3 45.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 239 12.7 16.2 61.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 172 9.2 11.7 73.3 OPPOSE 6 234 12.5 15.9 89.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 159 8.5 10.8 100.0 . 174 9.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 230 12.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1474 Missing cases 404 SDI8A Q16, opinion, SDI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 198 10.5 13.7 13.7 FAVOR 2 201 10.7 13.9 27.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 235 12.5 16.3 44.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 118 6.3 8.2 52.2 OPPOSE 6 243 12.9 16.9 69.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 446 23.7 31.0 100.0 . 182 9.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 255 13.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1441 Missing cases 437 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRAYER8A Q16, opinion, prayer in school Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 477 25.4 30.9 30.9 FAVOR 2 308 16.4 19.9 50.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 174 9.3 11.3 62.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 74 3.9 4.8 66.9 OPPOSE 6 177 9.4 11.5 78.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 334 17.8 21.6 100.0 . 160 8.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 174 9.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1544 Missing cases 334 MIISS8A Q17, most impt. issue. this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORT 1 319 17.0 18.7 18.7 DEFENSE 2 223 11.9 13.1 31.8 AFFACT 3 94 5.0 5.5 37.3 BALBUDG 4 421 22.4 24.7 62.0 POLLUT 5 185 9.9 10.9 72.9 CONTRAS 6 94 5.0 5.5 78.4 FARMERS 7 75 4.0 4.4 82.8 TARIFFS 8 140 7.5 8.2 91.0 SDI 9 72 3.8 4.2 95.2 PRAYER 10 81 4.3 4.8 100.0 . 174 9.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1704 Missing cases 174 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCBB8A Q18, pol philosophy of Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 69 3.7 7.4 7.4 LIBERAL 2 343 18.3 36.6 44.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 224 11.9 23.9 67.9 M-O-R 4 179 9.5 19.1 87.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 62 3.3 6.6 93.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 49 2.6 5.2 98.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 10 .5 1.1 100.0 . 348 18.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 594 31.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 936 Missing cases 942 LCGB8A Q18, pol philosophy of Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 16 .9 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 37 2.0 2.5 3.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 33 1.8 2.2 5.7 M-O-R 4 168 8.9 11.2 16.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 237 12.6 15.7 32.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 752 40.0 49.9 82.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 263 14.0 17.5 100.0 . 272 14.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 100 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1506 Missing cases 372 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCMC8A Q18, pol philosophy of Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 142 7.6 12.8 12.8 LIBERAL 2 533 28.4 48.1 60.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 238 12.7 21.5 82.3 M-O-R 4 133 7.1 12.0 94.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 33 1.8 3.0 97.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 20 1.1 1.8 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 10 .5 .9 100.0 . 345 18.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 424 22.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1109 Missing cases 769 LCRD8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 12 .6 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 30 1.6 2.1 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 59 3.1 4.1 7.0 M-O-R 4 174 9.3 12.1 19.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 314 16.7 21.9 41.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 681 36.3 47.4 88.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 167 8.9 11.6 100.0 . 314 16.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 127 6.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1437 Missing cases 441 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCMD8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 223 11.9 14.8 14.8 LIBERAL 2 608 32.4 40.3 55.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 365 19.4 24.2 79.2 M-O-R 4 216 11.5 14.3 93.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 45 2.4 3.0 96.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 45 2.4 3.0 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 8 .4 .5 100.0 . 281 15.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 87 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1510 Missing cases 368 LCPD8A Q18, pol philosophy of DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 31 1.7 3.0 3.0 LIBERAL 2 57 3.0 5.6 8.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 64 3.4 6.3 14.9 M-O-R 4 103 5.5 10.1 25.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 135 7.2 13.3 38.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 310 16.5 30.5 68.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 317 16.9 31.2 100.0 . 368 19.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 493 26.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1017 Missing cases 861 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG8A Q18, pol philosophy of Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 97 5.2 8.0 8.0 LIBERAL 2 394 21.0 32.3 40.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 314 16.7 25.7 66.0 M-O-R 4 257 13.7 21.1 87.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 83 4.4 6.8 93.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 65 3.5 5.3 99.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 10 .5 .8 100.0 . 341 18.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 317 16.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1220 Missing cases 658 LCAG8A Q18, pol philosophy of Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 41 2.2 3.7 3.7 LIBERAL 2 236 12.6 21.3 25.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 319 17.0 28.8 53.8 M-O-R 4 256 13.6 23.1 77.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 143 7.6 12.9 89.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 90 4.8 8.1 98.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 22 1.2 2.0 100.0 . 357 19.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 414 22.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1107 Missing cases 771 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAH8A Q18, pol philosophy of Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 33 1.8 2.7 2.7 LIBERAL 2 20 1.1 1.7 4.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 35 1.9 2.9 7.3 M-O-R 4 89 4.7 7.4 14.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 113 6.0 9.4 24.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 393 20.9 32.6 56.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 524 27.9 43.4 100.0 . 353 18.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 318 16.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1207 Missing cases 671 LCGH8A Q18, pol philosophy of Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 414 22.0 31.3 31.3 LIBERAL 2 546 29.1 41.2 72.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 215 11.4 16.2 88.7 M-O-R 4 97 5.2 7.3 96.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 21 1.1 1.6 97.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 23 1.2 1.7 99.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 8 .4 .6 100.0 . 343 18.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 211 11.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1324 Missing cases 554 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ8A Q18, pol philosophy of Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 834 44.4 56.3 56.3 LIBERAL 2 429 22.8 28.9 85.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 98 5.2 6.6 91.8 M-O-R 4 65 3.5 4.4 96.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 24 1.3 1.6 97.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 21 1.1 1.4 99.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 11 .6 .7 100.0 . 296 15.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 100 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1482 Missing cases 396 LCJK8A Q18, pol philosophy of Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 10 .5 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 18 1.0 1.5 2.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 56 3.0 4.7 7.0 M-O-R 4 86 4.6 7.1 14.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 99 5.3 8.2 22.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 408 21.7 33.9 56.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 527 28.1 43.8 100.0 . 342 18.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 332 17.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1204 Missing cases 674 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRR8A Q18, pol philosophy of Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 31 1.7 2.1 2.1 LIBERAL 2 24 1.3 1.6 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 15 .8 1.0 4.7 M-O-R 4 67 3.6 4.5 9.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 86 4.6 5.8 15.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 655 34.9 44.2 59.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 603 32.1 40.7 100.0 . 301 16.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 96 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 397 LCPR8A Q18, pol philosophy of Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 20 1.1 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 29 1.5 2.2 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 24 1.3 1.8 5.6 M-O-R 4 65 3.5 5.0 10.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 59 3.1 4.5 15.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 298 15.9 22.7 37.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 816 43.5 62.2 100.0 . 331 17.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 236 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1311 Missing cases 567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPS8A Q18, pol philosophy of Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 217 11.6 17.5 17.5 LIBERAL 2 437 23.3 35.2 52.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 226 12.0 18.2 71.0 M-O-R 4 193 10.3 15.6 86.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 74 3.9 6.0 92.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 67 3.6 5.4 97.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 26 1.4 2.1 100.0 . 353 18.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 285 15.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1240 Missing cases 638 LCAV8A Q18, pol philosophy of Am. Voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 10 .5 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 38 2.0 2.6 3.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 232 12.4 15.7 19.0 M-O-R 4 610 32.5 41.3 60.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 465 24.8 31.5 91.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 121 6.4 8.2 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 298 15.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 103 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1477 Missing cases 401 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP8A Q18, pol philosophy of Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 19 1.0 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 31 1.7 2.1 3.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 30 1.6 2.0 5.3 M-O-R 4 76 4.0 5.0 10.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 284 15.1 18.8 29.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 796 42.4 52.7 81.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 275 14.6 18.2 100.0 . 286 15.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1511 Missing cases 367 LCDP8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 204 10.9 13.2 13.2 LIBERAL 2 741 39.5 48.1 61.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 378 20.1 24.5 85.9 M-O-R 4 125 6.7 8.1 94.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 38 2.0 2.5 96.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 40 2.1 2.6 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 14 .7 .9 100.0 . 280 14.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 58 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1540 Missing cases 338 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHBB8A Q19, achieve in govt, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.8 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVE 2 275 14.6 30.8 34.6 AVERAGE 3 404 21.5 45.2 79.8 BELOW AVE 4 117 6.2 13.1 92.9 POOR 5 63 3.4 7.1 100.0 . 305 16.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 680 36.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 893 Missing cases 985 ACHGB8A Q19, achieve in govt, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 178 9.5 11.4 11.4 ABOVE AVE 2 409 21.8 26.2 37.6 AVERAGE 3 410 21.8 26.2 63.8 BELOW AVE 4 236 12.6 15.1 78.9 POOR 5 330 17.6 21.1 100.0 . 242 12.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 73 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1563 Missing cases 315 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHRD8A Q19, achieve in govt, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 218 11.6 14.5 14.5 ABOVE AVE 2 696 37.1 46.2 60.6 AVERAGE 3 437 23.3 29.0 89.6 BELOW AVE 4 87 4.6 5.8 95.4 POOR 5 70 3.7 4.6 100.0 . 262 14.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 108 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1508 Missing cases 370 ACHMD8A Q19, achieve in govt,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 138 7.3 10.4 10.4 ABOVE AVE 2 517 27.5 38.9 49.2 AVERAGE 3 447 23.8 33.6 82.9 BELOW AVE 4 135 7.2 10.2 93.0 POOR 5 93 5.0 7.0 100.0 . 410 21.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 138 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1330 Missing cases 548 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPD8A Q19, achieve in govt,Dupont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 2.5 5.7 5.7 ABOVE AVE 2 166 8.8 20.1 25.8 AVERAGE 3 380 20.2 46.1 72.0 BELOW AVE 4 131 7.0 15.9 87.9 POOR 5 100 5.3 12.1 100.0 . 458 24.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 596 31.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 1054 ACHRG8A Q19, achieve in govt, Gebhardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 2.0 3.6 3.6 ABOVE AVE 2 237 12.6 22.3 25.9 AVERAGE 3 553 29.4 52.1 78.0 BELOW AVE 4 167 8.9 15.7 93.8 POOR 5 66 3.5 6.2 100.0 . 450 24.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 367 19.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 817 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHAG8A Q19, achieve in govt, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 1.0 2.0 2.0 ABOVE AVE 2 167 8.9 17.2 19.1 AVERAGE 3 528 28.1 54.3 73.4 BELOW AVE 4 187 10.0 19.2 92.6 POOR 5 72 3.8 7.4 100.0 . 465 24.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 440 23.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 973 Missing cases 905 ACHAH8A Q19, achieve in govt, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.1 3.4 3.4 ABOVE AVE 2 219 11.7 18.4 21.8 AVERAGE 3 350 18.6 29.4 51.2 BELOW AVE 4 278 14.8 23.4 74.6 POOR 5 302 16.1 25.4 100.0 . 446 23.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 243 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1189 Missing cases 689 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHGH8A Q19, achieve in govt, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.0 1.5 1.5 ABOVE AVE 2 149 7.9 12.1 13.6 AVERAGE 3 398 21.2 32.4 46.0 BELOW AVE 4 253 13.5 20.6 66.6 POOR 5 411 21.9 33.4 100.0 . 441 23.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 208 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1229 Missing cases 649 ACHJJ8A Q19, achieve in govt, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 75 4.0 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVE 2 175 9.3 15.3 21.9 AVERAGE 3 177 9.4 15.5 37.4 BELOW AVE 4 195 10.4 17.1 54.4 POOR 5 521 27.7 45.6 100.0 . 432 23.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 303 16.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1143 Missing cases 735 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHJK8A Q19, achieve in govt, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 81 4.3 7.4 7.4 ABOVE AVE 2 295 15.7 26.8 34.2 AVERAGE 3 471 25.1 42.8 76.9 BELOW AVE 4 141 7.5 12.8 89.7 POOR 5 113 6.0 10.3 100.0 . 456 24.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 321 17.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1101 Missing cases 777 ACHPR8A Q19, achieve in govt,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.8 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVE 2 69 3.7 6.0 8.9 AVERAGE 3 127 6.8 11.0 20.0 BELOW AVE 4 193 10.3 16.8 36.8 POOR 5 728 38.8 63.2 100.0 . 294 15.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 433 23.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1151 Missing cases 727 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPS8A Q19, achieve in govt, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 79 4.2 6.3 6.3 ABOVE AVE 2 378 20.1 30.2 36.6 AVERAGE 3 544 29.0 43.5 80.1 BELOW AVE 4 144 7.7 11.5 91.6 POOR 5 105 5.6 8.4 100.0 . 285 15.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 343 18.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1250 Missing cases 628 TVBB8A Q19, performance on TV, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 .9 1.6 1.6 ABOVE AVE 2 141 7.5 13.0 14.6 AVERAGE 3 412 21.9 38.0 52.5 BELOW AVE 4 274 14.6 25.3 77.8 POOR 5 241 12.8 22.2 100.0 . 330 17.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 463 24.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1085 Missing cases 793 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVGB8A Q19, performance on TV, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 58 3.1 3.7 3.7 ABOVE AVE 2 292 15.5 18.8 22.6 AVERAGE 3 592 31.5 38.2 60.7 BELOW AVE 4 306 16.3 19.7 80.5 POOR 5 303 16.1 19.5 100.0 . 281 15.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 46 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1551 Missing cases 327 TVRD8A Q19, performance on TV, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 64 3.4 4.3 4.3 ABOVE AVE 2 454 24.2 30.6 34.9 AVERAGE 3 663 35.3 44.6 79.5 BELOW AVE 4 192 10.2 12.9 92.4 POOR 5 113 6.0 7.6 100.0 . 309 16.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 83 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1486 Missing cases 392 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVMD8A Q19, performance on TV, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 142 7.6 9.2 9.2 ABOVE AVE 2 592 31.5 38.5 47.7 AVERAGE 3 615 32.7 40.0 87.7 BELOW AVE 4 127 6.8 8.3 95.9 POOR 5 63 3.4 4.1 100.0 . 274 14.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 65 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1539 Missing cases 339 TVPD8A Q19, performance on TV, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 1.5 2.7 2.7 ABOVE AVE 2 172 9.2 16.5 19.2 AVERAGE 3 424 22.6 40.7 59.8 BELOW AVE 4 242 12.9 23.2 83.0 POOR 5 177 9.4 17.0 100.0 . 358 19.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 477 25.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 835 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVRG8A Q19, performance on TV, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 68 3.6 5.1 5.1 ABOVE AVE 2 323 17.2 24.2 29.2 AVERAGE 3 653 34.8 48.8 78.1 BELOW AVE 4 208 11.1 15.6 93.6 POOR 5 85 4.5 6.4 100.0 . 318 16.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 223 11.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1337 Missing cases 541 TVAG8A Q19, performance on TV, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 1.5 2.3 2.3 ABOVE AVE 2 245 13.0 20.1 22.4 AVERAGE 3 578 30.8 47.4 69.8 BELOW AVE 4 234 12.5 19.2 89.0 POOR 5 134 7.1 11.0 100.0 . 326 17.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 333 17.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1219 Missing cases 659 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVAH8A Q19, performance on TV, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 1.3 1.8 1.8 ABOVE AVE 2 134 7.1 10.2 12.0 AVERAGE 3 347 18.5 26.3 38.3 BELOW AVE 4 347 18.5 26.3 64.6 POOR 5 466 24.8 35.4 100.0 . 332 17.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 228 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1318 Missing cases 560 TVGH8A Q19, performance on TV, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 2.5 3.3 3.3 ABOVE AVE 2 252 13.4 17.9 21.2 AVERAGE 3 415 22.1 29.4 50.6 BELOW AVE 4 257 13.7 18.2 68.8 POOR 5 440 23.4 31.2 100.0 . 336 17.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 131 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1411 Missing cases 467 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVJJ8A Q19, performance on TV, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 447 23.8 29.2 29.2 ABOVE AVE 2 555 29.6 36.2 65.4 AVERAGE 3 275 14.6 18.0 83.4 BELOW AVE 4 99 5.3 6.5 89.8 POOR 5 156 8.3 10.2 100.0 . 278 14.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 68 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1532 Missing cases 346 TVJK8A Q19, performance on TV, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 59 3.1 4.7 4.7 ABOVE AVE 2 242 12.9 19.2 23.9 AVERAGE 3 608 32.4 48.3 72.2 BELOW AVE 4 208 11.1 16.5 88.7 POOR 5 142 7.6 11.3 100.0 . 334 17.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 285 15.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1259 Missing cases 619 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVPR8A Q19, performance on TV, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 121 6.4 8.5 8.5 ABOVE AVE 2 316 16.8 22.1 30.6 AVERAGE 3 398 21.2 27.9 58.4 BELOW AVE 4 234 12.5 16.4 74.8 POOR 5 360 19.2 25.2 100.0 . 311 16.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 138 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1429 Missing cases 449 TVPS8A Q19, performance on TV, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 31 1.7 2.3 2.3 ABOVE AVE 2 190 10.1 14.3 16.6 AVERAGE 3 560 29.8 42.2 58.8 BELOW AVE 4 319 17.0 24.0 82.8 POOR 5 228 12.1 17.2 100.0 . 323 17.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 227 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1328 Missing cases 550 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORBB8A Q19, moral character, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 150 8.0 16.0 16.0 ABOVE AVE 2 356 19.0 38.0 53.9 AVERAGE 3 372 19.8 39.7 93.6 BELOW AVE 4 34 1.8 3.6 97.2 POOR 5 26 1.4 2.8 100.0 . 333 17.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 607 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 938 Missing cases 940 MORGB8A Q19, moral character, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 233 12.4 15.8 15.8 ABOVE AVE 2 415 22.1 28.1 43.8 AVERAGE 3 497 26.5 33.6 77.5 BELOW AVE 4 171 9.1 11.6 89.0 POOR 5 162 8.6 11.0 100.0 . 283 15.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 117 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1478 Missing cases 400 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORRD8A Q19, moral character, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 194 10.3 13.6 13.6 ABOVE AVE 2 545 29.0 38.1 51.7 AVERAGE 3 556 29.6 38.9 90.6 BELOW AVE 4 84 4.5 5.9 96.5 POOR 5 50 2.7 3.5 100.0 . 312 16.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 137 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1429 Missing cases 449 MORMD8A Q19, moral character, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 241 12.8 17.0 17.0 ABOVE AVE 2 573 30.5 40.5 57.5 AVERAGE 3 487 25.9 34.4 91.9 BELOW AVE 4 71 3.8 5.0 97.0 POOR 5 43 2.3 3.0 100.0 . 275 14.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 188 10.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1415 Missing cases 463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORPD8A Q19, moral character, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 105 5.6 11.3 11.3 ABOVE AVE 2 304 16.2 32.6 43.9 AVERAGE 3 428 22.8 45.9 89.8 BELOW AVE 4 55 2.9 5.9 95.7 POOR 5 40 2.1 4.3 100.0 . 354 18.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 592 31.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 932 Missing cases 946 MORRG8A Q19, moral character, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 114 6.1 9.8 9.8 ABOVE AVE 2 395 21.0 34.1 43.9 AVERAGE 3 533 28.4 45.9 89.8 BELOW AVE 4 75 4.0 6.5 96.3 POOR 5 43 2.3 3.7 100.0 . 335 17.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 383 20.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1160 Missing cases 718 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORAG8A Q19, moral character, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 71 3.8 6.5 6.5 ABOVE AVE 2 333 17.7 30.5 37.0 AVERAGE 3 555 29.6 50.9 87.9 BELOW AVE 4 89 4.7 8.2 96.1 POOR 5 43 2.3 3.9 100.0 . 344 18.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 443 23.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1091 Missing cases 787 MORAH8A Q19, moral character, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 68 3.6 5.7 5.7 ABOVE AVE 2 256 13.6 21.3 27.0 AVERAGE 3 500 26.6 41.6 68.6 BELOW AVE 4 187 10.0 15.6 84.2 POOR 5 190 10.1 15.8 100.0 . 327 17.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 350 18.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1201 Missing cases 677 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORGH8A Q19, moral character, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .4 .5 .5 ABOVE AVE 2 26 1.4 1.8 2.3 AVERAGE 3 126 6.7 8.6 10.9 BELOW AVE 4 231 12.3 15.8 26.6 POOR 5 1075 57.2 73.4 100.0 . 304 16.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 109 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1465 Missing cases 413 MORJJ8A Q19, moral character, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 224 11.9 15.4 15.4 ABOVE AVE 2 414 22.0 28.5 43.9 AVERAGE 3 455 24.2 31.3 75.2 BELOW AVE 4 154 8.2 10.6 85.8 POOR 5 207 11.0 14.2 100.0 . 286 15.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 138 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1454 Missing cases 424 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORJK8A Q19, moral character, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 166 8.8 13.9 13.9 ABOVE AVE 2 375 20.0 31.5 45.5 AVERAGE 3 545 29.0 45.8 91.3 BELOW AVE 4 65 3.5 5.5 96.7 POOR 5 39 2.1 3.3 100.0 . 344 18.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 344 18.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 688 MORPR8A Q19, moral character, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 240 12.8 17.4 17.4 ABOVE AVE 2 332 17.7 24.0 41.4 AVERAGE 3 393 20.9 28.4 69.8 BELOW AVE 4 186 9.9 13.4 83.2 POOR 5 232 12.4 16.8 100.0 . 305 16.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 190 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1383 Missing cases 495 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORPS8A Q19, moral character, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 227 12.1 18.4 18.4 ABOVE AVE 2 460 24.5 37.3 55.7 AVERAGE 3 458 24.4 37.1 92.9 BELOW AVE 4 51 2.7 4.1 97.0 POOR 5 37 2.0 3.0 100.0 . 330 17.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 315 16.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1233 Missing cases 645 FPOLBB8A Q19, knows for pol, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.0 2.2 2.2 ABOVE AVE 2 94 5.0 11.5 13.8 AVERAGE 3 440 23.4 54.1 67.8 BELOW AVE 4 148 7.9 18.2 86.0 POOR 5 114 6.1 14.0 100.0 . 361 19.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 703 37.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 814 Missing cases 1064 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLGB8A Q19, knows for pol, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 431 22.9 28.6 28.6 ABOVE AVE 2 583 31.0 38.6 67.2 AVERAGE 3 317 16.9 21.0 88.2 BELOW AVE 4 86 4.6 5.7 93.9 POOR 5 92 4.9 6.1 100.0 . 285 15.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 84 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1509 Missing cases 369 FPOLRD8A Q19, knows for pol, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 239 12.7 16.8 16.8 ABOVE AVE 2 686 36.5 48.2 65.0 AVERAGE 3 421 22.4 29.6 94.7 BELOW AVE 4 47 2.5 3.3 98.0 POOR 5 29 1.5 2.0 100.0 . 316 16.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 140 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1422 Missing cases 456 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLMD8A Q19, knows for pol, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 54 2.9 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVE 2 257 13.7 18.3 22.1 AVERAGE 3 662 35.3 47.1 69.2 BELOW AVE 4 260 13.8 18.5 87.7 POOR 5 173 9.2 12.3 100.0 . 286 15.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 186 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1406 Missing cases 472 FPOLPD8A Q19, knows for pol, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 20 1.1 2.3 2.3 ABOVE AVE 2 109 5.8 12.3 14.6 AVERAGE 3 447 23.8 50.6 65.2 BELOW AVE 4 208 11.1 23.5 88.7 POOR 5 100 5.3 11.3 100.0 . 357 19.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 637 33.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 884 Missing cases 994 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLRG8A Q19, knows for pol, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.1 3.5 3.5 ABOVE AVE 2 209 11.1 18.4 22.0 AVERAGE 3 588 31.3 51.9 73.9 BELOW AVE 4 214 11.4 18.9 92.8 POOR 5 82 4.4 7.2 100.0 . 344 18.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 401 21.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1133 Missing cases 745 FPOLAG8A Q19, knows for pol, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.4 2.5 2.5 ABOVE AVE 2 203 10.8 19.3 21.8 AVERAGE 3 569 30.3 54.1 75.9 BELOW AVE 4 171 9.1 16.3 92.1 POOR 5 83 4.4 7.9 100.0 . 357 19.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 469 25.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1052 Missing cases 826 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLAH8A Q19, knows for pol, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 297 15.8 21.7 21.7 ABOVE AVE 2 594 31.6 43.3 65.0 AVERAGE 3 327 17.4 23.9 88.8 BELOW AVE 4 79 4.2 5.8 94.6 POOR 5 74 3.9 5.4 100.0 . 329 17.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 178 9.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1371 Missing cases 507 FPOLGH8A Q19, knows for pol, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 37 2.0 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVE 2 170 9.1 13.8 16.9 AVERAGE 3 510 27.2 41.5 58.4 BELOW AVE 4 226 12.0 18.4 76.8 POOR 5 285 15.2 23.2 100.0 . 351 18.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 299 15.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1228 Missing cases 650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLJJ8A Q19, knows for pol, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 99 5.3 7.0 7.0 ABOVE AVE 2 266 14.2 18.7 25.7 AVERAGE 3 391 20.8 27.5 53.1 BELOW AVE 4 272 14.5 19.1 72.2 POOR 5 395 21.0 27.8 100.0 . 301 16.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 154 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1423 Missing cases 455 FPOLJK8A Q19, knows for pol, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 65 3.5 5.8 5.8 ABOVE AVE 2 252 13.4 22.4 28.1 AVERAGE 3 596 31.7 52.9 81.0 BELOW AVE 4 145 7.7 12.9 93.9 POOR 5 69 3.7 6.1 100.0 . 344 18.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 407 21.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1127 Missing cases 751 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLPR8A Q19, knows for pol, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 76 4.0 6.0 6.0 ABOVE AVE 2 105 5.6 8.3 14.3 AVERAGE 3 217 11.6 17.1 31.3 BELOW AVE 4 292 15.5 23.0 54.3 POOR 5 580 30.9 45.7 100.0 . 328 17.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 280 14.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1270 Missing cases 608 FPOLPS8A Q19, knows for pol, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 63 3.4 5.3 5.3 ABOVE AVE 2 305 16.2 25.6 30.9 AVERAGE 3 609 32.4 51.2 82.1 BELOW AVE 4 128 6.8 10.8 92.9 POOR 5 85 4.5 7.1 100.0 . 326 17.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 362 19.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 688 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALBB8A Q19, Overall Eval, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 2.1 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVE 2 247 13.2 23.2 26.9 AVERAGE 3 461 24.5 43.3 70.2 BELOW AVE 4 182 9.7 17.1 87.3 POOR 5 135 7.2 12.7 100.0 . 332 17.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 481 25.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1065 Missing cases 813 EVALGB8A Q19, Overall Eval, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 188 10.0 12.0 12.0 ABOVE AVE 2 437 23.3 27.9 39.9 AVERAGE 3 418 22.3 26.7 66.6 BELOW AVE 4 243 12.9 15.5 82.2 POOR 5 279 14.9 17.8 100.0 . 281 15.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1565 Missing cases 313 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMC8A Q19, Overall Eval, Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 111 5.9 9.5 9.5 ABOVE AVE 2 347 18.5 29.8 39.4 AVERAGE 3 427 22.7 36.7 76.1 BELOW AVE 4 145 7.7 12.5 88.6 POOR 5 133 7.1 11.4 100.0 . 342 18.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 373 19.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1163 Missing cases 715 EVALRD8A Q19, Overall Eval, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 135 7.2 9.1 9.1 ABOVE AVE 2 627 33.4 42.3 51.5 AVERAGE 3 539 28.7 36.4 87.8 BELOW AVE 4 112 6.0 7.6 95.4 POOR 5 68 3.6 4.6 100.0 . 330 17.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 397 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMD8A Q19, Overall Eval, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 172 9.2 11.2 11.2 ABOVE AVE 2 590 31.4 38.5 49.8 AVERAGE 3 507 27.0 33.1 82.9 BELOW AVE 4 148 7.9 9.7 92.6 POOR 5 114 6.1 7.4 100.0 . 291 15.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1531 Missing cases 347 EVALPD8A Q19, Overall Eval, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 2.0 3.6 3.6 ABOVE AVE 2 174 9.3 16.5 20.1 AVERAGE 3 436 23.2 41.4 61.5 BELOW AVE 4 245 13.0 23.3 84.8 POOR 5 160 8.5 15.2 100.0 . 348 18.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 477 25.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 825 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRG8A Q19, Overall Eval, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 2.5 3.7 3.7 ABOVE AVE 2 235 12.5 18.4 22.1 AVERAGE 3 648 34.5 50.7 72.8 BELOW AVE 4 230 12.2 18.0 90.8 POOR 5 117 6.2 9.2 100.0 . 347 18.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 254 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1277 Missing cases 601 EVALAG8A Q19, Overall Eval, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 25 1.3 2.0 2.0 ABOVE AVE 2 169 9.0 13.8 15.8 AVERAGE 3 646 34.4 52.7 68.5 BELOW AVE 4 256 13.6 20.9 89.4 POOR 5 130 6.9 10.6 100.0 . 344 18.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 308 16.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1226 Missing cases 652 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAH8A Q19, Overall Eval, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.8 2.5 2.5 ABOVE AVE 2 144 7.7 10.5 12.9 AVERAGE 3 408 21.7 29.7 42.6 BELOW AVE 4 392 20.9 28.5 71.1 POOR 5 398 21.2 28.9 100.0 . 338 18.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 164 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1376 Missing cases 502 EVALGH8A Q19, Overall Eval, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 .7 1.0 1.0 ABOVE AVE 2 64 3.4 4.4 5.3 AVERAGE 3 256 13.6 17.5 22.9 BELOW AVE 4 307 16.3 21.0 43.9 POOR 5 818 43.6 56.1 100.0 . 323 17.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 96 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1459 Missing cases 419 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJJ8A Q19, Overall Eval, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 134 7.1 8.8 8.8 ABOVE AVE 2 358 19.1 23.6 32.5 AVERAGE 3 388 20.7 25.6 58.1 BELOW AVE 4 254 13.5 16.8 74.9 POOR 5 381 20.3 25.1 100.0 . 305 16.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 58 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1515 Missing cases 363 EVALJK8A Q19, Overall Eval, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 81 4.3 6.4 6.4 ABOVE AVE 2 265 14.1 21.1 27.5 AVERAGE 3 534 28.4 42.5 70.0 BELOW AVE 4 215 11.4 17.1 87.1 POOR 5 162 8.6 12.9 100.0 . 360 19.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 261 13.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1257 Missing cases 621 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRR8A Q19, Overall Eval, Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 282 15.0 18.5 18.5 ABOVE AVE 2 339 18.1 22.2 40.7 AVERAGE 3 281 15.0 18.4 59.1 BELOW AVE 4 197 10.5 12.9 72.0 POOR 5 427 22.7 28.0 100.0 . 315 16.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 37 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1526 Missing cases 352 EVALPR8A Q19, Overall Eval, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 87 4.6 6.1 6.1 ABOVE AVE 2 143 7.6 9.9 16.0 AVERAGE 3 260 13.8 18.1 34.1 BELOW AVE 4 281 15.0 19.5 53.6 POOR 5 667 35.5 46.4 100.0 . 314 16.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 126 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1438 Missing cases 440 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPS8A Q19, Overall Eval, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 74 3.9 5.7 5.7 ABOVE AVE 2 286 15.2 21.9 27.5 AVERAGE 3 575 30.6 44.0 71.5 BELOW AVE 4 219 11.7 16.8 88.3 POOR 5 153 8.1 11.7 100.0 . 327 17.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 244 13.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1307 Missing cases 571 MIQUAL8A Q20, Most impt quality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACHIEVE IN GOV 1 845 45.0 52.0 52.0 TV PERF 2 10 .5 .6 52.6 MORAL CHAR 3 582 31.0 35.8 88.4 KNOWL FOR POL 4 188 10.0 11.6 100.0 . 253 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1625 Missing cases 253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METBB8A Q21, met personally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1809 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 69 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALBB8A Q21, attended rally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 83 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTBB8A Q21, contacted, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1692 90.1 90.1 90.1 CHECKED 1 186 9.9 9.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILBB8A Q21, received mail, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1506 80.2 80.2 80.2 CHECKED 1 372 19.8 19.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADBB8A Q21, saw ad, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 765 40.7 40.7 40.7 CHECKED 1 1113 59.3 59.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 METGB8A Q21, met personally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1724 91.8 91.8 91.8 CHECKED 1 154 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALGB8A Q21, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1641 87.4 87.4 87.4 CHECKED 1 237 12.6 12.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGB8A Q21, contacted, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1554 82.7 82.7 82.7 CHECKED 1 324 17.3 17.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MAILGB8A Q21, received mail, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1277 68.0 68.0 68.0 CHECKED 1 601 32.0 32.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADGB8A Q21, saw ad, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 738 39.3 39.3 39.3 CHECKED 1 1140 60.7 60.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRD8A Q21, met personally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1759 93.7 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 119 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 RALRD8A Q21, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1715 91.3 91.3 91.3 CHECKED 1 163 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRD8A Q21, contacted, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1609 85.7 85.7 85.7 CHECKED 1 269 14.3 14.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRD8A Q21, received mail, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1298 69.1 69.1 69.1 CHECKED 1 580 30.9 30.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ADRD8A Q21, saw ad, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 759 40.4 40.4 40.4 CHECKED 1 1119 59.6 59.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METMD8A Q21, met personally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1808 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 70 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALMD8A Q21, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1769 94.2 94.2 94.2 CHECKED 1 109 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTMD8A Q21, contacted, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1627 86.6 86.6 86.6 CHECKED 1 251 13.4 13.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILMD8A Q21, received mail, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1518 80.8 80.8 80.8 CHECKED 1 360 19.2 19.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADMD8A Q21, saw ad, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 804 42.8 42.8 42.8 CHECKED 1 1074 57.2 57.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 METPD8A Q21, met personally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALPD8A Q21, attended rally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 97.6 97.6 97.6 CHECKED 1 46 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPD8A Q21, contacted, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1743 92.8 92.8 92.8 CHECKED 1 135 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MAILPD8A Q21, received mail, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1581 84.2 84.2 84.2 CHECKED 1 297 15.8 15.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPD8A Q21, saw ad, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 782 41.6 41.6 41.6 CHECKED 1 1096 58.4 58.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRG8A Q21, met personally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1784 95.0 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 94 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 RALRG8A Q21, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1745 92.9 92.9 92.9 CHECKED 1 133 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRG8A Q21, contacted, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1612 85.8 85.8 85.8 CHECKED 1 266 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRG8A Q21, received mail, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1496 79.7 79.7 79.7 CHECKED 1 382 20.3 20.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ADRG8A Q21, saw ad, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 745 39.7 39.7 39.7 CHECKED 1 1133 60.3 60.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METAG8A Q21, met personally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1845 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 33 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALAG8A Q21, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 53 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTAG8A Q21, contacted, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 66 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILAG8A Q21, received mail, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1673 89.1 89.1 89.1 CHECKED 1 205 10.9 10.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAG8A Q21, saw ad, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 719 38.3 38.3 38.3 CHECKED 1 1159 61.7 61.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 METAH8A Q21, met personally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 49 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALAH8A Q21, attended rally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 56 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTAH8A Q21, contacted, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1845 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 33 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MAILAH8A Q21, received mail, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1697 90.4 90.4 90.4 CHECKED 1 181 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAH8A Q21, saw ad, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 754 40.1 40.1 40.1 CHECKED 1 1124 59.9 59.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METGH8A Q21, met personally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 97.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 47 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 RALGH8A Q21, attended rally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 62 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGH8A Q21, contacted, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 83 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILGH8A Q21, received mail, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1630 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1 248 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ADGH8A Q21, saw ad, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 710 37.8 37.8 37.8 CHECKED 1 1168 62.2 62.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJJ8A Q21, met personally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 74 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALJJ8A Q21, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1724 91.8 91.8 91.8 CHECKED 1 154 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTJJ8A Q21, contacted, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1741 92.7 92.7 92.7 CHECKED 1 137 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJJ8A Q21, received mail, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1635 87.1 87.1 87.1 CHECKED 1 243 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADJJ8A Q21, saw ad, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 669 35.6 35.6 35.6 CHECKED 1 1209 64.4 64.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 METJK8A Q21, met personally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1767 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 111 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALJK8A Q21, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1750 93.2 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 128 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTJK8A Q21, contacted, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1693 90.1 90.1 90.1 CHECKED 1 185 9.9 9.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MAILJK8A Q21, received mail, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1458 77.6 77.6 77.6 CHECKED 1 420 22.4 22.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADJK8A Q21, saw ad, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 764 40.7 40.7 40.7 CHECKED 1 1114 59.3 59.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPR8A Q21, met personally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1770 94.2 94.2 94.2 CHECKED 1 108 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 RALPR8A Q21, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1700 90.5 90.5 90.5 CHECKED 1 178 9.5 9.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPR8A Q21, contacted, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1616 86.0 86.0 86.0 CHECKED 1 262 14.0 14.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPR8A Q21, received mail, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1367 72.8 72.8 72.8 CHECKED 1 511 27.2 27.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ADPR8A Q21, saw ad, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 729 38.8 38.8 38.8 CHECKED 1 1149 61.2 61.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPS8A Q21, met personally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1794 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 84 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALPS8A Q21, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1764 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 114 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTPS8A Q21, contacted, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1635 87.1 87.1 87.1 CHECKED 1 243 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPS8A Q21, received mail, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1531 81.5 81.5 81.5 CHECKED 1 347 18.5 18.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPS8A Q21, saw ad, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 747 39.8 39.8 39.8 CHECKED 1 1131 60.2 60.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 RANKBB8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 65 3.5 6.7 6.7 SECOND 2 97 5.2 10.0 16.8 THIRD 3 114 6.1 11.8 28.6 FOURTH 4 168 8.9 17.4 46.0 FIFTH 5 200 10.6 20.7 66.7 SIXTH 6 177 9.4 18.3 85.0 SEVENTH 7 145 7.7 15.0 100.0 . 912 48.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 912 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKMD8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 437 23.3 41.6 41.6 SECOND 2 317 16.9 30.2 71.8 THIRD 3 156 8.3 14.9 86.7 FOURTH 4 60 3.2 5.7 92.4 FIFTH 5 39 2.1 3.7 96.1 SIXTH 6 20 1.1 1.9 98.0 SEVENTH 7 21 1.1 2.0 100.0 . 828 44.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1050 Missing cases 828 RANKRG8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 148 7.9 15.1 15.1 SECOND 2 158 8.4 16.1 31.2 THIRD 3 202 10.8 20.6 51.8 FOURTH 4 171 9.1 17.4 69.2 FIFTH 5 163 8.7 16.6 85.8 SIXTH 6 89 4.7 9.1 94.9 SEVENTH 7 50 2.7 5.1 100.0 . 897 47.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 981 Missing cases 897 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKAG8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 79 4.2 8.1 8.1 SECOND 2 90 4.8 9.3 17.4 THIRD 3 121 6.4 12.5 29.9 FOURTH 4 162 8.6 16.7 46.6 FIFTH 5 180 9.6 18.6 65.2 SIXTH 6 217 11.6 22.4 87.5 SEVENTH 7 121 6.4 12.5 100.0 . 908 48.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 970 Missing cases 908 RANKGH8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 30 1.6 3.1 3.1 SECOND 2 44 2.3 4.5 7.6 THIRD 3 69 3.7 7.1 14.7 FOURTH 4 79 4.2 8.1 22.8 FIFTH 5 99 5.3 10.2 33.0 SIXTH 6 139 7.4 14.3 47.2 SEVENTH 7 514 27.4 52.8 100.0 . 904 48.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 974 Missing cases 904 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJJ8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 172 9.2 17.0 17.0 SECOND 2 163 8.7 16.1 33.2 THIRD 3 119 6.3 11.8 45.0 FOURTH 4 128 6.8 12.7 57.6 FIFTH 5 96 5.1 9.5 67.1 SIXTH 6 143 7.6 14.2 81.3 SEVENTH 7 189 10.1 18.7 100.0 . 868 46.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1010 Missing cases 868 RANKPS8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 146 7.8 14.7 14.7 SECOND 2 155 8.3 15.7 30.4 THIRD 3 178 9.5 18.0 48.4 FOURTH 4 168 8.9 17.0 65.4 FIFTH 5 146 7.8 14.7 80.1 SIXTH 6 124 6.6 12.5 92.6 SEVENTH 7 73 3.9 7.4 100.0 . 888 47.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 990 Missing cases 888 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKGB8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 394 21.0 32.9 32.9 SECOND 2 302 16.1 25.2 58.1 THIRD 3 191 10.2 15.9 74.0 FOURTH 4 111 5.9 9.3 83.3 FIFTH 5 81 4.3 6.8 90.1 SIXTH 6 119 6.3 9.9 100.0 . 680 36.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1198 Missing cases 680 RANKRD8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 416 22.2 35.2 35.2 SECOND 2 336 17.9 28.4 63.6 THIRD 3 212 11.3 17.9 81.6 FOURTH 4 138 7.3 11.7 93.2 FIFTH 5 50 2.7 4.2 97.5 SIXTH 6 30 1.6 2.5 100.0 . 696 37.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1182 Missing cases 696 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKPD8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 74 3.9 6.5 6.5 SECOND 2 156 8.3 13.7 20.3 THIRD 3 214 11.4 18.9 39.1 FOURTH 4 266 14.2 23.4 62.6 FIFTH 5 277 14.7 24.4 87.0 SIXTH 6 148 7.9 13.0 100.0 . 743 39.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1135 Missing cases 743 RANKAH8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 34 1.8 3.0 3.0 SECOND 2 50 2.7 4.4 7.4 THIRD 3 104 5.5 9.2 16.6 FOURTH 4 221 11.8 19.5 36.0 FIFTH 5 380 20.2 33.5 69.5 SIXTH 6 346 18.4 30.5 100.0 . 743 39.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1135 Missing cases 743 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJK8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 132 7.0 11.4 11.4 SECOND 2 241 12.8 20.9 32.3 THIRD 3 332 17.7 28.8 61.1 FOURTH 4 255 13.6 22.1 83.2 FIFTH 5 162 8.6 14.0 97.2 SIXTH 6 32 1.7 2.8 100.0 . 724 38.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1154 Missing cases 724 RANKPR8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 157 8.4 13.7 13.7 SECOND 2 71 3.8 6.2 19.9 THIRD 3 60 3.2 5.2 25.1 FOURTH 4 104 5.5 9.1 34.2 FIFTH 5 160 8.5 14.0 48.2 SIXTH 6 594 31.6 51.8 100.0 . 732 39.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1146 Missing cases 732 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMBB8A Q23, chance of nom, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 2 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WIN 2 5 .3 .4 .5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 21 1.1 1.6 2.1 TOSSUP 4 52 2.8 4.0 6.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 124 6.6 9.5 15.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 224 11.9 17.2 32.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 875 46.6 67.2 100.0 . 364 19.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 211 11.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1303 Missing cases 575 NOMMD8A Q23, chance of nom, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 659 35.1 41.0 41.0 PROBABLY WIN 2 462 24.6 28.8 69.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 196 10.4 12.2 82.0 TOSSUP 4 166 8.8 10.3 92.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 59 3.1 3.7 96.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 43 2.3 2.7 98.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 21 1.1 1.3 100.0 . 244 13.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1606 Missing cases 272 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRG8A Q23, chance of nom, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 15 .8 1.1 1.1 PROBABLY WIN 2 46 2.4 3.3 4.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 93 5.0 6.7 11.1 TOSSUP 4 175 9.3 12.6 23.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 204 10.9 14.7 38.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 284 15.1 20.5 58.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 571 30.4 41.1 100.0 . 372 19.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 118 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1388 Missing cases 490 NOMAG8A Q23, chance of nom, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 4 .2 .3 .3 PROBABLY WIN 2 16 .9 1.2 1.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 66 3.5 4.8 6.3 TOSSUP 4 152 8.1 11.1 17.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 214 11.4 15.7 33.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 265 14.1 19.4 52.5 CERTAIN LOSE 7 649 34.6 47.5 100.0 . 376 20.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 136 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1366 Missing cases 512 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMGH8A Q23, chance of nom, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 5 .3 .4 .4 PROBABLY WIN 2 8 .4 .6 .9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 19 1.0 1.3 2.2 TOSSUP 4 42 2.2 3.0 5.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 69 3.7 4.8 10.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 118 6.3 8.3 18.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1162 61.9 81.7 100.0 . 367 19.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 88 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1423 Missing cases 455 NOMJJ8A Q23, chance of nom, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 24 1.3 1.6 1.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 76 4.0 5.2 6.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 159 8.5 10.8 17.6 TOSSUP 4 276 14.7 18.8 36.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 282 15.0 19.2 55.6 PROBABLY LOSE 6 228 12.1 15.5 71.1 CERTAIN LOSE 7 425 22.6 28.9 100.0 . 342 18.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 66 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1470 Missing cases 408 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPS8A Q23, chance of nom, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 8 .4 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 20 1.1 1.4 2.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 55 2.9 4.0 6.0 TOSSUP 4 170 9.1 12.3 18.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 223 11.9 16.1 34.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 264 14.1 19.0 53.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 647 34.5 46.6 100.0 . 380 20.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 111 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1387 Missing cases 491 NOMGB8A Q23, chance of nom, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 750 39.9 47.6 47.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 329 17.5 20.9 68.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 156 8.3 9.9 78.4 TOSSUP 4 162 8.6 10.3 88.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 74 3.9 4.7 93.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 46 2.4 2.9 96.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 59 3.1 3.7 100.0 . 270 14.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1576 Missing cases 302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRD8A Q23, chance of nom, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 22 1.2 1.5 1.5 PROBABLY WIN 2 147 7.8 10.3 11.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 242 12.9 16.9 28.7 TOSSUP 4 257 13.7 17.9 46.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 197 10.5 13.7 60.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 162 8.6 11.3 71.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 407 21.7 28.4 100.0 . 363 19.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1434 Missing cases 444 NOMPD8A Q23, chance of nom, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 4 .2 .3 .3 PROBABLY WIN 2 8 .4 .6 .9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 30 1.6 2.3 3.2 TOSSUP 4 72 3.8 5.5 8.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 177 9.4 13.5 22.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 233 12.4 17.8 40.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 785 41.8 60.0 100.0 . 389 20.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 180 9.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1309 Missing cases 569 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMAH8A Q23, chance of nom, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 2 .1 .1 .1 PROBABLY WIN 2 5 .3 .4 .5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 17 .9 1.2 1.7 TOSSUP 4 52 2.8 3.8 5.5 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 109 5.8 7.9 13.5 PROBABLY LOSE 6 223 11.9 16.2 29.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 965 51.4 70.3 100.0 . 378 20.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 127 6.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1373 Missing cases 505 NOMJK8A Q23, chance of nom, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .3 .4 .4 PROBABLY WIN 2 27 1.4 2.0 2.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 68 3.6 5.0 7.4 TOSSUP 4 136 7.2 9.9 17.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 189 10.1 13.8 31.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 254 13.5 18.5 49.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 692 36.8 50.4 100.0 . 375 20.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 131 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1372 Missing cases 506 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPR8A Q23, chance of nom, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 8 .4 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 12 .6 .9 1.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 38 2.0 2.7 4.1 TOSSUP 4 71 3.8 5.1 9.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 136 7.2 9.7 19.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 196 10.4 14.0 33.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 937 49.9 67.0 100.0 . 362 19.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 118 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1398 Missing cases 480 NOVBB8A Q23, chance to win ge, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 9 .5 .8 .8 PROBABLY WIN 2 14 .7 1.2 2.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 39 2.1 3.3 5.3 TOSSUP 4 100 5.3 8.5 13.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 141 7.5 12.0 25.8 PROBABLY LOSE 6 250 13.3 21.3 47.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 623 33.2 53.0 100.0 . 578 30.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 124 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1176 Missing cases 702 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVMD8A Q23, chance to win ge, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 334 17.8 21.1 21.1 PROBABLY WIN 2 383 20.4 24.2 45.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 198 10.5 12.5 57.9 TOSSUP 4 345 18.4 21.8 79.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 170 9.1 10.8 90.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 100 5.3 6.3 96.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 51 2.7 3.2 100.0 . 286 15.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1581 Missing cases 297 NOVRG8A Q23, chance to win ge, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 27 1.4 2.2 2.2 PROBABLY WIN 2 57 3.0 4.5 6.7 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 102 5.4 8.1 14.8 TOSSUP 4 217 11.6 17.3 32.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 222 11.8 17.7 49.9 PROBABLY LOSE 6 216 11.5 17.2 67.1 CERTAIN LOSE 7 412 21.9 32.9 100.0 . 541 28.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 84 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1253 Missing cases 625 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVAG8A Q23, chance to win ge, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 9 .5 .7 .7 PROBABLY WIN 2 27 1.4 2.2 2.9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 89 4.7 7.2 10.2 TOSSUP 4 190 10.1 15.4 25.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 219 11.7 17.8 43.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 249 13.3 20.2 63.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 448 23.9 36.4 100.0 . 566 30.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1231 Missing cases 647 NOVGH8A Q23, chance to win ge, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 7 .4 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 4 .2 .3 .9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 19 1.0 1.6 2.6 TOSSUP 4 41 2.2 3.5 6.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 81 4.3 7.0 13.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 136 7.2 11.7 24.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 875 46.6 75.2 100.0 . 674 35.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 41 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1163 Missing cases 715 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVJJ8A Q23, chance to win ge, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 30 1.6 2.5 2.5 PROBABLY WIN 2 58 3.1 4.8 7.2 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 88 4.7 7.2 14.5 TOSSUP 4 197 10.5 16.2 30.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 222 11.8 18.2 48.9 PROBABLY LOSE 6 200 10.6 16.4 65.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 422 22.5 34.7 100.0 . 640 34.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1217 Missing cases 661 NOVPS8A Q23, chance to win ge, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 10 .5 .9 .9 PROBABLY WIN 2 25 1.3 2.2 3.1 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 60 3.2 5.4 8.5 TOSSUP 4 158 8.4 14.2 22.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 199 10.6 17.8 40.5 PROBABLY LOSE 6 220 11.7 19.7 60.2 CERTAIN LOSE 7 444 23.6 39.8 100.0 . 702 37.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 60 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1116 Missing cases 762 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVGB8A Q23, chance to win ge, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 274 14.6 19.9 19.9 PROBABLY WIN 2 369 19.6 26.7 46.6 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 192 10.2 13.9 60.5 TOSSUP 4 276 14.7 20.0 80.5 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 137 7.3 9.9 90.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 58 3.1 4.2 94.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 74 3.9 5.4 100.0 . 486 25.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1380 Missing cases 498 NOVRD8A Q23, chance to win ge, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 54 2.9 4.6 4.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 191 10.2 16.3 20.9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 256 13.6 21.8 42.6 TOSSUP 4 241 12.8 20.5 63.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 145 7.7 12.3 75.5 PROBABLY LOSE 6 93 5.0 7.9 83.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 195 10.4 16.6 100.0 . 664 35.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 39 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1175 Missing cases 703 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPD8A Q23, chance to win ge, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .3 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 18 1.0 1.7 2.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 47 2.5 4.4 6.7 TOSSUP 4 104 5.5 9.8 16.5 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 169 9.0 15.9 32.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 226 12.0 21.3 53.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 491 26.1 46.3 100.0 . 707 37.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 110 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 817 NOVAH8A Q23, chance to win ge, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .3 .5 .5 PROBABLY WIN 2 8 .4 .7 1.2 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 21 1.1 1.9 3.1 TOSSUP 4 58 3.1 5.1 8.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 135 7.2 11.9 20.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 222 11.8 19.6 39.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 683 36.4 60.3 100.0 . 693 36.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 52 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1133 Missing cases 745 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVJK8A Q23, chance to win ge, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 16 .9 1.4 1.4 PROBABLY WIN 2 65 3.5 5.8 7.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 78 4.2 7.0 14.2 TOSSUP 4 174 9.3 15.6 29.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 168 8.9 15.0 44.9 PROBABLY LOSE 6 207 11.0 18.5 63.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 409 21.8 36.6 100.0 . 693 36.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 68 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1117 Missing cases 761 NOVPR8A Q23, chance to win ge, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 16 .9 1.3 1.3 PROBABLY WIN 2 28 1.5 2.2 3.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 55 2.9 4.3 7.8 TOSSUP 4 85 4.5 6.7 14.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 145 7.7 11.4 25.8 PROBABLY LOSE 6 177 9.4 13.9 39.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 770 41.0 60.3 100.0 . 537 28.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 65 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1276 Missing cases 602 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH8A Q24, group member, Teachers Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1251 66.6 82.9 82.9 MEMB ONLY 2 168 8.9 11.1 94.0 ACTIVE MEMB 3 90 4.8 6.0 100.0 . 369 19.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1509 Missing cases 369 BUSORG8A Q24, group member, Bus Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1102 58.7 73.7 73.7 MEMB ONLY 2 275 14.6 18.4 92.1 ACTIVE MEMB 3 118 6.3 7.9 100.0 . 383 20.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1495 Missing cases 383 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN8A Q24, group member, Women's Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1355 72.2 92.6 92.6 MEMB ONLY 2 83 4.4 5.7 98.2 ACTIVE MEMB 3 26 1.4 1.8 100.0 . 414 22.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1464 Missing cases 414 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVILR8A Q24, group member, Civil Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1356 72.2 92.1 92.1 MEMB ONLY 2 92 4.9 6.3 98.4 ACTIVE MEMB 3 24 1.3 1.6 100.0 . 406 21.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1472 Missing cases 406 ENVIR8A Q24, group member, Environ Group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1233 65.7 83.3 83.3 MEMB ONLY 2 209 11.1 14.1 97.4 ACTIVE MEMB 3 39 2.1 2.6 100.0 . 397 21.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 397 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPRT8A Q24, group member, Interest Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1218 64.9 82.2 82.2 MEMB ONLY 2 198 10.5 13.4 95.6 ACTIVE MEMB 3 65 3.5 4.4 100.0 . 397 21.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 397 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOR8A Q24, group member, Labor Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1130 60.2 75.8 75.8 MEMB ONLY 2 263 14.0 17.6 93.4 ACTIVE MEMB 3 98 5.2 6.6 100.0 . 387 20.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1491 Missing cases 387 FARM8A Q24, group member, Farm Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1186 63.2 80.8 80.8 MEMB ONLY 2 221 11.8 15.1 95.9 ACTIVE MEMB 3 60 3.2 4.1 100.0 . 411 21.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1467 Missing cases 411 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG8A Q24, group member, Pol Evang Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1322 70.4 90.5 90.5 MEMB ONLY 2 107 5.7 7.3 97.8 ACTIVE MEMB 3 32 1.7 2.2 100.0 . 417 22.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1461 Missing cases 417 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ANTIAB8A Q24, group member, Anti-Abortion Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1283 68.3 86.6 86.6 MEMB ONLY 2 138 7.3 9.3 95.9 ACTIVE MEMB 3 61 3.2 4.1 100.0 . 396 21.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1482 Missing cases 396 LIBID8A Q24, group member, Liberal Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1348 71.8 92.6 92.6 MEMB ONLY 2 74 3.9 5.1 97.7 ACTIVE MEMB 3 34 1.8 2.3 100.0 . 422 22.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1456 Missing cases 422 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONID8A Q24, group member, Conserv Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1306 69.5 89.6 89.6 MEMB ONLY 2 102 5.4 7.0 96.6 ACTIVE MEMB 3 49 2.6 3.4 100.0 . 421 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1457 Missing cases 421 IMPTGR8A Q25, grp most impt politically Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TEACH 1 113 6.0 9.6 9.6 BUS ORG 2 176 9.4 15.0 24.6 WOMENS GR 3 33 1.8 2.8 27.4 CIVIL RTS 4 45 2.4 3.8 31.2 ENVIRON 5 101 5.4 8.6 39.8 INT GRP 6 96 5.1 8.2 48.0 UNION 7 181 9.6 15.4 63.4 FARM ORG 8 145 7.7 12.3 75.7 EVANG GRP 9 67 3.6 5.7 81.4 ANTI ABORT 10 113 6.0 9.6 91.0 LIBERAL GR 11 45 2.4 3.8 94.8 CONSERV GR 12 61 3.2 5.2 100.0 . 702 37.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1176 Missing cases 702 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYSP8A Q26, party and activity of spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 283 15.1 21.9 21.9 INACT DEM 2 278 14.8 21.5 43.4 ACTIVE REP 3 303 16.1 23.4 66.8 INCAT REP 4 257 13.7 19.9 86.7 ACTIVE INDEP 5 66 3.5 5.1 91.8 INACT INDEP 6 106 5.6 8.2 100.0 . 538 28.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 47 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1293 Missing cases 585 PTYM8A Q26, party and activity of Mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 195 10.4 14.8 14.8 INACT DEM 2 387 20.6 29.5 44.3 ACTIVE REP 3 187 10.0 14.2 58.5 INCAT REP 4 388 20.7 29.5 88.1 ACTIVE INDEP 5 49 2.6 3.7 91.8 INACT INDEP 6 108 5.8 8.2 100.0 . 418 22.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 146 7.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1314 Missing cases 564 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF8A Q26, party and activity of Father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 235 12.5 18.1 18.1 INACT DEM 2 354 18.8 27.3 45.4 ACTIVE REP 3 220 11.7 16.9 62.3 INCAT REP 4 344 18.3 26.5 88.8 ACTIVE INDEP 5 47 2.5 3.6 92.4 INACT INDEP 6 98 5.2 7.6 100.0 . 443 23.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 137 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1298 Missing cases 580 CANSUP8A Q27, cand supported in nom process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BABBITT 1 49 2.6 3.0 3.0 BUSH 2 270 14.4 16.6 19.6 DOLE 3 176 9.4 10.8 30.5 DUKAKIS 4 287 15.3 17.7 48.1 DUPONT 5 32 1.7 2.0 50.1 GEPHARDT 6 166 8.8 10.2 60.3 GORE 7 38 2.0 2.3 62.6 HAIG 8 5 .3 .3 63.0 HART 9 16 .9 1.0 63.9 JACKSON 10 131 7.0 8.1 72.0 KEMP 11 97 5.2 6.0 78.0 ROBERTSON 12 159 8.5 9.8 87.8 SIMON 13 139 7.4 8.6 96.3 NONE-NOT PARTIC 14 60 3.2 3.7 100.0 . 253 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1625 Missing cases 253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBB8A Q28, attended rally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 74 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDBB8A Q28, fundraising, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1861 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBB8A Q28, convince friends, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 48 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBB8A Q28, canvass, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1865 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MONBB8A Q28, contribute, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1855 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 23 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTMD8A Q28, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1711 91.1 91.1 91.1 CHECKED 1 167 8.9 8.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMD8A Q28, fundraising, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 56 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVMD8A Q28, convince friends, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1649 87.8 87.8 87.8 CHECKED 1 229 12.2 12.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVMD8A Q28, canvass, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 40 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONMD8A Q28, contribute, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1791 95.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 87 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTRG8A Q28, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1749 93.1 93.1 93.1 CHECKED 1 129 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8A Q28, fundraising, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1843 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRG8A Q28, convince friends, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1775 94.5 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 103 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVRG8A Q28, canvass, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1847 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 31 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG8A Q28, contribute, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 61 3.2 100.0 100.0 NOT CHECKED 0 1817 96.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 61 Missing cases 1817 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAG8A Q28, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1847 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 31 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDAG8A Q28, fundraising, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1867 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8A Q28, convince friends, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1841 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 37 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAG8A Q28, canvass, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1875 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MONAG8A Q28, contribute, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1870 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGH8A Q28, attended rally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1843 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGH8A Q28, fundraising, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1867 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVGH8A Q28, convince friends, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1857 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGH8A Q28, canvass, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1877 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONGH8A Q28, contribute, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1870 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTJJ8A Q28, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1758 93.6 93.6 93.6 CHECKED 1 120 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJJ8A Q28, fundraising, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1847 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 31 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ8A Q28, convince friends, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1751 93.2 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 127 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVJJ8A Q28, canvass, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1863 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJJ8A Q28, contribute, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 59 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS8A Q28, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1764 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 114 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDPS8A Q28, fundraising, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1859 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS8A Q28, convince friends, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1768 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 110 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS8A Q28, canvass, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1849 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 29 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MONPS8A Q28, contribute, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 48 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8A Q28, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1600 85.2 85.2 85.2 CHECKED 1 278 14.8 14.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB8A Q28, fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1798 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 80 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVGB8A Q28, convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1657 88.2 88.2 88.2 CHECKED 1 221 11.8 11.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8A Q28, canvass, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 74 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONGB8A Q28, contribute, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1747 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 131 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTRD8A Q28, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1733 92.3 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 145 7.7 7.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8A Q28, fundraising, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1842 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 36 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD8A Q28, convince friends, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1764 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 114 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVRD8A Q28, canvass, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1850 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRD8A Q28, contribute, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 68 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPD8A Q28, attended rally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 97.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 47 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDPD8A Q28, fundraising, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1867 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPD8A Q28, convince friends, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1853 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 25 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPD8A Q28, canvass, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1872 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MONPD8A Q28, contribute, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1864 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 14 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAH8A Q28, attended rally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1852 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDAH8A Q28, fundraising, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1865 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 13 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVAH8A Q28, convince friends, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1870 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAH8A Q28, canvass, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1876 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONAH8A Q28, contribute, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1872 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTJK8A Q28, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1766 94.0 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 112 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJK8A Q28, fundraising, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1850 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJK8A Q28, convince friends, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1802 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 76 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVJK8A Q28, canvass, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1858 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJK8A Q28, contribute, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 40 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPR8A Q28, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1708 90.9 90.9 90.9 CHECKED 1 170 9.1 9.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDPR8A Q28, fundraising, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 43 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPR8A Q28, convince friends, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1751 93.2 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 127 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPR8A Q28, canvass, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 48 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 MONPR8A Q28, contribute, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1800 95.8 95.8 95.8 CHECKED 1 78 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE8A Q29, Age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 94 5.0 5.4 5.4 25-29 2 86 4.6 5.0 10.4 30-39 3 313 16.7 18.1 28.4 40-49 4 277 14.7 16.0 44.4 50-59 5 341 18.2 19.7 64.1 60-64 6 184 9.8 10.6 74.7 65+ 7 438 23.3 25.3 100.0 . 145 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1733 Missing cases 145 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX8A Q30, Gender Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 884 47.1 51.1 51.1 FEMALE 2 846 45.0 48.9 100.0 . 148 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1730 Missing cases 148 MARR8A Q31, Married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1304 69.4 76.1 76.1 NO 2 410 21.8 23.9 100.0 . 164 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1714 Missing cases 164 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL8A Q32, Religion Pref Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 380 20.2 23.2 23.2 JEWISH 2 37 2.0 2.3 25.4 PROTESTANT 3 1057 56.3 64.5 89.9 OTHER 4 35 1.9 2.1 92.1 NO RELIG 5 130 6.9 7.9 100.0 . 239 12.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1639 Missing cases 239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG8A Q33, Born again Chrisitian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 534 28.4 31.7 31.7 NO 2 1153 61.4 68.3 100.0 . 191 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1687 Missing cases 191 FUNDAM8A Q34, Fundamentalist Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 376 20.0 23.5 23.5 NO 2 1225 65.2 76.5 100.0 . 277 14.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1601 Missing cases 277 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL8A Q35, How Religious Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 423 22.5 24.9 24.9 FAIRLY 2 930 49.5 54.8 79.7 NOT VERY 3 240 12.8 14.1 93.8 NOT REL 4 105 5.6 6.2 100.0 . 159 8.5 Missing NOT SURE 5 21 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1698 Missing cases 180 RACE8A Q36, Race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 1603 85.4 93.6 93.6 BLACK 2 75 4.0 4.4 98.0 HISPANIC 3 9 .5 .5 98.5 NATIVE AM 4 10 .5 .6 99.1 ASIAN AM 5 3 .2 .2 99.3 OTHER 6 12 .6 .7 100.0 . 166 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1712 Missing cases 166 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL8A Q37, Schooling Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 1 33 1.8 2.0 2.0 9-11 2 76 4.0 4.6 6.5 12 3 424 22.6 25.4 31.9 13-15 4 422 22.5 25.3 57.2 COLL GRAD 5 401 21.4 24.0 81.2 GRAD SCH 6 314 16.7 18.8 100.0 . 208 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1670 Missing cases 208 JOBYOU8A Q38, employment you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SM BUS 1 213 11.3 13.6 13.6 LG BUS 2 396 21.1 25.3 38.9 EDUCATION 3 256 13.6 16.4 55.3 GOVT 4 181 9.6 11.6 66.9 SELFEMP-BUS 5 111 5.9 7.1 74.0 SELFEMP-FARM 6 87 4.6 5.6 79.5 SELFEMP-PROF 7 84 4.5 5.4 84.9 HOUSEWIFE 8 191 10.2 12.2 97.1 STUDENT 9 45 2.4 2.9 100.0 . 314 16.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1564 Missing cases 314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBSP8A Q38, employment spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SM BUS 1 187 10.0 15.3 15.3 LG BUS 2 327 17.4 26.7 42.0 EDUCATION 3 154 8.2 12.6 54.6 GOVT 4 130 6.9 10.6 65.2 SELFEMP-BUS 5 85 4.5 6.9 72.1 SELFEMP-FARM 6 84 4.5 6.9 79.0 SELFEMP-PROF 7 49 2.6 4.0 83.0 HOUSEWIFE 8 196 10.4 16.0 99.0 STUDENT 9 12 .6 1.0 100.0 . 654 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1224 Missing cases 654 INCOME8A Q39, Income Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent under $9,999 1 117 6.2 7.0 7.0 $10,000-19,999 2 262 14.0 15.8 22.8 $20,000-29,999 3 338 18.0 20.3 43.2 $30,000-39,999 4 276 14.7 16.6 59.8 $40,000-49,999 5 210 11.2 12.6 72.4 $50,000-59,999 6 171 9.1 10.3 82.7 $60,000-69,999 7 87 4.6 5.2 88.0 $70,000-79,999 8 66 3.5 4.0 91.9 $80,000+ 9 134 7.1 8.1 100.0 . 217 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1661 Missing cases 217 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLASS8A Q40, Social Class Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UPPER 1 17 .9 1.1 1.1 UPPER MID 2 335 17.8 21.3 22.4 MIDDLE 3 959 51.1 61.0 83.3 LOWER MID 4 158 8.4 10.0 93.4 WORKING 5 104 5.5 6.6 100.0 . 157 8.4 Missing OTHER 6 148 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1573 Missing cases 305 DATE8A Q41, Date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 10 .5 .6 .6 3 2 .1 .1 .7 4 1 .1 .1 .8 5 1 .1 .1 .8 6 1 .1 .1 .9 9 1 .1 .1 .9 41 1 .1 .1 1.0 318 1 .1 .1 1.0 328 1 .1 .1 1.1 329 3 .2 .2 1.3 330 32 1.7 1.9 3.1 331 13 .7 .8 3.9 401 2 .1 .1 4.0 402 7 .4 .4 4.4 403 2 .1 .1 4.5 404 4 .2 .2 4.7 405 7 .4 .4 5.2 406 1 .1 .1 5.2 407 1 .1 .1 5.3 408 2 .1 .1 5.4 409 2 .1 .1 5.5 410 6 .3 .3 5.8 411 1 .1 .1 5.9 412 1 .1 .1 6.0 413 2 .1 .1 6.1 414 42 2.2 2.4 8.5 415 36 1.9 2.1 10.6 416 10 .5 .6 11.2 417 8 .4 .5 11.6 418 13 .7 .8 12.4 419 6 .3 .3 12.7 420 4 .2 .2 13.0 421 2 .1 .1 13.1 423 2 .1 .1 13.2 424 2 .1 .1 13.3 425 8 .4 .5 13.8 426 4 .2 .2 14.0 427 4 .2 .2 14.2 501 1 .1 .1 14.3 503 1 .1 .1 14.4 504 1 .1 .1 14.4 505 2 .1 .1 14.5 506 23 1.2 1.3 15.9 507 27 1.4 1.6 17.4 508 9 .5 .5 18.0 509 32 1.7 1.9 19.8 DATE8A Q41, Date 510 25 1.3 1.4 21.3 511 9 .5 .5 21.8 512 9 .5 .5 22.3 513 7 .4 .4 22.7 514 5 .3 .3 23.0 515 10 .5 .6 23.6 516 9 .5 .5 24.1 517 10 .5 .6 24.7 518 87 4.6 5.0 29.7 519 53 2.8 3.1 32.8 520 42 2.2 2.4 35.2 521 17 .9 1.0 36.2 522 19 1.0 1.1 37.3 523 24 1.3 1.4 38.7 524 18 1.0 1.0 39.7 525 12 .6 .7 40.4 526 6 .3 .3 40.8 527 3 .2 .2 40.9 529 2 .1 .1 41.1 530 9 .5 .5 41.6 531 14 .7 .8 42.4 532 1 .1 .1 42.4 601 14 .7 .8 43.3 602 4 .2 .2 43.5 603 27 1.4 1.6 45.0 604 28 1.5 1.6 46.7 605 17 .9 1.0 47.7 606 49 2.6 2.8 50.5 607 21 1.1 1.2 51.7 608 18 1.0 1.0 52.8 609 14 .7 .8 53.6 610 10 .5 .6 54.1 611 6 .3 .3 54.5 612 4 .2 .2 54.7 613 5 .3 .3 55.0 614 5 .3 .3 55.3 615 3 .2 .2 55.5 616 3 .2 .2 55.6 617 3 .2 .2 55.8 618 1 .1 .1 55.9 619 2 .1 .1 56.0 620 2 .1 .1 56.1 621 2 .1 .1 56.2 622 2 .1 .1 56.3 623 2 .1 .1 56.5 624 2 .1 .1 56.6 625 5 .3 .3 56.9 626 1 .1 .1 56.9 627 1 .1 .1 57.0 628 1 .1 .1 57.0 DATE8A Q41, Date 701 1 .1 .1 57.1 704 1 .1 .1 57.2 705 3 .2 .2 57.3 706 2 .1 .1 57.4 707 1 .1 .1 57.5 708 2 .1 .1 57.6 709 2 .1 .1 57.7 710 1 .1 .1 57.8 711 49 2.6 2.8 60.6 712 46 2.4 2.7 63.3 713 24 1.3 1.4 64.7 714 52 2.8 3.0 67.7 715 37 2.0 2.1 69.8 716 30 1.6 1.7 71.6 717 12 .6 .7 72.3 718 19 1.0 1.1 73.4 719 12 .6 .7 74.1 720 13 .7 .8 74.8 721 7 .4 .4 75.2 722 6 .3 .3 75.6 723 3 .2 .2 75.7 724 2 .1 .1 75.9 725 6 .3 .3 76.2 726 6 .3 .3 76.5 727 5 .3 .3 76.8 728 1 .1 .1 76.9 729 2 .1 .1 77.0 730 1 .1 .1 77.1 801 3 .2 .2 77.2 802 1 .1 .1 77.3 803 1 .1 .1 77.4 804 1 .1 .1 77.4 805 1 .1 .1 77.5 806 2 .1 .1 77.6 808 36 1.9 2.1 79.7 809 23 1.2 1.3 81.0 810 47 2.5 2.7 83.7 811 33 1.8 1.9 85.6 812 19 1.0 1.1 86.7 813 6 .3 .3 87.1 814 9 .5 .5 87.6 815 14 .7 .8 88.4 816 5 .3 .3 88.7 817 4 .2 .2 88.9 818 4 .2 .2 89.2 819 4 .2 .2 89.4 820 4 .2 .2 89.6 821 3 .2 .2 89.8 822 9 .5 .5 90.3 824 1 .1 .1 90.4 DATE8A Q41, Date 826 1 .1 .1 90.4 827 1 .1 .1 90.5 828 3 .2 .2 90.7 830 2 .1 .1 90.8 831 1 .1 .1 90.9 902 1 .1 .1 90.9 903 1 .1 .1 91.0 909 1 .1 .1 91.0 912 1 .1 .1 91.1 920 4 .2 .2 91.3 921 15 .8 .9 92.2 922 14 .7 .8 93.0 923 17 .9 1.0 94.0 924 12 .6 .7 94.7 925 8 .4 .5 95.1 926 20 1.1 1.2 96.3 927 23 1.2 1.3 97.6 928 8 .4 .5 98.1 929 14 .7 .8 98.9 930 9 .5 .5 99.4 1001 4 .2 .2 99.7 1002 1 .1 .1 99.7 1003 2 .1 .1 99.8 1004 1 .1 .1 99.9 1017 1 .1 .1 99.9 1024 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 151 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1727 Missing cases 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSPN88A response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 4 .2 .2 .2 YES 1.00 1874 99.8 99.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 **1988B** ATTMD8B Q1, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1692 90.1 90.1 90.1 CHECKED 1 186 9.9 9.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMD8B Q1, fundraising, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVMD8B Q1, convince friends, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1635 87.1 87.1 87.1 CHECKED 1 243 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVMD8B Q1, canvass, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 49 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTMD8B Q1, contribute, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1786 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 92 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJJ8B Q1, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1807 96.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 71 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDJJ8B Q1, fundraising, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1864 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 14 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ8B Q1, convince friends, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1817 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 61 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJJ8B Q1, canvass, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1869 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTJJ8B Q1, contribute, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1844 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS8B Q1, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1798 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 80 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPS8B Q1, fundraising, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1867 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVPS8B Q1, convince friends, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1815 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 63 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS8B Q1, canvass, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1861 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPS8B Q1, contribute, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1843 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTRG8B Q1, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1776 94.6 94.6 94.6 CHECKED 1 102 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8B Q1, fundraising, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1852 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRG8B Q1, convince friends, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1811 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 67 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVRG8B Q1, canvass, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1858 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRG8B Q1, contribute, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1844 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAG8B Q1, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1859 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDAG8B Q1, fundraising, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1875 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 3 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8B Q1, convince friends, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1858 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAG8B Q1, canvass, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1876 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTAG8B Q1, contribute, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1873 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8B Q1, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1645 87.6 87.6 87.6 CHECKED 1 233 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB8B Q1, fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 68 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVGB8B Q1, convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1630 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1 248 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8B Q1, canvass, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1797 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 81 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGB8B Q1, contribute, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1755 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 123 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTRD8B Q1, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1797 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 81 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8B Q1, fundraising, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1867 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD8B Q1, convince friends, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1810 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 68 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVRD8B Q1, canvass, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1866 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 12 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRD8B Q1, contribute, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1848 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 30 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJK8B Q1, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1771 94.3 94.3 94.3 CHECKED 1 107 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDJK8B Q1, fundraising, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1850 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJK8B Q1, convince friends, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1789 95.3 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 89 4.7 4.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJK8B Q1, canvass, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1851 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 27 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTJK8B Q1, contribute, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1821 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 57 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPR8B Q1, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1798 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 80 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPR8B Q1, fundraising, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1867 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVPR8B Q1, convince friends, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 62 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPR8B Q1, canvass, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1866 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 12 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPR8B Q1, contribute, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1852 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTBQ8B Q2, attended rally, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1672 89.0 89.0 89.0 CHECKED 1 206 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBQ8B Q2, fundraising, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 74 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBQ8B Q2, convince friends, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1537 81.8 81.8 81.8 CHECKED 1 341 18.2 18.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVBQ8B Q2, canvass, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1755 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 123 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTBQ8B Q2, contribute, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1724 91.8 91.8 91.8 CHECKED 1 154 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDB8B Q2, attended rally, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1750 93.2 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 128 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDDB8B Q2, fundraising, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1843 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDB8B Q2, convince friends, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1552 82.6 82.6 82.6 CHECKED 1 326 17.4 17.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDB8B Q2, canvass, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1809 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 69 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTDB8B Q2, contribute, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1750 93.2 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 128 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDH8B Q2, attended rally, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 66 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDH8B Q2, fundraising, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1861 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVDH8B Q2, convince friends, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1757 93.6 93.6 93.6 CHECKED 1 121 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH8B Q2, canvass, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1849 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 29 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTDH8B Q2, contribute, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1819 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 59 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 ATTRH8B Q2, attended rally, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1788 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 90 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRH8B Q2, fundraising, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 40 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH8B Q2, convince friends, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1743 92.8 92.8 92.8 CHECKED 1 135 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CANVRH8B Q2, canvass, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1821 97.0 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 57 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH8B Q2, contribute, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1786 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 92 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDL8B Q2, attended rally, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1787 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 91 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 FUNDDL8B Q2, fundraising, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1843 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 35 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDL8B Q2, convince friends, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1720 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 158 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDL8B Q2, canvass, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1841 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 37 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONTDL8B Q2, contribute, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1778 94.7 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 100 5.3 5.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRL8B Q2, attended rally, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1733 92.3 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 145 7.7 7.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRL8B Q2, fundraising, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 62 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 CONVRL8B Q2, convince friends, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1683 89.6 89.6 89.6 CHECKED 1 195 10.4 10.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRL8B Q2, canvass, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1793 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 85 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRL8B Q2, contribute, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1746 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 132 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0 VOTE888B Q3, Pres vote in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUSH 1 592 31.5 49.4 49.4 DUKAKIS 2 607 32.3 50.6 100.0 . 662 35.3 Missing OTHER 3 17 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 679 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VTHR888B Q4, Hse vote in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FOR THE DEMOCRAT 1 604 32.2 50.9 50.9 FOR THE REPUBLICAN 2 583 31.0 49.1 100.0 . 660 35.1 Missing OTHER 3 12 .6 Missing DID NOT VOTE 4 19 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1187 Missing cases 691 PTYID8B Q5, Describe party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 299 15.9 24.4 24.4 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 177 9.4 14.4 38.8 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 129 6.9 10.5 49.3 INDEPENDENT 4 40 2.1 3.3 52.6 INDEPENDENT REP 5 102 5.4 8.3 60.9 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 127 6.8 10.4 71.3 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 352 18.7 28.7 100.0 . 652 34.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1226 Missing cases 652 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS8B Q6, Characterize party involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORKS YEAR AFTER YEA 1 430 22.9 39.3 39.3 WORKS WHEN WORTHWHIL 2 664 35.4 60.7 100.0 . 784 41.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1094 Missing cases 784 LIBCON8B Q7, Describe political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 24 1.3 2.0 2.0 LIBERAL 2 217 11.6 18.2 20.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 154 8.2 12.9 33.2 M-O-R 4 207 11.0 17.4 50.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 203 10.8 17.1 67.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 328 17.5 27.6 95.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 57 3.0 4.8 100.0 . 660 35.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 688 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SWITCH8B Q8, Member another party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 290 15.4 24.1 24.1 NO 2 915 48.7 75.9 100.0 . 673 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1205 Missing cases 673 WHEN8B Q8a, year another party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .4 .4 6 1 .1 .4 .7 7 5 .3 1.8 2.5 8 8 .4 2.9 5.4 50 19 1.0 6.9 12.3 51 2 .1 .7 13.0 52 7 .4 2.5 15.5 53 1 .1 .4 15.9 54 1 .1 .4 16.2 55 2 .1 .7 17.0 56 5 .3 1.8 18.8 57 1 .1 .4 19.1 58 3 .2 1.1 20.2 59 2 .1 .7 20.9 60 25 1.3 9.0 30.0 61 1 .1 .4 30.3 62 4 .2 1.4 31.8 63 2 .1 .7 32.5 64 11 .6 4.0 36.5 65 2 .1 .7 37.2 66 3 .2 1.1 38.3 67 1 .1 .4 38.6 68 22 1.2 7.9 46.6 69 1 .1 .4 46.9 70 3 .2 1.1 48.0 71 1 .1 .4 48.4 72 16 .9 5.8 54.2 73 2 .1 .7 54.9 74 2 .1 .7 55.6 75 3 .2 1.1 56.7 76 26 1.4 9.4 66.1 77 2 .1 .7 66.8 78 6 .3 2.2 69.0 79 6 .3 2.2 71.1 80 35 1.9 12.6 83.8 82 2 .1 .7 84.5 84 19 1.0 6.9 91.3 85 1 .1 .4 91.7 86 5 .3 1.8 93.5 87 4 .2 1.4 94.9 88 12 .6 4.3 99.3 89 2 .1 .7 100.0 . 1601 85.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 277 Missing cases 1601 INT88G8B Q9, interest 1988 Pres election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY MUCH INTERESTED 1 805 42.9 66.1 66.1 SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 2 321 17.1 26.4 92.4 NOT MUCH INTERESTED 3 92 4.9 7.6 100.0 . 660 35.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1218 Missing cases 660 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAM888B Q10, general elect. involvmt,1988 Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 492 26.2 41.2 41.2 NO 2 701 37.3 58.8 100.0 . 685 36.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1193 Missing cases 685 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HELPPP8B Q10a, help party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 291 15.5 58.1 58.1 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 163 8.7 32.5 90.6 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 25 1.3 5.0 95.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 22 1.2 4.4 100.0 . 1377 73.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 1377 FRIEND8B Q10b, asked by friend Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 31 1.7 7.8 7.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 105 5.6 26.4 34.2 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 84 4.5 21.1 55.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 178 9.5 44.7 100.0 . 1480 78.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 398 Missing cases 1480 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBER8B Q10c, asked by org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 76 4.0 19.2 19.2 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 97 5.2 24.5 43.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 74 3.9 18.7 62.4 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 149 7.9 37.6 100.0 . 1482 78.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 396 Missing cases 1482 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND8B Q10d, strong support, Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 311 16.6 65.6 65.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 121 6.4 25.5 91.1 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 26 1.4 5.5 96.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 16 .9 3.4 100.0 . 1404 74.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 474 Missing cases 1404 OPPR8B Q10e, strong opposition, Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 310 16.5 66.8 66.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 82 4.4 17.7 84.5 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 30 1.6 6.5 90.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 42 2.2 9.1 100.0 . 1414 75.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 1414 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VP8B Q10f, strong support, Vice-Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 115 6.1 26.3 26.3 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 107 5.7 24.4 50.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 106 5.6 24.2 74.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 110 5.9 25.1 100.0 . 1440 76.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 1440 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OPVP8B Q10g, strong opposition, Vice-Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 163 8.7 36.8 36.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 71 3.8 16.0 52.8 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 92 4.9 20.8 73.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 117 6.2 26.4 100.0 . 1435 76.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 443 Missing cases 1435 ISS8B Q10h, issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 394 21.0 79.0 79.0 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 89 4.7 17.8 96.8 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 11 .6 2.2 99.0 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 5 .3 1.0 100.0 . 1379 73.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 1379 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXCITE8B Q10i, campaign excitement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 69 3.7 15.8 15.8 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 113 6.0 25.9 41.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 107 5.7 24.5 66.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 147 7.8 33.7 100.0 . 1442 76.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 436 Missing cases 1442 MIREAS8B Q10a, most important reason Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HELP PARTY 1 117 6.2 20.5 20.5 FRIEND ASKED 2 9 .5 1.6 22.1 ORG ASKED 3 5 .3 .9 23.0 STRONG SUPPORT, PRES 4 120 6.4 21.1 44.0 STRONG OPPOSITION, P 5 89 4.7 15.6 59.6 STRONG SUPPORT, VP C 6 3 .2 .5 60.2 STRONG OPPOSITION, V 7 5 .3 .9 61.1 ISSUES 8 213 11.3 37.4 98.4 CAMPAIGN EXCITEMENT 9 9 .5 1.6 100.0 . 1308 69.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 570 Missing cases 1308 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHIMP8B Q11a, record of achievment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 706 37.6 61.5 61.5 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 386 20.6 33.6 95.1 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 48 2.6 4.2 99.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 8 .4 .7 100.0 . 730 38.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 730 TVIMP8B Q11b, performance on TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 285 15.2 25.5 25.5 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 420 22.4 37.5 63.0 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 280 14.9 25.0 88.0 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 134 7.1 12.0 100.0 . 759 40.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1119 Missing cases 759 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHIMP8B Q11c, moral character Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 820 43.7 71.1 71.1 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 268 14.3 23.2 94.3 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 56 3.0 4.9 99.1 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 10 .5 .9 100.0 . 724 38.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1154 Missing cases 724 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPIMP8B Q11d, foreign policy knowledge Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 620 33.0 54.6 54.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 424 22.6 37.3 91.9 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 87 4.6 7.7 99.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 5 .3 .4 100.0 . 742 39.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1136 Missing cases 742 PHILAV8B Q11e, represent average voter phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 574 30.6 49.6 49.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 427 22.7 36.9 86.5 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 128 6.8 11.1 97.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 28 1.5 2.4 100.0 . 721 38.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 721 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHILPP8B Q11f, represent pol party phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 329 17.5 29.3 29.3 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 537 28.6 47.8 77.0 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 214 11.4 19.0 96.1 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 44 2.3 3.9 100.0 . 754 40.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1124 Missing cases 754 MIMP8B Q11a, most important to cand success Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RECORD 1 277 14.7 24.2 24.2 TV PERFORMANCE 2 175 9.3 15.3 39.5 MORAL CHARACTER 3 223 11.9 19.5 59.1 FOREIGN POLICY 4 48 2.6 4.2 63.3 AVERAGE VOTER POL PH 5 346 18.4 30.3 93.5 POL PARTY POL PHIL 6 74 3.9 6.5 100.0 . 735 39.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1143 Missing cases 735 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT8B Q12a,opinion, abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 325 17.3 28.8 28.8 FAVOR 2 142 7.6 12.6 41.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 55 2.9 4.9 46.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 56 3.0 5.0 51.2 OPPOSE 6 202 10.8 17.9 69.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 348 18.5 30.9 100.0 . 666 35.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 84 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1128 Missing cases 750 DEFSP8B Q12b,opinion, defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 139 7.4 12.5 12.5 FAVOR 2 191 10.2 17.2 29.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 141 7.5 12.7 42.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 146 7.8 13.1 55.5 OPPOSE 6 268 14.3 24.1 79.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 227 12.1 20.4 100.0 . 668 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 98 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1112 Missing cases 766 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT8B Q12c,opinion, affirm. action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 95 5.1 9.4 9.4 FAVOR 2 224 11.9 22.1 31.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 261 13.9 25.7 57.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 160 8.5 15.8 73.0 OPPOSE 6 161 8.6 15.9 88.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 113 6.0 11.1 100.0 . 685 36.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 179 9.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1014 Missing cases 864 BALBUD8B Q12d,opinion,balanced budget Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 377 20.1 35.5 35.5 FAVOR 2 313 16.7 29.5 65.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 156 8.3 14.7 79.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 68 3.6 6.4 86.1 OPPOSE 6 82 4.4 7.7 93.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 65 3.5 6.1 100.0 . 677 36.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 140 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 817 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLUT8B Q12e,opinion,regs on pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 396 21.1 35.2 35.2 FAVOR 2 399 21.2 35.5 70.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 204 10.9 18.1 88.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 64 3.4 5.7 94.6 OPPOSE 6 42 2.2 3.7 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 19 1.0 1.7 100.0 . 669 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 85 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1124 Missing cases 754 CONTRA8B Q12f,opinion,Contra sppt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 126 6.7 13.4 13.4 FAVOR 2 155 8.3 16.5 29.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 125 6.7 13.3 43.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 69 3.7 7.3 50.6 OPPOSE 6 161 8.6 17.1 67.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 303 16.1 32.3 100.0 . 686 36.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 253 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 939 Missing cases 939 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARMER8B Q12g,opinion, Farm aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 110 5.9 11.0 11.0 FAVOR 2 195 10.4 19.5 30.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 211 11.2 21.1 51.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 209 11.1 20.9 72.6 OPPOSE 6 167 8.9 16.7 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 106 5.6 10.6 100.0 . 684 36.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 196 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 998 Missing cases 880 TARIFF8B Q12h,opinion,tariffs on for. comp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 196 10.4 19.2 19.2 FAVOR 2 212 11.3 20.7 39.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 200 10.6 19.6 59.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 131 7.0 12.8 72.2 OPPOSE 6 155 8.3 15.2 87.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 129 6.9 12.6 100.0 . 679 36.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 176 9.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1023 Missing cases 855 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SDI8B Q12i,opinion, Strategic Def. Init. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 104 5.5 10.4 10.4 FAVOR 2 130 6.9 12.9 23.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 157 8.4 15.6 38.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 110 5.9 11.0 49.9 OPPOSE 6 204 10.9 20.3 70.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 299 15.9 29.8 100.0 . 671 35.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 203 10.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1004 Missing cases 874 PRAYER8B Q12j,opinion, prayer in school Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 295 15.7 26.9 26.9 FAVOR 2 255 13.6 23.2 50.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 133 7.1 12.1 62.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 67 3.6 6.1 68.3 OPPOSE 6 124 6.6 11.3 79.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 224 11.9 20.4 100.0 . 664 35.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 116 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1098 Missing cases 780 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ERA8B Q12k,opinion, ERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 266 14.2 25.5 25.5 FAVOR 2 264 14.1 25.3 50.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 161 8.6 15.4 66.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 56 3.0 5.4 71.6 OPPOSE 6 124 6.6 11.9 83.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 172 9.2 16.5 100.0 . 686 36.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 149 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 835 NHI8B Q12l,opinion, NHI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 238 12.7 23.4 23.4 FAVOR 2 258 13.7 25.4 48.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 149 7.9 14.7 63.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 67 3.6 6.6 70.1 OPPOSE 6 143 7.6 14.1 84.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 161 8.6 15.8 100.0 . 669 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 193 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1016 Missing cases 862 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NUC8B Q12m,opinion, nuclear power Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 76 4.0 8.1 8.1 FAVOR 2 173 9.2 18.5 26.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 177 9.4 19.0 45.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 135 7.2 14.5 60.1 OPPOSE 6 185 9.9 19.8 80.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 187 10.0 20.0 100.0 . 676 36.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 269 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 933 Missing cases 945 MIISS8B Q13, most impt. issue. this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 221 11.8 19.1 19.1 DEFENSE SPENDING 2 128 6.8 11.1 30.2 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3 24 1.3 2.1 32.3 BALANCED BUDGET 4 280 14.9 24.2 56.5 ENVIRON POLLUTION 5 170 9.1 14.7 71.2 CONTRA SUPPORT 6 40 2.1 3.5 74.7 FARMER AID 7 33 1.8 2.9 77.5 TARIFFS 8 71 3.8 6.1 83.7 SDI, STAR WARS 9 55 2.9 4.8 88.4 PRAYER IN SCHOOLS 10 23 1.2 2.0 90.4 ERA AMENDMENT 11 24 1.3 2.1 92.5 NHI 12 65 3.5 5.6 98.1 NUCLEAR POWER 13 22 1.2 1.9 100.0 . 722 38.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1156 Missing cases 722 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCLB8B Q14,pol philosophy of Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 26 1.4 2.5 2.5 LIBERAL 2 211 11.2 20.3 22.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 226 12.0 21.8 44.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 233 12.4 22.4 67.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 180 9.6 17.3 84.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 154 8.2 14.8 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 9 .5 .9 100.0 . 733 39.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 106 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1039 Missing cases 839 LCGB8B Q14,pol philosophy of Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .4 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 26 1.4 2.4 3.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 26 1.4 2.4 5.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 98 5.2 8.9 14.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 237 12.6 21.5 35.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 593 31.6 53.9 89.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 114 6.1 10.4 100.0 . 723 38.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 54 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1101 Missing cases 777 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD8B Q14,pol philosophy of Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 21 1.1 2.1 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 34 1.8 3.3 5.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 145 7.7 14.2 19.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 230 12.2 22.5 42.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 488 26.0 47.7 90.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 102 5.4 10.0 100.0 . 750 39.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 104 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1024 Missing cases 854 LCMD8B Q14,pol philosophy of Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 302 16.1 27.1 27.1 LIBERAL 2 487 25.9 43.6 70.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 196 10.4 17.6 88.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 91 4.8 8.2 96.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 16 .9 1.4 97.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 20 1.1 1.8 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 4 .2 .4 100.0 . 720 38.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 42 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1116 Missing cases 762 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG8B Q14,pol philosophy of Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 48 2.6 5.8 5.8 LIBERAL 2 284 15.1 34.2 40.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 245 13.0 29.5 69.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 177 9.4 21.3 90.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 45 2.4 5.4 96.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 24 1.3 2.9 99.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 8 .4 1.0 100.0 . 796 42.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 251 13.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 831 Missing cases 1047 LCAG8B Q14,pol philosophy of Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 28 1.5 3.6 3.6 LIBERAL 2 173 9.2 22.2 25.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 213 11.3 27.3 53.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 191 10.2 24.5 77.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 113 6.0 14.5 92.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 48 2.6 6.2 98.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 14 .7 1.8 100.0 . 798 42.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 300 16.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 780 Missing cases 1098 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ8B Q14,pol philosophy of Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 630 33.5 59.8 59.8 LIBERAL 2 303 16.1 28.8 88.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 57 3.0 5.4 94.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 29 1.5 2.8 96.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 10 .5 .9 97.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 13 .7 1.2 99.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 11 .6 1.0 100.0 . 754 40.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 71 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 825 LCJK8B Q14,pol philosophy of Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .3 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 9 .5 1.0 1.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 19 1.0 2.1 3.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 68 3.6 7.5 11.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 61 3.2 6.8 18.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 360 19.2 40.0 58.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 378 20.1 42.0 100.0 . 780 41.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 197 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 901 Missing cases 977 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDQ8B Q14,pol philosophy of Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .6 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 15 .8 1.7 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 11 .6 1.2 4.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 66 3.5 7.5 11.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 98 5.2 11.1 22.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 398 21.2 45.1 67.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 283 15.1 32.1 100.0 . 756 40.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 240 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 882 Missing cases 996 LCRR8B Q14,pol philosophy of Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 16 .9 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 22 1.2 2.1 3.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 13 .7 1.2 4.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 37 2.0 3.5 8.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 72 3.8 6.8 15.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 483 25.7 45.6 60.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 416 22.2 39.3 100.0 . 752 40.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 67 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1059 Missing cases 819 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPR8B Q14,pol philosophy of Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 14 .7 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 20 1.1 2.2 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 14 .7 1.5 5.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 30 1.6 3.2 8.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 34 1.8 3.7 12.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 215 11.4 23.1 35.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 603 32.1 64.8 100.0 . 762 40.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 186 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 930 Missing cases 948 LCPS8B Q14,pol philosophy of Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 135 7.2 15.6 15.6 LIBERAL 2 340 18.1 39.2 54.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 171 9.1 19.7 74.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 121 6.4 14.0 88.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 41 2.2 4.7 93.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 44 2.3 5.1 98.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 15 .8 1.7 100.0 . 782 41.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 229 12.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 867 Missing cases 1011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAV8B Q14,pol philosophy of Am Voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 25 1.3 2.3 2.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 118 6.3 10.9 13.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 386 20.6 35.6 49.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 394 21.0 36.3 85.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 147 7.8 13.6 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 10 .5 .9 100.0 . 729 38.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 65 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1084 Missing cases 794 LCST8B Q14,pol philosophy of Am Voter,state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .6 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 69 3.7 6.3 7.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 226 12.0 20.7 28.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 269 14.3 24.6 52.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 300 16.0 27.5 80.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 190 10.1 17.4 97.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 27 1.4 2.5 100.0 . 730 38.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1092 Missing cases 786 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP8B Q14,pol philosophy of Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 14 .7 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 22 1.2 2.0 3.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 16 .9 1.5 4.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 58 3.1 5.4 10.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 228 12.1 21.0 31.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 591 31.5 54.5 85.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 155 8.3 14.3 100.0 . 737 39.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 57 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1084 Missing cases 794 LCDP8B Q14,pol philosophy of Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 127 6.8 11.5 11.5 LIBERAL 2 533 28.4 48.2 59.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 305 16.2 27.6 87.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 89 4.7 8.0 95.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 16 .9 1.4 96.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 27 1.4 2.4 99.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 9 .5 .8 100.0 . 726 38.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 46 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1106 Missing cases 772 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALLB8B Q15,Overall Eval Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 126 6.7 11.8 11.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 435 23.2 40.7 52.5 AVERAGE 3 360 19.2 33.7 86.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 78 4.2 7.3 93.5 POOR 5 70 3.7 6.5 100.0 . 718 38.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 91 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1069 Missing cases 809 EVALGB8B Q15,Overall Eval Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 193 10.3 17.0 17.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 411 21.9 36.2 53.2 AVERAGE 3 321 17.1 28.3 81.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4 115 6.1 10.1 91.5 POOR 5 96 5.1 8.5 100.0 . 714 38.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 28 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1136 Missing cases 742 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRD8B Q15,Overall Eval Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 99 5.3 9.0 9.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 497 26.5 45.3 54.3 AVERAGE 3 353 18.8 32.2 86.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 95 5.1 8.7 95.2 POOR 5 53 2.8 4.8 100.0 . 725 38.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 56 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1097 Missing cases 781 EVALMD8B Q15,Overall Eval Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 85 4.5 7.4 7.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 357 19.0 31.2 38.6 AVERAGE 3 322 17.1 28.1 66.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 154 8.2 13.5 80.2 POOR 5 226 12.0 19.8 100.0 . 710 37.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 24 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1144 Missing cases 734 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRG8B Q15,Overall Eval Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 2.0 4.2 4.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 190 10.1 21.2 25.4 AVERAGE 3 405 21.6 45.2 70.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4 178 9.5 19.9 90.5 POOR 5 85 4.5 9.5 100.0 . 753 40.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 229 12.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 896 Missing cases 982 EVALAG8B Q15,Overall Eval Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.4 3.1 3.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 151 8.0 17.8 20.9 AVERAGE 3 400 21.3 47.3 68.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 185 9.9 21.9 90.1 POOR 5 84 4.5 9.9 100.0 . 759 40.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 273 14.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 846 Missing cases 1032 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJJ8B Q15,Overall Eval Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 109 5.8 10.1 10.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 292 15.5 27.0 37.0 AVERAGE 3 220 11.7 20.3 57.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 169 9.0 15.6 72.9 POOR 5 293 15.6 27.1 100.0 . 738 39.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 57 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1083 Missing cases 795 EVALJK8B Q15,Overall Eval Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 77 4.1 8.1 8.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 271 14.4 28.6 36.7 AVERAGE 3 305 16.2 32.2 69.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4 169 9.0 17.8 86.8 POOR 5 125 6.7 13.2 100.0 . 756 40.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 175 9.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 947 Missing cases 931 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALDQ8B Q15,Overall Eval Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 1.8 3.2 3.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 164 8.7 15.9 19.1 AVERAGE 3 275 14.6 26.7 45.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 209 11.1 20.3 66.1 POOR 5 349 18.6 33.9 100.0 . 732 39.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 116 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1030 Missing cases 848 EVALRR8B Q15,Overall Eval Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 240 12.8 21.3 21.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 285 15.2 25.3 46.7 AVERAGE 3 189 10.1 16.8 63.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 139 7.4 12.4 75.8 POOR 5 272 14.5 24.2 100.0 . 731 38.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 22 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1125 Missing cases 753 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPR8B Q15,Overall Eval Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 3.6 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 126 6.7 12.4 19.0 AVERAGE 3 188 10.0 18.5 37.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 195 10.4 19.2 56.7 POOR 5 440 23.4 43.3 100.0 . 740 39.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 122 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1016 Missing cases 862 EVALPS8B Q15,Overall Eval Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 55 2.9 5.9 5.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 266 14.2 28.7 34.6 AVERAGE 3 321 17.1 34.6 69.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 147 7.8 15.9 85.1 POOR 5 138 7.3 14.9 100.0 . 755 40.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 196 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 927 Missing cases 951 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRP8B Q15,Overall Eval Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 69 3.7 6.2 6.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 314 16.7 28.3 34.6 AVERAGE 3 370 19.7 33.4 68.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4 177 9.4 16.0 83.9 POOR 5 178 9.5 16.1 100.0 . 726 38.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 44 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1108 Missing cases 770 EVALDP8B Q15,Overall Eval Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 61 3.2 5.5 5.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 225 12.0 20.3 25.7 AVERAGE 3 406 21.6 36.5 62.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 247 13.2 22.2 84.5 POOR 5 172 9.2 15.5 100.0 . 725 38.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 42 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1111 Missing cases 767 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH8B Q16a,opinion,Teacher's Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 145 7.7 12.2 12.2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 297 15.8 25.1 37.3 NEUTRAL 3 310 16.5 26.2 63.5 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 235 12.5 19.8 83.4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 197 10.5 16.6 100.0 . 694 37.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1184 Missing cases 694 BUSORG8B Q16b,opinion,Bus Org. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 129 6.9 10.9 10.9 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 454 24.2 38.5 49.4 NEUTRAL 3 415 22.1 35.2 84.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 143 7.6 12.1 96.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 38 2.0 3.2 100.0 . 699 37.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1179 Missing cases 699 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN8B Q16c,opinion,Women's Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 106 5.6 9.0 9.0 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 280 14.9 23.6 32.6 NEUTRAL 3 296 15.8 25.0 57.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 245 13.0 20.7 78.3 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 257 13.7 21.7 100.0 . 694 37.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1184 Missing cases 694 CIVILR8B Q16d,opinion,Civil Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 127 6.8 10.8 10.8 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 296 15.8 25.2 36.0 NEUTRAL 3 328 17.5 27.9 63.9 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 264 14.1 22.4 86.3 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 161 8.6 13.7 100.0 . 702 37.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1176 Missing cases 702 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR8B Q16e,opinion, Envi. Group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 289 15.4 24.7 24.7 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 392 20.9 33.5 58.2 NEUTRAL 3 328 17.5 28.0 86.2 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 122 6.5 10.4 96.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 40 2.1 3.4 100.0 . 707 37.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1171 Missing cases 707 NONPRT8B Q16f,opinion,Interest Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 261 13.9 22.3 22.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 397 21.1 33.9 56.2 NEUTRAL 3 357 19.0 30.5 86.7 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 107 5.7 9.1 95.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 49 2.6 4.2 100.0 . 707 37.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1171 Missing cases 707 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOR8B Q16g,opinion, Labor Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 113 6.0 9.5 9.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 279 14.9 23.5 33.1 NEUTRAL 3 274 14.6 23.1 56.2 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 333 17.7 28.1 84.2 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 187 10.0 15.8 100.0 . 692 36.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1186 Missing cases 692 FARM8B Q16h,opinion, Farm Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 116 6.2 10.1 10.1 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 381 20.3 33.1 43.2 NEUTRAL 3 463 24.7 40.3 83.5 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 149 7.9 13.0 96.4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 41 2.2 3.6 100.0 . 728 38.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1150 Missing cases 728 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG8B Q16i,opinion,Pol. Evangelical Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 76 4.0 6.5 6.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 148 7.9 12.6 19.0 NEUTRAL 3 199 10.6 16.9 36.0 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 269 14.3 22.9 58.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 484 25.8 41.2 100.0 . 702 37.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1176 Missing cases 702 ANTIAB8B Q16j,opinion, Anti-Abortion Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 206 11.0 17.3 17.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 167 8.9 14.0 31.3 NEUTRAL 3 172 9.2 14.5 45.8 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 228 12.1 19.2 65.0 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 417 22.2 35.0 100.0 . 688 36.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 688 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBID8B Q16k,opinion, Liberal Phil. Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 25 1.3 2.2 2.2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 125 6.7 10.8 13.0 NEUTRAL 3 322 17.1 27.9 40.9 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 267 14.2 23.1 64.0 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 416 22.2 36.0 100.0 . 723 38.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1155 Missing cases 723 CONID8B Q16l,opinion, Conserv. Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 71 3.8 6.2 6.2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 220 11.7 19.1 25.3 NEUTRAL 3 368 19.6 32.0 57.4 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 276 14.7 24.0 81.4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 214 11.4 18.6 100.0 . 729 38.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1149 Missing cases 729 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DP8B Q16m,opinion, Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 225 12.0 19.1 19.1 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 316 16.8 26.8 45.8 NEUTRAL 3 209 11.1 17.7 63.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 239 12.7 20.3 83.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 191 10.2 16.2 100.0 . 698 37.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1180 Missing cases 698 RP8B Q16n,opinion, Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 232 12.4 19.9 19.9 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 300 16.0 25.7 45.6 NEUTRAL 3 230 12.2 19.7 65.4 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 236 12.6 20.2 85.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 168 8.9 14.4 100.0 . 712 37.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1166 Missing cases 712 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWACT8B Q17,next four years Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE ALWAYS 1 272 14.5 22.5 22.5 ACTIVE ELECTIONS 2 120 6.4 9.9 32.5 ACTIVE ELECTIONS W/I 3 289 15.4 23.9 56.4 NOT ACTIVE 4 129 6.9 10.7 67.1 NOT SURE 5 398 21.2 32.9 100.0 . 670 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1208 Missing cases 670 EVLEXP8B Q18,evaluate nomination exper. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY POSITIVE 1 272 14.5 24.1 24.1 MORE POSITIVE THAN N 2 458 24.4 40.6 64.7 NEUTRAL 3 221 11.8 19.6 84.2 MORE NEGATIVE THAN P 4 145 7.7 12.8 97.1 VERY NEGATIVE 5 33 1.8 2.9 100.0 . 749 39.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1129 Missing cases 749 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE8B Q19, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 44 2.3 3.6 3.6 25-29 2 54 2.9 4.4 8.0 30-39 3 197 10.5 16.1 24.1 40-49 4 180 9.6 14.7 38.9 50-59 5 249 13.3 20.4 59.2 60-64 6 164 8.7 13.4 72.7 65 AND OLDER 7 334 17.8 27.3 100.0 . 656 34.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1222 Missing cases 656 SEX8B Q20, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 639 34.0 52.5 52.5 FEMALE 2 578 30.8 47.5 100.0 . 661 35.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1217 Missing cases 661 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MARR8B Q21, married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARRIED 1 946 50.4 77.8 77.8 DIVORCED 2 64 3.4 5.3 83.1 WIDOWED 3 95 5.1 7.8 90.9 NEVER MARRIED 4 111 5.9 9.1 100.0 . 662 35.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1216 Missing cases 662 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG8B Q22, born again Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 397 21.1 33.5 33.5 NO 2 789 42.0 66.5 100.0 . 692 36.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1186 Missing cases 692 JOBYOU8B Q23, job, you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 428 22.8 37.6 37.6 OWNER/PARTNER 2 177 9.4 15.6 53.2 UPPER-LEVEL MGMT 3 63 3.4 5.5 58.8 MIDDLE-LEVEL MGMT 4 130 6.9 11.4 70.2 SKILLED LABOR 5 150 8.0 13.2 83.4 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 45 2.4 4.0 87.3 OTHER 7 144 7.7 12.7 100.0 . 741 39.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1137 Missing cases 741 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBSP8B Q23, job, spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 266 14.2 29.1 29.1 OWNER/PARTNER 2 148 7.9 16.2 45.2 UPPER-LEVEL MGMT 3 64 3.4 7.0 52.2 MIDDLE-LEVEL MGMT 4 97 5.2 10.6 62.8 SKILLED LABOR 5 159 8.5 17.4 80.2 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 49 2.6 5.4 85.6 OTHER 7 132 7.0 14.4 100.0 . 963 51.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 915 Missing cases 963 M18B month 1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 351 18.7 28.4 28.4 1 883 47.0 71.6 100.0 . 644 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1234 Missing cases 644 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M28B month 2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .1 .1 1 418 22.3 34.1 34.2 2 763 40.6 62.2 96.4 3 40 2.1 3.3 99.7 4 2 .1 .2 99.8 8 1 .1 .1 99.9 9 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 652 34.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1226 Missing cases 652 D18B day 1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 507 27.0 41.4 41.4 1 259 13.8 21.2 62.6 2 321 17.1 26.2 88.8 3 137 7.3 11.2 100.0 . 654 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1224 Missing cases 654 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - D28B day 2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 146 7.8 12.0 12.0 1 145 7.7 11.9 23.8 2 106 5.6 8.7 32.5 3 118 6.3 9.7 42.2 4 89 4.7 7.3 49.5 5 115 6.1 9.4 58.9 6 125 6.7 10.2 69.1 7 89 4.7 7.3 76.4 8 150 8.0 12.3 88.7 9 138 7.3 11.3 100.0 . 657 35.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1221 Missing cases 657 RSPN88B response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 639 34.0 34.0 34.0 YES 1.00 1239 66.0 66.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1878 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 0