Codebook for the 1988 cross-section of Democratic and Republican State Party Convention Delegates in Iowa and Virginia. Study is a nomination election wave. PIs: Ronald B. Rapoport and Walter J. Stone LIVED8 Q1,How long have you lived in this state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 179 6.3 6.3 6.3 5-10 years 2 207 7.3 7.3 13.7 10-20 years 3 462 16.3 16.4 30.1 more than 20 years 4 1971 69.5 69.9 100.0 . 16 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2819 Missing cases 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACTIVE8 Q2,Time active in party pol in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 1106 39.0 39.4 39.4 5-10 years 2 511 18.0 18.2 57.6 10-20 years 3 619 21.8 22.1 79.7 more than 20 years 4 569 20.1 20.3 100.0 . 30 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2805 Missing cases 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTIC88 Q3,1988 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 186 6.6 6.6 6.6 checked 1 2649 93.4 93.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 PARTIC84 Q3,1984 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1153 40.7 40.7 40.7 checked 1 1682 59.3 59.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTIC80 Q3,1980 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1423 50.2 50.2 50.2 checked 1 1412 49.8 49.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTIC76 Q3,1976 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1821 64.2 64.2 64.2 checked 1 1014 35.8 35.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 PARTIC72 Q3,1972 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2114 74.6 74.6 74.6 checked 1 721 25.4 25.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTIC68 Q3,1968 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2308 81.4 81.4 81.4 checked 1 527 18.6 18.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTIC64 Q3,1964 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2453 86.5 86.5 86.5 checked 1 382 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 PARTIC60 Q3,1960 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2530 89.2 89.2 89.2 checked 1 305 10.8 10.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMB8 Q4,member, local pty comm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1127 39.8 39.8 39.8 checked 1 1708 60.2 60.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIR8 Q4,chair, local pty comm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2386 84.2 84.2 84.2 checked 1 449 15.8 15.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 LOCAL8 Q4,elected local office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2629 92.7 92.7 92.7 checked 1 206 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STNAT8 Q4,elected state/nat'l office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2799 98.7 98.7 98.7 checked 1 36 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPT8 Q4,appointed office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2593 91.5 91.5 91.5 checked 1 242 8.5 8.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 PAIDST8 Q4,paid staff Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2659 93.8 93.8 93.8 checked 1 176 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DELEGST8 Q4,state delegate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 314 11.1 11.1 11.1 checked 1 2521 88.9 88.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTE848 Q5,Pres. vote in 1984 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Reagan 1 1403 49.5 52.8 52.8 Mondale 2 1253 44.2 47.2 100.0 . 52 1.8 Missing Did not vote 3 127 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2656 Missing cases 179 NOM848 Q6,Cand. pref for 84 party nom, Dems Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Mondale 1 656 23.1 26.9 26.9 Hart 2 339 12.0 13.9 40.7 Jackson 3 188 6.6 7.7 48.4 Reagan 5 1260 44.4 51.6 100.0 . 117 4.1 Missing Other Dem 4 181 6.4 Missing Other Rep 6 94 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2443 Missing cases 392 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTYID8 Q7,Describe party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strong Democrat 1 1156 40.8 41.2 41.2 Democrat, not so str 2 157 5.5 5.6 46.8 Independent, closer 3 99 3.5 3.5 50.4 Independent 4 24 .8 .9 51.2 Independent, closer 5 88 3.1 3.1 54.4 Republican, not so s 6 158 5.6 5.6 60.0 Strong Republican 7 1121 39.5 40.0 100.0 . 24 .8 Missing other party 8 8 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2803 Missing cases 32 ALWAYS8 Q8, Characterize party involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent works for party year 1 1872 66.0 69.3 69.3 works for worthwhile 2 829 29.2 30.7 100.0 . 134 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2701 Missing cases 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBCON8 Q9,Describe political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 123 4.3 4.5 4.5 liberal 2 528 18.6 19.2 23.7 slightly liberal 3 336 11.9 12.2 35.9 middle of the road 4 341 12.0 12.4 48.3 slightly conservativ 5 323 11.4 11.8 60.1 conservative 6 774 27.3 28.2 88.3 extremely conservati 7 322 11.4 11.7 100.0 . 48 1.7 Missing not sure 8 40 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2747 Missing cases 88 CAMPR8 Q10,Pres campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 1044 36.8 38.6 38.6 fairly active 2 1159 40.9 42.8 81.4 not active 3 502 17.7 18.6 100.0 . 130 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2705 Missing cases 130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAMPSEN8 Q10,Sen. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 784 27.7 30.4 30.4 fairly active 2 1020 36.0 39.5 69.9 not active 3 776 27.4 30.1 100.0 . 255 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2580 Missing cases 255 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAMPHR8 Q10,Hse. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 969 34.2 37.2 37.2 fairly active 2 939 33.1 36.0 73.2 not active 3 698 24.6 26.8 100.0 . 229 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2606 Missing cases 229 CAMPGOV8 Q10,Gov. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 894 31.5 34.4 34.4 fairly active 2 914 32.2 35.1 69.5 not active 3 793 28.0 30.5 100.0 . 234 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2601 Missing cases 234 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAMPLOC8 Q10,Local campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 1120 39.5 42.1 42.1 fairly active 2 873 30.8 32.8 74.9 not active 3 667 23.5 25.1 100.0 . 175 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2660 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTENT8 Q11,Attn. to newspapers for 1988 Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent a great deal 1 1073 37.8 38.1 38.1 quite a bit 2 814 28.7 28.9 67.0 some 3 624 22.0 22.2 89.2 very little 4 250 8.8 8.9 98.1 none 5 54 1.9 1.9 100.0 . 20 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2815 Missing cases 20 PARTY8 Q12,Part. in local nom,help pol. party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1634 57.6 60.6 60.6 somewhat important 2 786 27.7 29.2 89.8 not very important 3 205 7.2 7.6 97.4 not at all important 4 71 2.5 2.6 100.0 . 139 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2696 Missing cases 139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GROUP8 Q12,part in local nom, rep groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 799 28.2 32.1 32.1 somewhat important 2 602 21.2 24.2 56.4 not very important 3 456 16.1 18.3 74.7 not at all important 4 629 22.2 25.3 100.0 . 349 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2486 Missing cases 349 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANDID8 Q12, part, in local nom, sppt cand. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1769 62.4 66.9 66.9 somewhat important 2 713 25.1 26.9 93.8 not very important 3 111 3.9 4.2 98.0 not at all important 4 53 1.9 2.0 100.0 . 189 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2646 Missing cases 189 ISSUES8 Q12,party in local nom, rep. issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 2044 72.1 75.8 75.8 somewhat important 2 515 18.2 19.1 94.9 not very important 3 106 3.7 3.9 98.8 not at all important 4 32 1.1 1.2 100.0 . 138 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2697 Missing cases 138 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIREAS8 Q13,best reason to part in nom process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent help party 1 814 28.7 29.3 29.3 represent group 2 136 4.8 4.9 34.2 support cand 3 726 25.6 26.1 60.3 issues 4 1102 38.9 39.7 100.0 . 57 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2778 Missing cases 57 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOV8 Q14,reason to sppt cand,winner Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1265 44.6 48.1 48.1 somewhat important 2 812 28.6 30.9 78.9 not very important 3 310 10.9 11.8 90.7 not at all important 4 244 8.6 9.3 100.0 . 204 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2631 Missing cases 204 PHIL8 Q14,reason to sppt cand,pol. phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 2012 71.0 75.0 75.0 somewhat important 2 612 21.6 22.8 97.8 not very important 3 48 1.7 1.8 99.6 not at all important 4 12 .4 .4 100.0 . 151 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2684 Missing cases 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISSTOME8 Q14,reason to sppt cand,issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1502 53.0 57.6 57.6 somewhat important 2 839 29.6 32.2 89.7 not very important 3 216 7.6 8.3 98.0 not at all important 4 52 1.8 2.0 100.0 . 226 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2609 Missing cases 226 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOM8 Q14,reason to sppt cand,win nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1013 35.7 39.6 39.6 somewhat important 2 877 30.9 34.2 73.8 not very important 3 413 14.6 16.1 89.9 not at all important 4 258 9.1 10.1 100.0 . 274 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2561 Missing cases 274 MISUPPT8 Q15,best reason to sppt cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent support win Nov 1 687 24.2 24.9 24.9 support pol phil 2 1334 47.1 48.3 73.1 support issues 3 592 20.9 21.4 94.6 support win Nom 4 150 5.3 5.4 100.0 . 72 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2763 Missing cases 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT8 Q16,opinion, abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 854 30.1 32.7 32.7 favor 2 220 7.8 8.4 41.2 slightly favor 3 122 4.3 4.7 45.8 slightly oppose 5 104 3.7 4.0 49.8 oppose 6 341 12.0 13.1 62.9 strongly oppose 7 968 34.1 37.1 100.0 . 81 2.9 Missing not sure 4 145 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2609 Missing cases 226 DEFENSE8 Q16,opinion, defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 502 17.7 19.4 19.4 favor 2 463 16.3 17.9 37.3 slightly favor 3 262 9.2 10.1 47.4 slightly oppose 5 243 8.6 9.4 56.8 oppose 6 429 15.1 16.6 73.3 strongly oppose 7 691 24.4 26.7 100.0 . 78 2.8 Missing not sure 4 167 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2590 Missing cases 245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT8 Q16,opinion, affirm. action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 408 14.4 16.8 16.8 favor 2 561 19.8 23.1 39.9 slightly favor 3 511 18.0 21.0 60.9 slightly oppose 5 345 12.2 14.2 75.1 oppose 6 349 12.3 14.4 89.4 strongly oppose 7 257 9.1 10.6 100.0 . 100 3.5 Missing not sure 4 304 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2431 Missing cases 404 BALBUDG8 Q16,opinion,balanced budget Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 951 33.5 38.3 38.3 favor 2 559 19.7 22.5 60.9 slightly favor 3 299 10.5 12.1 72.9 slightly oppose 5 136 4.8 5.5 78.4 oppose 6 216 7.6 8.7 87.1 strongly oppose 7 320 11.3 12.9 100.0 . 101 3.6 Missing not sure 4 253 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2481 Missing cases 354 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLUT8 Q16,opinion,regs on pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 850 30.0 33.3 33.3 favor 2 870 30.7 34.1 67.5 slightly favor 3 494 17.4 19.4 86.8 slightly oppose 5 143 5.0 5.6 92.4 oppose 6 120 4.2 4.7 97.1 strongly oppose 7 73 2.6 2.9 100.0 . 83 2.9 Missing not sure 4 202 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 285 CONTRAS8 Q16,opinion,Contra sppt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 596 21.0 24.5 24.5 favor 2 384 13.5 15.8 40.3 slightly favor 3 210 7.4 8.6 48.9 slightly oppose 5 139 4.9 5.7 54.6 oppose 6 298 10.5 12.2 66.9 strongly oppose 7 806 28.4 33.1 100.0 . 100 3.5 Missing not sure 4 302 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2433 Missing cases 402 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARMERS8 Q16,opinion, Farm aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 351 12.4 15.6 15.6 favor 2 555 19.6 24.6 40.1 slightly favor 3 514 18.1 22.8 62.9 slightly oppose 5 359 12.7 15.9 78.8 oppose 6 286 10.1 12.7 91.5 strongly oppose 7 192 6.8 8.5 100.0 . 111 3.9 Missing not sure 4 467 16.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2257 Missing cases 578 TARIFF8 Q16,opinion,tariffs on for. comp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 444 15.7 18.6 18.6 favor 2 468 16.5 19.6 38.1 slightly favor 3 395 13.9 16.5 54.6 slightly oppose 5 293 10.3 12.2 66.9 oppose 6 420 14.8 17.6 84.4 strongly oppose 7 373 13.2 15.6 100.0 . 93 3.3 Missing not sure 4 349 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2393 Missing cases 442 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SDI8 Q16,opinion, Strategic Def. Init. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 516 18.2 20.9 20.9 favor 2 391 13.8 15.8 36.8 slightly favor 3 297 10.5 12.0 48.8 slightly oppose 5 183 6.5 7.4 56.2 oppose 6 303 10.7 12.3 68.5 strongly oppose 7 778 27.4 31.5 100.0 . 91 3.2 Missing not sure 4 276 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2468 Missing cases 367 PRAYER8 Q16,opinion, prayer in school Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 842 29.7 32.8 32.8 favor 2 366 12.9 14.2 47.0 slightly favor 3 256 9.0 10.0 57.0 slightly oppose 5 117 4.1 4.6 61.5 oppose 6 253 8.9 9.8 71.4 strongly oppose 7 736 26.0 28.6 100.0 . 67 2.4 Missing not sure 4 198 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2570 Missing cases 265 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS8 Q17,most impt. issue. this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent abortion 1 564 19.9 21.4 21.4 defense spending cut 2 379 13.4 14.4 35.8 affirmative action 3 149 5.3 5.7 41.5 balanced budget 4 543 19.2 20.6 62.1 regulate pollution 5 248 8.7 9.4 71.5 support Contras 6 150 5.3 5.7 77.2 farmers aid 7 103 3.6 3.9 81.1 tariffs 8 184 6.5 7.0 88.1 SDI 9 158 5.6 6.0 94.1 school prayer 10 155 5.5 5.9 100.0 . 202 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2633 Missing cases 202 LCBB8 Q18,pol philosophy of Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 233 8.2 12.6 12.6 liberal 2 751 26.5 40.6 53.2 slightly liberal 3 380 13.4 20.5 73.7 middle of the road 4 284 10.0 15.3 89.0 slightly conservativ 5 121 4.3 6.5 95.6 conservative 6 64 2.3 3.5 99.0 extremely conservati 7 18 .6 1.0 100.0 . 424 15.0 Missing not sure 8 560 19.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1851 Missing cases 984 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCGB8 Q18,pol philosophy of Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 26 .9 1.1 1.1 liberal 2 44 1.6 1.8 2.9 slightly liberal 3 50 1.8 2.0 4.9 middle of the road 4 187 6.6 7.6 12.5 slightly conservativ 5 447 15.8 18.2 30.8 conservative 6 1210 42.7 49.4 80.1 extremely conservati 7 487 17.2 19.9 100.0 . 282 9.9 Missing not sure 8 102 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2451 Missing cases 384 LCMC8 Q18,pol philosophy of Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 431 15.2 21.0 21.0 liberal 2 972 34.3 47.4 68.4 slightly liberal 3 378 13.3 18.4 86.8 middle of the road 4 180 6.3 8.8 95.6 slightly conservativ 5 48 1.7 2.3 98.0 conservative 6 30 1.1 1.5 99.4 extremely conservati 7 12 .4 .6 100.0 . 404 14.3 Missing not sure 8 380 13.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2051 Missing cases 784 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD8 Q18,pol philosophy of Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 18 .6 .8 .8 liberal 2 44 1.6 1.8 2.6 slightly liberal 3 62 2.2 2.6 5.2 middle of the road 4 237 8.4 9.9 15.1 slightly conservativ 5 426 15.0 17.8 32.8 conservative 6 1263 44.6 52.7 85.6 extremely conservati 7 346 12.2 14.4 100.0 . 337 11.9 Missing not sure 8 102 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2396 Missing cases 439 LCMD8 Q18,pol philosophy of Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 752 26.5 30.4 30.4 liberal 2 886 31.3 35.8 66.2 slightly liberal 3 452 15.9 18.3 84.5 middle of the road 4 253 8.9 10.2 94.7 slightly conservativ 5 82 2.9 3.3 98.1 conservative 6 38 1.3 1.5 99.6 extremely conservati 7 10 .4 .4 100.0 . 306 10.8 Missing not sure 8 56 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2473 Missing cases 362 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPD8 Q18,pol philosophy of DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 38 1.3 1.9 1.9 liberal 2 69 2.4 3.5 5.4 slightly liberal 3 89 3.1 4.5 9.9 middle of the road 4 180 6.3 9.1 19.0 slightly conservativ 5 232 8.2 11.7 30.7 conservative 6 632 22.3 31.9 62.6 extremely conservati 7 741 26.1 37.4 100.0 . 420 14.8 Missing not sure 8 434 15.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1981 Missing cases 854 LCRG8 Q18,pol philosophy of Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 292 10.3 13.4 13.4 liberal 2 688 24.3 31.6 45.0 slightly liberal 3 520 18.3 23.9 68.9 middle of the road 4 407 14.4 18.7 87.6 slightly conservativ 5 156 5.5 7.2 94.8 conservative 6 87 3.1 4.0 98.8 extremely conservati 7 27 1.0 1.2 100.0 . 392 13.8 Missing not sure 8 266 9.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2177 Missing cases 658 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAG8 Q18,pol philosophy of Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 168 5.9 8.0 8.0 liberal 2 510 18.0 24.2 32.2 slightly liberal 3 487 17.2 23.1 55.3 middle of the road 4 452 15.9 21.4 76.7 slightly conservativ 5 276 9.7 13.1 89.8 conservative 6 169 6.0 8.0 97.8 extremely conservati 7 46 1.6 2.2 100.0 . 416 14.7 Missing not sure 8 311 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2108 Missing cases 727 LCAH8 Q18,pol philosophy of Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 47 1.7 2.2 2.2 liberal 2 63 2.2 3.0 5.2 slightly liberal 3 38 1.3 1.8 7.0 middle of the road 4 120 4.2 5.7 12.7 slightly conservativ 5 209 7.4 9.9 22.6 conservative 6 612 21.6 29.0 51.6 extremely conservati 7 1020 36.0 48.4 100.0 . 409 14.4 Missing not sure 8 317 11.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2109 Missing cases 726 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCGH8 Q18,pol philosophy of Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 1009 35.6 44.5 44.5 liberal 2 788 27.8 34.8 79.3 slightly liberal 3 273 9.6 12.0 91.4 middle of the road 4 143 5.0 6.3 97.7 slightly conservativ 5 25 .9 1.1 98.8 conservative 6 20 .7 .9 99.6 extremely conservati 7 8 .3 .4 100.0 . 400 14.1 Missing not sure 8 169 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2266 Missing cases 569 LCJJ8 Q18,pol philosophy of Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 1689 59.6 68.8 68.8 liberal 2 572 20.2 23.3 92.1 slightly liberal 3 91 3.2 3.7 95.8 middle of the road 4 57 2.0 2.3 98.1 slightly conservativ 5 16 .6 .7 98.7 conservative 6 16 .6 .7 99.4 extremely conservati 7 15 .5 .6 100.0 . 318 11.2 Missing not sure 8 61 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2456 Missing cases 379 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJK8 Q18,pol philosophy of Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 12 .4 .6 .6 liberal 2 23 .8 1.1 1.6 slightly liberal 3 39 1.4 1.8 3.5 middle of the road 4 92 3.2 4.3 7.8 slightly conservativ 5 129 4.6 6.1 13.9 conservative 6 674 23.8 31.7 45.6 extremely conservati 7 1155 40.7 54.4 100.0 . 406 14.3 Missing not sure 8 305 10.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2124 Missing cases 711 LCRR8 Q18,pol philosophy of Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 34 1.2 1.4 1.4 liberal 2 14 .5 .6 2.0 slightly liberal 3 10 .4 .4 2.4 middle of the road 4 60 2.1 2.5 4.9 slightly conservativ 5 105 3.7 4.4 9.3 conservative 6 1056 37.2 44.2 53.6 extremely conservati 7 1109 39.1 46.4 100.0 . 313 11.0 Missing not sure 8 134 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2388 Missing cases 447 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPR8 Q18,pol philosophy of Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 36 1.3 1.6 1.6 liberal 2 29 1.0 1.3 2.9 slightly liberal 3 12 .4 .5 3.4 middle of the road 4 39 1.4 1.7 5.1 slightly conservativ 5 71 2.5 3.1 8.2 conservative 6 377 13.3 16.6 24.9 extremely conservati 7 1704 60.1 75.1 100.0 . 345 12.2 Missing not sure 8 222 7.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2268 Missing cases 567 LCPS8 Q18,pol philosophy of Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 588 20.7 27.3 27.3 liberal 2 861 30.4 40.0 67.3 slightly liberal 3 299 10.5 13.9 81.2 middle of the road 4 193 6.8 9.0 90.1 slightly conservativ 5 87 3.1 4.0 94.2 conservative 6 88 3.1 4.1 98.2 extremely conservati 7 38 1.3 1.8 100.0 . 427 15.1 Missing not sure 8 254 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2154 Missing cases 681 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAV8 Q18,pol philosophy of Am. Voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 12 .4 .5 .5 liberal 2 67 2.4 2.8 3.2 slightly liberal 3 333 11.7 13.7 16.9 middle of the road 4 987 34.8 40.6 57.5 slightly conservativ 5 773 27.3 31.8 89.3 conservative 6 245 8.6 10.1 99.4 extremely conservati 7 14 .5 .6 100.0 . 314 11.1 Missing not sure 8 90 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2431 Missing cases 404 LCRP8 Q18,pol philosophy of Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 27 1.0 1.1 1.1 liberal 2 25 .9 1.0 2.1 slightly liberal 3 19 .7 .8 2.9 middle of the road 4 83 2.9 3.3 6.2 slightly conservativ 5 403 14.2 16.2 22.4 conservative 6 1434 50.6 57.8 80.2 extremely conservati 7 491 17.3 19.8 100.0 . 303 10.7 Missing not sure 8 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2482 Missing cases 353 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP8 Q18,pol philosophy of Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely liberal 1 529 18.7 21.1 21.1 liberal 2 1038 36.6 41.4 62.6 slightly liberal 3 614 21.7 24.5 87.1 middle of the road 4 233 8.2 9.3 96.4 slightly conservativ 5 49 1.7 2.0 98.3 conservative 6 34 1.2 1.4 99.7 extremely conservati 7 8 .3 .3 100.0 . 296 10.4 Missing not sure 8 34 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2505 Missing cases 330 ACHGB8 Q19,Rate ach. in govt, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 404 14.3 15.4 15.4 above average 2 678 23.9 25.9 41.4 average 3 536 18.9 20.5 61.9 below average 4 310 10.9 11.9 73.7 poor 5 687 24.2 26.3 100.0 . 161 5.7 Missing 8 59 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2615 Missing cases 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHRD8 Q19,Rate ach. in govt, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 517 18.2 20.2 20.2 above average 2 1114 39.3 43.5 63.7 average 3 614 21.7 24.0 87.7 below average 4 173 6.1 6.8 94.5 poor 5 141 5.0 5.5 100.0 . 197 6.9 Missing not sure 6 79 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2559 Missing cases 276 ACHMD8 Q19,Rate ach. in govt,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 332 11.7 13.2 13.2 above average 2 790 27.9 31.4 44.5 average 3 670 23.6 26.6 71.1 below average 4 319 11.3 12.7 83.8 poor 5 408 14.4 16.2 100.0 . 179 6.3 Missing not sure 6 137 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2519 Missing cases 316 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHAG8 Q19,Rate ach. in govt, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 48 1.7 2.2 2.2 above average 2 400 14.1 18.2 20.4 average 3 1013 35.7 46.2 66.7 below average 4 445 15.7 20.3 87.0 poor 5 286 10.1 13.0 100.0 . 245 8.6 Missing not sure 6 398 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2192 Missing cases 643 ACHJJ8 Q19,Rate ach. in govt, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 158 5.6 6.9 6.9 above average 2 283 10.0 12.4 19.3 average 3 283 10.0 12.4 31.7 below average 4 393 13.9 17.2 48.9 poor 5 1167 41.2 51.1 100.0 . 217 7.7 Missing not sure 6 334 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2284 Missing cases 551 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPR8 Q19,Rate ach. in govt,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 175 6.2 8.0 8.0 above average 2 146 5.1 6.7 14.7 average 3 203 7.2 9.3 24.0 below average 4 307 10.8 14.1 38.0 poor 5 1353 47.7 62.0 100.0 . 236 8.3 Missing not sure 6 415 14.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2184 Missing cases 651 TVGB8 Q19,Rate perf. on TV, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 106 3.7 4.0 4.0 above average 2 424 15.0 16.2 20.2 average 3 908 32.0 34.7 54.9 below average 4 506 17.8 19.3 74.3 poor 5 674 23.8 25.7 100.0 . 190 6.7 Missing not sure 6 27 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2618 Missing cases 217 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVRD8 Q19,Rate perf. on TV, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 169 6.0 6.6 6.6 above average 2 805 28.4 31.6 38.2 average 3 963 34.0 37.8 76.0 below average 4 395 13.9 15.5 91.5 poor 5 217 7.7 8.5 100.0 . 228 8.0 Missing not sure 6 58 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2549 Missing cases 286 TVMD8 Q19,Rate perf. on TV, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 221 7.8 8.7 8.7 above average 2 886 31.3 34.8 43.5 average 3 1022 36.0 40.1 83.6 below average 4 261 9.2 10.2 93.8 poor 5 157 5.5 6.2 100.0 . 220 7.8 Missing not sure 6 68 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2547 Missing cases 288 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVAG8 Q19,Rate perf. on TV, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 71 2.5 3.0 3.0 above average 2 542 19.1 23.1 26.2 average 3 1062 37.5 45.3 71.5 below average 4 443 15.6 18.9 90.4 poor 5 224 7.9 9.6 100.0 . 275 9.7 Missing not sure 6 218 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2342 Missing cases 493 TVJJ8 Q19,Rate perf. on TV, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 874 30.8 33.7 33.7 above average 2 986 34.8 38.0 71.7 average 3 335 11.8 12.9 84.6 below average 4 135 4.8 5.2 89.8 poor 5 264 9.3 10.2 100.0 . 205 7.2 Missing not sure 6 36 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2594 Missing cases 241 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVPR8 Q19,Rate perf. on TV, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 480 16.9 19.0 19.0 above average 2 695 24.5 27.5 46.5 average 3 521 18.4 20.6 67.1 below average 4 311 11.0 12.3 79.4 poor 5 520 18.3 20.6 100.0 . 226 8.0 Missing not sure 6 82 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2527 Missing cases 308 MORALGB8 Q19,Rate moral Char., Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 577 20.4 22.9 22.9 above average 2 589 20.8 23.3 46.2 average 3 700 24.7 27.7 73.9 below average 4 242 8.5 9.6 83.5 poor 5 416 14.7 16.5 100.0 . 182 6.4 Missing not sure 6 129 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2524 Missing cases 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORALRD8 Q19,Rate moral Char., Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 496 17.5 20.0 20.0 above average 2 858 30.3 34.5 54.5 average 3 861 30.4 34.6 89.1 below average 4 149 5.3 6.0 95.1 poor 5 122 4.3 4.9 100.0 . 212 7.5 Missing not sure 6 137 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2486 Missing cases 349 MORALMD8 Q19,Rate moral Char., Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 471 16.6 20.2 20.2 above average 2 751 26.5 32.3 52.5 average 3 695 24.5 29.9 82.4 below average 4 200 7.1 8.6 91.0 poor 5 210 7.4 9.0 100.0 . 212 7.5 Missing not sure 6 296 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2327 Missing cases 508 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORALAG8 Q19,Rate moral Char., Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 186 6.6 9.0 9.0 above average 2 621 21.9 30.0 38.9 average 3 914 32.2 44.1 83.0 below average 4 221 7.8 10.7 93.7 poor 5 131 4.6 6.3 100.0 . 266 9.4 Missing not sure 6 496 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2073 Missing cases 762 MORALJJ8 Q19,Rate moral Char., Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 336 11.9 14.1 14.1 above average 2 619 21.8 25.9 40.0 average 3 632 22.3 26.4 66.4 below average 4 339 12.0 14.2 80.6 poor 5 464 16.4 19.4 100.0 . 210 7.4 Missing not sure 6 235 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2390 Missing cases 445 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORALPR8 Q19,Rate moral Char., Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 636 22.4 26.3 26.3 above average 2 474 16.7 19.6 45.9 average 3 550 19.4 22.7 68.6 below average 4 269 9.5 11.1 79.7 poor 5 491 17.3 20.3 100.0 . 213 7.5 Missing not sure 6 202 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2420 Missing cases 415 FPOLGB8 Q19,Rate For. Policy, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 938 33.1 36.0 36.0 above average 2 831 29.3 31.9 67.9 average 3 489 17.2 18.8 86.6 below average 4 143 5.0 5.5 92.1 poor 5 206 7.3 7.9 100.0 . 165 5.8 Missing not sure 6 63 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2607 Missing cases 228 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLRD8 Q19,Rate For. Policy, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 618 21.8 24.3 24.3 above average 2 1129 39.8 44.4 68.7 average 3 585 20.6 23.0 91.7 below average 4 126 4.4 5.0 96.7 poor 5 85 3.0 3.3 100.0 . 194 6.8 Missing not sure 6 98 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2543 Missing cases 292 FPOLMD8 Q19,Rate For. Policy, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 71 2.5 2.9 2.9 above average 2 423 14.9 17.2 20.0 average 3 887 31.3 36.0 56.0 below average 4 475 16.8 19.3 75.3 poor 5 608 21.4 24.7 100.0 . 186 6.6 Missing not sure 6 185 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2464 Missing cases 371 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLAG8 Q19,Rate For. Policy, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 94 3.3 4.3 4.3 above average 2 472 16.6 21.4 25.6 average 3 883 31.1 40.0 65.6 below average 4 454 16.0 20.5 86.1 poor 5 307 10.8 13.9 100.0 . 245 8.6 Missing not sure 6 380 13.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2210 Missing cases 625 FPOLJJ8 Q19,Rate For. Policy, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 168 5.9 6.8 6.8 above average 2 452 15.9 18.2 25.0 average 3 556 19.6 22.4 47.4 below average 4 453 16.0 18.2 65.6 poor 5 854 30.1 34.4 100.0 . 196 6.9 Missing not sure 6 156 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2483 Missing cases 352 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLPR8 Q19,Rate For. Policy, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 279 9.8 11.5 11.5 above average 2 252 8.9 10.4 21.9 average 3 281 9.9 11.6 33.5 below average 4 475 16.8 19.6 53.0 poor 5 1140 40.2 47.0 100.0 . 210 7.4 Missing not sure 6 198 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2427 Missing cases 408 EVALBB8 Q19,Overall Eval., Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 107 3.8 5.2 5.2 above average 2 463 16.3 22.6 27.8 average 3 661 23.3 32.3 60.1 below average 4 368 13.0 18.0 78.1 poor 5 449 15.8 21.9 100.0 . 369 13.0 Missing not sure 6 418 14.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2048 Missing cases 787 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGB8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 462 16.3 18.4 18.4 above average 2 636 22.4 25.4 43.8 average 3 504 17.8 20.1 63.9 below average 4 333 11.7 13.3 77.2 poor 5 573 20.2 22.8 100.0 . 302 10.7 Missing not sure 6 25 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2508 Missing cases 327 EVALMC8 Q19,Overall Eval., Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 213 7.5 10.1 10.1 above average 2 653 23.0 30.9 40.9 average 3 628 22.2 29.7 70.6 below average 4 273 9.6 12.9 83.5 poor 5 349 12.3 16.5 100.0 . 377 13.3 Missing not sure 6 342 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2116 Missing cases 719 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRD8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 415 14.6 17.0 17.0 above average 2 934 32.9 38.2 55.2 average 3 695 24.5 28.4 83.7 below average 4 231 8.1 9.5 93.1 poor 5 168 5.9 6.9 100.0 . 348 12.3 Missing not sure 6 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2443 Missing cases 392 EVALMD8 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 387 13.7 15.8 15.8 above average 2 727 25.6 29.7 45.6 average 3 537 18.9 22.0 67.6 below average 4 330 11.6 13.5 81.1 poor 5 463 16.3 18.9 100.0 . 324 11.4 Missing not sure 6 67 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2444 Missing cases 391 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPD8 Q19,Overall Eval.,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 108 3.8 5.1 5.1 above average 2 405 14.3 19.2 24.4 average 3 682 24.1 32.4 56.7 below average 4 433 15.3 20.6 77.3 poor 5 478 16.9 22.7 100.0 . 413 14.6 Missing not sure 6 316 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2106 Missing cases 729 EVALRG8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 98 3.5 4.4 4.4 above average 2 301 10.6 13.6 18.0 average 3 887 31.3 40.1 58.1 below average 4 517 18.2 23.4 81.5 poor 5 409 14.4 18.5 100.0 . 405 14.3 Missing not sure 6 218 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2212 Missing cases 623 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAG8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 61 2.2 2.8 2.8 above average 2 332 11.7 15.4 18.2 average 3 891 31.4 41.3 59.6 below average 4 535 18.9 24.8 84.4 poor 5 337 11.9 15.6 100.0 . 434 15.3 Missing not sure 6 245 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2156 Missing cases 679 EVALAH8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 36 1.3 1.6 1.6 above average 2 205 7.2 9.1 10.7 average 3 558 19.7 24.7 35.4 below average 4 573 20.2 25.4 60.8 poor 5 885 31.2 39.2 100.0 . 401 14.1 Missing not sure 6 177 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2257 Missing cases 578 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGH8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 36 1.3 1.5 1.5 above average 2 149 5.3 6.4 8.0 average 3 308 10.9 13.2 21.2 below average 4 375 13.2 16.1 37.3 poor 5 1457 51.4 62.7 100.0 . 399 14.1 Missing not sure 6 111 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2325 Missing cases 510 EVALJJ8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 255 9.0 10.6 10.6 above average 2 487 17.2 20.2 30.8 average 3 442 15.6 18.3 49.1 below average 4 375 13.2 15.5 64.6 poor 5 854 30.1 35.4 100.0 . 362 12.8 Missing not sure 6 60 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2413 Missing cases 422 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJK8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 216 7.6 9.8 9.8 above average 2 486 17.1 22.0 31.8 average 3 599 21.1 27.1 58.8 below average 4 408 14.4 18.5 77.3 poor 5 502 17.7 22.7 100.0 . 436 15.4 Missing not sure 6 188 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2211 Missing cases 624 EVALRR8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 661 23.3 27.2 27.2 above average 2 498 17.6 20.5 47.7 average 3 225 7.9 9.3 57.0 below average 4 204 7.2 8.4 65.3 poor 5 842 29.7 34.7 100.0 . 368 13.0 Missing not sure 6 37 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2430 Missing cases 405 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPR8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 354 12.5 15.0 15.0 above average 2 249 8.8 10.6 25.6 average 3 316 11.1 13.4 39.0 below average 4 336 11.9 14.2 53.2 poor 5 1104 38.9 46.8 100.0 . 377 13.3 Missing not sure 6 99 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2359 Missing cases 476 EVALPS8 Q19,Overall Eval.,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 163 5.7 7.3 7.3 above average 2 487 17.2 21.9 29.3 average 3 663 23.4 29.9 59.1 below average 4 405 14.3 18.2 77.4 poor 5 503 17.7 22.6 100.0 . 416 14.7 Missing not sure 6 198 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2221 Missing cases 614 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MITRAIT8 Q20, Most impt. quality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent achievmt record 1 1239 43.7 47.6 47.6 performance on TV 2 16 .6 .6 48.2 moral character 3 1115 39.3 42.8 91.0 know foreign policy 4 233 8.2 9.0 100.0 . 232 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2603 Missing cases 232 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METBB8 Q21, met personally,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2545 89.8 89.8 89.8 checked 1 290 10.2 10.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 RALLYBB8 Q21,attended rally,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2522 89.0 89.0 89.0 checked 1 313 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTBB8 Q28,contribute,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2551 90.0 90.0 90.0 checked 1 284 10.0 10.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILBB8 Q21,received mail,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2198 77.5 77.5 77.5 checked 1 637 22.5 22.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ADBB8 Q21,saw ad,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1088 38.4 38.4 38.4 checked 1 1747 61.6 61.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METGB8 Q21, met personally,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2450 86.4 86.4 86.4 checked 1 385 13.6 13.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYGB8 Q21,attended rally,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2299 81.1 81.1 81.1 checked 1 536 18.9 18.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONTGB8 Q21,contacted,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2368 83.5 83.5 83.5 checked 1 467 16.5 16.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILGB8 Q21,received mail,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2001 70.6 70.6 70.6 checked 1 834 29.4 29.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADGB8 Q21,saw ad,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1199 42.3 42.3 42.3 checked 1 1636 57.7 57.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 METRD8 Q21, met personally,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2346 82.8 82.8 82.8 checked 1 489 17.2 17.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYRD8 Q21,attended rally,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2332 82.3 82.3 82.3 checked 1 503 17.7 17.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRD8 Q21,contacted,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2388 84.2 84.2 84.2 checked 1 447 15.8 15.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MAILRD8 Q21,received mail,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2147 75.7 75.7 75.7 checked 1 688 24.3 24.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADRD8 Q21,saw ad,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1203 42.4 42.4 42.4 checked 1 1632 57.6 57.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METMD8 Q21, met personally,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2414 85.1 85.1 85.1 checked 1 421 14.9 14.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 RALLYMD8 Q21,attended rally,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2389 84.3 84.3 84.3 checked 1 446 15.7 15.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTMD8 Q21,contacted,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2275 80.2 80.2 80.2 checked 1 560 19.8 19.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILMD8 Q21,received mail,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2112 74.5 74.5 74.5 checked 1 723 25.5 25.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ADMD8 Q21,saw ad,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1100 38.8 38.8 38.8 checked 1 1735 61.2 61.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPD8 Q21, met personally,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2605 91.9 91.9 91.9 checked 1 230 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYPD8 Q21,attended rally,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2586 91.2 91.2 91.2 checked 1 249 8.8 8.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONTPD8 Q21,contacted,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2561 90.3 90.3 90.3 checked 1 274 9.7 9.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPD8 Q21,received mail,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2351 82.9 82.9 82.9 checked 1 484 17.1 17.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPD8 Q21,saw ad,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1139 40.2 40.2 40.2 checked 1 1696 59.8 59.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 METRG8 Q21, met personally,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2473 87.2 87.2 87.2 checked 1 362 12.8 12.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYRG8 Q21,attended rally,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2487 87.7 87.7 87.7 checked 1 348 12.3 12.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRG8 Q21,contacted,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2500 88.2 88.2 88.2 checked 1 335 11.8 11.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MAILRG8 Q21,received mail,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2286 80.6 80.6 80.6 checked 1 549 19.4 19.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADRG8 Q21,saw ad,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1114 39.3 39.3 39.3 checked 1 1721 60.7 60.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METAG8 Q21, met personally,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2637 93.0 93.0 93.0 checked 1 198 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 RALLYAG8 Q21,attended rally,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2598 91.6 91.6 91.6 checked 1 237 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTAG8 Q21,contacted,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2602 91.8 91.8 91.8 checked 1 233 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILAG8 Q21,received mail,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2433 85.8 85.8 85.8 checked 1 402 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ADAG8 Q21,saw ad,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1119 39.5 39.5 39.5 checked 1 1716 60.5 60.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METAH8 Q21, met personally,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2708 95.5 95.5 95.5 checked 1 127 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYAH8 Q21,attended rally,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2663 93.9 93.9 93.9 checked 1 172 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONTAH8 Q21,contacted,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2740 96.6 96.6 96.6 checked 1 95 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILAH8 Q21,received mail,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2526 89.1 89.1 89.1 checked 1 309 10.9 10.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAH8 Q21,saw ad,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1128 39.8 39.8 39.8 checked 1 1707 60.2 60.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 METGH8 Q21, met personally,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2620 92.4 92.4 92.4 checked 1 215 7.6 7.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYGH8 Q21,attended rally,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2600 91.7 91.7 91.7 checked 1 235 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGH8 Q21,contacted,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2628 92.7 92.7 92.7 checked 1 207 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MAILGH8 Q21,received mail,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2441 86.1 86.1 86.1 checked 1 394 13.9 13.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADGH8 Q21,saw ad,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1080 38.1 38.1 38.1 checked 1 1755 61.9 61.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJJ8 Q21, met personally,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2524 89.0 89.0 89.0 checked 1 311 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 RALLYJJ8 Q21,attended rally,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2425 85.5 85.5 85.5 checked 1 410 14.5 14.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTJJ8 Q21,contacted,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2472 87.2 87.2 87.2 checked 1 363 12.8 12.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJJ8 Q21,received mail,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2307 81.4 81.4 81.4 checked 1 528 18.6 18.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ADJJ8 Q21,saw ad,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1100 38.8 38.8 38.8 checked 1 1735 61.2 61.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJK8 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2533 89.3 89.3 89.3 checked 1 302 10.7 10.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYJK8 Q21,contacted,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2513 88.6 88.6 88.6 checked 1 322 11.4 11.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONTJK8 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2550 89.9 89.9 89.9 checked 1 285 10.1 10.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJK8 Q21,received mail,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2297 81.0 81.0 81.0 checked 1 538 19.0 19.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADJK8 Q21,saw ad,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1222 43.1 43.1 43.1 checked 1 1613 56.9 56.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 METPR8 Q21, met personally,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2458 86.7 86.7 86.7 checked 1 377 13.3 13.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALLYPR8 Q21,attended rally,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2329 82.2 82.2 82.2 checked 1 506 17.8 17.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPR8 Q21,contacted,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2370 83.6 83.6 83.6 checked 1 465 16.4 16.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MAILPR8 Q21,received mail,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2168 76.5 76.5 76.5 checked 1 667 23.5 23.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPR8 Q21,saw ad,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1180 41.6 41.6 41.6 checked 1 1655 58.4 58.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPS8 Q21, met personally,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2484 87.6 87.6 87.6 checked 1 351 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 RALLYPS8 Q21,attended rally,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2499 88.1 88.1 88.1 checked 1 336 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPS8 Q21,contacted,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2460 86.8 86.8 86.8 checked 1 375 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPS8 Q21,received mail,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2296 81.0 81.0 81.0 checked 1 539 19.0 19.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ADPS8 Q21,saw ad,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1105 39.0 39.0 39.0 checked 1 1730 61.0 61.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKBB8 Q22,Rank Dem Pref.,Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 84 3.0 5.9 5.9 second choice 2 205 7.2 14.3 20.2 third choice 3 219 7.7 15.3 35.5 fourth choice 4 276 9.7 19.3 54.9 fifth choice 5 249 8.8 17.4 72.3 sixth choice 6 200 7.1 14.0 86.3 seventh choice 7 196 6.9 13.7 100.0 . 1406 49.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1429 Missing cases 1406 RANKMD8 Q22,Rank Dem Pref.,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 614 21.7 39.5 39.5 second choice 2 472 16.6 30.3 69.8 third choice 3 191 6.7 12.3 82.1 fourth choice 4 117 4.1 7.5 89.6 fifth choice 5 62 2.2 4.0 93.6 sixth choice 6 43 1.5 2.8 96.3 seventh choice 7 57 2.0 3.7 100.0 . 1279 45.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1556 Missing cases 1279 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKRG8 Q22,Rank Dem Pref.,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 184 6.5 12.9 12.9 second choice 2 185 6.5 12.9 25.8 third choice 3 235 8.3 16.4 42.3 fourth choice 4 235 8.3 16.4 58.7 fifth choice 5 264 9.3 18.5 77.2 sixth choice 6 203 7.2 14.2 91.4 seventh choice 7 123 4.3 8.6 100.0 . 1406 49.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1429 Missing cases 1406 RANKAG8 Q22,Rank Dem Pref.,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 177 6.2 12.4 12.4 second choice 2 167 5.9 11.7 24.1 third choice 3 202 7.1 14.2 38.3 fourth choice 4 188 6.6 13.2 51.5 fifth choice 5 230 8.1 16.1 67.6 sixth choice 6 262 9.2 18.4 86.0 seventh choice 7 199 7.0 14.0 100.0 . 1410 49.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1425 Missing cases 1410 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKGH8 Q22,Rank Dem Pref.,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 32 1.1 2.3 2.3 second choice 2 61 2.2 4.4 6.6 third choice 3 77 2.7 5.5 12.1 fourth choice 4 112 4.0 8.0 20.1 fifth choice 5 156 5.5 11.1 31.2 sixth choice 6 273 9.6 19.5 50.7 seventh choice 7 691 24.4 49.3 100.0 . 1433 50.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1402 Missing cases 1433 RANKJJ8 Q22,Rank Dem Pref.,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 267 9.4 17.8 17.8 second choice 2 156 5.5 10.4 28.1 third choice 3 189 6.7 12.6 40.7 fourth choice 4 183 6.5 12.2 52.9 fifth choice 5 174 6.1 11.6 64.4 sixth choice 6 230 8.1 15.3 79.7 seventh choice 7 305 10.8 20.3 100.0 . 1331 46.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1504 Missing cases 1331 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKPS8 Q22,Rank Dem Pref.,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 209 7.4 14.6 14.6 second choice 2 246 8.7 17.2 31.7 third choice 3 292 10.3 20.4 52.1 fourth choice 4 240 8.5 16.7 68.8 fifth choice 5 202 7.1 14.1 82.9 sixth choice 6 135 4.8 9.4 92.3 seventh choice 7 110 3.9 7.7 100.0 . 1401 49.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1434 Missing cases 1401 RANKGB8 Q22,Rank Rep Pref.,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 518 18.3 26.3 26.3 second choice 2 543 19.2 27.6 53.9 third choice 3 321 11.3 16.3 70.2 fourth choice 4 235 8.3 11.9 82.1 fifth choice 5 159 5.6 8.1 90.2 sixth choice 6 194 6.8 9.8 100.0 . 865 30.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1970 Missing cases 865 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKRD8 Q22,Rank Rep Pref.,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 692 24.4 35.7 35.7 second choice 2 527 18.6 27.2 63.0 third choice 3 344 12.1 17.8 80.7 fourth choice 4 189 6.7 9.8 90.5 fifth choice 5 105 3.7 5.4 95.9 sixth choice 6 79 2.8 4.1 100.0 . 899 31.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1936 Missing cases 899 RANKPD8 Q22,Rank Rep Pref.,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 117 4.1 6.3 6.3 second choice 2 245 8.6 13.3 19.6 third choice 3 425 15.0 23.0 42.6 fourth choice 4 453 16.0 24.5 67.1 fifth choice 5 383 13.5 20.7 87.8 sixth choice 6 225 7.9 12.2 100.0 . 987 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1848 Missing cases 987 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKAH8 Q22,Rank Rep Pref.,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 30 1.1 1.6 1.6 second choice 2 66 2.3 3.6 5.3 third choice 3 166 5.9 9.1 14.4 fourth choice 4 268 9.5 14.7 29.1 fifth choice 5 610 21.5 33.5 62.6 sixth choice 6 680 24.0 37.4 100.0 . 1015 35.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1820 Missing cases 1015 RANKJK8 Q22,Rank Rep Pref.,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 180 6.3 9.7 9.7 second choice 2 413 14.6 22.3 32.0 third choice 3 459 16.2 24.8 56.7 fourth choice 4 462 16.3 24.9 81.7 fifth choice 5 241 8.5 13.0 94.7 sixth choice 6 99 3.5 5.3 100.0 . 981 34.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1854 Missing cases 981 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKPR8 Q22,Rank Rep Pref.,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent first choice 1 432 15.2 23.0 23.0 second choice 2 69 2.4 3.7 26.7 third choice 3 101 3.6 5.4 32.1 fourth choice 4 144 5.1 7.7 39.7 fifth choice 5 252 8.9 13.4 53.1 sixth choice 6 880 31.0 46.9 100.0 . 957 33.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 957 NOMMD8 Q23,Chance to win election,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 1416 49.9 56.3 56.3 probably will win 2 473 16.7 18.8 75.1 more likely to win t 3 176 6.2 7.0 82.1 a tossup 4 195 6.9 7.8 89.8 more likely to lose 5 107 3.8 4.3 94.1 probably will lose 6 89 3.1 3.5 97.6 certain to lose 7 60 2.1 2.4 100.0 . 289 10.2 Missing not sure 8 30 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2516 Missing cases 319 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMAG8 Q23,Chance of party nom., Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 4 .1 .2 .2 probably will win 2 43 1.5 2.0 2.2 more likely to win t 3 100 3.5 4.7 7.0 a tossup 4 180 6.3 8.5 15.5 more likely to lose 5 238 8.4 11.3 26.8 probably will lose 6 320 11.3 15.2 42.0 certain to lose 7 1222 43.1 58.0 100.0 . 624 22.0 Missing not sure 8 104 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2107 Missing cases 728 NOMJJ8 Q23,Chance of party nom., Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 35 1.2 1.6 1.6 probably will win 2 104 3.7 4.7 6.3 more likely to win t 3 172 6.1 7.8 14.0 a tossup 4 232 8.2 10.5 24.5 more likely to lose 5 308 10.9 13.9 38.4 probably will lose 6 425 15.0 19.2 57.5 certain to lose 7 942 33.2 42.5 100.0 . 556 19.6 Missing not sure 8 61 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2218 Missing cases 617 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMGB8 Q23,Chance of party nom., Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 1268 44.7 52.5 52.5 probably will win 2 331 11.7 13.7 66.2 more likely to win t 3 162 5.7 6.7 72.9 a tossup 4 183 6.5 7.6 80.5 more likely to lose 5 158 5.6 6.5 87.1 probably will lose 6 125 4.4 5.2 92.3 certain to lose 7 187 6.6 7.7 100.0 . 394 13.9 Missing not sure 8 27 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2414 Missing cases 421 NOMRD8 Q23,Chance of party nom., Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 59 2.1 2.8 2.8 probably will win 2 187 6.6 8.7 11.5 more likely to win t 3 240 8.5 11.2 22.7 a tossup 4 250 8.8 11.7 34.3 more likely to lose 5 235 8.3 11.0 45.3 probably will lose 6 249 8.8 11.6 56.9 certain to lose 7 923 32.6 43.1 100.0 . 623 22.0 Missing not sure 8 69 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2143 Missing cases 692 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPR8 Q23,Chance of party nom., Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 43 1.5 2.0 2.0 probably will win 2 43 1.5 2.0 4.0 more likely to win t 3 90 3.2 4.2 8.2 a tossup 4 104 3.7 4.8 13.1 more likely to lose 5 147 5.2 6.9 19.9 probably will lose 6 225 7.9 10.5 30.4 certain to lose 7 1493 52.7 69.6 100.0 . 605 21.3 Missing not sure 8 85 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2145 Missing cases 690 NOVMD8 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 634 22.4 25.8 25.8 probably will win 2 545 19.2 22.2 47.9 more likely to win t 3 299 10.5 12.2 60.1 a tossup 4 441 15.6 17.9 78.0 more likely to lose 5 250 8.8 10.2 88.2 probably will lose 6 160 5.6 6.5 94.7 certain to lose 7 130 4.6 5.3 100.0 . 343 12.1 Missing not sure 8 33 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2459 Missing cases 376 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVAG8 Q23,Chance to win election,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 23 .8 1.2 1.2 probably will win 2 106 3.7 5.4 6.6 more likely to win t 3 159 5.6 8.1 14.7 a tossup 4 276 9.7 14.1 28.8 more likely to lose 5 303 10.7 15.5 44.2 probably will lose 6 348 12.3 17.7 62.0 certain to lose 7 746 26.3 38.0 100.0 . 763 26.9 Missing not sure 8 111 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1961 Missing cases 874 NOVJJ8 Q23,Chance to win election,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 51 1.8 2.5 2.5 probably will win 2 110 3.9 5.3 7.8 more likely to win t 3 147 5.2 7.1 14.9 a tossup 4 199 7.0 9.6 24.5 more likely to lose 5 316 11.1 15.3 39.8 probably will lose 6 357 12.6 17.3 57.1 certain to lose 7 887 31.3 42.9 100.0 . 699 24.7 Missing not sure 8 69 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2067 Missing cases 768 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVGB8 Q23,Chance to win election,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 466 16.4 19.5 19.5 probably will win 2 425 15.0 17.8 37.2 more likely to win t 3 236 8.3 9.9 47.1 a tossup 4 489 17.2 20.4 67.5 more likely to lose 5 343 12.1 14.3 81.8 probably will lose 6 217 7.7 9.1 90.9 certain to lose 7 218 7.7 9.1 100.0 . 403 14.2 Missing not sure 8 38 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2394 Missing cases 441 NOVRD8 Q23,Chance to win election,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 142 5.0 7.1 7.1 probably will win 2 271 9.6 13.6 20.7 more likely to win t 3 390 13.8 19.5 40.3 a tossup 4 355 12.5 17.8 58.0 more likely to lose 5 246 8.7 12.3 70.4 probably will lose 6 187 6.6 9.4 79.7 certain to lose 7 404 14.3 20.3 100.0 . 757 26.7 Missing not sure 8 83 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1995 Missing cases 840 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPR8 Q23,Chance to win election,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent certain to win 1 77 2.7 3.9 3.9 probably will win 2 77 2.7 3.9 7.8 more likely to win t 3 119 4.2 6.1 13.9 a tossup 4 111 3.9 5.6 19.5 more likely to lose 5 176 6.2 9.0 28.5 probably will lose 6 221 7.8 11.2 39.7 certain to lose 7 1185 41.8 60.3 100.0 . 761 26.8 Missing not sure 8 108 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1966 Missing cases 869 TEACHER8 Q24,member of Teacher's Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1880 66.3 80.4 80.4 member only 2 241 8.5 10.3 90.7 active member or lea 3 218 7.7 9.3 100.0 . 496 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2339 Missing cases 496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSORG8 Q24,member of Bus Org. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1571 55.4 67.9 67.9 member only 2 472 16.6 20.4 88.3 active member or lea 3 271 9.6 11.7 100.0 . 521 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2314 Missing cases 521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN8 Q24,member of Women's Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1927 68.0 85.8 85.8 member only 2 220 7.8 9.8 95.5 active member or lea 3 100 3.5 4.5 100.0 . 588 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2247 Missing cases 588 CIVILR8 Q24,member of Civil Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1916 67.6 84.4 84.4 member only 2 226 8.0 10.0 94.4 active member or lea 3 128 4.5 5.6 100.0 . 565 19.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2270 Missing cases 565 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR8 Q24,member of Envi. Group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1716 60.5 76.4 76.4 member only 2 431 15.2 19.2 95.6 active member or lea 3 98 3.5 4.4 100.0 . 590 20.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2245 Missing cases 590 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPART8 Q24,member of Interest Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1678 59.2 73.7 73.7 member only 2 443 15.6 19.5 93.1 active member or lea 3 156 5.5 6.9 100.0 . 558 19.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2277 Missing cases 558 LABOR8 Q24,member of Labor Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1738 61.3 76.5 76.5 member only 2 282 9.9 12.4 88.9 active member or lea 3 253 8.9 11.1 100.0 . 562 19.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2273 Missing cases 562 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARM8 Q24,member of Farm Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1729 61.0 78.3 78.3 member only 2 323 11.4 14.6 93.0 active member or lea 3 155 5.5 7.0 100.0 . 628 22.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2207 Missing cases 628 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG8 Q24,member of Pol. Evangelical Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1853 65.4 82.4 82.4 member only 2 233 8.2 10.4 92.7 active member or lea 3 164 5.8 7.3 100.0 . 585 20.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2250 Missing cases 585 ANTIAB8 Q24,member of Anti-Abortion Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1790 63.1 79.3 79.3 member only 2 281 9.9 12.4 91.7 active member or lea 3 187 6.6 8.3 100.0 . 577 20.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2258 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBID8 Q24,member of Liberal Phil. Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1914 67.5 86.4 86.4 member only 2 204 7.2 9.2 95.6 active member or lea 3 98 3.5 4.4 100.0 . 619 21.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2216 Missing cases 619 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONID8 Q24,member of Conserv. Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never member 1 1728 61.0 77.6 77.6 member only 2 294 10.4 13.2 90.8 active member or lea 3 206 7.3 9.2 100.0 . 607 21.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2228 Missing cases 607 MIGRP8 Q25, grp most imp politically Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent teachers org 1 182 6.4 9.0 9.0 business org 2 279 9.8 13.7 22.7 womens org 3 67 2.4 3.3 26.0 civil rights org 4 132 4.7 6.5 32.5 environ group 5 125 4.4 6.1 38.6 non-partisan interes 6 150 5.3 7.4 46.0 labor union 7 233 8.2 11.5 57.5 farm org 8 178 6.3 8.8 66.2 pol evangelical grou 9 203 7.2 10.0 76.2 anti-abortion group 10 174 6.1 8.6 84.8 liberal ideological 11 102 3.6 5.0 89.8 conservative ideolog 12 208 7.3 10.2 100.0 . 802 28.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2033 Missing cases 802 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYSP8 Q26, party and pol activity of spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent active Democrat 1 580 20.5 28.0 28.0 inactive Democrat 2 319 11.3 15.4 43.3 active Republican 3 674 23.8 32.5 75.8 inactive Republican 4 315 11.1 15.2 91.0 active independent 5 71 2.5 3.4 94.4 inactive independent 6 116 4.1 5.6 100.0 . 728 25.7 Missing not sure of party 7 32 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2075 Missing cases 760 PTYM8 Q26, party and pol activity of Mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent active Democrat 1 406 14.3 17.9 17.9 inactive Democrat 2 653 23.0 28.9 46.8 active Republican 3 398 14.0 17.6 64.4 inactive Republican 4 552 19.5 24.4 88.8 active independent 5 59 2.1 2.6 91.4 inactive independent 6 194 6.8 8.6 100.0 . 428 15.1 Missing not sure of party 7 145 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2262 Missing cases 573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF8 Q26, party and pol activity of Father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent active Democrat 1 413 14.6 19.1 19.1 inactive Democrat 2 571 20.1 26.4 45.5 active Republican 3 422 14.9 19.5 65.1 inactive Republican 4 520 18.3 24.1 89.1 active independent 5 63 2.2 2.9 92.0 inactive independent 6 172 6.1 8.0 100.0 . 512 18.1 Missing not sure of party 7 162 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2161 Missing cases 674 CANSUP8 Q27,cand. supported in nom process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Babbit 1 65 2.3 2.5 2.5 Bush 2 357 12.6 13.7 16.2 Dole 3 329 11.6 12.6 28.8 Dukakis 4 456 16.1 17.5 46.3 DuPont 5 65 2.3 2.5 48.8 Gephardt 6 162 5.7 6.2 55.0 Gore 7 144 5.1 5.5 60.5 Haig 8 6 .2 .2 60.7 Hart 9 19 .7 .7 61.5 Jackson 10 274 9.7 10.5 72.0 Kemp 11 140 4.9 5.4 77.3 Robertson 12 388 13.7 14.9 92.2 Simon 13 182 6.4 7.0 99.2 none 14 21 .7 .8 100.0 . 227 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2608 Missing cases 227 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBB8 Q28, attend rally, Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2601 91.7 91.7 91.7 checked 1 234 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 FUNDBB8 Q28,fundraising,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2809 99.1 99.1 99.1 checked 1 26 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBB8 Q28,convince friends,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2770 97.7 97.7 97.7 checked 1 65 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBB8 Q28,canvass,Babbit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2805 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MONEYBB8 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2799 98.7 98.7 98.7 checked 1 36 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTMD8 Q28, attend rally,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2248 79.3 79.3 79.3 checked 1 587 20.7 20.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMD8 Q28,fundraising,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2636 93.0 93.0 93.0 checked 1 199 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONVMD8 Q28,convince friends,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2405 84.8 84.8 84.8 checked 1 430 15.2 15.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVMD8 Q28,canvass,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2405 84.8 84.8 84.8 checked 1 430 15.2 15.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYMD8 Q28,contribute,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2615 92.2 92.2 92.2 checked 1 220 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ATTRG8 Q28, attend rally,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2532 89.3 89.3 89.3 checked 1 303 10.7 10.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8 Q28,fundraising,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2764 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 71 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRG8 Q28,convince friends,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2700 95.2 95.2 95.2 checked 1 135 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CANVRG8 Q28,canvass,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2766 97.6 97.6 97.6 checked 1 69 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYRG8 Q28,contribute,Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2722 96.0 96.0 96.0 checked 1 113 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAG8 Q28, attend rally,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2617 92.3 92.3 92.3 checked 1 218 7.7 7.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 FUNDAG8 Q28,fundraising,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2802 98.8 98.8 98.8 checked 1 33 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8 Q28,convince friends,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2737 96.5 96.5 96.5 checked 1 98 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAG8 Q28,canvass,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2805 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MONEYAG8 Q28,contribute,Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2792 98.5 98.5 98.5 checked 1 43 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGH8 Q28, attend rally,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2678 94.5 94.5 94.5 checked 1 157 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGH8 Q28,fundraising,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2817 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 18 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONVGH8 Q28,convince friends,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2805 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGH8 Q28,canvass,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2818 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 17 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYGH8 Q28,contribute,Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2811 99.2 99.2 99.2 checked 1 24 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ATTJJ8 Q28, attend rally,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2426 85.6 85.6 85.6 checked 1 409 14.4 14.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJJ8 Q28,fundraising,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2714 95.7 95.7 95.7 checked 1 121 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ8 Q28,convince friends,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2619 92.4 92.4 92.4 checked 1 216 7.6 7.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CANVJJ8 Q28,canvass,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2738 96.6 96.6 96.6 checked 1 97 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYJJ8 Q28,contribute,Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2628 92.7 92.7 92.7 checked 1 207 7.3 7.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS8 Q28, attend rally,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2517 88.8 88.8 88.8 checked 1 318 11.2 11.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 FUNDPS8 Q28,fundraising,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2757 97.2 97.2 97.2 checked 1 78 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS8 Q28,convince friends,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2666 94.0 94.0 94.0 checked 1 169 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS8 Q28,canvass,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2744 96.8 96.8 96.8 checked 1 91 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MONEYPS8 Q28,contribute,Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2694 95.0 95.0 95.0 checked 1 141 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8 Q28, attend rally,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2291 80.8 80.8 80.8 checked 1 544 19.2 19.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB8 Q28,fundraising,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2654 93.6 93.6 93.6 checked 1 181 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONVGB8 Q28,convince friends,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2473 87.2 87.2 87.2 checked 1 362 12.8 12.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8 Q28,canvass,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2680 94.5 94.5 94.5 checked 1 155 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYGB8 Q28,contribute,Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2531 89.3 89.3 89.3 checked 1 304 10.7 10.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ATTRD8 Q28, attend rally,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2445 86.2 86.2 86.2 checked 1 390 13.8 13.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8 Q28,fundraising,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2694 95.0 95.0 95.0 checked 1 141 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD8 Q28,convince friends,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2566 90.5 90.5 90.5 checked 1 269 9.5 9.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CANVRD8 Q28,canvass,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2679 94.5 94.5 94.5 checked 1 156 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYRD8 Q28,contribute,Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2635 92.9 92.9 92.9 checked 1 200 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPD8 Q28, attend rally,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2699 95.2 95.2 95.2 checked 1 136 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 FUNDPD8 Q28,fundraising,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2819 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 16 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPD8 Q28,convince friends,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2781 98.1 98.1 98.1 checked 1 54 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPD8 Q28,canvass,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2813 99.2 99.2 99.2 checked 1 22 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MONEYPD8 Q28,contribute,DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2797 98.7 98.7 98.7 checked 1 38 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAH8 Q28, attend rally,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2766 97.6 97.6 97.6 checked 1 69 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDAH8 Q28,fundraising,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2827 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 8 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CONVAH8 Q28,convince friends,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2830 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAH8 Q28,canvass,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2831 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYAH8 Q28,contribute,Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2827 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 8 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 ATTJK8 Q28, attend rally,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2619 92.4 92.4 92.4 checked 1 216 7.6 7.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJK8 Q28,fundraising,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2764 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 71 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJK8 Q28,convince friends,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2699 95.2 95.2 95.2 checked 1 136 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 CANVJK8 Q28,canvass,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2758 97.3 97.3 97.3 checked 1 77 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONEYJK8 Q28,contribute,Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2730 96.3 96.3 96.3 checked 1 105 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPR8 Q28, attend rally,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2373 83.7 83.7 83.7 checked 1 462 16.3 16.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 FUNDPR8 Q28,fundraising,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2683 94.6 94.6 94.6 checked 1 152 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPR8 Q28,convince friends,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2470 87.1 87.1 87.1 checked 1 365 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPR8 Q28,canvass,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2603 91.8 91.8 91.8 checked 1 232 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MONEYPR8 Q28,contribute,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2539 89.6 89.6 89.6 checked 1 296 10.4 10.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE8 Q29, Age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 160 5.6 5.9 5.9 25-29 2 184 6.5 6.8 12.6 30-39 3 644 22.7 23.7 36.3 40-49 4 693 24.4 25.5 61.8 50-59 5 523 18.4 19.2 81.0 60-64 6 242 8.5 8.9 89.9 65 and older 7 276 9.7 10.1 100.0 . 113 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2722 Missing cases 113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX8 Q30, Sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent male 1 1485 52.4 54.6 54.6 female 2 1235 43.6 45.4 100.0 . 115 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2720 Missing cases 115 MARRIED8 Q31, Married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 2069 73.0 76.5 76.5 no 2 636 22.4 23.5 100.0 . 130 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2705 Missing cases 130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL8 Q32, Religious Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Catholic 1 452 15.9 16.9 16.9 Jewish 2 36 1.3 1.3 18.3 Protestant 3 1810 63.8 67.7 86.0 Other 4 79 2.8 3.0 88.9 No religious prefere 5 182 6.4 6.8 95.7 other 6 114 4.0 4.3 100.0 . 162 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2673 Missing cases 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BRNAGN8 Q33, Born again Chrisitian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 1071 37.8 40.3 40.3 no 2 1585 55.9 59.7 100.0 . 179 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2656 Missing cases 179 FUNDAM8 Q34, Fundamentalist Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 709 25.0 27.6 27.6 no 2 1861 65.6 72.4 100.0 . 265 9.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2570 Missing cases 265 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL8 Q35, How Religious Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very religious 1 872 30.8 32.9 32.9 fairly religious 2 1229 43.4 46.4 79.3 not very religious 3 343 12.1 12.9 92.2 not religious at all 4 206 7.3 7.8 100.0 . 157 5.5 Missing not sure 5 28 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2650 Missing cases 185 RACE8 Q36, Race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent White 1 2435 85.9 91.2 91.2 Black 2 178 6.3 6.7 97.8 Hispanic 3 12 .4 .4 98.3 Native American 4 11 .4 .4 98.7 Asian-American 5 13 .5 .5 99.2 Other 6 22 .8 .8 100.0 . 164 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2671 Missing cases 164 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL8 Q37, Schooling Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent grade school/0-8 yrs 1 17 .6 .6 .6 some high school/9-1 2 38 1.3 1.4 2.1 high school graduate 3 400 14.1 15.2 17.2 some college 4 706 24.9 26.7 44.0 college graduate 5 656 23.1 24.8 68.8 graduate school 6 823 29.0 31.2 100.0 . 195 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2640 Missing cases 195 JOBYOU8 Q38, emplyment you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent small business 1 325 11.5 13.8 13.8 large business 2 581 20.5 24.6 38.4 educational institut 3 410 14.5 17.4 55.7 government 4 295 10.4 12.5 68.2 self-employed,busine 5 172 6.1 7.3 75.5 self-employed,farmer 6 115 4.1 4.9 80.4 self-employed,profes 7 197 6.9 8.3 88.7 housewife 8 175 6.2 7.4 96.1 student 9 92 3.2 3.9 100.0 . 473 16.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2362 Missing cases 473 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBSP8 Q38, emplyment spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent small business 1 269 9.5 14.7 14.7 large business 2 430 15.2 23.5 38.2 educational institut 3 280 9.9 15.3 53.5 government 4 249 8.8 13.6 67.1 self-employed,busine 5 128 4.5 7.0 74.1 self-employed,farmer 6 110 3.9 6.0 80.1 self-employed,profes 7 100 3.5 5.5 85.5 housewife 8 247 8.7 13.5 99.0 student 9 18 .6 1.0 100.0 . 1004 35.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1831 Missing cases 1004 INCOME8 Q39, Income Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent under $9999 1 117 4.1 4.5 4.5 $10,000-$19,999 2 292 10.3 11.2 15.6 $20,000-$29,999 3 431 15.2 16.5 32.1 $30,000-$39,999 4 503 17.7 19.2 51.4 $40,000-$49,999 5 364 12.8 13.9 65.3 $50,000-$59,999 6 322 11.4 12.3 77.6 $60,000-$69,999 7 186 6.6 7.1 84.7 $70,000-$79,999 8 100 3.5 3.8 88.5 $80,000 and over 9 300 10.6 11.5 100.0 . 220 7.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2615 Missing cases 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLASS8 Q40, Social Class Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent upper class 1 51 1.8 2.0 2.0 upper middle class 2 710 25.0 28.3 30.4 middle class 3 1393 49.1 55.6 86.0 lower middle class 4 229 8.1 9.1 95.1 working class 5 123 4.3 4.9 100.0 . 159 5.6 Missing other 6 170 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2506 Missing cases 329 MONTHA Q41, month, 1st column Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2162 76.3 99.8 99.8 1 5 .2 .2 100.0 . 668 23.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2167 Missing cases 668 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTHB Q41, month, 2nd column Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .0 .0 .0 1 3 .1 .1 .2 4 3 .1 .1 .3 5 38 1.3 1.6 1.9 6 2382 84.0 98.0 99.8 7 4 .1 .2 100.0 . 404 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2431 Missing cases 404 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAYA Q41, day, 1st column Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 383 13.5 16.6 16.6 1 391 13.8 17.0 33.6 2 1521 53.7 66.0 99.6 3 9 .3 .4 100.0 . 531 18.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2304 Missing cases 531 DAYB Q41, day, 2nd column Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 12 .4 .5 .5 1 372 13.1 15.3 15.8 2 7 .2 .3 16.1 3 16 .6 .7 16.8 4 533 18.8 22.0 38.8 5 1457 51.4 60.1 98.8 6 24 .8 1.0 99.8 7 3 .1 .1 100.0 8 1 .0 .0 100.0 . 410 14.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2425 Missing cases 410 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASSIST8 Q42, state party assistance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1234 43.5 56.9 56.9 somewhat important 2 816 28.8 37.6 94.5 not important 3 120 4.2 5.5 100.0 . 299 10.5 Missing not sure 4 366 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2170 Missing cases 665 POSIT8 Q42, state party issue positions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 807 28.5 38.6 38.6 somewhat important 2 930 32.8 44.5 83.1 not important 3 354 12.5 16.9 100.0 . 382 13.5 Missing not sure 4 362 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2091 Missing cases 744 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INFO8 Q42, state party services and info Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1066 37.6 50.4 50.4 somewhat important 2 883 31.1 41.7 92.2 not important 3 166 5.9 7.8 100.0 . 367 12.9 Missing not sure 4 353 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2115 Missing cases 720 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECRUIT8 Q42, state party recruitment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 989 34.9 47.7 47.7 somewhat important 2 839 29.6 40.5 88.2 not important 3 244 8.6 11.8 100.0 . 365 12.9 Missing not sure 4 398 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2072 Missing cases 763 INFORM8 Q42, state party inform electorate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very important 1 1033 36.4 47.5 47.5 somewhat important 2 881 31.1 40.5 87.9 not important 3 263 9.3 12.1 100.0 . 363 12.8 Missing not sure 4 295 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2177 Missing cases 658 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIROLE8 Q43, state party most important role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent campaign assistance 1 761 26.8 29.8 29.8 issue positions 2 470 16.6 18.4 48.3 services and informa 3 467 16.5 18.3 66.6 candidate recruitmen 4 250 8.8 9.8 76.4 informing electorate 5 603 21.3 23.6 100.0 . 284 10.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2551 Missing cases 284 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYORG8 Q44, state party org improved Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent improved 1 1519 53.6 62.6 62.6 deteriorated 2 326 11.5 13.4 76.0 no change 3 583 20.6 24.0 100.0 . 407 14.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2428 Missing cases 407 SEXFREE8 Q45, sexual freedom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly agree 1 1023 36.1 38.5 38.5 agree 2 747 26.3 28.1 66.6 undecided 3 288 10.2 10.8 77.4 disagree 4 468 16.5 17.6 95.0 strongly disagree 5 132 4.7 5.0 100.0 . 177 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2658 Missing cases 177 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHANGE8 Q45, moral behavior change Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly agree 1 187 6.6 7.1 7.1 agree 2 627 22.1 23.9 31.0 undecided 3 229 8.1 8.7 39.7 disagree 4 830 29.3 31.6 71.4 strongly disagree 5 751 26.5 28.6 100.0 . 211 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2624 Missing cases 211 TRADFAM8 Q45, traditional family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly agree 1 1324 46.7 50.0 50.0 agree 2 870 30.7 32.8 82.8 undecided 3 203 7.2 7.7 90.5 disagree 4 194 6.8 7.3 97.8 strongly disagree 5 59 2.1 2.2 100.0 . 185 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2650 Missing cases 185 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GODWORD8 Q45, Bible all true Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly agree 1 892 31.5 34.0 34.0 agree 2 496 17.5 18.9 52.9 undecided 3 294 10.4 11.2 64.1 disagree 4 450 15.9 17.2 81.3 strongly disagree 5 491 17.3 18.7 100.0 . 212 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2623 Missing cases 212 MARIJ8 Q45, marijuana wrong Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly agree 1 920 32.5 35.0 35.0 agree 2 649 22.9 24.7 59.8 undecided 3 334 11.8 12.7 72.5 disagree 4 490 17.3 18.7 91.2 strongly disagree 5 232 8.2 8.8 100.0 . 210 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2625 Missing cases 210 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GETVOTE8 Q46, get out vote Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 636 22.4 22.4 22.4 checked 1 2199 77.6 77.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMMPUB8 Q46, public communication Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1179 41.6 41.6 41.6 checked 1 1656 58.4 58.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 REPGRP8 Q46, represent groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2092 73.8 73.8 73.8 checked 1 743 26.2 26.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECCAND8 Q46, recruitment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2217 78.2 78.2 78.2 checked 1 618 21.8 21.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUILD8 Q46, build party org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 1648 58.1 58.1 58.1 checked 1 1187 41.9 41.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2835 Missing cases 0 MIACT8 Q47, most important activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent get out vote 1 1202 42.4 50.5 50.5 issues 2 688 24.3 28.9 79.5 represent group 3 113 4.0 4.8 84.2 candidate recruitmen 4 79 2.8 3.3 87.6 build party org 5 296 10.4 12.4 100.0 . 457 16.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2378 Missing cases 457 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CBS8 Q48, attention CBS news Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 541 19.1 26.4 26.4 1 or 2 a week 2 707 24.9 34.5 60.8 not at all 3 804 28.4 39.2 100.0 . 783 27.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2052 Missing cases 783 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NBC8 Q48, attention NBC news Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 576 20.3 28.1 28.1 1 or 2 a week 2 820 28.9 39.9 68.0 not at all 3 657 23.2 32.0 100.0 . 782 27.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2053 Missing cases 782 ABC8 Q48, attention ABC news Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 449 15.8 22.9 22.9 1 or 2 a week 2 744 26.2 37.9 60.7 not at all 3 771 27.2 39.3 100.0 . 871 30.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1964 Missing cases 871 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PBS8 Q48, attention PBS news Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 283 10.0 15.9 15.9 1 or 2 a week 2 507 17.9 28.5 44.5 not at all 3 986 34.8 55.5 100.0 . 1059 37.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1776 Missing cases 1059 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CABLE8 Q48, attention cable news Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 589 20.8 31.2 31.2 1 or 2 a week 2 409 14.4 21.6 52.8 not at all 3 892 31.5 47.2 100.0 . 945 33.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1890 Missing cases 945 ABCNL8 Q48, attention ABC Nightline Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 309 10.9 16.2 16.2 1 or 2 a week 2 742 26.2 38.8 55.0 not at all 3 860 30.3 45.0 100.0 . 924 32.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1911 Missing cases 924 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOCNEWS8 Q48, attention local paper Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 1950 68.8 79.8 79.8 1 or 2 a week 2 356 12.6 14.6 94.4 not at all 3 138 4.9 5.6 100.0 . 391 13.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2444 Missing cases 391 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - USATDAY8 Q48, attention USA Today Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 123 4.3 7.2 7.2 1 or 2 a week 2 373 13.2 21.9 29.1 not at all 3 1208 42.6 70.9 100.0 . 1131 39.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1704 Missing cases 1131 NYT8 Q48, attention New York Times Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 43 1.5 2.6 2.6 1 or 2 a week 2 139 4.9 8.5 11.2 not at all 3 1448 51.1 88.8 100.0 . 1205 42.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1630 Missing cases 1205 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WASHPST8 Q48, attention Wash Post Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 327 11.5 18.5 18.5 1 or 2 a week 2 193 6.8 10.9 29.4 not at all 3 1248 44.0 70.6 100.0 . 1067 37.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1768 Missing cases 1067 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WSJ8 Q48, attention Wall Street Journal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 3 or more a week 1 230 8.1 13.2 13.2 1 or 2 a week 2 304 10.7 17.5 30.7 not at all 3 1206 42.5 69.3 100.0 . 1095 38.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1740 Missing cases 1095 TIME8 Q49, attention Time Mag Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent usually every week 1 414 14.6 19.6 19.6 occasionally 2 1026 36.2 48.6 68.1 never 3 673 23.7 31.9 100.0 . 722 25.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2113 Missing cases 722 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NEWSWK8 Q49, attention Newsweek Mag Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent usually every week 1 423 14.9 20.4 20.4 occasionally 2 994 35.1 47.8 68.2 never 3 661 23.3 31.8 100.0 . 757 26.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2078 Missing cases 757 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - USNWR8 Q49, attention U.S. News & World Rpt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent usually every week 1 350 12.3 17.4 17.4 occasionally 2 855 30.2 42.6 60.1 never 3 801 28.3 39.9 100.0 . 829 29.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2006 Missing cases 829 NATREV8 Q49, attention National Review Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent usually every week 1 74 2.6 4.3 4.3 occasionally 2 212 7.5 12.2 16.5 never 3 1451 51.2 83.5 100.0 . 1098 38.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1737 Missing cases 1098 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NEWREP8 Q49, attention New Republic Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent usually every week 1 46 1.6 2.7 2.7 occasionally 2 200 7.1 11.6 14.2 never 3 1482 52.3 85.8 100.0 . 1107 39.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1728 Missing cases 1107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHMAG8 Q49, attention other mags Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent usually every week 1 279 9.8 33.2 33.2 occasionally 2 142 5.0 16.9 50.1 never 3 419 14.8 49.9 100.0 . 1995 70.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2835 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 840 Missing cases 1995